Click here to download

Machine intelligence sports as research programs
Journal Title: PARADIGMI 
Author/s: Guglielmo Tamburrini 
Year:  2015 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  15 Pg. 163-177 FullText PDF:  60 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PARA2015-003010
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Games and competitions have played a significant role throughout the history of artificial intelligence and robotics. Machine intelligence games are examined here from a distinctive methodological perspective, focusing on their use as generators of multidisciplinary research programs, and relying on Robocup as an exemplary case of research program developing from machine intelligence games. These research programs are schematized in terms of framework building, subgoaling, and outcome appraisal processes. The latter process is found to involve a rather intricate system of rewards and penalties, which take into account the double allegiance of participating scientists, technology trading and integration, competence and methods sharing, in addition to expected industrial payoffs and a variety of other fringe research benefits in the way of research outreach and results dissemination, recruitment of junior researchers and students enrollment.
Keywords: Double allegiance of scientists, Machine intelligence games, Methodology of AI, Methodology of robotics, Multidisciplinary research, Research gamification.

  1. Asada M., Kitano H., Noda I. and Veloso M. (1999). RoboCup: today and tomorrow – what we have learned. Artificial Intelligence, 110: 193-214.
  2. Cordeschi R. (1984). La teoria dell’elaborazione umana dell’informazione. Aspetti critici e problemi metodologici. In: Continenza B., Cordeschi R., Gagliasso E., Ludovico A. and Stanzione M., Evoluzione e modelli. Il concetto di adattamento nelle teorie dei sistemi biologici, culturali e artificiali. Roma: Editori Riuniti: 321-422.
  3. Cordeschi R. (2002). The discovery of the artificial: behavior, mind and machines before and beyond cybernetics. Dordrecht: Kluwer., DOI: 10.1007/978-94-015-9870-5
  4. Cordeschi R. and Tamburrini G. (2015). Alan Turing e il programma di ricerca dell’intelligenza artificiale. In: Hosni H., a cura di. Menti e macchine. Alan Mathison Turing a cento anni dalla nascita. Pisa: Edizioni della Normale: 85-124.
  5. Frixione M. (2015). The Turing test and the interface problem: a role for the imitation game in the methodology of cognitive science. Paradigmi, 3: 129-148.
  6. Gabel T. and Riedmiller M. (2010). On progress in RoboCup: the simulation league showcase. In: Chown E. and Plöger P.G., eds. RoboCup 2010: robot soccer world cup XIV, LNCS 6556. Singapore: Springer.
  7. Galison P. (1997). Image and logic: a material culture of microphysics. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  8. Gandy R.O. (1996). Human versus mechanical intelligence. In: Millican P. and Clark A., eds. Machines and thought. Oxford: Clarendon Press: 125-136.
  9. Godfrey-Smith P. (2003) Theory and reality: an introduction to the philosophy of science. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  10. Kitano H., Kuniyoshi Y., Noda I., Asada M., Matsubara H. and Osawa E. (1997) RoboCup: a challenge problem for AI. AI Magazine 18: 73-85.
  11. Kuhn Th. S. (1962). The structure of scientific revolutions. Chicago: University of Chicago Press. Fourth 50th anniversary edition (2012).
  12. Lakatos I. (1970). Falsification and the methodology of scientific research programmes. In: Lakatos I. and Musgrave A., eds. Criticism and the growth of knowledge. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press: 91-196.
  13. Laudan L (1977). Progress and its problems: toward a theory of scientific growth. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  14. Levinson R., Feng-hsiung Hsu, Marsland T.A., Schaeffer J. and Wilkins D.E. (1991). Panel on computer chess. In: Mylopoulos J. and Reiter R., eds. Proceedings of the 12th international joint conference on artificial intelligence. San Francisco: Morgan Kaufmann: 547-552.
  15. McCarthy J. (1997). AI as sport. Science, 276: 1518-1519.
  16. McKenzie A.J., Himmelreich J. and Thomson Ch. (2015). Epistemic landscapes, optimal search, and the division of cognitive labor. Philosophy of Science, 82: 424-453.
  17. Robson K., Plangger K., Kietzmann J., McCarthy I. and Pitt L. (2015). Is it all a game? Understanding the principles of gamification. Business Horizons, 58: 411-420.
  18. Russell S. and Norvig P. (2010). Artificial intelligence: a modern approach. New York: Prentice Hall.
  19. Strevens M. (2003). The role of the priority rule in science. Journal of Philosophy, 100: 55-79.
  20. Turing A.M. (1950). Computing machinery and intelligence. Mind, 59: 433-460. (Reprinted in: Turing [1992]): 133-160).
  21. Turing A.M. (1953). Digital computers applied to games. In: Bowden B.V., ed. Faster than thought. A Symposium on digital computing machines. London: Pitman & Sons. (Reprinted in: Turing [1992]: 161-185).
  22. Turing A.M. (1992). Collected works of A.M. Turing. Vol. 3, ed. by Ince D.C. Amsterdam: North-Holland.
  23. Visser U. and Burkhard H.D. (2007). RoboCup: ten years of achievements and future challenges. AI Magazine, 28:115-132.
  24. Weinsberg M. and Muldoon R. (2009). Epistemic landscapes and the division of cognitive labor. Philosophy of Science, 76: 225-252.

Guglielmo Tamburrini, in "PARADIGMI" 3/2015, pp. 163-177, DOI:10.3280/PARA2015-003010

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content