Clicca qui per scaricare

Accounting Research: Relevance Lost
Titolo Rivista: FINANCIAL REPORTING 
Autori/Curatori: Andrew Higson, Rasha Kassem 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 59-76 Dimensione file:  214 KB
DOI:  10.3280/FR2016-001004
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 




For research to have an impact, it has to exist in the first place. Moves in the UK to link University funding to research activity have reinforced the importance of research to academia - however, this may also have had adverse consequences. It is now very difficult for qualified accountants to obtain teaching and research positions at UK universities because of the lack of a research background. Institutional pressures on those conducting research may also have resulted in dysfunctional behaviour regarding the nature of the work conducted and the output. In the 1960s there was an attempt to make accounting research more "scientific", however, this seems to resulted in the emphasis on research methodology rather than the importance of making a contribution to knowledge. The lack of emphasis on the reliability (the reproducibility of the results) and validity (whether you are testing what you think you are testing) of statistical findings merely appears to have resulted in the application of pseudoscience to accounting research. All these factors appear to have combined to bring into question the relevance of the accounting research produced.
Keywords: Research, publications, impact, pseudoscience

  1. AAA (2008), Accounting faculty in U.S. colleges and universities: status and trends, 1993-2004. (Sarasota, FL.: American Accounting Association).
  2. Agyemang G. and Broadbent J. (2015), Management control systems and research management in universities, Accounting, Auditing & Accountability Journal, 28 (7), pp. 1018-1046,, 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2013-1531DOI: 10.1108/AAAJ-11-2013-1531
  3. Ahrens T. and Chapman C. (2014), In defence of the double-blind review, EAA Newsletter, 2, pp. 13-14.
  4. Baker C.R. (2011), A genealogical history of positivist and critical accounting research, Accounting History, 16 (2), pp. 207-22,, 10.1177/1032373210396335DOI: 10.1177/1032373210396335
  5. Ball R. and Brown P. (1968), An Empirical Evaluation of Accounting Income Numbers, Journal of Accounting Research, 6 (2), pp. 159-178,, 10.2307/2490232DOI: 10.2307/2490232
  6. Basu S. (2012), How can accounting researchers become more innovative?, Accounting Horizons, 26 (4), pp. 851-870,, 10.2308/acch-10311DOI: 10.2308/acch-10311
  7. Basu S. (2013), Devil’s advocate: the most incorrect beliefs of accounting experts, Accounting Horizons, 27 (4), pp. 841-846,, 10.2308/acch-10364DOI: 10.2308/acch-10364
  8. Baxter W.T. (1988), Accounting Research – Academic Trends versus Practical Needs. (Edinburgh: The Institute of Chartered Accountants of Scotland).
  9. Beattie V. (2005), Moving the financial accounting research front forward: the UK contribution, The British Accounting Review, 37 (1), pp. 85-114,, 10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.004DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2004.09.004
  10. Beattie V. (2014), “Reviewer shortage creates crisis for journal peer review system”, EAA Newsletter, 2, pp. 10-12.
  11. Beattie V. and Smith S.J. (2012), Today’s PhD Students – Is there a future generation of accounting academics or are they a dying breed? A UK perspective. (Edinburgh: ICAS).
  12. Bedford Committee, AAA (1986), Future accounting education: preparing for the expanding profession, Issues in Accounting Education, 1 (1), Spring, pp. 168-195.
  13. Bricker R.J., Borokhovich K. and Simkins B. (2003), The impact of accounting research on finance, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 14 (4), pp. 417-438,, 10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00013-8DOI: 10.1016/S1045-2354(02)00013-8
  14. Brown R., Jones M. and Steele T. (2007), “Still flickering at the margins of existence? Publishing patterns and themes in accounting and finance research over the last two decades”, The British Accounting Review, 39, pp. 125-151,, 10.1016/j.bar.2007.03.004DOI: 10.1016/j.bar.2007.03.004
  15. Cederstrom C. and Hoedermaekers C. (2012), On dead dogs and unwritten jokes: life in University today, Scandinavian Journal of Management, 28, pp. 229-233,, 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.05.007DOI: 10.1016/j.scaman.2012.05.007
  16. Darnill A. (1996), Publish or perish, Accountancy, September, p. 124.
  17. Demski J.S. (2007), Is accounting an academic discipline?, Accounting Horizons, 21 (2), pp. 153-157,, 10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.153DOI: 10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.153
  18. Diamantopoulos A., O’Donohoe S. and Lane J. (1990), Modelling advertising decisions by accountants: A path analysis, The British Accounting Review, 22 (1), pp. 3-26,, 10.1016/0890-8389(90)90112-UDOI: 10.1016/0890-8389(90)90112-U
  19. Duncan O.D. (1975), Introduction to Structural Equation Models. (New York: Academic Press).
  20. Fellingham J.C. (2007), Is accounting an academic discipline?, Accounting Horizons, 21 (2), pp. 159-163,, 10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.159DOI: 10.2308/acch.2007.21.2.159
  21. Gordon R.A. and Howell J.E. (1959), Higher Education for Business. (New York: Columbia University Press).
  22. Higson A. (1996), In a word, what is research?, Accountancy, December, p. 81.
  23. Higson A. (2003), Corporate Financial Reporting: Theory & Practice. (London: Sage Publications).
  24. Hopwood A.G. (2007), Whither accounting research?, The Accounting Review, 82 (5), pp. 1365-1374,, 10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1365DOI: 10.2308/accr.2007.82.5.1365
  25. Hussain S. (2015), Journal list fetishism and the ‘sign of 4’ in the ASB guide: a question of trust?, Organization, 22 (1), pp. 119-138,, 10.1177/1350508413506763DOI: 10.1177/1350508413506763
  26. Jeanjean T. and Ramirez C. (2009), “Back to the Origins of Positive Theories: A Contribution to an Analysis of Paradigm Changes in Accounting Research”, Accounting in Europe, 6 (1), pp. 107-126,, 10.1080/17449480902896510DOI: 10.1080/17449480902896510
  27. Krippendorff K. (1980), Content Analysis: an introduction to its methodology. (Beverly Hills, CA: Sage).
  28. Lawrence P.A. (2003), The politics of publication: Authors, reviewers and editors must act to protect the quality of research, Nature, March, pp. 259-261,, 10.1038/422259aDOI: 10.1038/422259a
  29. Lee T.A. (1995), “Shaping the U.S. academic accounting research profession: The American Accounting Association and the social construction of a professional elite”, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 6 (3), pp. 241-261,, 10.1006/cpac.1995.1023DOI: 10.1006/cpac.1995.1023
  30. Lee T. (1997), Editorial Gatekeepers of the Accounting Academy, Accounting, Auditing and Accountability Journal, 10 (1), pp. 10-30,, 10.1108/09513579710158694DOI: 10.1108/09513579710158694
  31. Liggio C.D. (1974), The expectation gap: the accountant’s legal Waterloo, Journal of Contemporary Business, 3 (3), pp. 27-44.
  32. Macve R. (1992), “The Plight of Accounting Education in Australia: A sense of déjà vu”, Accounting Education, 1 (2), pp. 129-132,, 10.1080/09639289200000022DOI: 10.1080/09639289200000022
  33. Mittermaier L.J. (1991), Representation on the editorial boards of academic accounting journals: an analysis of accounting faculties and doctoral programs, Issues in Accounting Education, 6 (2), Fall, pp. 221-238.
  34. Morris H., Harvey C. and Kelly A. (2009), Journal rankings and the ABS Journal Quality Guide, Management Decision, 47 (9), pp. 1441–145,, 10.1108/00251740910995648DOI: 10.1108/00251740910995648
  35. Moser D.V. (2012), Is Accounting Research Stagnant?, Accounting Horizons, December, 26 (4), pp. 845-850,, 10.2308/acch-10312DOI: 10.2308/acch-10312
  36. Osborne J.W. and Waters E. (2002), Four Assumptions of Multiple Regression that Researchers Should Always Test, Practical Assessment, Research & Evaluation, 8 (2). Retrieved May 23, 2016 from http://PAREonline.net/getvn.asp?v=8&n=2.
  37. Osterloh M. (2010), Governance by numbers. Does it really work in Research?, Analyse & Kritik, 32 (2), pp. 267-283,, 10.1515/auk-2010-0205DOI: 10.1515/auk-2010-0205
  38. Pierson F.C. (1959), The Education of American Business Men. (New York: McGraw-Hill).
  39. Pieters R. and Baumgartner H. (2002), Who talks to whom? Intra- and inter-disciplinary communication of economics journals, Journal of Economic Literature, 40 (2), pp. 483-509,, 10.1257/jel.40.2.483DOI: 10.1257/jel.40.2.483
  40. Puxty A.G., Sikka P. and Willmott H.C. (1994), Systems of surveillance and the silencing of UK academic accounting labour, The British Accounting Review, 26 (2), pp. 137-171,, 10.1006/bare.1994.1011DOI: 10.1006/bare.1994.1011
  41. Rayburn J.D. (2006), President’s message, Accounting Education News, 34 (3), pp. 1 and 4.
  42. Reiter S.A. and Williams P.F. (2002), The structure and progressivity of accounting research: the crisis in the academy revisited, Accounting, Organizations and Society, 27, pp. 575-607,, 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00050-2DOI: 10.1016/S0361-3682(01)00050-2
  43. Riahi-Belkaoui A. (2000), Accounting Theory, 4th edition. (London: Business Press Thomson Learning).
  44. Schultz Jr. J.J. (1989), The Bedford Committee Report: Prospects for Implementation, Issues in Accounting Education, Spring, pp. 218-221.
  45. Simkin M.V. and Roychowdhury V.P. (2003), Read Before You Cite!, Complex Systems, 14, pp. 269-274.
  46. Sparkes A. (2013), Qualitative research in sport, exercise and health in the era of neoliberalism, audit and New Public Management: understanding the conditions for the (im)possibilities of a new paradigm dialogue, Qualitative Research in Sport Exercise and Health,, 10.1080/2159676X.2013.796493DOI: 10.1080/2159676X.2013.796493
  47. Sundem G. (1987), Overview of Four Years of Submissions to The Accounting Review, The Accounting Review, LXII (1), January, pp. 191-202.
  48. Sundem G.L. and Williams D.Z. (1992), Changes in Accounting Education: Preparing for the 21st Century, Accounting Education, 1 (1), pp. 56-61,, 10.1080/09639289200000006DOI: 10.1080/09639289200000006
  49. Teixeira A. (2014), The International Accounting Standards Board and Evidence-Informed Standard-Setting, Accounting in Europe, 11 (1), pp. 5-12,, 10.1080/17449480.2014.900269DOI: 10.1080/17449480.2014.900269
  50. Tourish D. and Willmott H. (2015), In Defiance of Folly: Journal rankings, mindless measures and the ABS Guide, Critical Perspectives on Accounting, 26, pp. 37-46,, 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.02.004DOI: 10.1016/j.cpa.2014.02.004
  51. Watts R. and Zimmerman J.L. (1978), Towards a Positive Theory of the Determination of Accounting Standards, The Accounting Review, 53 (1), pp. 112-134.
  52. Watts R. and Zimmerman J.L. (1986), Positive Accounting Theory. (Englewood Cliffs: Prentice-Hall).
  53. Weetman P. (1993), Recruitment by accounting departments in the higher education sector: a comment on the Scottish experience, The British Accounting Review, 25 (3), September, pp. 287-300,, 10.1006/bare.1993.1027DOI: 10.1006/bare.1993.1027
  54. Willmott H. (2011), Journal List Fetishism and the Perversion of Scholarship: Reactivity and the ASB List, Organization, 18 (4), pp. 429-42,, 10.1177/1350508411403532DOI: 10.1177/1350508411403532
  55. Woods M. and Higson A. (1996), The interface of accounting research with education and practice, Accounting Education, 5 (1), March, pp. 35-42,, 10.1080/09639289600000004DOI: 10.1080/09639289600000004
  56. Zeff S.A. (1989), Recent trends in accounting education and research in the USA: some implications for UK academics, The British Accounting Review, 21 (2), June, pp. 159-176,, 10.1016/0890-8389(89)90194-7DOI: 10.1016/0890-8389(89)90194-7

Andrew Higson, Rasha Kassem, in "FINANCIAL REPORTING" 1/2016, pp. 59-76, DOI:10.3280/FR2016-001004

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche