Clicca qui per scaricare

Vivere con la mutazione genetica BRCA: implicazioni psicosociali e percezione del rischio di cancro
Titolo Rivista: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Autori/Curatori: Nadia Rania, Laura Migliorini 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2015 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  14 P. 100-113 Dimensione file:  82 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2015-002008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Scientific advances and new technologies in the field of genetic urge the deepening of the psychological effects that individual and family genetic diagnosis necessarily entails. The increased perception of being at risk of getting cancer as a result of the BRCA genetic test results to define a particular emotional state related to lifestyle choices possible and to live with a perception of high risk of cancer. Many authors argue that will arise more and more frequently psychological issues related to genetic diagnosis. This work illustrates the state of the literature on the particular psychological condition experienced by the individual in relation to the risk of hereditary cancer. It will be considered the recent case of Angelina Jolie that making public its genetic diagnosis, has explained the psychological implications and decision she lived. Living with BRCA1/2 mutation is, in fact, a challenge for the individual and for society in facing the new diagnostic tools, together with the old fear of the disease and the possibility to counter it.


Keywords: Percezione del rischio, mutazioni genetiche BRCA1/2, adattamento psicologico, modello bio-psico-sociale, implicazioni psico-sociali, cancro ereditario

  1. Aronowitz R.A. (2007). Unnatural History. Breast cancer and American society. New York: Cambridge University Press
  2. Bakos A.D., Hutson S.P., Loud J.T., Peters J.A., Giusti R.M., Greene M.H. (2008). BRCA mutation-negative women from hereditary breast and ovarian cancer families: a qualitative study of the BRCA-negative experience. Health Expect, 11(3): 220-231., 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00494.DOI: 10.1111/j.1369-7625.2008.00494.
  3. Bowen D.J., Burke W., McTiernan A., Yasui Y., Andersen M.R. (2004). Breast cancer risk counseling improves women’s functioning. Patient Educ Couns, 53: 79-86., 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00122-DOI: 10.1016/S0738-3991(03)00122-
  4. Cipolletta S., Consolaro F., Horvath P. (2014). When health is an attitudinal matter. A qualitative research. Journal of Humanistic Psychology, 54(4): 391-413., 10.1177/002216781350763DOI: 10.1177/002216781350763
  5. Konrad M. (2005). Narrating the New Predictive Genetics: Ethics, Ethnography and Science. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press
  6. Cull A., Anderson E.D., Campbell S., Mackay J., Smyth E., Steel M. (1999). The impact of genetic counselling about breast cancer risk on women’s risk perceptions and levels of distress. Br J Cancer, 79: 501-508., 10.1038/sj.bjc.669007DOI: 10.1038/sj.bjc.669007
  7. d’Agincourt-Canning L. (2006). A gift or a yoke? Women’s and men’s responses to genetic risk information from BRCA1 and BRCA2 testing. Clin Genet, 70: 462-472., 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00720.DOI: 10.1111/j.1399-0004.2006.00720.
  8. den Heijer M., Seynaeve C., Vanheusden K., Duivenvoorden H.J., Vos J., Bartels C.C.M., Menke-Pluymers M.B.E., Tibben A. (2011a). The contribution of self-esteem and self-concept in psychological distress in women at risk of hereditary breast cancer. Pycho-Oncology, 20: 1170-1175., 10.1002/pon.182DOI: 10.1002/pon.182
  9. den Heijer M., Seynaeve C., Vanheusden K., Duivenvoorden H.J., Bartels C.C.M., Menke-Pluymers M.B.E., Tibben A. (2011b). Psychological distress in women at risk for hereditary breast cancer: the role of family communication and perceived social support. Psycho-Oncology, 20: 1317-1323., 10.1002/pon.185DOI: 10.1002/pon.185
  10. DiMillo J., Samson A., Theriault A., Lowry L., Corsini L., Verma S., Tomiak E. (2012). Living with the BRCA genetic mutation: An uncertain conclusion to an unending process. Psychology, Health & Medicine, 1-10., 10.1080/13548506.2012.68782DOI: 10.1080/13548506.2012.68782
  11. Duden B. (2006). I geni in testa e il feto nel grembo. Sguardo storico sul corpo delle donne. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri Engel G. (1977). The need for a new medical model: a challenge for biomedicine. Science, 196: 129-136., 10.1126/science.84746DOI: 10.1126/science.84746
  12. Esplen M.J., Stuckless N., Hunter J., Liede A., Metcalfe K., Glendon G., Narod S., Butler K., Scott J., Irwin E. (2009). The BRCA self-concept scale: A new instrument to measure self-concept in BRCA1/2 mutation carriers. Psycho-Oncology, 18: 1216-1229., 10.1002/pon.149DOI: 10.1002/pon.149
  13. Grubs R.E., Piantanida M. (2010). Grounded Theory in Genetic Counseling research: an interpretative perspective. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 19: 99-111., 10.1007/s10897-009-9270-DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9270-
  14. Gurmankin A.D., Domchek S., Stopfer J., Fels C., Armstrong K. (2005). Patients’ resistance to risk information in genetic counseling for BRCA1/2. Arch Intern Med, 165: 523-529., 10.1001/archinte.165.5.52DOI: 10.1001/archinte.165.5.52
  15. Hatcher M.B., Fallowfield L.J. (2003). A qualitative study looking at the psychosocial implications of bilateral prophylactic mastectomy. The Breast, 12: 1-9., 10.1016/S0960-9776(02)00135-DOI: 10.1016/S0960-9776(02)00135-
  16. Hopwood P., Howell A., Lalloo F., Evans G. (2003). Do women understand the odds? Risk perceptions and recall of risk information in women with a family history of breast cancer. Community Genet, 6: 214-23., 10.1159/00007938DOI: 10.1159/00007938
  17. Hoskins L.M., Roy K.M., Greene M.H. (2012). Toward a New Understanding of Risk Perception Among Young Female BRCA1/2. “Previvors”. Families, Systems & Health, 30(1): 32-46., 10.1037/a002727DOI: 10.1037/a002727
  18. Hoskins L.M., Roy K., Peters J.A., Loud J.T., Greene M.H. (2008). Disclosure of positive BRCA1/2 mutation status in young couples: the journey form uncertainty to bonding through partner support. Families, Systems & Health, 26(3): 296-316., 10.1037/a001291DOI: 10.1037/a001291
  19. Kash K.M., Ortega-Verdejo K., Dabney M.K., Holland J.C., Miller D.G., Osborne M.P. (2000). Psychosocial aspects of cancer genetics: women at high
  20. risk for breast and ovarian cancer. Sem. Surg. Oncol., 18(4): 333-338., 10.1002/(sici)1098-2388(200006)18:4<333::aid-ssu8>3.0.co;2-DOI: 10.1002/(sici)1098-2388(200006)18:4<333::aid-ssu8>3.0.co;2-
  21. Kelly K.M., Leventhal H., Andrydowski M., Toppmeyer D., Much J., Dermody J., Marvin M., Baran J., Schwalb M. (2005). Using the common sense model to understand perceived cancer risk in individuals testing for BRCA1/2 mutations. Psycho-Oncology, 14(1): 34-48., 10.1002/pon.80DOI: 10.1002/pon.80
  22. Lazarus R.S., Folkman S. (1984). Stress, Appraisal, and Coping. New York: Springer Publishing Company
  23. Lerman C., Lustbader E., Rimer B., Daly M., Miller S., Sands C., Balshem A. (1995). Effects of individualized breast cancer risk counseling: a randomized trial. Journal of the National Cancer Institute, 87(4): 286-92., 10.1093/jnci/87.4.28DOI: 10.1093/jnci/87.4.28
  24. Lerman C., Croyle R.T., Tercyak K.P., Hamann H. (2002). Genetic Testing: Psychological aspects and implications. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 70(3): 784-797., 10.1037/0022-006X.70.3.78DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.70.3.78
  25. Mavaddat N., Peock S., Frost S., Ellis S., Platte R., Fineberg E., Evans V.D., Izatt L., Eeles R.A., Adlard J., Davidson R., Eccles D., Cole T., Cook J., Brewer C., Tischkowitz M., Douglas F., Hodgson S., Walker L., Porteous M.E., Morrison P.J., Side L.E., Kennedy M.J., Houghton C., Donaldson A., Rogers M.T., Dorkins H., Miedzybrodzka Z., Gregory H., Eason J., Barwell J., McCann E., Murray A., Antoniou A.C., Easton D.F. (2013). Cancer Risks for BRCA1 and BRCA2 Mutation Carriers: Results From Prospective Analysis of EMBRACE. J Natl Cancer Inst, 105(11): 812-822., 10.1093/jnci/djt09DOI: 10.1093/jnci/djt09
  26. McAllister M. (2001). Grounded Theory in Genetic Counseling Research. Journal of Genetic Counseling, 10(3): 233-250., 10.1023/a:101662840849DOI: 10.1023/a:101662840849
  27. McEwen A. (2011). “Getting on with it”: New Zealand Women’s Experiences of Living with an Increased Risk of Breast and Ovarian Cancer. A thesis submitted for the Degree of Doctor of Philosophy (PhD) at the University of Otago
  28. Mikkelsen E.M., Sunde L., Johansen C., Johnsen S.P. (2007). Risk perception among women receiving genetic counseling: A population-based follow-up study. Cancer Detection and Prevention, 31: 457-464., 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.10.01DOI: 10.1016/j.cdp.2007.10.01
  29. Murthy V.S., Garza M.A., Almario D.A., Vogel K.J., Grubs R.E., Gettig E.A., Wilson J.W., Thomas S.B. (2011). Using a family history intervention to improve cancer risk perception in a black community. Journal Genetic Counselling, 20: 639-649., 10.1007/s10897-0119389-DOI: 10.1007/s10897-0119389-
  30. Nowotny H., Testa G. (2012). Geni a nudo. Ripensare l’uomo nel XXI secolo, Torino: Codice Edizioni
  31. Omachonu V.K., Einspruch N.G. (2010). Innovation in Healthcare delivery systems: a conceptual framework. The Innovation Journal: The Pubblic sector Innovation Journal, 15(1): 1-20
  32. Ormondroyd E., Donnelly L., Moynihan C., Savona C., Bancroft E., Evans D.G., Eeles R.A., Lavery S., Watson M. (2012). Attitudes to reproductive genetic testing in women who had a positive BRCA test before having children: a qualitative analysis. European Journal of Human Genetics, 20(1): 4-10., 10.1038/ejhg.2011.14DOI: 10.1038/ejhg.2011.14
  33. Palmonari A., Cavazza N. (2012). Ricerche e protagonisti della psicologia sociale. Bologna: il Mulino
  34. Patenaude A.F. (2010). Genetic Testing and Psychology. In: Patrinos G.P. e Ansorge W.J., a cura di, Molecular Diagnostics (549-562).
  35. Elsevier Ltd Patenaude A.F., Guttmacher A.E., Collins F.S. (2002). Genetic testing and psychology: new roles, new responsibilities. American Psychologist, 57: 271-282., 10.1037/0003-066X.57.4.27DOI: 10.1037/0003-066X.57.4.27
  36. Pilarsky R. (2009). Risk perception among women at risk for hereditary breast and ovarian cancer. Journal Genetic Counselling, 18: 303-312., 10.1007/s10897-009-9227-DOI: 10.1007/s10897-009-9227-
  37. Quinn G.P., Vadarampil S.T., Tollin S., Miree C.A., Murphy D., Bower B., Silva C. (2010). BRCA carriers’ thoughts on risk management in relation to preimplantation genetic diagnosis and childbearing: when too many choices are just as difficult as none. Fertility and sterility, 94(6): 2473-2475., 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.06DOI: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2010.03.06
  38. Rania N., Migliorini L. (2015). “Naked genes” as health psychological innovation: a challenge for research and intervention. Procedia – Social and Behavioral Sciences, 165: 78-84., 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.60DOI: 10.1016/j.sbspro.2014.12.60
  39. Roberts A.R. (2000). Crisis intervention handbook. Assessment, treatment and research. Oxford: Oxford University Press
  40. Ryff C.D. (1989). Happiness Is Everything, or Is It? Explorations on the Meaning of Psychological Well-Being. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 57(6): 1069-1081., 10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.1069SavadoriL.,RumiatiR.(2005).Nuovirischi,vecchiepaure.Bologna:ilMulinoSeligmanM.E.P.,CsikszentmihalyiM.(2000).PositivePsychology:AnIntroduction.AmericanPsychologist,55(1):5-14.DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.57.6.1069SavadoriL.,RumiatiR.(2005).Nuovirischi,vecchiepaure.Bologna:ilMulinoSeligmanM.E.P.,CsikszentmihalyiM.(2000).PositivePsychology:AnIntroduction.AmericanPsychologist,55(1):5-14.DOI:10.1037/0003-066X.55.1.
  41. Vazquez C., Hervas G., Rahona J.J., Gomez D. (2009) Psychological well-being and health. Contributions of positive psychology. Anuario de Psicologia Clinica de la Salud, Annuary of Clinical and Health Psychology, (5): 15-27
  42. Vernon S.W. (1999). Risk Perception and Risk Communication for Cancer Screening Behaviors: a Review. Journal of the National Cancer Institute Monographs, 25: 101-119., 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a02418DOI: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.jncimonographs.a02418
  43. Wenzel L., Osann K., Lester J., Kurz R., Hsieh S., Nelson E.L., Karlan B. (2012) Biopsychological Stress Factors in BRCA Mutation Carriers. Psychosomatics, 53: 582-590., 10.1016/j.psym.2012.06.00DOI: 10.1016/j.psym.2012.06.00
  44. Wevers M.R., Hahn D.E.E., Verhoef S., Bolhaar M.D.K., Ausems M.G.E.M, Aaronson N.K., Bleiker E.M.A. (2012). Breast cancer genetic counseling after diagnosis but before treatment: A pilot study on treatment consequences and psychological impact. Patient Education and Counseling, 89: 89-95., 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.01DOI: 10.1016/j.pec.2012.03.01
  45. Zani B., Cicognani E. (2000). Psicologia della salute. Bologna: il Mulino
  46. Zinn J. (2005). The biographical approach: A better way to understand behavior in health and illness. Health, Risk and Society, 7(1): 1-9., 10.1080/1369857050004234DOI: 10.1080/1369857050004234
  47. Zinn J. (2008). Heading into the unknown: Everyday strategies for managing risk and uncertainty. Health, Risk and Society, 10(5): 439-450., 10.1080/1369857080238089DOI: 10.1080/1369857080238089
  48. Zinzi P. (2004). Psicologia e medicina genetica Promuovere la salute secondo l’approccio centrato sulla persona. ACP – Rivista di Studi Rogersiani, 1-20



  1. Laura Migliorini, Paola Cardinali, Nadia Rania, How Could Self-Determination Theory Be Useful for Facing Health Innovation Challenges? in Frontiers in Psychology 1870/2019 pp. , DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01870
  2. Paola Cardinali, Laura Migliorini, Nadia Rania, The Caregiving Experiences of Fathers and Mothers of Children With Rare Diseases in Italy: Challenges and Social Support Perceptions in Frontiers in Psychology 1780/2019 pp. , DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.01780

Nadia Rania, Laura Migliorini, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 2/2015, pp. 100-113, DOI:10.3280/SES2015-002008

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche