Il dilemma della politica: incrementalismo, possibilismo e teoria della complessità

Titolo Rivista RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione
Autori/Curatori Mita Marra
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2015/62 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 19 P. 120-138 Dimensione file 496 KB
DOI 10.3280/RIV2015-062010
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

  1. Bevir, M. (2011), “Interpretative Theory”, in Bevir, M. (Ed.) The Sage Handbook of Governance, Thousand Oaks, CA: SAGE Publications.
  2. Callon, M. (1998), “An Essay on Framing and Overflowing: Economic Externalities Revisited by Sociology, in Id. (ed.), The Laws of the Markets, Blackwell Publishers, Oxford-Malden, pp. 244-69.
  3. Craver C.F. and Bechtel V. (2007), “Top-down causation without top-down causes”, Biology and Philosophy, 22, pp. 547-563.
  4. Crozier M. and Friedberg E. (1981), L’acteur et le système : les contraintes de l’action collective, Editions du Seuil.
  5. Elster J. (1998), “A Plea for Mechanisms”, in P. Hedstrøm, R. Swedberg (eds.), Social Mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, Cambridge, Cambridge University Press, pp. 45-73.
  6. Fujita, M., Krugman, P.R. and Venables, A.J. (2001), The Spatial Economy, Cambridge (Mass.): The MIT Press.
  7. Hedstrøm P., and Swedberg R. (1998), “Social mechanisms: An introductory essay”, in P.
  8. Hedstrøm, R. Swedberg (eds), Social mechanisms: An Analytical Approach to Social Theory, pp. 1-31, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge.
  9. Henry, G. (2000), “Why not use?” in New Directions for Evaluation, n. 88, pp. 85-97.
  10. Hirschman, A.O. (1958), Strategy of Economic Development. New Haven: Yale University Press; trad. it (1968), La strategia dello sviluppo economico, La Nuova Italia, Firenze.
  11. — (1967), Development Projects Observed. The Brookings Institution, Washington, DC.
  12. — (1970), Exit, Voice and Loyalty. Harvard University Press, Cambridge, MA.
  13. — (1981), Essays in trespassing: economics to politics and beyond. Cambridge (Eng.); New York: Cambridge University Press.
  14. — (1985), A Bias for Hope: Essays on Development and Latin America. New Haven: Yale University Press.
  15. — (1990), Come far passare le riforme, Il Mulino, Bologna.
  16. Hirschman, A.O. and Lindblom, C.E. (1962), “Economic development, research and development, policy making: some converging views” in System Research and Behavioral Sciences, Vol.7(2): 211–222.
  17. Jones, M.D. and Radaelli, C.M. (2015), “The Narrative Policy Framework: child or monster?” in Critical Policy Studies, Vol. 9(3): 339-355.
  18. Kahneman, D. and Tversky, A. (1979), “Prospect theory: An analysis of decision under risk”, in Econometrica, 47, 262-290.
  19. — (1982), “The framing of decisions and the psychology of choice” in Science, Vol. 211 (4481): 453-458.
  20. — (1992), “Advances in Prospect Theory: Cumulative Representations of Uncertainty”, Journal of Risk and Uncertainty, Vol. 5: 297-323.
  21. Kirkhart, K. E. (2000), “Reconceptualizing evaluation use: An integrated theory of influence”, in New Directions for Evaluation, 88, pp. 5-23.
  22. Lindblom, C.E. (1959), “The Science of ‘Muddling Through’,” Public Administration Review, Vol. 19, No. 2 (Spring, 1959), pp. 79-88.
  23. — (1992), Inquiry and Change. The Troubled Attempt to Understand and Shape Society, Yale University Press, New Haven.
  24. Lindblom, C. E. and Cohen, D. K. (1979), Usable Knowledge. Social Science and Social Problem Solving, Yale University Press.
  25. Marra, M. (2000), “How Much Does Evaluation Matter? Some Examples of the Utilization of the Evaluation of the World Bank’s Anti-Corruption Activities”, in Evaluation, Vol 6(1): 22–36.
  26. — (2004a), “The Contribution of Evaluation to Externalization and Socialization of Tacit Knowledge. The Case of the World Bank”, in Evaluation, vol. 10, n. 3, pp. 263-283.
  27. — (2004b), Knowledge Partnerships for Development: What Challenges for Evaluation?, in Evaluation and Program Planning, vol. 27, n. 2, pp 151-160.
  28. — (2010a) “Come e perché gli indicatori co-evolvono con gli obiettivi e gli strumenti delle politiche pubbliche”. In: Claudio Bezzi, Leonardo Cannavò, Mauro Palumbo (a cura di) Costruire e usare indicatori nella ricerca sociale e nella valutazione. p. 128-145.
  29. — (2010b) “Note sulla causalità. Gli indicatori tra micro e macro analisi”. In: Claudio Bezzi, Leonardo Cannavò, Mauro Palumbo (a cura di) Costruire e usare indicatori nella ricerca sociale e nella valutazione. p. 173-181.
  30. — (2011) “Some Insights from Complexity Science for the Evaluation of Complex Policies”. In: Forss, K., Marra, M. and Schwartz, R. (Eds.) Evaluating the Complex, Attribution, Contribution and Beyond. Vol. 18: 315-334, New Brunswick USA:Transaction Publishers.
  31. Meldolesi, L. (1994), Alla scoperta del possibile. Il mondo sorprendente di Albert Otto Hirschman, Il Mulino, Bologna.
  32. Pasquino, G. (2014), “Hirschman politologo (per necessità e virtù)”, in Moneta e Credito, vol. 67 n. 266 (2014), 167-189.
  33. Pawson R. (2001), Evidence Based Policy: II. The Promise of ‘Realist Synthesis, Esrc Uk Centre for Evidence Based Policy and Practice, Working Paper 4, London, University of London. — (2006) Evidence-Based Policy. A Realist Perspective. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  34. — (2013) The Science of Evaluation: A Realist Manifesto. Thousand Oaks: Sage Publications.
  35. Pawson R. and Tilley N. (1997), Realist Evaluation, London, Sage Publications.
  36. Rogers P. (2008), “Using Programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspects of Interventions”, in Evaluation, vol. 14, n. 1, pp. 29- 48.
  37. Sabel, C. F. (1994), “Learning by Monitoring: The Institutions of Economic Development”. In N. J. Smelser e R. Swedberg (Eds.) The Handbook of Economic Sociology, Princeton University Press, Princeton, pp. 137-65.
  38. Scharpf F.W. (1994), Games Real Actors Could Play: Positive and Negative Co-ordination in Embedded Negotiations, in «Journal of Theoretical Politics», vol. 6, n. 1, pp. 27-53.
  39. Simon H. (1957), Administrative Behavior, New York, Free Press.
  40. Wandling. R. (2011), “Rationality and Rational Choice.” in Ishiyama, J. and Breuning M. [Eds] 21st century political science: A reference handbook. (34-43). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications, Inc.
  41. Weiss, C. H. (1977), Using Social Research in Public Policy Making, Lexington (Mass.), Lexington
  42. Books.
  43. — (1979),. The many meanings of research utilization. Public Administration Review, 39, 426-431.
  44. Weiss, C. H. (1980). Knowledge creep and decision accretion. Knowledge: Creation, Utilization, Diffusion, 1, 381-404.
  45. — (1998), Have we learned anything new about the use of evaluation?, in American Journal of Evaluation, 19, 21-33.
  46. Witt U. (2003), “Economic Policy Making in Evolutionary Perspective”, in Journal of Evolutionary Economics, 13, pp. 77-94.

Mita Marra, Il dilemma della politica: incrementalismo, possibilismo e teoria della complessità in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 62/2015, pp 120-138, DOI: 10.3280/RIV2015-062010