Clicca qui per scaricare

Sommes-nous tous des lycanthropes? Imagination, folie et vision en dieu dans De la recherche de la vérité de Malebranche
Titolo Rivista: RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA 
Autori/Curatori: Delphine Antoine-Mahut 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: Lingua: Francese 
Numero pagine:  15 P. 677-691 Dimensione file:  55 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SF2016-004008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 




De la recherche de la verité. Arnauld’s description, often repeated, of the vision of God as the ramblings of a "visionary" is most often viewed as a term that backfires on Malebranche himself coming from his criticism of the errors of the imagination in the second book of The Search after Truth. To defend him, the follower of Malebranche then no longer has any other choice than to widen the gap between pure knowledge and the effects from the fact that, since the Fall, the union of the soul with God has turned into a dependence of the soul upon the body. This article suggests that, on the contrary, an authentically Malebranchian meaning can be given to Arnauld’s criticism by articulating rather than dissociating Malebranche’s denunciation of the imagination’s perversion and his adversaries’ criticism of the foundations of his theory of knowledge. What results is both clarifying and edifying: if more or less in every man we find a lycanthrope, that is to say, a man that takes the visions of his imaginations for reality, it is precisely because ever since original sin, a "pure" vision of God has become practically impossible. Reestablishing the lost connection between Books II and III of The Search after Truth thus, in the same movement, restores the anthropological foundations of Malebranche’s philosophy.
Keywords: Anthropology, error, history of ideas, imagination, madness, Malebranche, vision of God

  1. - Antoine-Mahut 2015: Delphine Antoine-Mahut, Reviving Spiritualism with Monads. Francisque Bouillier’s impossible mission (1839-1864), «British Journal for the History of Philosophy», XXIII (2015), pp. 1106-1127.
  2. - Antoine-Mahut (dir.) 2014: Id., Les Malebranchismes des Lumières. Études sur les réceptions contrastées de la philosophie de Malebranche, fin XVIIe et XVIIIe siècles, Champion, Paris 2014. - Bardout 2000: Jean-Christophe Bardout, Metaphysics and Philosophy, in Steven Nadler (dir.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000, pp. 139-164.
  3. - Blake 1939: Ralph M. Blake, Note on the Use of the Term Idée Prior to Descartes, «Philosophical Review», XLVIII (1939), pp. 532-535.
  4. - Borghero 2011: Carlo Borghero, Les Cartésiens face à Newton. Philosophie, science et religion dans la première moitié du XVIIIe siècle, Brepols, Turnhout 2011.
  5. - Bouillier 1852: Francisque Bouillier, De la vision en Dieu de Malebranche, «Séances et Travaux de l’Academie des Sciences Morales et Politiques», XXII (1852), pp. 37-68.
  6. - Bouillier 1854: Id., Histoire de la philosophie cartésienne, 2 volumes, Durand, Paris, et Brun, Lyon 1854 (repr. Slatkine, Genève 1970).
  7. - Brown 2000: Stuart Brown, The Critical Reception of Malebranche, from His Own Time to the End of the Eighteenth Century, in Steven Nadler (dir.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000, pp. 262-287.
  8. - Carbone 2015: Raffaele Carbone, L’imagination, les coutumes bizarres et les limites du pouvoir politique chez Malebranche, in Id. (dir.), Imagination, coutume, pouvoir (XVIe-XVIIe siècles). Actes de la journée d’études, Publications de la Sorbonne, Paris 2015, pp. 127-149.
  9. - Carbone, Vermeir 2012: Raffaele Carbone, Koen Vermeir, Malebranche et les pouvoirs de l’imagination, «Rivista di storia della filosofia», LXVII (2012), pp. 661-669.
  10. - de Buzon 2010: Frédéric de Buzon, Aspects de la folie chez Malebranche, «XVIIe siècle», LXII (2010), pp. 247-256.
  11. - de Buzon 2012: Id., Le bon usage de l’imagination: Malebranche lecteur des “Regulae ad directionem ingenii”, «Rivista di storia della filosofia», LXVII (2012), pp. 671-690.
  12. - De Lancre 1622: Pierre de Rosteguy De Lancre, Incrédulité et mescreance du sortilege plainement convaincue, Nicolas Buon, Paris 1622.
  13. - Descartes 1996: René Descartes, Oeuvres, par Charles Adam et Paul Tannery, 11 volumes, Vrin, Paris 1996.
  14. - Gaudemard 2012: Lynda Gaudemard, Les «marques d’envie»: métaphysique et embryologie chez Descartes, «Early Science and Medicine», XVII (2012), pp. 309-338.
  15. - Israël 2005: Jonathan Israël, Les Lumières radicales. La philosophie, Spinoza et la naissance de la modernité (1650-1750). Editions d’Amsterdam, Paris 2005 (éd. orig. Radical Enlightenment. Philosophy and the Making of Modernity 1650-1750, Oxford University Press, Oxford 2001).
  16. - Kolesnik-Antoine 2006: Delphine Kolesnik-Antoine (= D. Antoine-Mahut), Malebranche. De l’imagination, Vrin, Paris 2006.
  17. - Kolesnik-Antoine 2009: Id., L’Homme cartésien. La «force qu’a l’âme de mouvoir le corps». Descartes, Malebranche, Presses Universitaires de Rennes, Rennes 2009.
  18. - Kolesnik-Antoine 2011a: Id., Descartes. Une politique des passions, Presses Universitaires de France, Paris 2011.
  19. - Kolesnik-Antoine 2011b: Id., Comme rendre l’âme «comme matérielle»? Le cas de Malebranche, «Corpus», LXI (2011), pp. 205-220.
  20. - Kolesnik-Antoine 2012: Id., La structure passionnelle de l’âme malebranchiste: entre Descartes et Regius ?, in Sabrina Ebbersmeyer (dir.), Emotional Minds, de Gruyter, Berlin 2012, pp. 51-68. - Lennon 1993: Thomas M. Lennon, The Contagious Communication of Strong Imaginations: History, Modernity, and Scepticism in the Philosophy of Malebranche, in Tom Sorell (dir.), The Rise of Modern Philosophy: The Tension Between the New and Traditional Philosophies from Machiavellismo to Leibniz, Oxford University
  21. Press, Oxford 1993, pp. 197-212.
  22. - Malebranche 1843: Nicolas Malebranche, Seconde Lettre, in OEuvres philosophiques de Antoine Arnauld. Nouvelle édition collationnée sur les meilleurs textes et précédée d’une introduction par Jules Simon, Delahays, Paris 1843.
  23. - Malebranche 2006: Id., De la recherche de la vérité, par Jean-Christophe Bardout, 3 volumes, Vrin, Paris 2006.
  24. - Moreau 1996: Denis Moreau, Vérité et rapport entre les idées, «L’Enseignement philosophique», XLIX (1996), pp. 7-19.
  25. - Moreau 1999: Id., Deux cartésiens. La polémique Arnauld Malebranche, Vrin, Paris 1999.
  26. - Moreau 2000: Id., The Malebranche-Arnauld Debate, in Steven Nadler (dir.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000, pp. 87-111.
  27. - Nadler 1991: Steven Nadler, Malebranche and the Vision in God: A Note on “The Search After Truth”, III, 2, iii, «Journal of the History of Ideas», LII (1991), pp. 309-314.
  28. - Pellegrin 2004: Marie-Frédérique Pellegrin, Comment naissent les monstres ? Dieu et la question du mal chez Malebranche, in Jean-Claude Beaune (dir.), La vie et la mort des monstres, Champ Vallon, Seyssel 2004, pp. 137-148.
  29. - Pellegrin 2012: Marie-Frédérique Pellegrin, Sorciers et loups-garous, «rêveries des démonographes». La contagion imaginative chez Malebranche, «Rivista di storia della filosofia», LXVII (2012), pp. 691-704.
  30. - Priarolo 1998: Mariangela Priarolo, Una difficile eredità: Arnauld, Malebranche e l’idea cartesiana, «Giornale Critico della Filosofia Italiana», XVIII (1998), pp. 378-402.
  31. - Pyle 2003: Andrew Pyle, Malebranche, Routledge, London 2003.
  32. - Rioux-Beaulne 2009: Mitia Rioux-Beaulne, Théorie de l’imagination en France à l’aube des Lumières: Malebranche et Fontenelle, «Revue de métaphysique et de morale» (2009), pp. 489-510.
  33. - Rioux-Beaulne 2012a: Id., Contagion et identification: la communication des passions chez Malebranche et Diderot, in Lucie Desjardins, Daniel Dumouchel (dir.), Penser les passions à l’âge classique, Hermann, Paris 2012, pp. 159-186.
  34. - Rioux-Beaulne 2012b: Id., «Les enfants voient ce que leurs mères voient»: l’imaginationisme de Malebranche et sa réception au XVIIIe siècle, «Rivista di storia della filosofia», LXVII (2012), pp. 705-726.
  35. - Schmaltz 2000: Tad Schmaltz, Malebranche on Ideas and the Vision in God, in Steven Nadler (dir.), The Cambridge Companion to Malebranche, Cambridge University Press, Cambridge 2000, pp. 59-86.
  36. - Scribano 2002: Emanuela Scribano, L’existence de Dieu. Histoire de la preuve ontologique de Descartes à Kant, Seuil, Paris 2002.
  37. - Scribano 2006: Emanuela Scribano, Angeli e beati, Modelli di conoscenza da Cartesio a Spinoza, Laterza, Bari-Roma 2006.
  38. - Wilkin 2008: Rebecca M. Wilkin, Essaying the Mechanical Hypothesis: Descartes, La Forge and Malebranche on the Formation of Birthmarks, «Early Science and Medicine», XIII (2008), pp. 533-567.

Delphine Antoine-Mahut, in "RIVISTA DI STORIA DELLA FILOSOFIA" 4/2016, pp. 677-691, DOI:10.3280/SF2016-004008

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche