Logic, thinking and language in Frege

Titolo Rivista: PARADIGMI
Autori/Curatori: Daniele Mezzadri
Anno di pubblicazione: 2017 Fascicolo: 3 Lingua: Italiano
Numero pagine: 16 P. 165-180 Dimensione file: 186 KB
DOI: 10.3280/PARA2017-003012
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit.
Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

In this paper I take the opportunity of the recent publication of Pieranna Garavaso’s and Nicla Vassallo’s Frege on Thinking and its Epistemic Significance (with whose main tenets this paper is in constant dialogue) to provide an overview of some important components of Frege’s conception of logic. Section 1 discusses Frege’s view that the task of logic is to provide justification for what we think, and in sections 2 and 3 this idea is shown to play a central role in his anti-psychologistic view that logic is normative for thinking. Section 4 offers a survey of Frege’s manifold conception of thinking. Finally, section 5 discusses the relations between thinking and language in Frege’s philosophy.

  1. Burge T. (1992). Frege on Knowing the Third Realm. Mind, 101, 404: 633-650,
  2. Burge T. (1998). Frege on Knowing the Foundation. Mind, 107, 426: 305–347,
  3. Carl W. (1995). Frege’s Theory of Sense and Reference. Its Origins and Scope. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  4. Dummett M. (1993). Origins of Analytical Philosophy. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  5. Frege G. (1879). Begriffsschrift, eine der arithmetischen nachgebildete Formelsprache des reinen Denkens. Halle: L. Nebert (Engl. transl. Conceptual Notation. A Formula Language of Pure Thought Modelled upon the Formula Language of Arithmetic. In: Conceptual Notation and Related Articles, ed. by T.W. Bynum. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972: 101-208.
  6. Frege G. (1882). Über den wissenschaftliche Berechtigung einer Begriffsschrift. Zeitschrift für Philosophie und philosophischen Kritik, 81: 48-56 (Engl. transl. On the Scientific Justification of a Conceptual Notation. In Conceptual Notation and Related Articles, ed. by T.W. Bynum. Oxford: Clarendon Press, 1972: 83-89.
  7. Frege G. (1884). Die Grundlagen der Arithmetik, eine logisch mathematische Untersuchung über den Begriff der Zahl. Breslau: Koebner (Engl. transl. The Foundations of Arithmetic. Oxford: Blackwell, 1953).

  8. Frege G. (1893). Grundgesetze der Arithmetik (Vol. I). Jena: H. Pohle (Partial Engl. transl. The Basic Laws of Arithmetic. Exposition of the System. Berkeley-Los Angeles: University of California Press, 1964).
  9. Frege G. (1967). Kleine Schriften. Hildesheim: G. Olms (Engl. transl. Collected Papers on Mathematics, Logic and Philosophy. Oxford: Blackwell, 1984).
  10. Frege G. (1969). Nachgelassene Schriften. Hamburg: Felix Meiner Verlag (Engl. transl. Posthumous Writings. Oxford: Blackwell, 1979).

  11. Frege G. (1976). Wissenschaftlicher Briefwechsel. Hamburg: Felix Meiner (Engl. transl. Philosophical and Mathematical Correspondence. Oxford: Blackwell, 1980).
  12. Garavaso P. and Vassallo N. (2014). Frege on Thinking and its Epistemic Significance. Lanham: Lexington Books.
  13. Haack S. (1978). Philosophy of Logics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
  14. Hanna R. (1993). Logical Cognition: Husserl's Prolegomena and the Truth in Psychologism. Philosophy and Phenomenological Research, 53, 2: 251-275, DOI: 10.2307/2107768
  15. Kanterian E. (2012). Frege. A Guide for the Perplexed. London-New York: Continuum.
  16. Kremer M. (2000). Judgment and Truth in Frege. Journal of the History of Philosophy, 38, 4: 549-581,
  17. MacFarlane J. (2002). Frege, Kant, and the Logic in Logicism. The Philosophical Review, 111, 1: 25-65, DOI: 10.1215/00318108-111-1-25
  18. Mezzadri D. (2015). Frege on the Normativity and Constitutivity of Logic for Thought I. Philosophy Compass, 10, 9: 583-591,
  19. Rein A. (1985). Frege and Natural Language. Philosophy, 60, 234: 513-524, DOI: 10.1017/S0031819100042546
  20. Scot Rousse B. (2015). Demythologizing the Third Realm: Frege on Grasping Thoughts. Journal for the History of Analytical Philosophy, 3: 1-14,
  21. Textor M. (2010). Frege on Judging as Acknowledging the Truth. Mind 119, 475: 615-655,
  22. Wittgenstein L. (1922). Tractatus Logico-Philosophicus. London: Kegan Paul.

Daniele Mezzadri, Logic, thinking and language in Frege in "PARADIGMI" 3/2017, pp 165-180, DOI: 10.3280/PARA2017-003012