Click here to download

Human evolution: the hard evidence of an ever-changing bush
Journal Title: PARADIGMI 
Author/s: Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi 
Year:  2017 Issue: 2 Language: English 
Pages:  23 Pg. 89-111 FullText PDF:  285 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PARA2017-002007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The numerous discoveries of fossils from different periods occurred in recent years in Africa, Asia and Europe, along with the re-interpretation of data available for some time, have allowed scientists to propose new and more complex models of human evolution. To describe the diversity of hominin species documented to date in the fossil record in the last 7 million years the metaphor of the evolutionary bush is often used. It allows to describe the complexity of morphologies and variability of adaptations observable in numerous species prior to the appearance of Homo sapiens more accurately than the old idea of a unilinear model of evolution. This paper summarizes our current knowledge on the various phases of human evolution, in a situation in flux, with each new discovery imposing a reconsideration of the current interpretative models and the formulation of new ones.
Keywords: "Bush" model, Data re-interpretation, Fossil Hominins, Human evolution, Hu-man origins, Unilinear model.

  1. Lieberman D.E. (1998). Sphenoid Shortening and the Evolution of Modern Human Cranial Shape. Nature, 393: 158-162,, DOI: 10.1038/30227
  2. Ruff C. (2009). Relative Limb Strength and Locomotion in Homo habilis. Am. J. Phys. Anthropol., 138: 90-100,
  3. Wood B.A. and Boyle E.K. (2016). Hominin Taxic Diversity: Fact or Fantasy?. Yearb. Phys. Anthropol., 159: 37-78,
  4. Wood B.A. and Collard M. (1999). The Human Genus. Science, 284: 65-71.
  5. Wood B.A. and Harrison T. (2011). The Evolutionary Context of the First Hominins. Nature, 470: 347-352,
  6. Antón S.C., Potts R. and Aiello L.C. (2014). Evolution of Early Homo: An Integrated Biological Perspective. Science, 345 (6192): 1236828,
  7. Bermudez de Castro J.M. et al. (2016). Continuity versus Discontinuity of the Human Settlement of Europe between the Late Early Pleistocene and the Early Middle Pleistocene. The Mandibular Evidence. Quaternary Science Reviews, 153: 51-62,
  8. Harcourt A.H. (2016). Human Phylogeography and Diversity. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 113, 29: 8072-8,
  9. Hovers E. (2015). Archaeology: Tools Go Back in Time. Nature, 521: 294-295,
  10. Hublin J.-J. (2015). Paleoanthropology: How Old Is the Oldest Human?. Current Biology, 25, 11: 453-455,
  11. Manzi G. (2016). Humans of the Middle Pleistocene: The Controversial Calvarium from Ceprano (Italy) and Its Significance for the Origin and Variability of Ho-mo heidelbergensis. Quat. Int., 411: 254-261,
  12. Marean C.W. (2015). The Most Invasive Species of All. Scientific American, 313: 32-39.
  13. Roebroeks W. and Soressi M.A. (2016). Neandertals Revised. Proc Natl Acad Sci USA, 113: 6372-6379,
  14. Stringer C. (2015). Human Evolution: The Many Mysteries of Homo naledi. eLife, 4,
  15. Stringer C. (2016). The Origin and Evolution of Homo sapiens. Phil. Trans. R. Soc. B., 371, 20150237,
  16. Stringer C. and Barnes I. (2015). Deciphering the Denisovans. Proc. Natl Acad. Sci. USA, 112: 201522477,
  17. Thompson J.C. (2017). New opportunities rising: More fossil specimens and an eagerly awaited age for Homo naledi raise new questions and open fresh opportunities for paleoanthropologists. eLife, 6,
  18. Van den Bergh G.D. et al. (2016). Homo floresiensis-like Fossils from the Early Middle Pleistocene of Flores. Nature, 534: 245-248,

Jacopo Moggi-Cecchi, in "PARADIGMI" 2/2017, pp. 89-111, DOI:10.3280/PARA2017-002007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content