Benign or Threatening? Majority Preferences over Minority Practices and the Narratives of Diversity

Titolo Rivista TERRITORIO
Autori/Curatori Ifigenia Evlampia Kokkali
Anno di pubblicazione 2016 Fascicolo 2016/78 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 11 P. 166-176 Dimensione file 1956 KB
DOI 10.3280/TR2016-078020
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Negli ultimi anni il tema della diversità delle popolazioni urbane è entrato con forza nel dibattito accademico sulle città, le politiche urbane e la pianificazione. L’articolo propone un confronto tra le due principali retoriche mobilitate in merito alla diversità. Quella secondo cui la diversità è una forza creativa capace di sviluppare innovazione sociale e di rendere le città più competitive e attrattive e che trova ispirazione nella teoria di Florida sulla classe creativa. E quella che invece delinea la diversità come criticità per alcuni outcome sociali e come fonte di controversia tra maggioranze e minoranze etnicoculturali, proponendo una revisione critica della letteratura prodotta sul tema e concentrandosi sulle recenti polemiche emerse su diversità e il ruolo della pianificazione e delle politiche urbane per la risoluzione dei conflitti. Dal punto di vista empirico, l’articolo si misura con il caso della recente controversia nella Chinatown Milanese

Keywords:Diversità retorica; politica urbana/pianificazione; Milanese Chinatown

  1. Alesina A., Ferrara E., 2002, «Who Trusts Others?». Journal of Public Economics, 85, 2: 207-234.
  2. Allievi S. (in collaboration with eurobarometer), 2009, Conflicts over Mosques in Europe: Policy Issues and Trends, nef Initiative on Religion and Democracy in Europe. London: Alliance Publishing Trust.
  3. Allievi S., 2010, ed., Mosques in Europe: Why a Solution has Become a Problem, nef Initiative on Religion and Democracy in Europe. London: Alliance Publishing Trust.
  4. Ambrosini M., 2013, «‘We are Against a Multi-ethnic Society’: Policies of Exclusion at the Urban Level in Italy». Ethnic and Racial Studies, 36, 1: 136-155. DOI: 10.1080/01419870.2011.644312
  5. Amnesty International, 2012, Choice and Prejudice: Discrimination Against Muslims in Europe. Report.
  6. Angelucci A., Barberis E., Kazepov Y., 2014, Governance Arrangements and Initiatives in Milan, Italy. Report of the FP7 European Research Programme divercities, Work package 5: «Governance Arrangements
  7. and Initiatives». Deliverable 5.1. www.urbandivercities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2013/05/Italy_WP5_FinalReport.pdf (accessed on 30/11/2015)
  8. Bader V., 2007, Secularism or Democracy?: Associational Governance of Religious Diversity. Amsterdam: Amsterdam U.P.
  9. Balducci S., Lanzani A., Tamini L., Cologna D., 2006, Milan’s ‘Chinatown’: An Example of Functional Readaptation of Space by a Migrant Minority in a Low-segregation Context. Paper presented at the International symposium «Europe and China. Which Future? The Implications of the Rise of China as a Global Economic Power for Cities and Regions in Europe». Dortmund, Septermber, 29-30.
  10. Barberis E., Kazepov Y., Angelucci A., 2014, Urban Policies on Diversity in Milan, Italy. Report of the FP7 European Research Programme divercities, Work package 4: «Assessment of Urban Policies». Deliverable 4.1. www.urbandivercities.eu/wp-content/uploads/2014/09/ Urban-Policies-on-Diversity-in-Milan.pdf (accessed on 30/11/2015).
  11. Bauböck R., 2011, Divercities: Urban Citizenship and Religious Accommodation, Quaderni del Circolo Rosselli. Transcription of a talk given at University of Florence on March 24 at the seminar «Gli Immigrati nelle città dell’Unione Europea».
  12. Bellini E., Ottaviano G., Pinelli D., Prarolo G., 2008, Cultural Diversity and Economic Performance: Evidence from European Regions. Hwwi Research Paper, 3-14.
  13. Benn Michaels W., 2007, The Trouble with Diversity: How We Learned to Love Identity and Ignore Inequality. New York: Metropolitan.
  14. Blanc B., Germain A., 1998, «La vie de quartier dans le Montréal multiethnique ». Revue européenne des migrations internationales, 14, 1: 141-158.
  15. Briata P., 2014, Spazio urbano e immigrazione in Italia. Esperienze di pianificazione in una prospettiva europea. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  16. Bruzzese A., Tamini L., 2014, «Milano Porta Nuova. Servizi commerciali, produzioni creative e trasformazioni urbanistiche». Imprese & Città, 03: 78-89.
  17. Caldwell M.L., 2004, Not by Bread Alone: Social Support in the New Russia. Jackson, TN: University of California Press.
  18. Clark T.N., 2003, «Urban Amenities: Lakes, Opera, and Juice Bars Do They Drive Development?». Research in Urban Policy, 9: 103-140.
  19. Cologna D., 2008, «Il caso Sarpi e la diversificazione dell’imprenditoria cinese». In: Cima R., Dancelli M., Parisi T., Rinaldi G., Un dragone nel Po. La Cina in Piemonte tra percezione e realtà. Torino: Edizioni dell’Orso.
  20. Cocconi G., 2007, «Una ribellione, non uno scontro etnico. Giovanni Cocconi intervista il sinologo Daniele Cologna sugli incidenti di Milano». Europa, April 14.
  21. Cremaschi M., Fioretti C., 2015, «Diversity and Interculturalism, a Critique and a Defence. Going through Multiethnic Neighbourhoods in Rome».
  22. In: Balbo M. (ed.), The Intercultural City: Exploring an Elusive Idea. London and New York: IB Tauris.
  23. Damelang A., Steinhardt M., Stiller S., 2007, Europe’s Diverse Labour Force: The Case of German Cities. eurodiv Paper 49.
  24. European Commission, 2011, Directorate General for Regional Policy, Cities of Tomorrow. Challenges, Visions, Ways Forward. Luxembourg: Office of the European Union.
  25. Fainstein S., 2005, «Cities and Diversity: Should we want it? Can we Plan for it?». Urban Affairs Review, 41, 1: 3-19. DOI: 10.1177/1078087405278968
  26. Florida R., 2002, The Rise of the Creative Class: And how it’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  27. Galeotti A.E., 2002, Toleration as Recognition. Cambridge: Cambridge U.P. Germain A., 1999. «Les quartiers multiethniques montréalais: une lecture urbaine». Recherches Sociographiques, 40, 1: 9-32.
  28. Gilbert S., 2013, Beyond Via Sarpi: The Challenges of Chinese Immigration in Contemporary Italy. Hadley, MA: Mount Holyoke College. Senior Honors Thesis, Departments of Classics Italian and Asian Studies.
  29. Glaeser E., 2005, «Review of Richard Florida’s: The Rise of the Creative Class». Regional Science and Urban Economics, 35, 5: 593-596.
  30. Glick-Schiller N., 2012, «A Comparative Relative Perspective on the Relationships between Migrants and Cities». Urban Geography, 33, 6: 879-903. DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.33.6.879
  31. Harvey D., 1989, «From Managerialism to Entrepreneurialism: The Transformation in Urban Governance in Late Capitalism». Geografiska Annaler, Series B, Human Geography, 71, 1: 3-17.
  32. Kokkali I., 2013, «City Representations and the Selective Visibility of the (Ethnic) ‘Others’: A Short Note on the Fervent ‘Diversity Discourse’». U3-iQuaderni, 3: 43-48 (Urban Representations).
  33. Kokkali I., 2015, «Albanian Immigrants in the Greek City: Spatial ‘Invisibility’ and Identity Management as a Strategy of Adaptation». In: Vermeulen H., Baldwin-Edwards M., Van Boeschoten R. (eds.), Migration in the Southern Balkans: From Ottoman Territory to Globalized Nation States. Dordrecht: Springer, 123-142.
  34. Mocchi S., 2011, «No Integration Without Participation. A Study of the Requests for Building Mosques in Milan». Respect Project Working Papers Series, 6. http://respect.iusspavia.it/?workingpapers.
  35. Moeran B., 2007, «From Participant Observation to Observant Participation: Anthropology, Fieldwork and Organizational Ethnography». Creative Encounters Working Papers #2. http://openarchive.cbs.dk/bitstream/handle/10398/7038/wp%202007-2.pdf?sequence=1.
  36. Montagna N., 2016, «The Contestation of space in Milan’s Chinatown». City, 20, 1: 91-100. DOI: 10.1080/13604813.2015.1096057
  37. Monteleone R., Manzo L.K.C., 2010, «Un quartiere storico in fuga dal presente». In; Bricocoli M., Savoldi P. (a cura di), Milano Downtown. Azione pubblica e luoghi dell’abitare. Milano: et.al./edizioni, 133-161.
  38. Nathan M., 2011, The Long Term Impacts of Migration in British Cities: Diversity, Wages, Employment and Prices. serc Discussion Paper 67.
  39. Niebuhr A., 2006, Migration and Innovation: Does Cultural Diversity Matter for Regional R&D Activity? hwwi Research Paper, 3-1.
  40. Ottaviano G., Peri G., 2004, Cities and Cultures. feem Working Paper 92.
  41. Peck J., 2005, «Struggling with the Creative Class». International Journal of Urban and Regional Research, 29, 4: 740-770. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2427.2005.00620.x
  42. Putnam R., 2007, «E Pluribus Unum: Diversity and Community in the Twenty-first Century The 2006 Johan Skytte Prize Lecture». Scandinavian Political Studies, 30, 2: 137-174. DOI: 10.1111/j.1467-9477.2007.00176.x
  43. Qadeer M., 1997, «Pluralistic Planning for Multicultural Cities». Journal of the American Planning Association, 63, 4: 481-494. DOI: 10.1080/01944369708975941
  44. Rath J., 2005, «Feeding the Festive City: Immigrant Entrepreneurs and Tourist Industry». In: Guild E., van Selm J. (eds.), International Migration and Security: Opportunities and Challenges. London and New York: Routledge, 238-253.
  45. Raulin A., 2001, L’ethnique est quotidien. Diasporas, marchés et cultures métropolitaines. Paris: L’Harmattan.
  46. Sandercock L., 2003a, Cosmopolis II: Mongrel Cities of the 21st Century. London: A&C Black.
  47. Sandercock L., 2003b, Integrating Immigrants: The Challenge for Cities, City Governments, and the City-Building Professions. Vancouver Centre of Excellence – Research on Immigration and Integration in the Metropolis, Working Paper Series 03-20 (November).
  48. Wedemeier J., 2010, The Impact of Creativity on Growth in German Regions. mpra Paper 26573, November.
  49. Wimmer A., 2015, «Is Diversity Detrimental? Ethnic Fractionalization, Public Goods Provision, and the Historical Legacies of Stateness». Comparative Political Studies, published online before print July 28, 1-39. DOI: 10.1177/0010414015592645
  50. Wong K.S., 1995, «Chinatown: Conflicting Images, Contested Terrain». Melus, 20, 1: 3-15.
  51. von Streit A., Bontje M., dell’Agnesse E., 2011, «Stable Trajectories Towards the Creative Knowledge City? Amsterdam, Munich and Milan».
  52. In: Musterd S., Murie A. (eds.), Making Competitive Cities. New York: John Wiley & Sons, 43-66.
  53. Zukin S., 1991, Landscapes of Power. From Detroit to Disney World. Berkeley, CA: University of California Press.
  54. Zukin S., 1998, «Urban Lifestyles: Diversity and Standardization in Spaces of Consumption». Urban Studies, 35, 5-6: 825-839.

Ifigenia Evlampia Kokkali, Benign or Threatening? Majority Preferences over Minority Practices and the Narratives of Diversity in "TERRITORIO" 78/2016, pp 166-176, DOI: 10.3280/TR2016-078020