Click here to download

The role of denial in sexual violence: the evaluation of criminogenic and responsivity needs
Journal Title: GRUPPI 
Author/s: Georgia Zara 
Year:  2016 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  18 Pg. 123-140 FullText PDF:  240 KB
DOI:  10.3280/GRU2016-001010
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

All sex offenders deny their offences, or minimize the seriousness of them or their consequences on the victims. Rarely they are ready to accept responsibility for the offence. However, the role of denial upon sexual recidivism is controversial. Within the criminal justice system and correctional settings, denial is judged as a factor that exacerbates the risk of reoffending. This assumption becomes dubious when psycho-criminological and clinical evidence shows that denial is not per se a criminogenic need; it is a responsivity need and is only indirectly associated with sexual recidivism. Interventions designed to evaluate rather than reject denial could be more effective because they can provide specific knowledge to maximize treatment effectiveness. Perhaps society will benefit more from offenders who stop abusing victims, even if the process of admitting and taking responsibility for their offences will only follow behavioural change, rather than anticipating it.
Keywords: Sex offending, Denial, Criminogenic needs, Responsivity needs, Recidivism, Treatment.

  1. Andrews D.A. & Bonta J. (2010). The Psychology of Criminal Conduct (5th ed.). Cincinnati, OH: Anderson.
  2. Arkowitz H., Miller W.R. & Rollnick S. (2015) (Eds.). Motivational Interviewing in the Treatment of Psychological Problems. New York: The Guilford Press.
  3. ATSA Professional Issues Committee. (2001). Practice Standards and Guidelines for Members of the Association for the Treatment of Sexual Abusers. Beaver-ton, OR: ATSA.
  4. Blagden N.J., Winder B., Gregson M. & Thorne K. (2011). Working with Denial in Convicted Sexual Offenders: A Qualitative Analysis of Treatment Professionals’ Views and Experiences and their Implications for Practice. International Journal of Offender Therapy and Comparative Criminology, 57, 332-356., DOI: 10.1177/0306624X1143230
  5. Blokland A. & Lussier P. (2016). Sex Offenders. A Criminal Career Approach. Chichester, UK: Wliey-Blackwell.
  6. Burrowes B. & Needs A. (2009). Time to Contemplate Change? A Framework for Assessing Readiness to Change with Offenders. Aggression and Violent Behav-ior, 14, 39-49.
  7. Knight R.A. & Thornton D. (2007). Evaluating and Improving Risk Assessment Schemes for Sexual Recidivism: A Longterm Follow-up of Convicted Sexual Offenders (Document No. 217618). Washington, DC: U.S. Department of Justice.
  8. Langton C.M., Barbaree H.E., Harkins L., Arenovich T., Mcnamee J., Peacock E.J., Dalton A., Hansen K.T., Luong D. & Marcon H. (2008). Denial and Minimization among Sexual Offenders: Posttreatment Presentation and Association with Sexual Recidivism. Criminal Justice and Behavior, 35, 69-98., DOI: 10.1177/009385480730928
  9. Levenson J.S. (2011). “But I Didn’t Do It!”: Ethical Treatment of Sex Offenders in Denial. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 23, 346-364., DOI: 10.1177/1079063210382048
  10. Looman J., Dickie I. & Abrace, J. (2005). Responsivity Issues in the Treatment of Sexual Offenders. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 6, 330-353., DOI: 10.1177/152483800528085
  11. Lord A. & Willmot P. (2004). The Process of Overcoming Denial in Sexual Offenders. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 10, 51-61., DOI: 10.1080/1355260041000167093
  12. Lösel F. & Schmucker M. (2005). The Effectiveness of Treatment for Sexual Offenders: A Comprehensive Meta-analysis. Journal of Experimental Criminolo-gy, 1, 117-146.
  13. Lund C.A. (2000). Predictors of Sexual Recidivism: Did Meta-analysis Clarify the Role and Relevance of Denial? Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 273-285., DOI: 10.1177/10790632000120040
  14. Mann R.E., Hanson R.K. & Thornton D. (2010). Assessing Risk for Sexual Recidivism: some Proposals on the Nature of Psychologically Meaningful Risk Fac-tors. Sexual Abuse: A journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 191-217., DOI: 10.1177/107906321036603
  15. Marshall W.L., Marshall L.E., Serran G.A. & O’Brien M.D. (2013). What Works in Reducing Sexual Offending. In: Craig L.A., Dixon L. & Gannon T.A. (Eds.). What Works in Offender Rehabilitation. An Evidencebased Approach to Assessment and Treatment. Chichester, UK: Wiley-Blackwell.
  16. Maruna S. & Mann R.E. (2006). A Fundamental Attribution Error? Rethinking Cognitive Distortions. Legal and Criminological Psychology, 11, 155-177., DOI: 10.1348/135532506X11460
  17. Miller W.R. & Rollnick S. (2013). Motivational Interviewing: Helping People Change (3rd ed.). New York, NY: Guilford Press.
  18. Piquero A.R., Farrington D.P. & Blumstein A. (2007). Key Issues in Criminal Career Research. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  19. Pollock N.L. & Hashmall J.M. (1991). The Excuses of Child Molesters. Behavioral Sciences and the Law, 9, 53-59.
  20. Prentky R.A., Barbaree H.E. & Janus E.S. (2015). Sexual Predators: Society, Risk, and the Law. New York: Routledge.
  21. Schneider S.L. & Wright R.C. (2001). The FoSOD: A Measurement Tool for Reconceptualizing the Role of Denial in Child Molesters. Journal of Interpersonal Violence, 16, 545-564., DOI: 10.1177/08862600101600600
  22. Schneider S.L. & Wright R.C. (2004). Understanding Denial in Sexual Offenders. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 5, 3-20., DOI: 10.1177/1524838003259320
  23. Seto M.C. & Lalumière M.L. (2001). A Brief Screening Scale to Identify Pedophilic Interests among Child Molesters. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 13, 15-25., DOI: 10.1177/10790632010130010
  24. Shakespeare W. (1608 in quarto). King Lear. In: Craig W.J. (1894) (Ed.). The Complete Works of William Shakespeare. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  25. Vanhoeck K. & van Daele E. (2011). Denial of Sexual Crimes: A Therapeutic Exploration. In: Boer D.P., Eher R., Craig L.A., Miner M.H. & Pfäfflin F. (Eds.). International Perspectives on the Assessment and Treatment of Sexual Offend-ers: Theory, Practice and Research. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons.
  26. Ward T. & Beech A. (2006). An Integrated Theory of Sexual Offending. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 11, 44-63.
  27. Ward T. & Hudson S.M. (2000). Sexual Offenders’ Implicit Planning: A Conceptual Model. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 12, 189-202., DOI: 10.1023/A:100953410915
  28. Ware J. & Harkins L. (2015). Addressing Denial. In: Wilcox D.T., Garrett T., and Harkins L. (Eds.). Sex Offender Treatment: A Case Study Approach to Issues and Interventions. London: Wiley.
  29. Ware J. & Mann R.E. (2012). How Should “Acceptance of Responsibility” be Addressed in Sexual Offending Treatment Programs? Aggression and Violent Be-havior, 17, 279-288.
  30. Ware J., Marshall W.L. & Marshall L.E. (2015). Categorical Denial in Convicted Sex Offenders: The Concept, its Meaning, and its Implication for Risk and Treatment. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 25, 215-226.
  31. Wheeler S. & Lord L. (1999) Denial: A Conceptual Analysis. Archives of Psychiatric Nursing, XIII, 6: 311-320., DOI: 10.1016/S0883-9417(99)80063-
  32. Wilson R.J. (1999). Emotional Congruence in Sexual Offenders against Chil-dren. Sexual Abuse: Journal of Research and Treatment, 11, 33-47., DOI: 10.1177/10790632990110010
  33. Wilson D. & Jones T. (2008). “In My Own World”: A Case Study of a Paedophile’s Thinking and Doing and his Use of the Internet. The Howard Journal of Criminal Justice, 47,107-120.
  34. Wright R.C. & Schneider S.L. (2004). Mapping Child Molester Treatment Progress with the FoSOD: Denial, Explanations, and Accountability. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 85-105., DOI: 10.1177/10790632040160020
  35. Yates P.M. (2009). Is Sexual Offender Denial Related to Sex Offence Risk and Recidivism? A Review and Treatment Implications. Psychology Crime and Law Special Issue: Cognition and Emotion, 15, 183-199., DOI: 10.1080/1068316080219090
  36. Zara G. (2005). Le carriere criminali. Milano: Giuffrè.
  37. Zara G. (2016a). La psico-criminologia: questioni deontologiche e questioni di me-todo. In: Zara G., Presutti M. & Calvi E. (Eds.). Lo psicologo, tra l’essere e il fare. Deontologia psicologica in ambito psico-criminologico, forense e della ricerca. Italia: PubliEdit.
  38. Zara G. (2016b). Valutare il rischio in ambito criminologico. Procedure e strumenti per l’assessment psicologico. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  39. Jung S. & Nunes K.L. (2012). Denial and its Relationship with Treatment Perceptions among Sex Offenders. Journal of Forensic Psychiatry & Psychology, 23, 485-496., DOI: 10.1080/14789949.2012.697567
  40. Jung S. & Daniels M. (2012). Conceptualizing Sex Offender Denial from a Multifaceted Framework: Investigating the Psychometric Qualities of a new Instrument. Journal of Addictions & Offender Counseling, 33, 2-17.
  41. Harkins L., Howard P., Barnett G., Wakeling H. & Miles C. (2015). Relationships between Denial, Risk, and Recidivism in Sexual Offenders. Archives of Sexual Behavior, 44, 157-166.
  42. Harkins L., Beech A.R. & Goodwill A.M. (2010). Examining the Influence of Denial, Motivation, and Risk on Sexual Recidivism. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 22, 78-94., DOI: 10.1177/107906320935810
  43. Hanson R.K. & Yates P.M. (2013). Psychological Treatment of Sex Offenders. Current Psychiatry Reports, 15, 1-8.
  44. Hanson R.K. & Morton-Bourgon K.E. (2009). The Accuracy of Recidivism Risk Assessments for Sexual Offenders: A Meta-Analysis of 118 Prediction Studies. Psychological Assessment, 21, 1-21.
  45. Hanson R.K. & Morton-Bourgon K.E. (2005). The Characteristics of Persistent Sexual Offenders: A Meta-analysis of Recidivism Studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 73, 1154-1163., DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.73.6.115
  46. Hanson R.K. & Harris A.J.R. (2013). Criminogenic Needs of Sexual Offenders on Community Supervision. In: Craig R.L.A., Dixon L. & Gannon T.A. (Eds.). What Works in Offender Rehabilitation. An Evidence-Based Approach to Assessment and Treatment. Chichester, UK: John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
  47. Hanson R.K. & Harris A.J.R. (1998). Dynamic Predictors of Sexual Recidivism. (User Report 1998-01). Ottawa: Department of the Solicitor General of Canada.
  48. Hanson R.K. & Bussière M.T. (1998). Predicting Relapse: A Meta-analysis of Sexual Offender Recidivism Studies. Journal of Consulting and Clinical Psychology, 66, 348-362., DOI: 10.1037/0022-006X.66.2.34
  49. Gee D.G., Devilly G.J. & Ward T. (2004). The Content of Sexual Fantasies for Sexual Offenders. Sexual Abuse: A Journal of Research and Treatment, 16, 315-331., DOI: 10.1177/10790632040160040
  50. Freud S. (1961). Negation. In: Strachey J. (Ed.). The Standard Edition of the Complete Psychological Works of Sigmund Freud: Vol. 19. London: Hogarth Press (original work published 1925).
  51. Freud S. (1925). La negazione. In: OSF, 10. Torino: Boringhieri.
  52. Eliot T.S. (1936/1962). T.S. Eliot: The Complete Poems and Plays, 1909-1950. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World.
  53. Dostoevskij F. (1866/1987). Delitto e castigo. Vol. II, trad. it. di Polledro A. Tori-no: Orpheus Libri Giulio Einaudi.
  54. Delucchi F. (2002). Difese e abuso di sostanze. In: Lingiardi V. e Madeddu F. (Eds). I meccanismi di difesa. Teoria, valutazione, clinica. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  55. Conte J.R. (1985). Clinical Dimensions of Adult Sexual Abuse of Children. Behavioral Sciences & the Law, 3, 341-354.
  56. Craissati J. (2015). Should we Worry about Sex Offenders who Deny their Offences? Probation Journal, 62, 395-405., DOI: 10.1177/0264550515600543
  57. Craig L.A., Browne K.D., Stringer I. & Beech A. (2005). Sexual Recidivism: A Review of Dynamic and Actuarial Predictors. Journal of Sexual Aggression, 11, 65-84., DOI: 10.1080/1355260041000166773
  58. Craig L.A., Browne K.D. & Stringer I. (2003). Risk Scales and Factors Predictive of Sexual Offence Recidivism. Trauma, Violence, & Abuse, 4, 45-68., DOI: 10.1177/152483800223894
  59. Zara G. (2017, forthcoming). Valutare il diniego nei sex offenders con il CID-SO© (Comprehensive Inventory of Denial – Sex Offender Version). Milano: Raffael-lo Cortina. Accepted for publication.
  60. Zara G. & Farrington D.P. (2016). Criminal Recidivism: Explanation, Prediction and Prevention. Abingdon, UK: Routledge.

Georgia Zara, The role of denial in sexual violence: the evaluation of criminogenic and responsivity needs in "GRUPPI" 1/2016, pp. 123-140, DOI:10.3280/GRU2016-001010


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content