The medicalization of infertility and new reproductive technologies: the case of infertile couples in Oran (Algeria)
Titolo Rivista: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ
Autori/Curatori: Aicha Benabed
Anno di pubblicazione:
2 The art of ART. Assisted Reproductive Technology challeging gender, biomedicine and inequalities a cura di Lia Lombardi, Alice Sophie Sarcinelli Lingua:
Dimensione file: 71 KB
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:
Our article examines the meaning and the representations of some couples who have resorted to reproductive technologies of medical assistance to procreation in Algeria. We explore the way in which these couples think and conceive the medicalization which applies to human begetting and reproduction, with particular emphasis on those aspects of their experience which they consider essential. Through the notion of social representations, the article shows that Assisted Reproductive Technologies (ART) will meet desire of child and allow women to comply with their expected role. The social pressure in favor of procreation and the medical injunction to the diagnosis made to the patients have only increased and strengthened the medicalization of reproduction.
Keywords: Reproductive technologies; infertility; medicalization; body; representations; norms.
- Arksey H. (1996). Collecting data through joint interviews. Social Research Update. University of Surrey. Retrieved from: http://sru.soc.surrey.ac.uk/SRU-15.html (Last access: 28/06/2017)
- Becker G. (2000). The elusive embryo. How women and men approach new reproductive technologies. Berkeley and London: University of California Press.
- Boeije H.R. (2004). And then there were three: self-presentational styles and the presence of the partner as a third person in the interview. Field Methods, 16(3): 3-22., DOI: 10.1177/1525822X0325922
- Bottorf J.L., Kalaw C., Johnson J.L., Stwart M. & Greaves L. (2005). Tobacco use in intimate spaces: issues in the study of couple dynamics. Qualitative Health Research, 15(4): 564-577., DOI: 10.1177/104973230426967
- Cronk L., Gerkey D. & Irons W. (2009). Interviews as experiments: using audience effects to examine social relationships. Field Methods, 21(4): 331-346., DOI: 10.1177/1525822X0934172
- Franklin S. & Roberts C. (2006). Born and made. An ethnography of preimplantation genetic diagnosis. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
- Gerrits T. (1997). Social and cultural aspects of infertility in Mozambique. Patient Education and Counselling, 31: 39-48.
- Gerrits T. (2012). Interweaving personal biography and academic work: studying infertility among ‘others’ and ‘at home’. Medische Antropologie, 24(1): 73-95.
- Gerrits T. (2016). Patient-Centred IVF: Bioethics and Care in a Dutch Clinic. Ox-ford: Berghahn Publishers.
- Greil A.L. (1991). Not yet pregnant. Infertile couples in contemporary America. New Brunswick and London: Rutger University Press.
- Greil A.L. (1997). Infertility and psychological distress: a critical review of the literature. Social Science & Medicine, 45(11): 1679-1704., DOI: 10.1016/S0277-9536(97)00102-0
- Greil A L., Slauson‐Blevins K. & McQuillan J. (2010). The experience of infertility: a review of recent literature. Sociology of Health & Illness, 32(1): 140-162.
- Inhorn M.C. (2003). Local babies, global science. Gender, religion and in vitro fertilization in Egypt. New York: Routledge.
- Inhorn M.C. (2004). Privacy, privatization, and the politics of patronage: ethnographic challenges to penetrating the secret world of Middle Eastern, hospital-based in vitro fertilization. Social Science & Medicine, 59(10): 2095-2108.
- Inhorn M.C. (2012). The new Arab man: emergent masculinities, technologies, and Islam in the Middle East. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
- Morris S. (2001). Joint and individual interviewing in the context of cancer. Qualitative Health Research, 11: 553-567., DOI: 10.1177/10497320112911920
- Nachtigall R.D., Becker G, Wozny M. (1992). The effects of gender-specific diagnosis on men’s and women’s response to infertility. Fertility & Sterility, 57(1): 113-121., DOI: 10.1016/S0015-0282(16)54786-
- Racher F.E., Kaufert J.M. & Havens B. (2000). Conjoint research interviews with frail, elderly couples: methodological implications. Journal of Family Nursing, 6(4): 367-378., DOI: 10.1177/10748407000060040
- Sandelowski M. (1993). With child in mind. Studies of the personal encounter with infertility. Philadelphia: University of Pennsylvania Press.
- Sandelowski M., Holditch-Davis D. & Glenn Harris B. (1992). Using qualitative and quantitative methods. The transition to parenthood of infertile couples. In: Gilgun J.F., Daly K. & Handel G., eds., Qualitative methods in family research. London: Sage Publications.
- Seale C., Charteris-Black J., Dumelow C., Locock L. & Ziebland S. (2008). The effect of joint interviewing on the performance of gender. Field Methods, 20(2): 107-128.
- Thompson C. (2005). Making parents. The ontological choreography of reproductive technologies. Cambridge, Massachusetts and London: The MIT Press.
- Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T. (2009). “It’s a bit Unmanly in a Way”: Men and Infertility in Denmark. In: Inhorn M.C., Tjørnhøj-Thomsen T., Goldberg H. and Mosegaard M.C., eds., Reconceiving the Second Sex: Men, Masculinity and Reproduction. New York: Berghahn Books.
- Uyterlinde J. (2001). Eisprong. Amsterdam: Mets & Schilt.
- Valentine G. (1999). Doing household research: interviewing couples together and apart. Area, 31(1): 67-74.
- Verdurmen J. (1997). Keuzes bij onvruchtbaarheid. Besluitvorming bij onvruchtbare paren. Amsterdam: University of Amsterdam (Unpublished PhD Disserta-tion).
- Verhaak C.M., Smeenk J.M.J., Van Minnen A., Kremer J.A.M. & Kraaimaat F.W. (2005). A longitudinal, prospective study on emotional adjustment before, during and after consecutive fertility treatment cycles. Human Reproduction, 20(8): 2253-2260.
Aicha Benabed, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 2/2018, pp. 29-41, DOI:10.3280/SES2018-002003