Click here to download

Interventi
Journal Title: PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE 
Author/s: Euro Pozzi 
Year:  2017 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  4 Pg. 303-306 FullText PDF:  31 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PU2017-002008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Commentary on Paolo F. Peloso’ paper "From surveillance to support. Some notes on dangerousness and control in psychiatry" (Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 2017, 51, 2: 285-296). Paolo F. Peloso discusses an important and often unspoken issue: psychiatry has always dealt with the control of mental patients’ dangerousness. The patients’ feelings of loss of control allow Peloso to extend the need of control to all patients. In place of a modality of "control/surveillance" (which is immobilizing), he suggests a modality of "control/support" (which is dynamic). The psychiatrist should have a prosthetic function for the patient. However, it is not clear why this function should belong only to the psychiatrist and not also to other mental health professionals. Furthermore, the distinction between surveillance and support is unconvincing because both are part of the treatment process. The boundaries of psychiatry are not clearly defined; only some general principles are spelled out, with the result that the psychiatrist is left with the difficulty of verifying how much control is needed. Peloso surely reveals a common hypocrisy, but it is possible that Forensic Psychiatric Hospital in Italy have been closed because the idea of control is already pervasive in Community Mental Health Centers.
Keywords: Dangerousness in psychiatry; Control; Surveillance; Support; Mental patient

  1. Bricola F. (1990). La responsabilità dell’operatore psichiatrico: profili penalistici. In: Ariatti R., Lo Russo L. & Melega V., a cura di, I problemi giuridici dell’assistenza psichiatrica dopo la legge 180. Atti dei Convegno, aprile 1990. Bologna: Assessorato alla Sanità della Regione Emilia Romagna, 1991, pp. 163-168.
  2. Burti L. (2017). Attualità di Goffman: quanto contribuisce alla carriera morale di malato mentale la psichiatria di comunità italiana contemporanea? Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 51, 2: 211-246., 10.3280/PU2017-002003DOI: 10.3280/PU2017-002003
  3. Goffman E. (1961). Asylums: Essays on the Social Situation of Mental Patients and Other In-mates. New York: Anchor Books (trad. it.: Asylums. Le istituzioni totali: i meccanismi dell’esclusione e della violenza. Torino: Einaudi, 1968).
  4. Pellegrini P. (2015a). Riflessioni sul superamento degli Ospedali Psichiatrici Giudiziari. Psico-terapia e Scienze Umane, XLIX, 3: 476-479., 10.3280/PU2015-003009DOI: 10.3280/PU2015-003009
  5. Pellegrini P. (2015b). Misure di sicurezza psichiatriche? Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, XLIX, 4: 645-648., 10.3280/PU2015-004006DOI: 10.3280/PU2015-004006
  6. Peloso P.F. (2017). Dalla sorveglianza al sostegno. Note su pericolosità e controllo in psichiatria. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, 51, 2: 285-296., 10.3280/PU2017-002006DOI: 10.3280/PU2017-002006
  7. Pozzi E. (2008). Responsabilità in psichiatria: una nota. Psicoterapia e Scienze Umane, XLII, 2: 219-224.
  8. Zanchetti M. (2004). Fra l’incudine e il martello: la responsabilità penale dello psichiatra per il suicidio del paziente in una recente pronuncia della Cassazione. Cassazione Penale. Rivista mensile di giurisprudenza, XLVI: 2859-2871.

Euro Pozzi, in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 2/2017, pp. 303-306, DOI:10.3280/PU2017-002008

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content