Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
A socio-spatial vulnerability assessment for disaster management: insights from the 2012 emilia earthquake (italy)
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE 
Autori/Curatori: Fabio Carnelli, Ivan Frigerio 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2016 Fascicolo: 111  Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  23 P. 22-44 Dimensione file:  1124 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SUR2016-111002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


This article aims to provide a framework to build a spatial assessment about the interaction between social vulnerability indicators and the 2012 Emilia earthquake. Using Mirandola as case study, five social vulnerability indicators were selected, mapped and spatially correlated to a building damage index calculated using geo-referenced information of damaged buildings available at a local level. The evaluation of this spatial relationship may be a useful tool for post-disaster recovery and reconstruction policies.

L’articolo si propone di costruire un quadro di valutazione territoriale circa l’interazione tra gli indicatori di vulnerabilità sociale e il terremoto dell’Emilia del 2012. Utilizzando Mirandola come caso di studio, cinque indicatori di vulnerabilità sociale sono stati selezionati, mappati e correlati spazialmente ad un indice di danno degli edifici, calcolato utilizzando informazioni georeferenziate degli edifici danneggiati disponibili a livello locale. La valutazione di queste relazioni socio-territoriali potrebbe costituire un utile strumento ai fini di policy di recovery e ricostruzione post-disastro.
Keywords: Vulnerabilità sociale, Terremoto dell’Emilia, analisi socio-territoriale, disaster management, disaster recovery, GIS, Mirandola.

  1. Adger W.N. (2006). Vulnerability. Global Environmental Change, 16 (3): 268-281.
  2. Albarello D. (2015). Pensare i futuri terremoti. In Carnelli F., Ventura S. (ed.). Oltre il rischio sismico. Valutare, comunicare e decidere oggi. Roma: Carocci.
  3. Alexander D. (1993). Natural Disasters. Boca Raton: CRC Press.
  4. Anselin L. (1995). Local indicators of spatial association-LISA. Geographical analysis, 27 (2): 93-115.
  5. Anselin L., Syabri I., Kho Y. (2006). GeoDa: an introduction to spatial data analysis. Geographical analysis, 38 (1): 5–22.
  6. Babugura A.A. (2015). Children, youth and disaster. In Wisner B., Gaillard J.C., Kelman I. (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. London: Routledge.
  7. Benadusi M. (2013). The Two-faced Janus of Disaster Management: Still Vulnerable Yet Already Resilient. South East Asia Research, special issue “Life After Collective Death: Part 2”, 21 (3): 419-438.
  8. Bolin B. (1986). Disaster victims and recovery: a comparison between black and white. International Journal of Mass Emergencies and Disasters, 4 (1): 35-50.
  9. Bolin B., Stanford L. (1998). The Northridge Earthquake: Community-based Approaches to Unmet Recovery Needs. Disasters, 22 (1): 21-38., DOI: 10.1111/1467-7717.00073
  10. Bolin B. (2007). Race, Class, Ethnicity and disaster vulnerability. In Rodriguez H., Quarantelli E.L., Dynes R.R. (ed.). Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer.
  11. Bourque L.B., Siegel M.J., Kano M., Wood M.M. (2007). Morbidity and mortality associated with disasters. In Rodriguez H., Quarantelli E.L., Dynes R.R. (ed.). Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer.
  12. Calandra L.M. (2012). Territorio e democrazia. Un laboratorio di geografia sociale nel doposisma aquilano. L’Aquila: L’Una.
  13. Campagnoli P. (2015). Un’altra Emilia. Architettura e paesaggi prima e dopo il sisma. Bologna: Bologna University Press.
  14. Capriotti (ed.). (2014). Ricostruire l’emergenza. Bologna: Regione Emilia Romagna, text available http://www.regione.emilia-romagna.it/urp/allegati/Dossiersisma.pdf, last accessed 20th April, 2016.
  15. Carnelli F. (2012). Istantanee etnografiche post-sismiche da Paganica. In Calandra L. (ed.). Territorio e democrazia. Un laboratorio di geografia sociale nel doposisma aquilano. L’Aquila: L’Una.
  16. Carnelli F. (2015). La festa di San Giovanni a Paganica. Riti e Santi fra le macerie del post-sisma aquilano. In Saitta P. (ed.). Fukushima, Concordia e altre macerie. Vita quotidiana, resistenza e gestione del disastro. Firenze: Ed.it press.
  17. Carnelli F., Ventura S. (ed.). (2015). Oltre il rischio sismico. Valutare, comunicare e decidere oggi. Roma: Carocci.
  18. Ciccaglione R, Pitzalis S. (2015). La catastrofe come occasione. Etnografie dal sisma emiliano tra engagement e possibile consulenza. In Benadusi M. (ed.). Antropologia dei disastri. Ricerca, attivismo, applicazione, Antropologia pubblica, 1 (1).
  19. Ciccozzi A. (2011). Catastrofe e C.A.S.E. In Osservatorio sul terremoto dell’Università degli Studi dell’Aquila. (a cura di). Il terremoto dell’Aquila: analisi e riflessioni sull’emergenza. L’Aquila: L’Una.
  20. Comune di Mirandola (2013). Piano della Ricostruzione (Reconstruction Plan).
  21. Comune di Mirandola (2014a). Piano Strutturale Comunale, (Municipal Structural Plan).
  22. Comune di Mirandola (2014b). Piano Organico (Organic Plan), Inquadramento strategico e indicazioni preliminari per il Programma Speciale d’Area.
  23. Contardo J.I. (2014). Gentrification in the context of post-earthquake reconstruction urban policies: a review of the Chilean experience. Global Urban Research Centre Working Paper No. 9, University of Manchester. Text available http://www.seed.manchester.ac.uk/medialibrary/gurc/working_papers/GURC_wp9.pdf, last access 20th April 2016.
  24. Cutter S, et al. (2003). Revealing the vulnerability of people and places: a case study of Georgetown County, South Carolina. Annals of the Association of American Geographers, 90 (4): 713-737., DOI: 10.1111/0004-5608.0021
  25. Cutter S.L., Finch C. (2008). Temporal and spatial changes in social vulnerability to natural hazards. Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. U.S.A., 105: 2301-2306.
  26. Daniels R., Kettl D., Kunreuther H. (2006). On risk and disaster: Lessons from Hurricane Katrina. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
  27. Daley W.R., Brown S., Archer P., Kruger P., Jordan P., Batts D., Mallonee S. (2005). Risk of Tornado-Related Death and Injury in Oklahoma, May 3, 1999. American Journal of Epidemiology, 161 (12): 1144-1150.
  28. De Souza R.M. (2004). In Harm’s Way: Hurricanes, Population Trends, and Environmental Change. Population Reference Bureau.
  29. Eidson M., Lybarger J.A., Parsons J.E., MacCormack J.P., Freeman J.I. (1990). Risk Factors for Tornado Injuries. International Journal of Epidemiology, 19(4): 1051-1056.
  30. Frigerio I., De Amicis M. (2016). Mapping social vulnerability to natural hazards in Italy: A suitable tool for risk mitigation strategies. Environmental Science & Policy, 63: 187-196.
  31. Frigerio I., Ventura S., Strigaro D., Mattavelli M., De Amicis M., Mugnano S., Boffi M. (2016a). A GIS-based approach to identify the spatial variability of social vulnerability to seismic hazard in Italy. Applied Geography, 74: 12-22.
  32. Frigerio I., Strigaro D., Mattavelli M., Mugnano S., De Amicis M. (2016b). Costruzione di un indice di vulnerabilità sociale in relazione a pericolosità naturali per il territorio italiano. RENDICONTI Online, 39: 68-71., DOI: 10.3301/ROL.2016.49
  33. Frisch G.J. (2009). L’Aquila. Non si uccide così anche una città? Clean: Napoli.
  34. Gaillard J.C. (2015). Caste, ethnicity, religious affiliation and disaster. In: Wisner B., Gaillard J.C., Kelman (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. London: Routledge.
  35. Gaither C.J., Poudyal N.C., Goodrick S., Bowker J.M., Malone S., Gan J. (2011). Wildland fire risk and social vulnerability in the Southeastern United States: An exploratory spatial data analysis approach. Forest Policy and Economics, 13(1): 24-36.
  36. Hawkins R.L., Maurer K. (2011). “You fix my community, you have fixed my life”: the disruption and rebuilding of ontological security in New Orleans. Disasters, 35 (1): 143-159.
  37. Hewitt K. (1983). Interpretations of Calamity. Boston: Allen & Unwin.
  38. Hinkel J. (2011). Indicators of vulnerability and adaptive capacity: towards a clarification of the science policy interface. Global Environmental Change, 21(1), 198-208.
  39. ISTAT (2015). Statistic board, 14th population and housing census. 14th censimento della popolazione e delle abitazioni.
  40. IPCC (2014). Climate Change 2014: Synthesis Report, Contribution of Working Groups I, II and III to the Fifth Assessment Report of the Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change, text available: https://www.ipcc.ch/report/ar5/syr/
  41. Krueger F., Bankoff G., Cannon T., Orlowsky B., Schipper L.F. (ed.). (2015). Cultures and disasters. Understanding cultural framings in disaster risk reduction. London: Routledge.
  42. Lindell M.K. (2013). Recovery and reconstruction after disaster. In Bobeowsky P.T. (ed.). Encyclopedia of Natural Hazards. Dordrecht: Springer.
  43. Myers C.A., Slack T., Singelmann J. (2008). Social vulnerability and migration in the wake of disaster: the case of Hurricanes Katrina and Rita. Popul. Environ., 29: 271–291.
  44. Morrow B.H. (1999). Identifying and Mapping Community Vulnerability. Disasters 23(1): 1-18.
  45. Ngo E.B. (2015). Elderly people and disaster. In Wisner B., Gaillard J.C., Kelman (ed.) The Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. London: Routledge.
  46. Oliver-Smith A. (1994). Perù’s five haundred year earthquake: vulnerability in historical context. In Varley A. (ed.). Disasters, development and environment. London: Wiley.
  47. Peacock W.G., Dash N., Zhang Y. (2007). Sheltering and Housing recovery following disasters. In Rodriguez H., Quarantelli E.L., Dynes R.R. (ed.). Handbook of Disaster Research. New York: Springer.
  48. Peacock W.G., Van Zandt S., Zhang Y., Highfield W.E. (2015). Inequities in long-term housing recovery after disasters. Journal of American Planning Association, 80(4): 356-371., DOI: 10.1080/01944363.2014.980440
  49. Peguaro A.A. (2006). Latino Disaster Vulnerability. The Dissemination of Hurricane Migration Information Among Florida’s Homeowners. Hispanic Journal of Behavioral Sciences, 28(1): 5-22., DOI: 10.1177/0739986305284012
  50. Olori D., Ciccozzi E. (2016). L’Aquila città in frantumi: la ricostruzione come acceleratore delle dinamiche socio-spaziali. In Castrignanò M., Landi A. (ed.). La città e le sfide ambientali globali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  51. Puente S. (1999). Social Vulnerability to Disaster in Mexico City. In Mitchell J.K. (ed.). Crucibles of Hazard: Mega-Cities and Disasters in Transition. Tokyo: United Nations University Press.
  52. Pelling M. (2015). Hazards, risk and urbanization. In Wisner B., Gaillard J.C., Kelman (ed.). The Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction. London: Routledge.
  53. Perry R.W. (2007). What is a disaster? In Rodriguez H., Quarantelli E.L. and Dynes R.R., (ed.). Handbook of Disaster Research, New York: Springer.
  54. Poudyal N.C., Johnson-Gaither C., Goodrick S., Bowker J.M., Gan J. (2012). Locating spatial variation in the association between wildland fire risk and social vulnerability across six southern states. Environmental management, 49(3): 623-635.
  55. Rodriguez H., Quarantelli E.L., Dynes R.R. (2007). Handbook of Disaster Research, New York: Springer.
  56. Saitta P. (2015). Introduzione. In Saitta P. (a cura di). Fukushima, Concordia e altre macerie. Vita quotidiana, resistenza e gestione del disastro, Firenze: Ed.it Press.
  57. Thomas D.S.K., Ertugay K., Kemec S. (2007). The role of geographic information system/remote sensing in disaster management. In Rodriguez H., Quarantelli E.L., Dynes R.R. (ed.). Handbook of Disaster Research, New York: Springer.
  58. Ventura S. (2010). Trent’anni di terremoti italiani. Un’analisi comparata sulla gestione delle emergenze. In Osservatorio Permanente sul dopo sisma, (ed.) Le macerie invisibili. Auletta: edizioni MIdA.
  59. Weichselgartner J. (2001). Disaster mitigation: the concept of vulnerability revisited. Disaster Prevention and Management: An International Journal, 10, 2: 85-95., DOI: 10.1108/0965356011038860
  60. Wisner B., Blaikie P., Cannon T., Davis I. (2004). At Risk. Natural hazards, people’s vulnerability and disasters, London: Routledge.
  61. Wisner B., Gaillard J.C., Kelman I., (ed.). (2015). The Routledge Handbook of Hazards and Disaster Risk Reduction, London: Routledge.
  62. Zhou Y., Li N., Wu W., Wu J., Shi P. (2014). Local spatial and temporal factors influencing population and societal vulnerability to natural disasters. Risk Anal., 34: 614–639.



  1. Eleonora Giovene di Girasole, Daniele Cannatella, Social Vulnerability to Natural Hazards in Urban Systems. An Application in Santo Domingo (Dominican Republic) in Sustainability /2017 pp. 2043, DOI: 10.3390/su9112043
  2. Oscar Luigi Azzimonti, Matteo Colleoni, Mattia De Amicis, Ivan Frigerio, Combining hazard, social vulnerability and resilience to provide a proposal for seismic risk assessment in Journal of Risk Research /2020 pp. 1225, DOI: 10.1080/13669877.2019.1646308
  3. Alberto Basaglia, Alessandra Aprile, Enrico Spacone, Luca Pelà, Assessing community resilience, housing recovery and impact of mitigation strategies at the urban scale: a case study after the 2012 Northern Italy Earthquake in Bulletin of Earthquake Engineering /2020 pp. 6039, DOI: 10.1007/s10518-020-00919-8
  4. Oscar Luigi Azzimonti, Matteo Colleoni, Mattia De Amicis, Ivan Frigerio, Mappare la vulnerabilità sociale e la resilienza di un territorio in PRISMA Economia - Società - Lavoro 3/2018 pp. 14, DOI: 10.3280/PRI2017-003002

Fabio Carnelli, Ivan Frigerio, in "SOCIOLOGIA URBANA E RURALE" 111/2016, pp. 22-44, DOI:10.3280/SUR2016-111002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche