Click here to download

Empathy and systemic psychotherapy. Theoretical and clinical implications
Journal Title: PSICOBIETTIVO 
Author/s: Luigi Onnis 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  24 Pg. 23-46 FullText PDF:  143 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PSOB2016-003002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The Author, after proposing a definition and a brief historical reconstruction of the concept of empathy, takes into account the scientific contribution that nowadays draw great interest about empathy: those coming from developmental psychology, particularly through the importance of intersubjectivity, and those coming from neurosciences, through the mirror neurons function. It emerges that empathy is a relational construct which involves an intersubjective theming on emotional and affective basis (before than cognitive) mediated by implicit, specifically bodily languages. Those relational characteristics of empathy perfectly fit with the systemic-relational psychotherapy which inspires itself to the relevance of intersubjective relationship, moreover it gives a great importance to the therapeutic use of analogical languages in order to promote an emotional circulation between therapist and family. A clinical case is described in which the empathic activation among the family members and the therapist is promoted by the use of the analogical method of Family Time Sculptures. In the final part of the paper the risk of an overvaluation of empathy is also discussed, particularly when it is considered as a factor that, by itself, can produce change.
Keywords: Empathy; Intersubjectivity; Mirror Neurons; Systemic Therapy; Implicit Languages; Family Time Sculptures

  1. Baron-Cohen S. (1995) L’autismo e la lettura della mente (trad. it.: Astrolabio, Roma, 1997)
  2. Bateson G. (1976) Verso un’ecologia della mente, Adelphi, Milano
  3. Bonino S., Lo Coco A., Tani F. (1998) Empatia. I processi di condivisione delle emozioni, Giunti, Firenze
  4. Borke H. (1971) “Interpersonal perception of young children: egocentrism or empathy?”, Developmental Psychology, 5: 263-296
  5. Boszormeny-Nagy I., Spark J. (1988) Lealtà invisibili, Astrolabio, Roma Buder M. (1923-1970) I and you, english translation by W. Kauffman, Touchstone, New York
  6. Ceccarelli M., Pugliatti M., Avallone E., Brescia G., Cimmino M., Valente M., Farina B. (2013) “L’organizzazione gerarchica dei processi cognitivi: dalle social neurosciences alla pratica clinica”, Psicobiettivo, 2: 107-128
  7. Damasio A. (1995) L’errore di Cartesio, Adelphi, Milano
  8. Damasio A. (2000) Emozioni e coscienza, Adelphi, Milano
  9. Decety J., Jackson P.L. (2004) “The functional architecture of human empathy”, Behavioral Cognitive Neuro Sciences Review, 3: 71-100
  10. Eisenberg N., Strayer J. (1987) Empathy and its development, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York
  11. Elkaim M. (1989) Si tu m’aimes ne m’aimes pas, Le Seuil, Paris
  12. Fodor J. (1992) “A theory of the child’s theory of mind”, Cognition, 44: 283-296
  13. Freud S. (1899) L’interpretazione dei sogni (trad. it.: Boringhieri, Torino, 1989)
  14. Gallese V. (2005) “Emboded simulation: from neurons to phenomenal experience”, Phenomenology and the Cognitive Science, 4: 23-48
  15. Gallese V. (2015) “Sé corporei in relazione: simulazione incarnate come prospettiva in seconda persona sull’intersoggettività”, in Onnis L. (a cura di), Una nuova alleanza tra psicoterapia e neuroscienze: dall’intersoggettività ai neuroni specchio. Dialogo tra D. Stern e V. Gallese, FrancoAngeli, Milano
  16. Gallese V., Fadiga L., Fogassi L., Rizzolatti G. (1996) “Action recognition in premotor cortex”, Brain, 119: 593-601
  17. Gallese V., Migone P., Eagle M. (2006) “La simulazione incarnata e i neuroni specchio. Le basi neurofisiologiche dell’intersoggettività ed alcune implicazioni per la psicoanalisi”, Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 40, 3: 543-580
  18. Hobson R.P. (2002) The cradle of thought, Pan Mc Millan, London
  19. Hoffman M.L. (1982) “Development of prosocial motivation: empathy and quilt”, in Eisemberg N. (ed.), The development of prosocial behavior, Academic Press, New York
  20. Kandel E.R. (1999) “Biology and the future of Psychoanalysis: a new intellectual frame work for psychiatry”, American J. of Psychiatry, 156: 505-524
  21. Kohut H. (1971) The analysis of the self, International Univ. Press, New York (trad. it.: Narcisismo e analisi del Sé, Boringhieri, Torino, 1976)
  22. Le Doux J. (1998) Il cervello emotivo, Baldini, Castoldi, Milano
  23. Lipps T. (1905) “Das wissen von fremden ichen”, Psychologische Untersuchungen, 4: 694-722
  24. Meltloff A.N., Moore M.K. (1977) “Imitation of facial and manual gestures by human neonates”, Sciences, 198: 75-78
  25. Meltloff A.N., Moore M.K. (1999) “Persons and representations: why infant imitation is important for theories of human development”, in Nadel J., Butterworth G. (eds.), Imitation in infancy, Cambridge Univ. Press, Cambridge
  26. Onnis L., Di Gennaro A., Cespa G., Agostini B., Chouhy A., Dentale R.C., Quinzi P. (1980a) “Le sculture del presente e del futuro: un modello di lavoro terapeutico nelle situazioni psicosomatiche”, Ecologia della Mente, 1: 21-48
  27. Onnis L., Laurent M., Bendetti P., Cespa G., Onnis L., Di Gennaro A., Cespa G., Dentale R.C., Quinzi P. (1980b) “Il mito familiare. Concetti teorici e implicazioni terapeutiche”, Ecologia della Mente, 2: 95-112
  28. Onnis L., Di Gennaro A., Cespa G., Agostini B., Chouhy A., Dentale R.C., Quinzi P. (1980c) “Sculpting present and future: a systemic intervention model applied to psychosomatic families”, Family Process, 33, 3: 341-355
  29. Onnis L. (2004) Il tempo sospeso, FrancoAngeli, Milano
  30. Onnis L. (2009) “Se la psiche è il riflesso del corpo: una nuova alleanza tra neuroscienze e psicoterapia”, Psicobiettivo, 2: 51-73., DOI: 10.3280/PSOB2009-00200
  31. Onnis L. (2012) “Le voci interne della famiglia: Miti e fantasmi familiari”, in Onnis L. (a cura di), La terapia familiare in Europa, FrancoAngeli, Milano
  32. Onnis L. (2013) “Le Sculture del Tempo Familiare: un metodo di “narrazione analogica” in psicoterapia sistemica”, Ecologia della Mente, 1: 5-27
  33. Onnis L. (2014a) “La dimensione dell’intersoggettività nella psicoterapia sistemica relazionale”, Ecologia della Mente, 1: 5-15
  34. Onnis L. (2014b) (a cura di) Una nuova alleanza tra psicoterapia e neuroscienze: dall’intersoggettività ai neuroni specchio. Dialogo tra D. Stern e V. Gallese,
  35. FreancoAngeli, Milano
  36. Rizzolatti G., Fadiga L., Gallese V., Fogassi L. (1996) “Premotor cortex and the recognition of motor actions”, Cognitive Brain Research, 9: 131-141
  37. Rizzolatti G., Sinigaglia C. (2006) So quel che fai: il cervello che agisce e i neuroni specchio, Raffaello Cortina, Milano
  38. Rogers C. (1975) “Empathic. An unappreciated way of being”, The counseling psychologist, 2: 2-10
  39. Sander L.W. (1975) “Infant and caretaking environment. Investigation and conceptualization of adaptive behavior in a system of increating complexity”, in Anthony E.J. (ed.), Exploration in child Psychiatry, Plenum, New York
  40. Siegel D.J. (2009) La mente relazionale, Raffaello Cortina, Milano
  41. Stern D.N. (1985) Il mondo interpersonale del bambino, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino
  42. Stern D.N. (2005) Il momento presente, Raffaello Cortina, Milano
  43. Stern D.N. (2006) “L’implicito e l’esplicito in psicoterapia”, in Spagnuolo-Lobb M. (a cura di), Atti del Convegno della Federazione Italiana Associazioni di Psicoterapia (FIAP), FrancoAngeli, Milano
  44. Stern D.N., Hefer L., Haff W., Dore J. (1984) La “sintonizzazione affettiva” (trad. it. in: Le interazioni madre-bambino nello sviluppo e nella clinica, Raffaello Cortina, Milano, 1998)
  45. Stern D.N., Sander L.W., Nehum J.P., Harrison A.M., Lyons-Ruth K.,
  46. Morgan A.C., Brushweler Stern N., Tronick E. (1998) “Non interpretive mechanism in psychoanalytic therapy: the ‘something more’, than interpretation”, International Journal of Psychoanlysis, 79: 903-918 (trad. it. in: Onnis L. (a cura di), Una nuova alleanza tra psicoterapia e neuroscienze. Dialogo tra D. Stern e V. Gallese, FrancoAngeli, Milano)
  47. Strayer J. (1987) “Affective and cognitive perspective on empathy”, in Eisemberg, F. Strayer (eds.), Empathy and its development, Cambridge Univ. Press, New York
  48. Titchener E. (1909) Experimental psychology of the thought processes, Mc Millan, New York
  49. Trevarthen C. (1980) “The foundation of intersubjectivity. Development of interpersonal and cooperative understanding in infants”, in Olson D. (ed.), The social foundation of Language and thought, Norton, New York
  50. Trevarthen C. (1993) “Il sé generale dell’intersoggettività, la psicologia della comunicazione infantile”, in Neisser U. (a cura di), La percezione di Sé: le fonti ecologiche interpersonali della conoscenza di sé, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino, 1999
  51. Tronick E.Z., Als H., Brazelton T.B. (1977) “The infant capacity to regulate mutually in face to face interaction”, Journal of Communication, 27: 74, 80

Luigi Onnis, Empathy and systemic psychotherapy. Theoretical and clinical implications in "PSICOBIETTIVO" 3/2016, pp. 23-46, DOI:10.3280/PSOB2016-003002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content