Clicca qui per scaricare

Do big 4 audit companies detect earnings management and report it in the audit opinion? Empirical evidence from italian non-listed firms
Autori/Curatori: Giuseppe Iuliano, Gaetano Matonti 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2015 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  39 P. 5-43 Dimensione file:  250 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EI2015-002001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

One of the earliest theories in the audit literature is that Big 4 auditors, due to their larger size and better training programmes, provide higher audit quality than other auditors in listed companies (e.g. Dopuch and Simunic, 1982; Davidson and Neu, 1993; Becker et al., 1998; Francis and Krishnan, 1999; Bauwhede et al., 2003; Cai et al., 2005). The argument is that larger audit firms have more reputation to lose by sacrificing their independence on any given audit engagement, thus Big 4 auditors’ higher levels of audit quality should be associated with lower levels of earnings management. To the extent that managers want to "mislead some stakeholders about the underlying economic performance of the company or to influence contractual outcomes that depend on reported accounting numbers" (Healy and Wahlen, 1999, p. 368), earnings will also be managed in non-listed firms. Bank financing is usually a major source of finance in privately held companies (Van Tendeloo and Vanstraelen, 2008), resulting in agency conflicts between bankers and owners, and between bankers and management (Vander Bauwhede and Willekens, 2004), which could also create earnings management incentives. The audit quality is the joint probability that the auditor detects an anomaly (first dimension) in financial statements, and then reveals it to the external users (second dimension) (DeAngelo, 1981). Analysing a panel sample of Italian non-listed firms over the years 2007-2012, our main findings suggest that Big 4 auditors are more likely to discover (auditor’s technical capabilities) earnings management initiatives than other auditors (a non- Big 4 auditor and statutory auditors), because a Big 4 auditor is negatively associated with the absolute value of discretionary accruals (Jones, 1991; Dechow et al., 1995). Analysing the same sample firms, a logistic panel regression suggests that, according to previous literature, the absolute value of discretionary accruals is positively associated with the probability that a qualified audit report is issued, meaning that the absolute value of discretionary accruals explains the issuance of qualified opinion for materially misstated financial statements. The panel logistic regression also suggests that the association of the absolute value of discretionary accruals and of a Big 4 auditor is positively associated with the probability that a qualified audit opinion is issued, meaning that when a Big 4 auditor discovers an accounting anomaly in the financial statements, it is reported in the audit opinion (auditor independence). Our findings also show that the audit opinion in previous years also affects, on average, the audit opinion of the year of the analysis.

Keywords: Earnings management, audit opinion, non-listed firms. First submission: 07.03.2016, accepted: 13.12.2016

  1. Akhtaruddin M. (2005). Corporate mandatory disclosure practices in Bangladesh. The international journal of accounting, 40(4): 399-422.
  2. Alsaeed K. (2006). The association between firm-specific characteristics and disclosure: The case of Saudi Arabia. Journal of American Academy of Business, 7(1): 310-321.
  3. Arnedo L., Lizarraga F. and Sanchez S. (2007). Does public/private status affect the level of earnings management in code-law contexts outside the United States? A study based on the Spanish case. International Journal of Accounting, 42: 305-328.
  4. Arnedo L., Lizarraga F. and Sanchez S. (2008). Discretionary accruals and auditor behavior in code-law contexts: An application to failing Spanish firms. European Accounting Review, 17(4): 641-666.
  5. Ashbaugh-Skaife H., Collins D., Kinney W. (2007). The discovery and reporting of internal control deficiencies prior to SOX-mandated audits. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 44: 166-192.
  6. Asquith P., Beatty A., and Weber J. (2005). Performance pricing in bank debt contracts. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40(1): 101-128.
  7. Azizkhani M., Monroe G. and Shailer G. (2007). Auditor Tenure and Perceived Credibility of Financial Reporting. Canberra: The Australian National University.
  8. Badertscher B.A., Phillips J.D., Pincus M. and Rego S.O. (2006). Tax Implications of Earnings Management Activities: Evidence from Restatements. -- Available at: SSRN: (Accessed 7 October 2016).
  9. Ball R. and Shivakumar L. (2005). Earnings quality in UK private firms: comparative loss recognition timeliness. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 39: 83-128.
  10. Balsam S., Krishnan J. & Yang J. S. (2003). Auditor industry specialization and earnings quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 22(2): 71-97.
  11. Baltagi B. (2008). Econometric Analysis of Panel Data. Chichester, West Sussex: John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  12. Barton J., Simko P. (2002). The balance sheet as an earnings management constraint. The Accounting Review, 77: 1-27.
  13. Bartov E., Gul F., Tsui J. (2000). Discretionary accruals models and audit qualifications. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 30: 421-452.
  14. Beattie V., Brandt R. and Fearnley S. (2001). Behind Closed Doors: What Company Audit is Really About. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  15. Beatty A., Harris D.G. (1998). The effects of taxes, agency costs and information asymmetry on earnings management: A comparison of public and private firms. Review of accounting studies, 3: 299-326.
  16. Beatty A.L., Ke B. and Petroni K.R. (2002). Earnings Management to Avoid Declines across Publicly Privately Held Banks. The Accounting Review, 77(3): 547-570.
  17. Becker C.L., Defond M.L., Jiambalvo J., Subramanyam K.R. (1998). The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management. Contemporary Accounting Research, Spring, 15(1): 1-24.
  18. Bellovary J. L., & Johnstone K. M. (2007). Descriptive evidence from audit practice on SAS No. 99 brainstorming activities. Current Issues in Auditing, 1(1): A1–A11.
  19. Bisogno M. (2012). Audit quality of Italian industrial non-listed firms: an empirical analysis. International Journal of Business Research and Development, 1(1): 32-47.
  20. Bonner S., Palmrose Z., Young S. (1998). Fraud type and auditor litigation: an analysis of SEC accounting and auditing enforcement releases. The Accounting Review, 73: 503-532.
  21. Boone J.P., Khurana I.K. and Raman K.K. (2010). Do the Big 4 and the second-tier firms provide audits of similar quality? Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 29(4): 330-352.
  22. Broye G. & Weill L. (2008). Does leverage influence auditor choice? A cross-country analysis. Applied Financial Economics, 18(9): 715-31.
  23. Burgstahler D. C. and Dichev I. (1997).Earning management to avoid earnings decreases and losses. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 24(l): 99-126.
  24. Burgstahler D.C., Hail L. and Leuz C. (2006). The Importance of Reporting Incentives: Earnings Management in European Private and Public Firms. The Accounting Review, 81(5): 983-1016.
  25. Bradshaw M.T., Richardson S.A., Sloan R.G. (1999). Earnings quality and financial reporting credibility: an empirical investigation. Working Paper, University of Michigan.
  26. Butler M., Leone A.J., and Willenborg M. (2004). An empirical analysis of auditor reporting and its association with abnormal accruals. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 37(2): 139-165.
  27. Cai C., Zhao S., and Huang Y. (2005). Toward The Effect of Audit Quality on Earnings Management-Empirical Evidence From Manufacturing Enterprises Listed in Shangai Stock Market. Journal of Modern Accounting and Auditing, 1(2): 69-80.
  28. Cameran M. and Prencipe A. (2011). Qualità della revisione contabile e tipo di revisore. Il caso delle società italiane non quotate (Audit quality and auditor type. The case of Italian non-listed firms). Economia & Management, l: 99-115.
  29. Cano-Rodríguez M. (2010). Big Auditors, Private Firms and Accounting Conservatism: Spanish Evidence. European Accounting Review, 19(1): 131-159.
  30. Carcello J.V. and Neal T.L. (2000). Audit committee composition and auditor reporting. Accounting Review, 75: 453-467.
  31. Carey P. and Simnett R. (2006).Audit partner tenure and audit quality. Accounting Review, 81(13): 653–676.
  32. Charitou A., Lambertides N., and Trigeorgis L. (2007) Earnings behaviour of financially distressed firms: The role of institutional ownership. Abacus, 43(3): 271-296.
  33. Chaney P.K., Jeter D.C. and Shivakumar L. (2004) Self-selection of auditors and audit pricing in private firms. The Accounting Review, 79(1): 51-73.
  34. Chen P.F., and Daley L. (1996). Regulatory Capital, Tax, and Earnings Management Effects on Loan Loss Accruals in the Canadian Banking Industry. Contemporary Accounting Research, 13(1): 91-128.
  35. Chen C.J.P., Chen S., and Su X. (2001). Profitability regulation, earnings management, and modified audit opinions: Evidence from China. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 20(2): 9-30.
  36. Chen K.Y., Lin K., and Zhou J. (2005). Audit quality and earnings management for Taiwan IPO firms. Managerial Auditing Journal, 20(1): 86-104.
  37. Chen H., Chen J., Lobo G., & Wang Y. (2011). Effects of audit quality on earnings management and cost of equity capital: Evidence from China. Contemporary Accounting Research, 28(3): 892-920.
  38. Chen H., Chen J.Z., Lobo G., Wang Y. (2011). Effects of audit quality on earnings management and cost of equity capital: evidence from China. Contemp. Account. Res., 28(3): 892-925.
  39. Chi H.-Y., & Chin C.-L. (2011). Firms versus partner measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on auditor quality. Auditing: A Journal of Practice & Theory, 30(2): 201-229
  40. Choi J., Jeon K. & Park J. (2004). The role of audit committees in decreasing earnings statement: Korean evidence. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Performance Evaluation, 1(1): 37-60.
  41. Coppens L. and Peek E. (2005). An analysis of earnings management by European private firms, Journal of International Accounting, Auditing and Taxation, 14(1): 1-17.
  42. Christie A.A. and Zimmerman J.L. (1994). Efficient and Opportunistic Choices of Accounting Procedures: Corporate Control. Accounting Review, 69(4): 539­566.
  43. Charles J., Stanley C., & Charlotte H. (2010). The imp act of audit quality on earnings management to achieve user reference points in EPS. Journal of Applied Business Research, 26(1): 19-30.
  44. DeAngelo H., DeAngelo L., and Skinner D.J. (1994), Accounting choice in troubled companies. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17: 113-143.
  45. DeAngelo L.E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2): 183-199.
  46. Dang L. (2004). Assessing Actual Audit Quality. Doctoral Dissertation. Drexel University.
  47. Davidson R. & Neu D. (1993). A note on the association between audit firm size and audit quality. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9(2): 479-88.
  48. DeAngelo L.E. (1981). Auditor size and audit quality. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 3(2): 183-199.
  49. Dechow P.M. and Dichev I.D. (2002). The Quality of Accruals and Earnings: The Role of Accrual Estimation Errors. The Accounting Review, 77: 35-59.
  50. Dechow P., Sloan R.G. and Sweeney A.P. (1995). Detecting earnings management. Accounting Review, 70(2): 193-225.
  51. Dechow P., Skinner D. (2000). Earnings management: reconciling the views of accounting academics, practitioners, and regulators. Accounting Horizons, 14: 232-250.
  52. DeFond M.L. and Jiambalvo J. (1993). Factors related to auditor–client disagreements over incomeincreasing accounting methods. Contemporary Accounting Research, 9: pp. 415-431.
  53. DeFond M.L., Raghunandan K., & Subramanyam K.R. (2002). Do non-audit service fees impair auditor independence? Evidence from going concern audit opinions. Journal of Accounting Research, 40 (4): 1247-1274.
  54. Degeorge F., Patel J. and Zeckhauser R. (1999). Earnings management to exceed thresholds. Journal of Business, 72: 1-33.
  55. Desai M.A., and Dharmapala D. (2009). Earnings Management, Corporate Tax Shelters, and Book-Tax Alignment. National Tax Journal, 62(1): 169-186.
  56. Dhaliwal D., Gleason C., Mills L. (2004). Last chance earnings management: using the tax expense to achieve earnings targets. Contemporary Accounting Research, 21(2): 431-459.
  57. DeFond M., Park C. (1997). Smoothing income in anticipation of future earnings. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 23: 115-139.
  58. DeFond M. and Zhang J. (2014). A review of archival auditing research. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 58(2): 275-326.
  59. Dye R. (1995). Incorporation and the audit market. Journal of Accounting and Economics. 19(1): 75-114.
  60. Dopuch N. & Simunic D. 1982. Competition in auditing: an assessment. Fourth – 29 – Symposium on Auditing Research, University of Illinois.
  61. Dopuch N., Holthausen R. and Leftwich R. (1987). Predicting Audit Qualifications with Financial and Market Variables. The Accounting Review, 62: 431-54.
  62. EC, European Commission (2015). “2015 SBA Fact Sheet, Italy”, -- Available at (Accessed on 26th January, 2016).
  63. Ecoda, The European Confederation of Directors Associations (2010). Corporate Governance Guidance and Principles for Unlisted Companies in Europe. -- Available on the internet at (Accessed 19 October 2015).
  64. Emmanuel G. (2012). Audit quality in common-law and code-law emerging markets: Evidence on earnings conservatism: agency costs and cost of equity. Emerging Markets Review, 13(2): 101-117.
  65. Francis J.R., Maydew E.L. and Sparks H.C. (1999). The role of Big 6 auditors in the credible reporting of accruals. Auditing: A Journal of Practice and Theory, 18(2): 17-34.
  66. Francis J.R., Krishnan J. (1999). Accruals and auditors reporting conservatism. Accounting Contemporary Accounting Research, 16: 135-165.
  67. Francis J. R., and Yu M. D. (2009). Big 4 office size and audit quality. The Accounting Review, 84(5): 1521-1552.
  68. Gajevszky A (2014). The impact of auditor`s opinion on earnings management: evidence from Romania. Network Intelligence Studies, II, 1(3).
  69. Gaeremynck A., Van Der Meulen S., & Willekens M. (2008). Audit-firm portfolio characteristics and client financial reporting quality. European Accounting Review, 1: 1-28.
  70. Gerayli M.S., Yanesari A.M. and Ma`atoofi A.R. (2011). Impact of Audit Quality on Earnings Management: Evidence from Iran. International Research Journal of Finance and Economics, 66: 77-84.
  71. Gul F.A., Yu Kit Fung S., Jaggi B. (2009). Earnings quality: Some evidence on the role of auditor tenure and auditors’ industry expertise. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 47: 265-287.
  72. Habbash M. & Alghamdi S. J. (2016). Audit quality and earnings management in less developed economies: the case of Saudi Arabia. Manag. Gov.
  73. Healy P., Wahlen J. (1999). A Review of the Earnings Management Literature and Its Implications for Standard Setting. Accounting Horizons, 13(4): 365-383.
  74. Herbohn K. and Ragunathan V. (2008). Auditor reporting and earnings management: Some additional evidence. Accounting and Finance, 48: 575-601.
  75. Hilary G. and Lennox C. (2005). The Credibility of Self-Regulation: Evidence from the Accounting Profession’s Peer Review Program. Journal of Accounting and Economics, 40: 221-229.
  76. Hirst D.E. (1994). Auditor sensitivity to earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 11(4): 405-422
  77. Hoitash R., Markelevich A. & Barragato C.A. (2007). Auditor fees and audit quality. Managerial Auditing Journal, 22(8): 761-86.
  78. Hope O-K, Langli J.C. and Thomas W.B. (2010). Agency Conflicts and Auditing in Private Firms. Working paper, University of Toronto, Norwegian School of Management, and University of Oklahoma.
  79. Haw I., Hu B., Hwang L., Wu W. (2004). Ultimate ownership, income management, and legal and extra-legal institutions. Journal of Accounting Research, 42: 423-462.
  80. Hutchens W. (2003). Private securities litigation in the People’s Republic of China: material disclosure about China’s legal system. University of Pennsylvania Journal of International Economic Law, 24(3): 599-689.
  81. Iacovone D. (2015). Imprese e familiari in crescita nel mondo [Family businesses growing in the world]. Il Sole 24 Ore, 5 Febbraio.
  82. Ianniello G. and Galloppo G. (2015). Stock market reaction to auditor opinions – Italian evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, May, 30(6/7).
  83. Inaam Z., Khmoussi H., and Fatma Z. (2012). Audit Quality and Earnings Management in the Tunisian Context. International Journal of Accounting and Financial Reporting, 2(2).
  84. Jeong S. W. and Rho J. (2004). Big 6 auditors and audit quality: The Korean evidence. International Journal of Accounting, 39: 175-196.
  85. Jelinek K. (2007). The Effect of Leverage Increases on Earnings Management. Journal of Business & Economic Studies, 13(2): 24-46.
  86. Jensen M.C. (1986). Agency Costs of Free Cash Flow, Corporate Finance and Takeovers. American Economics Review, 76(2): 323-329.
  87. Jensen M.C. and Meckling W.H. (1976). Theory of the Firm: Managerial Behaviour, Agency Costs and Ownership Structure. Journal of Financial Economics, 3(4): 305-360.
  88. Jeong S.W. and Rho J. (2004). Big Six Auditors and Audit Quality: The Korean Evidence. The International Journal of Accounting, 39(2): 175-196.
  89. Jones (1991). Earnings Management During Import Relief Investigations. Journal of Accounting Research, Autumn, 29(2): 193-228.
  90. Karjalainen J. (2011). Audit Quality and Private Finnish Firms, Publications of the University of Eastern Finland Dissertations in Social Sciences and Business Studies No 29.
  91. Kasznik R. (1999). On the association between voluntary disclosure and earnings management. Journal of Accounting Research, 37: 57-81.
  92. Kim J.B., Chung R. and Firth M. (2003). Auditor conservatism, asymmetric monitoring and earnings management. Contemporary Accounting Research, 20(2): 323-359.
  93. Kleinman G. and Palmon D. (2001). Understanding Auditor-Client Relationships: A Multi-Faceted Analysis. Princeton: Markus Wiener Publishers.
  94. Koumanakos E., Georgopoulos A., and Siriopoulos C. (2008). Auditor awareness of earnings management. International Journal of Accounting, Auditing and Performance Evaluation, 5(1): 50-65.
  95. Koh K., Rajgopal S., & Srinivasan S. (2013). Non-audit services and financial reporting quality: evidence from 1978 to 1980. Review of Accounting Studies, 18(1): 1-33.
  96. Laitinen E.K. and Laitinen T. (1998). Cash Management Behavior and Failure Prediction. Journal of Business Finance & Accounting, 25: 893-919., DOI: 10.1111/1468-5957.00218
  97. Lam S. and Chang S. (1994). Auditor Service Quality and Auditor Size: Evidence From Initial Public Offerings in Singapore. Journal of International Accounting, Auditing & Taxation, 3(1): 103-114.
  98. Lennox C.S. (2005). Management Ownership and Audit Firm Size. Contemporary Accounting Research, 22(1): 205-227.
  99. Lin and Hwang (2010). Audit Quality, Corporate Governance, and Earnings Management: A Meta-Analysis. International Journal of Auditing, 14: 57-77.
  100. Llukani T. (2013). Earnings Management and Firm Size: an empirical analyze in Albanian market. European Scientific Journal, 9(16): 135-143.
  101. Maijoor S. J. and Vanstraelen A. (2006). Earnings Management within Europe: The Effect of Member State Audit Environment. Audit Firm Quality and International Capital Markets. Accounting and Business Research, 36(1): 33-52.
  102. Mariani L., Tettamanzi P., Corno F. (2010). External Auditing vs Statutory Committee Auditing: The Italian Evidence. International Journal of Accounting, 14: 25-40.
  103. Melis A. (2004). On the Role of the Board of Statutory Auditors in Italian Listed Companies. Corporate Governance, 12(1): 74-84.
  104. Nichols D.R., and Smith D.B. (1983). Auditor Credibility and Auditor Changes. Journal of Accounting Research, 21(2): 534-544.
  105. Morck R., Shleifer A. and Vishny R. (1988). Management Ownership and Market Valuation: An Empirical Analysis. Journal of Financial Economics, 20: 293-315.
  106. Nelson M.W., Elliott J.A. and Tarpley R.L. (2003). How are earnings managed? example from auditors. Accounting Horizons, Supplement, 17: 17-35.
  107. Nobes C. (2010). On researching into the use of IFRS by private entities in Europe. Accounting in Europe, 7(2): 213-226.
  108. OECD (2015). “Principles of Corporate Governance”, -- available on the internet at (Accessed 19 September 2016).
  109. Omid A. M (2015). Qualified audit opinion, accounting earnings management and real earnings management: Evidence from Iran. Asian Economic and financial Review.
  110. Othman H.B. and Zeghal D. (2006). A Study of Earnings-Management Motives in the Anglo- American and Euro-Continental Accounting Models: The Canadian and French cases. The International Journal of Accounting, 41: 406-435.
  111. Palmrose Z. (1988). An analysis of auditor litigation and audit service quality. The Accounting Review, 63(1): 55-73.
  112. Petroni K. R. & Beasley M. (1996). Errors in Accounting Estimates and Their Relation to Audit Firm Type. Journal of Accounting Research, 34(1): 151-171.
  113. Piot C. and Janin R. (2007). External Auditors, Audit Committees and Earnings Management in France. European Accounting Review, 16(2): 429-454.
  114. Prencipe A. (2006). Earnings quality. Milan: Pearson Education.
  115. Pwc, PriceWaterHouseCoopers (2015). Point of View. Audit quality. Can it be measured? -- Available on the internet at: (Accessed 10th October 2016).
  116. Rajhi M.T. and Azibi J. (2008). Auditor’s Choice and Earnings Management After Enron Scandals: Empirical Approach in French Context. 2008 EABR & TLC Conferences Proceedings, Rothenburg, Germany.
  117. Reichelt K., and Wang D. (2010). National and office-specific measures of auditor industry expertise and effects on audit quality. Journal of Accounting Research, 48(3): 647-686.
  118. Rusmin R. (2010) Auditor quality and earnings management: Singaporean evidence. Managerial Auditing Journal, 25(7): 618-638.
  119. Sengupta P. and Shen M. (2007). Can accruals quality explain auditors’ decision making? The impact of accruals quality on audit fees, going concern opinions and auditor change. --Available from [Accessed 15.04.2012].
  120. Skinner D. and Suraj S. (2012). Audit Quality and Auditor Reputation: Evidence from Japan. Accounting Review, 87(5): 1737-1765.
  121. Spathis C. (2003). Audit Qualification, Firm Litigation, and Financial Information: an Empirical Analysis in Greece. International Journal of Auditing, 50 7(1): 71-85.
  122. Stice J. (1991). Using financial and market information to identify pre-engagement factors associated with lawsuits against auditors. The Accounting Review, 66(3): 516-534.
  123. Tsipouridou G. and Spathis C. (2014). Audit opinion and earnings management: Evidence from Greece. Accounting Forum, 38: 38-54.
  124. Vakilifard H. and Mortazavi M. S. (2016). The Impact of Financial Leverage on Accrual-Based and Real Earnings Management. International Journal of Academic Research in Accounting, Finance and Management Sciences, 6(2): 53-60.
  125. Vander Bauwhede H. and Willekens M. (2004). Evidence on (the lack of) audit-quality differentiation in the private client segment of the Belgian audit market. European Accounting Review, 13(3): 501-522.
  126. Van Tendeloo B. and Vanstraelen A. (2008). Earnings management and audit quality in Europe: Evidence from the private client segment market. European Accounting Review, 17(3): 447-469.
  127. Watts R.L. and Zimmerman J.L. (1986). Positive Accounting Theory. Englewood Cliffs, NJ: Prentice Hall.
  128. Weber J., Willenborg M., and Zhang J. (2008). Does auditor reputation matter? The case of KPMG Germany and ComROAD AG. Journal of Accounting Research, 46(4): 941-972.
  129. Yasar A. (2013). Big Four Auditors’ Audit Quality and Earnings Management: Evidence from Turkish Stock Market. International Journal of Business and Social Science, Special Issue, 4(17): 153-163.

Giuseppe Iuliano, Gaetano Matonti, in "ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA" 2/2015, pp. 5-43, DOI:10.3280/EI2015-002001


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche