Click here to download

Wild strawberries: models of conduction and multiple settings in a mental health service
Journal Title: INTERAZIONI 
Author/s: Giuseppe Saraò, Giuseppe Livio Comin 
Year:  2018 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  14 Pg. 61-74 FullText PDF:  162 KB
DOI:  10.3280/INT2018-001005
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The work begins with a wide-angle view of the inside of a mental health centre (CSM), introducing the relations and oscillations in the functioning of the multiple settings and the functioning of the suffering psychisms, with reference to the top of the psychotherapeutic experts of a Community Service. It continues by pointing out the usefulness and the difficulties of using the undifferentiated, impalpable elements produced by individual patients and individual workers for treatment inside a "Service House". Our proposal, the pivotal element of the whole paper, is to consider the "group tool" in both the treatment and the work groups as a probe for exploring the complexity of the undifferentiated elements. The articulation of this group tool considers the relationships and transitions among the single spaces, their leftovers and their storage spaces; the possibility that a space possesses a specific unconscious; but also the culture of a treatment group and the model it refers to. This articulation starts from conceptual considerations distilled through experience, it connects with the clinical material of a treatment group and its model of conduction, then returns to other conceptual considerations, which might be represented by the image of "Wild strawberries", understood as a metaphor of change (Bergman’s film) and the undifferentiated elements which, like wild strawberries, can emerge unpredictably anywhere.
Keywords: Groupal paradigm, multi-setting, undifferentiated elements, reciprocal regulation process, dream belongingness

  1. Ambrosiano L., Gaburri E. (2013). Pensare con Freud. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  2. Beebe B., Lachmann F. (1988). The contribution of mother-infant mutual influence to the origins of self and object representations. Psychoanalitic Psychology, 5: 305-337.
  3. Bion W.R. (1962). Apprendere dall’esperienza. Roma: Armando.
  4. Bion W.R. (1963). Gli elementi della psicoanalisi. Roma: Armando.
  5. Bollas C. (1985). Loving hate. Annual of Psychoanal., 12-13: 221-237.
  6. Boston Change Process Study Group (2010). Il cambiamento in psicoterapia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  7. Correale A. (2013). Area traumatica e campo istituzionale. Roma: Borla.
  8. Esposito R. (2008). Termini della politica. Comunità, immunità, biopolitica. Milano: Mimesis.
  9. Gaburri E., Ambrosiano L. (2003). Ululare con i lupi, conformismo e rêverie. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  10. Kaës R. (1976). L’apparato pluripsichico: costruzione nel gruppo. Roma: Armando, 1983.
  11. Kaës R. (2007). Un singolare plurale. Roma: Borla.
  12. Kaës R. (2010). Il lavoro dell’inconscio in tre spazi della realtà psichica. Un modello della complessità. Riv. Psicoanal., 56, 3: 671-685.
  13. Lyons-Ruth K. (1999). L’inconscio bipersonale: dialogo intersoggettivo, rappresentazione procedurale e l’emergere di nuove forme di organizzazione relazionale” In Carli L., Rodini C. (a cura di), Le forme di intersoggettività. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2008.
  14. Lotman J.M. (1978). Testo e contesto. Bari: Laterza.
  15. Margherita G. (2012). L’insieme multistrato: gruppi, masse, istituzioni tra caos e psicoanalisi. Roma: Armando.
  16. Neri C. (1995). Gruppo. Roma: Borla.
  17. Puget J. (2005). Un sogno singolare. In Neri C., Pines M., Friedman R. (a cura di), I sogni nella psicoterapia di gruppo. Roma: Borla.
  18. Saraò G., Comin G. L. (2014). Fallimenti, fratture e ricomposizioni, l’impensabile e il possibile nel setting gruppale istituzionale. Relazione presentata al XVII Congresso SPI Milano, 22-25 maggio 2014
  19. Stern D.N. (2004). Il momento presente, in psicoterapia e nella vita quotidiana. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2005.
  20. Tronick E.Z. (2005). Why is connection with other so critical? The formation of dyadic state of consciousness and the expansion of individual’s state of consciousness. Coherence governed selection and cocreation of meaning out of messy meaning. In Nadel J., Muir D. (a cura di), Emotional Development. Oxford: Oxford Univesity Press.
  21. Winnicott D.W. (1971). Gioco e realtà. Roma: Armando.
  22. Winnicott D.W. (1995). Esplorazioni psicoanalitiche. Milano: Raffaello Cortina

Giuseppe Saraò, Giuseppe Livio Comin, Wild strawberries: models of conduction and multiple settings in a mental health service in "INTERAZIONI" 1/2018, pp. 61-74, DOI:10.3280/INT2018-001005


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content