Click here to download

The public sector efficiency in Italy: The case of Lombardy municipalities in the provision of the essential public services
Author/s: Tommaso Agasisti, Antonio Dal Bianco, Massimo Griffini 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  26 Pg. 59-84 FullText PDF:  375 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EP2016-001004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

This paper evaluates how efficient are the municipalities located in the most populous Italian Region (Lombardy) in providing essential public services: general administration, municipal and administrative police, waste collection, road network and street lighting. The empirical analysis is conducted through bootstrap Data Envelopment Analysis (DEA) on a sample of 331 municipalities with more than 5,000 inhabitants, and refers to the three years 2010, 2011 and 2012. The results highlight that there is room for substantial improvement of efficiency: the same level of output can be obtained while reducing the resources of about 33%. A second-stage truncated regression reveals that: the structure of population matters, scale effects do exist, and more financially healthy municipalities are also more efficient in providing essential services
Keywords: Global efficiency, public services, municipalities, bootstrap data
Jel Code: H72, H83

  1. Alesina A. and Perotti R. (1996). Fiscal adjustments in OECD countries: composition and macroeconomic effects. NBER Working Paper N. w5730.
  2. Battese G.E. and Coelli T.J. (1995). A model for technical inefficiency effects in a stochastic frontier production function for panel data. Empirical Economics, 20(2): 325-332., 10.1007/BF01205442DOI: 10.1007/BF01205442
  3. Boetti L., Piacenza M. and Turati G. (2010). Decentralization and local governments’ performance: how does fiscal autonomy affect spending efficiency? FinanzArchiv: Public Finance Analysis, 68(3): 269-302., 10.1628/001522112X653840DOI: 10.1628/001522112X653840
  4. Coelli T.J., Prasada Rao D.S., O’Donnell C.J. and Battese G.E. (2005). An Introduction to Efficiency and Productivity Analysis. New York: Springer.
  5. Giavazzi F. and Pagano M. (1995). Non-Keynesian effects of fiscal policy changes: international evidence and the Swedish experience. NBER Working Paper N. w5332.
  6. McDonald J. (2009). Using least squares and tobit in second stage DEA efficiency analyses. European Journal of Operational Research, 197(2): 792-798., 10.1016/j.ejor.2008-07-039DOI: 10.1016/j.ejor.2008-07-039
  7. Perotti R. (1996). Fiscal consolidation in Europe: Composition matters. The American Economic Review, 86(2): 105-110.
  8. Sampaio de Sousa M., Cribari-Neto F. and Stošić B. (2005). Explaining DEA technical efficiency scores in an outlier corrected environment: the case of public services in Brazilian municipalities. Brazilian Review of Econometrics, 25: 287-313. Testo disponibile al sito:
  9. Sampaio de Sousa M. and Stošić B. (2004). Technical efficiency of the Brazilian municipalities: correcting nonparametric frontier measurement for outliers. Journal of Productivity Analysis, 24: 157-181.
  10. Simar L. and Wilson P.W. (2000). A general methodology for bootstrapping in non-parametric frontier models. Journal of Applied Statistics, 27(6): 779-802., 10.1080/02664760050081951DOI: 10.1080/02664760050081951
  11. Worthington A.C. (2000). Cost efficiency in Australian local government: a comparative analysis of mathematical programming and econometric approaches. Financial Accountability and Management, 16: 201-224., 10.1111/1468-0408.00105DOI: 10.1111/1468-0408.00105

Tommaso Agasisti, Antonio Dal Bianco, Massimo Griffini, in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 1/2016, pp. 59-84, DOI:10.3280/EP2016-001004


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content