The creativity innovation role in a school by skills

Titolo Rivista EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING
Autori/Curatori Monica Guerra, Federica Valeria Villa
Anno di pubblicazione 2017 Fascicolo 2017/1 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 12 P. 5-16 Dimensione file 157 KB
DOI 10.3280/EXI2017-001001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Qui sotto puoi vedere in anteprima la prima pagina di questo articolo.

Se questo articolo ti interessa, lo puoi acquistare (e scaricare in formato pdf) seguendo le facili indicazioni per acquistare il download credit. Acquista Download Credits per scaricare questo Articolo in formato PDF

Anteprima articolo

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Working on teaching today means observing and decoding the teachinglearning process which is established between the adult and the child, between the class and the context, and between man and society. Today, in Italy, the Ministerial indications, although outlining the frame of reference and the goals to be reached, allow ample possibilities of autonomy for schools, simultaneously allowing being positioned in a dialogue at a distance with the other countries of the European Union. In 2006, the Recommendation of the European Parliament and Council defined the eight key skills to ensure the subject’s permanent learning. In the United States, the key skills are described in wider, positively vague, terms, on areas referred to critical thinking, to collaboration, to creativity and meta-cognition, and are set out in different explanatory frameworks. Amongst the skills proposed, we are focusing here on the one oriented towards creativity, fundamental for the complete development of the person projected to the future meant as a set of factors including the cognitive aspects, the traits of the personality, the motivational aspects, the emotive factors and the connection with the environment that stimulates or inhibits the expression of the creative potential. This paper, by some explorative studies’ outcomes that involved primary teachers and students, meant to discuss how inserting creativity in teaching by skills, means supporting the abilities involved in it, promoting the child’s experience through the offer as issues and conversations of the contents of knowledge, with various and flexible teaching strategies aimed at concerning the cognitive and learning styles of each one.

Keywords:Creativity, teaching, key-skills, divergent thinking, primary school, creative teaching.

  1. Aljughaiman, A. & Mowrer-Reynolds, E. (2005). Teachers’ Conceptions of Creativity and Creative Students. The Journal of Creative Behaviour, 39 (1), 26-31.
  2. Ames, C. (1992). Classrooms: Goals, Structure, and Student Motivation. Journal of Educational Psychology, 84 (3), 261-271. In Tan, A. G. (2007). Creativity: A Handbook for Teachers. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
  3. Barbot, B., Besançon, M. & Lubart, T. I. (2011). Assessing Creativity in the Class-room. The Open Education Journal, 4 (1), 58-66.
  4. Beaudot, A. (1969). Il problema della creatività nella scuola. Torino: SEI (ed. or. 1969, La créativité à l’école. Paris: Presses Universitaries de France).
  5. Beghetto, R. A. (2010). Creativity in the Classroom. In Kaufman, J. & Sternberg, R. (Eds.), The Cambridge Handbook of Creativity (pp. 447-463). New York (NY): Cambridge University Press.
  6. Cescato, S., Bove, C. & Braga, P. (2015). Video, formazione e consapevolezza. Intrecci metodologici. Form@re – Open Journal per la formazione in rete, 15 (2), 61-74.
  7. Collins, M. A. & Amabile, T. M. (1999). Motivation and Creativity. In Sternberg, R. J. (Ed.), Handbook of Human Creativity (pp. 297-312). New York: Cambridge. In Tan, A. G. (2007), Creativity: A Handbook for Teachers. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technologi-cal University.
  8. Coyle, D., Hood, P. & Marsh, D. (2010). CLIL – Content and Language Integrated Learning. Cambridge: CUP.
  9. Craft, A. (2003). The Limits to Creativity in Education: Dilemmas for the Educator. British Journal of Educational Studies, 51 (2), 113-127.
  10. Da Re, F. (2013). La didattica per competenze. Apprendere competenze, descriverle e valutarle. Torino: Pearson Italia.
  11. D’Alessio, C. (2017). Aspetti epistemologici nella ricerca empirica in educazione. Un approccio critico-euristico. In Ghirotto (a cura di), Formare alla ricerca empirica in educazione. Atti del convegno nazionale del gruppo di lavoro SIPED – Teoria e metodi della ricerca empirica in educazione (pp. 239-249). Bologna: Alma Mater Studiorum-Univerità di Bologna.
  12. Dewey, J. (1984). Democrazia ed educazione. Firenze: La Nuova Italia.
  13. Edwards, C., Gandini, L., & Forman, G. (a cura di) (1995). I cento linguaggi dei bambini. L’approccio di Reggio Emilia all’educazione dell’infanzia. Bergamo: Edizioni Junior.
  14. Gillies, R. M. (2003). The Behaviours, Interactions, and Perceptions of Junior High School Students during Small-group Learning. Journal of Educational Psychology, 95 (1), 137-147.
  15. Goodman, S. (2014). Fuel Creativity in the Classroom With Divergent Thinking, updated 2015, August 12. Retrieved November 14, 2017, from https://tinyurl.com/ycr7lt6y.
  16. Guerra, M. (2015). Fuori. Suggestioni nell’incontro tra educazione e natura. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  17. Guerra, M. & Villa, F. V. (2017a). Creative Research in Schools: A Methodology for Teacher-researcher. EDULEARN17 Proceedings, 3464-3468.
  18. Guerra, M. & Villa, F. V. (2017b). Open Educational Methods and Divergent Thinking (DT): A Preliminary Study in an Italian Primary School. The International Journal of Creativity & Problem Solving, 27 (1), 73-89.
  19. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
  20. Haarmann, H. J., O’Rourke, P. & Ragusa, E. (2013). Does divergent Thinking Training improve Language Proficiency and Performance? Literature Review reveals Benefits and suggests Testable Approaches. USA: University of Maryland, Center for Advanced Study of Language.
  21. Hadani, H. (2015). Inspiring a Generation to Create: Critical Components of Creativity in Children. Sausalito, California: Centre for Childhood Creativity.
  22. Hsieh, P. H. (2011). Encyclopaedia of Child Behaviour and Development. USA: Springer Science + Business Media, LLC, 915-916.
  23. Johnson, R. B., & Onwuegbuzie, A. J. (2004). Mixed Methods Research: A Research Paradigm whose Time has come. Educational Researcher, 33 (7), 14-26.
  24. Kouros, C. & Abrami, P. C. (2006). How do Students really feel about working in Small Groups? The Role of Student Behaviours and Attitudes in Cooperative Classroom Settings. Montreal, Canada: Centre for the Study of Learning and Performance.
  25. Lai, R. M. & Viering, M. (2012). Assessing 21st Century Skills: Integrating Research Findings. In Annual Meeting of the National Council on Measurement in Education. Vancouver, Canada: Pearson.
  26. Lubart, T. & Guignard, J. H. (2004). The Generality-specificity of Creativity: A Multivariate Approach. In Sternberg, R. J., Grigorenko, E. L., & Singer, J. L. (Eds.), Creativity: From Potential to Realization (pp. 43-56). Washington (DC): American Psychological Association.
  27. Mantovani, S. (1998). La ricerca sul campo in educazione. I metodi qualitativi. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
  28. Mortari, L. (2009). Ricercare e riflettere. La formazione del docente professionista. Roma: Carocci.
  29. Pintrich, P. R. & Schunck, D. H. (2002). Motivation in Education: Theory, Research, and Application (2nd ed.). Columbus, Ohio: Merrill-Prentice Hall. In Tan, A. G. (2007), Creativity: A Handbook for Teachers. Singapore: World Scientific Publishing Co. Pte. Ltd. National Institute of Education, Nanyang Technological University.
  30. Rinaldi, C. (2009). In dialogo con Reggio Emilia. Ascoltare, ricercare e apprendere. In De Canale, B. (2015), Talenti e scuola dell’infanzia. Napoli: Giapeto.
  31. Robinson, K. (2015). Fuori di testa. Perché la scuola uccide la creatività. Trento: Centro Studi Erikson (ed. or. 2011, Out of mind. Learning to be Creative. USA: John Wiley & Sons Limited.
  32. Runco, M. A. (1996). Personal Creativity: Definition and Developmental Issues. San Francisco, California: New Directions for Child Development, Jossey-Bass Publishers, No. 72, 5, 9, 15.
  33. Runco, M. A. (2008). Commentary: Divergent Thinking is not Synonymous with Creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 2 (2), 93-96.
  34. Runco, M. A. (2015). Assessing Student Creativity. USA: LEGO Education.
  35. Runco, M. A. & Jaeger, G. J. (2012). The Standard Definition of Creativity. Creativity Research Journal, 24 (1), 92-96.
  36. Scardamalia, M., Bransford, J., Kozma, R. & Quellmalz, E. (2010) (ATC 21). New Assessments and Environments for Knowledge Building. Assessment and Learning of 21st Century Skills.
  37. Simonton, D. K. (2012). Taking the US Patent Office Criteria seriously: A Quantitative Three-criterion Creativity Definition and Its Implications. Creativity Research Journal, 24 (1-2), 97-106.
  38. Smith, K. (2011). Come diventare un esploratore del mondo. Museo (d’arte) di vita tascabile. Mantova: Corraini.
  39. Stein, M. I. (1953). Creativity and Culture. Journal of Psychology, 36, 311-313.
  40. The Partnership for 21st Century Skills (2009) (P21). P21 Framework Definition. Retrived from: www.p21.org/storage/documents/P21_Framework_Definitions.pdf.
  41. Torrance E. P. (1972). Can we teach Children to think creatively? Chicago, Illinois: Annual Meeting of the American Educational Research Association, University of Georgia, Athens, Dept. of Education Psychology.
  42. Villa, F. V. (2017). Strategie creative-educative. Rivista bambini, spaggiari, 3, 23-26.
  43. Vygotskij, L. S. (1967). Imagination and Creativity in Childhood. Journal of Russian & East European Psychology, 42 (1), 7-97.
  44. Webb, N. M. (1995). Group Collaboration in Assessment: Multiple Objectives, Processes, and Outcomes. Educational Evaluation and Policy Analysis, 17 (2), 239-261.
  45. Webb, N. M., Farivar, S. H., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2001). Productive Helping in cooperative Groups. CSE Technical Report No. 555. Los Angeles: CRESST.
  46. Webb, N. M., Farivar, S. H., & Mastergeorge, A. M. (2011). Productive Helping in Cooperative Groups. PsycEXTRA Dataset.

Monica Guerra, Federica Valeria Villa, The creativity innovation role in a school by skills in "EXCELLENCE AND INNOVATION IN LEARNING AND TEACHING" 1/2017, pp 5-16, DOI: 10.3280/EXI2017-001001