Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Il discorso dello "sviluppo sostenibile": critica di una fantasia ideologica
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Autori/Curatori: Alice Dal Gobbo 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: 109 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  15 P. 61-75 Dimensione file:  76 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2016-109005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


La crisi ecologica mette in discussione i sistemi economico, sociale e politico occidentali. Le politiche neoliberiste oggi egemoni non sembrano capaci di implementare misure adeguate alla sua portata. L’autrice delinea i punti salienti di uno studio critico portato avanti tramite il metodo della Lacanian Discourse Analysis su tre documenti di politica ambientale. Propone che lo “sviluppo sostenibile” abbia funzione di fantasia ideologica: oscura le contraddizioni del sistema per perpetuarlo.


Keywords: Crisi ecologica, politiche ambientali, critica, neoliberismo, sviluppo sostenibile, fantasia ideologica

  1. Parker I. (2007). Lacanian psychoanalysis and revolutionary Marxism. Lacanian Ink, 29.
  2. Barr S., Gilg A., Shaw G. (2011). Citizens, consumers and sustainability: (Re)framing environmental practice in an age of climate change. Global Environmental Change, 21., 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.00DOI: 10.1016/j.gloenvcha.2011.07.00
  3. Bellamy R., Greenaway J. (1995). The New Right conception of citizenship and the Citizen’s Charter. Government and Opposition, 4.
  4. Berglund C., Matti S. (2006). Citizen and consumer: the dual role of individuals in environmental policy. Environmental Politics, 4., 10.1080/0964401060078517DOI: 10.1080/0964401060078517
  5. Boyd R., Krutilla K., Vicusi W.K. (1995). Energy taxation as a policy instrument to reduce CO2 emissions: A net benefit analysis. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 29., 10.1006/jeem.1995.102DOI: 10.1006/jeem.1995.102
  6. Bullard N. (2011). It’s too late for sustainability. What we need is system change. Development, 2., 10.1057/dev.2011.2DOI: 10.1057/dev.2011.2
  7. Butler C. (2010). Morality and climate change: Is leaving your TV on standby a risky behaviour? Environmental Values, 2., 10.3197/096327110X1269942022055DOI: 10.3197/096327110X1269942022055
  8. Carter A. (1999). A Radical Green Political Theory. London: Routledge.
  9. Carter N. (2007). The Politics of the Environment: Ideas, Activism, Policy. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 10.1017/CBO978051181917DOI: 10.1017/CBO978051181917
  10. Cortella L. (1996). La teoria critica dalla dialettica alla dialogica. Fenomenologia e Società, 1-2.
  11. Daiello V. (2010). (K)not an impasse: working through Lacanian theory as a research methodology. Visual Arts Research, 2., 10.1353/var.2010.001DOI: 10.1353/var.2010.001
  12. Department for Environment, Food and Rural Affairs (2005). One future - Different paths. The UK’s shared framework for sustainable development. London: DEFRA Publications.
  13. Dobson A. (1993). Critical Theory and Green Politics. In Dobson A., Lucardie P. (a cura di). The Politics of Nature: Explorations in Green Political Theory. London: Routledge.
  14. Doubleday R. (2004). Institutionalising non-governmental organisation dialogue at Unilever: framing the public as ‘consumer-citizens’. Science and Public Policy, 2., 10.3152/14715430478178010DOI: 10.3152/14715430478178010
  15. Eckersley R. (2004). The Green State: Rethinking Democracy and Sovereignty. Cambridge MA: MIT Press.
  16. Feindt P.H., Oels A. (2006). Does discourse matter? Discourse analysis in environmental policy making. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3., 10.1080/1523908050033963DOI: 10.1080/1523908050033963
  17. Fink B. (1995). The Lacanian Subject: Between Language and Jouissance. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  18. Fink B. (2013). Against Understanding, vol. 1: Commentary, Cases and Critiques in a Lacanian Key. London: Routledge.
  19. Flick U. (2013). An Introduction to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE Publisher.
  20. Foster J. B. (2002). Ecology Against Capitalism. New York: Monthly Review Press.
  21. Foucault M., Gordon C. (a cura di). (1980). Power/Knowledge: Selected Interviews and Other Writings 1972-1977. Harlow: Pearson Education Limited.
  22. Geller H., Harrington P., Rosenfeld A.H., Tanishima S., Unander, F. (2006). Polices for increasing energy efficiency: Thirty years of experience in OECD countries. Energy Policy, 34., 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.01DOI: 10.1016/j.enpol.2005.11.01
  23. Hajer M.A. (1995). The Politics of Environmental Discourse: Ecological Modernization and the Policy Process. London: Oxford University Press.
  24. Hajer M.A., Versteeg W. (2006). A decade of discourse analysis of environmental politics: Achievements, challenges, perspectives. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3., 10.1080/1523908050033964DOI: 10.1080/1523908050033964
  25. Hargreaves T. (2011). Practice-ing behaviour change: Applying social practice theory to pro-environmental behaviour change. Journal of Consumer Culture, 1., 10.1177/146954051039050DOI: 10.1177/146954051039050
  26. Helm D. (2008). Climate-change policy: why so little has been achieved? Oxford Review of Economic Policy, 2., 10.1093/oxrep/grn01DOI: 10.1093/oxrep/grn01
  27. Honneth A. (2009). Pathologies of Reason: On the Legacy of Critical Theory. New York: Columbia University Press.
  28. Hook D. (2003). Language and the flesh: psychoanalysis and the limits of discourse. Pretexts: Literary & Cultural Studies, 1.
  29. Horowitz G. (1987). The Foucaultian impasse: No sex, no self, no revolution. Political Theory, 1., 10.1177/009059178701500100DOI: 10.1177/009059178701500100
  30. Jackson T. (2009). Prosperity without Growth: Economics for a Finite Planet. London: Earthscan.
  31. Jaeggi R. (2008). Per una critica dell’ideologia. Iride, 55., 10.1414/2896DOI: 10.1414/2896
  32. Longhi S. (2013). Individual pro-environmental behaviour in the household context. ISER Working Papers Series, 21.
  33. Luke T.W. (1995). On environmentality: Geo-power and eco-knowledge in the discourses of contemporary environmentalism. Cultural Critique, 31., 10.2307/135444DOI: 10.2307/135444
  34. Luke T.W. (1999). Ecocritique: Contesting the Politics of Nature, Economy, and Culture. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  35. Marx K. (2013). Il Capitale, vol. 1. Torino: UTET.
  36. Nye M., Hargreaves T. (2009). Exploring the social dynamics of proenvironmental behavior change. Journal of Industrial Ecology, 1., 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00193.DOI: 10.1111/j.1530-9290.2009.00193.
  37. Oels A. (2006). Rendering climate change governable: From biopower to advanced liberal government? Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3., 10.1080/1523908050033966DOI: 10.1080/1523908050033966
  38. Parker I. (2005). Lacanian Discourse Analysis in psychology: Seven theoretical elements. Theory Psychology, 15., 10.1177/095935430505136DOI: 10.1177/095935430505136
  39. Pavon-Cuéllar D. (2010). From the Conscious Interior to an Exterior Unconscious: Lacan, Discourse Analysis and Social Psychology. London: Karnak Books.
  40. Pavon-Cuéllar D., Parker I. (2013). Introduction: Lacanian theory, discourse analysis and the question of the ‘event’. In Parker I., Pavon-Cuéllar D. (a cura di). Lacan, Discourse, Event: New Psychoanalytic Approaches to Textual Indeterminacy. London: Routledge.
  41. Sharp L., Richardson T. (2001). Reflections on Foucauldian Discourse Analysis in planning and environmental policy research. Journal of Environmental Policy & Planning, 3., 10.1002/jepp.8DOI: 10.1002/jepp.8
  42. Shove E. (2010). Beyond the ABC: Climate change policy and theories of social change. Environment and Planning. A., 6., 10.1068/a4228DOI: 10.1068/a4228
  43. Slocum R. (2004). Consumer citizens and the Cities for Climate Protection campaign. Environment and Planning A, 5., 10.1068/a3613DOI: 10.1068/a3613
  44. Stern P.C. (1986). Blind spots in policy analysis: What economics doesn't say about energy use. Journal of Policy Analysis and Management, 2., 10.2307/332354DOI: 10.2307/332354
  45. Stern P.C. (2000). Toward a coherent theory of environmentally significant behaviour. Journal of Social Issues, 3., 10.1111/0022-4537.0017DOI: 10.1111/0022-4537.0017
  46. Tews K., Busch P.O., Jörgens H. (2003). The diffusion of new environmental policy instruments. European Journal of Political Research, 4., 10.1111/1475-6765.0009DOI: 10.1111/1475-6765.0009
  47. United Nations General Assembly (2012). The future we want. Resolution, 66, 288.
  48. Vighi F., Feldner H. (2007). Ideology critique or discourse analysis? Žižek against Foucault. European Journal of Political Theory, 2., 10.1177/147488510707434DOI: 10.1177/147488510707434
  49. Webb J. (2012). Climate change and society: The chimera of behaviour change technologies.m Sociology, 1., 10.1177/003803851141919DOI: 10.1177/003803851141919
  50. Welsh Assembly Government (2009). One Wales: One planet. The Sustainable Development scheme of the Welsh Assembly Government.
  51. http://wales.gov.uk/topics/sustainabledevelopment/publications/onewalesoneplanet/?lang=en.
  52. Whitebook J. (2002). Michel Foucault: A Marcusean in structuralist clothing. Thesis Eleven, 71., 10.1177/072551360207101100DOI: 10.1177/072551360207101100
  53. Žižek S. (2009). In Defense of Lost Causes. London: Verso.

Alice Dal Gobbo, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 109/2016, pp. 61-75, DOI:10.3280/SUR2016-109005

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche