Click here to download

Evaluation of quality nursing: pros and cons of EBN from a systematic review
Journal Title: RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 
Author/s: Sabrina Spagnuolo, Serenella Stasi 
Year:  2017 Issue: 67 Language: Italian 
Pages:  21 Pg. 24-44 FullText PDF:  481 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIV2017-067003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 



Keywords: Evidence Based Nursing; Quality Nursing Care; Systematic Review; Pluralist Approach; Best Practice; Meta-Analysis.

  1. Weiss C., (1995). Nothing as practical as good theory. In: Connell J., Kubish A., Schorr L.B., Weiss C., (a cura di) New approaches to evaluating community initiaiitves. New York: Aspen Institute.
  2. Zimmermann B., Lindemberg C., Plsek P.,(1998) Edgeware: Complxity resources for Healthcare Leaders, VHA Publishing, Irving, TX.
  3. Tomei G., (2016) Valutare gli outcame dei programmi complessi. Approcci, Metodologie e tecniche Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  4. Stern E., (2016) La valutazione di impatto. Una guida per committenti e manager preparata per Bond. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  5. Stame N., (2010) What does not work ? Three failures and many answers, Evaluation, Vol 16, 4: 371-387,, DOI: 10.1177/135638901038191
  6. Stame N., (2012) Fare di più e meglio con meno, e in modo democratico, Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione, 53-54: 33-45,, DOI: 10.3280/RIV2012-05300
  7. Stame N., (2016) Valutazione Pluralista Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  8. Savedoff et al (2006), Will We Ever Learn? Improving Lives through Impact Evaluation, Report of the Evaluation Gap Working Group When, testo disponibile al sito: https://www.cgdev.org/files/7973_file_WillWeEverLearn.pdf, 13/03/2016
  9. Rogers, P.,J., (2008), Using programme Theory to Evaluate Complicated and Complex Aspecs of Interventions, Evaluation, January, vol. 14, 1
  10. Rogers P., Williams B., (2006). Evaluation for practice improvment and organizational learning. In: Shaw I. S., Green G.C., Mark M.M., (a cura di), Handbook of evaluation. London: Sage.
  11. Petticrew e Roberts (2006) Systematic Review in the social science, Oxford: Blackwell.
  12. Perrin B.,(2007). Towards a new view of accountability. In : Bemelmans-Videc M.L.,Lonsdale J., Perrin B. (A cura di), Making Accountability Work. New Brunswick NJ: Transaction Publishers.
  13. Pawson R., Tilley N., (1997). Realistic evaluation. London:Sage.
  14. Pawson R., (2006) Evidence-Based politics: A realist perspective. London: Sage.
  15. Martini A., Trivellato (2011) Sono soldi ben spesi?. Venezia:Marsilio.
  16. Lipsey M., (2000). Statistical Conclusion validity for intervention research: a Significant (P< .05) problem. In: Bickman L. (a cura di) Validity and social experimentation,Vol 1 Di Donald Campbell’s legacy. Sage: Thousand Oaks CA.
  17. Liberati A. et al (2015), PRISMA Statement per il reporting di revisioni sistematiche e meta-analisi degli studi che valutano gli interventi sanitari: spiegazione ed elaborazione, Evidence 7(6)
  18. Leone L., et al. (2017) Misure di contrasto della povertà e condizionalità. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  19. Kitson A., Ahmed L.B., Harvey G., Seers K. & Thompson D.R.(1996). From research to practice: one organisational model for promoting research-based practice. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23: pp 430-440.
  20. ISTAT 2015 Le dimensioni della salute in Italia determinanti sociali, politiche sanitarie e differenze territoriali.
  21. ISTAT Rapporto annuale 2015. La situazione del paese.
  22. Hunt J.M. (1996) Guest editorial. Journal of Advanced Nursing 23, pp. 423-425.
  23. Forsst K., Marra M., Schawartz R., (eds) (2011) Evaluating the Complex. Attribution, Contribution and Beyond, Transaction Pubblischers, Sommerset, NJ.
  24. Burrows D.E., & McLeish K., (1995). A model for research-based practice. Journal of Clinical Nursing 4: pp. 243-247.
  25. Bardelloni, Barbini, Nante, (2008). Gli strumenti per la valutazione della qualità dell’assistenza infermieristica. Mondo Sanitario, 3:1-7.
  26. Argyris C., Schon D., (1978). Organizational Learning: A theory of action perspective. Reading MA: Addison Wesley. (tr. it. L’apprendimento organizzativo. Milano: Guerini e associati, 1998.)

Sabrina Spagnuolo, Serenella Stasi, Evaluation of quality nursing: pros and cons of EBN from a systematic review in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 67/2017, pp. 24-44, DOI:10.3280/RIV2017-067003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content