Click here to download

Innovative policies in the Italian public administration
Author/s: Giorgia Citarella 
Year:  2017 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  25 Pg. 73-97 FullText PDF:  190 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EI2017-001004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

During the 1990s, attention pivoted on Reform in the Public Administration (PA) relative both to the functional and organizational capacity of the Institutions and Administrations and to wider citizen participation in the diffusion of new technologies. At the same time, the Institutions began to privilege principles of efficiency, efficacy and economicity in public action. In particular, reduction in management costs were highlighted while the foundations were laid for processes of administrative simplification and the development of the "digital State". At European and national scale, the notion of e-Government was far-reaching and inclusive of a series of policies linked to the introduction of ICT (organizational, technological, formative/performative, infrastructural and information technology solutions), in order to collect, conserve, process and transmit (textual, visual or audio) digital information. The focus of the e-Government concept targeted four objectives: 1) collecting and storing massive quantities of information within a confined space; 2) processing and transmitting information more speedily; 3) the exchange of information (interoperability) using diverse techniques and language; 4) the conservation and security of information, content and the impact of digitising modes and processes. Notwithstanding, a decade later e-Government policies of the latest generation still pivot on the delicate issue of interoperability which goes far beyond technical problems of connectivity and language. The impact of the economic recession in Italy (still ongoing) as can be envisaged, has had disastrous results on the productive and social fabric of the country. Planning to resolve governance issues in the Italian Public Administration through innovative policies and strategies of global development such as Structural Funds - Europe 2020 Strategy is vital to support the Digital Agenda, innovation and private sector industrial research while the diffusion of technological enterprise is necessary to boost competitiveness and a new culture of systemic actions to foster structural impact. Within this strategic vision, one of the core issues concerns a more virtuous alignment with European policies, well defined in the Strategy Horizon 2020, the main European Union funding tool for Research Europa envisaged for the period 2014-2020.
Keywords: Innovation, E-Government, ICT, Italian Public Administration.

  1. Ballon P., Pierson J., Delaere S., and Others (2005). Test and Experimentation Platforms for Broadband Innovation. In: IBBT/VUB-SMIT Report.
  2. Banca d’Italia (2009). La banda larga in Italia. In: Questioni di Economia e finanza. Eurosistema.
  3. Barroso J.M. (2010). Europa 2020. Una strategia per una crescita intelligente, sostenibile e inclusiva. Bruxelles, 3.3.2010 COM (2010) 2020, pp. 3.
  4. Bates R.J. (2002). Broadband telecomunications. In: Handbook.
  5. Brunner M., Suter E.M. (2008). International CIIP Handbook 2008/2009. In: Center for Security Studies. Zurich: ETH.
  6. Caio F. (2009). Portare l’Italia verso la leadership europea nella banda larga.
  7. Considerazioni sulle opzioni di politica industriale, Presentazione sulle conclusioni del Progetto al Ministero dello Sviluppo Economico.
  8. Caragliu A., Del Bo C., Nijkamp P. (2009). Smart Cities in Europe. In: Series Research Memoranda 0048.
  9. VU University Amsterdam, Faculty of Economics, Business Administration and Econometrics. Caretti M. (2008). WiMAX mobile e Telecom Italia. Notiziario Tecnico Telecom Italia, 17(1), Aprile.
  10. Castells M. (2002). La nascita della società in rete. Milano: EGEA.
  11. Chen-Ritzo C.H., Harrison C., Paraszczak J., Parr F. (2009). Instrumenting the Planet. IBM Journal of Research & Development, 53(3): 338-353.
  12. Chesbrough H.W. (2003). Open Innovation: The New Imperative for Creating and Profiting from Technology. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  13. Cisis (2010). Rapporto sull’innovazione nell’Italia delle Regioni. In: Forum PA.
  14. Dasgupta S. (2001). Policy Reform, Economic Growth and the Digital Divide. An Econometric Analysis. World Bank.
  15. Davenport T.H. (1994). Innovazione dei processi, riprogettare il lavoro attraverso l’IT. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  16. Dos Santos B.L., Peffers K., Mauer D.C. (1993). The Impact of Information Technology Investment Announcements on the Market Value of the Firm. Information Systems Research, 4: 1-23.
  17. Dwivedi Y.K. (2008). Handbook of Research on Global Diffusion of Broadband Data Transmission. Information Science Reference. IGI Global.
  18. ENISA (European Network and Information Security Agency) (2010). European Proposal for a Regulation of the European Parliament and of the Council. In: Concerning the European Network and Information Security Agency, EC,COM(2010) 521 61.
  19. Esmailzadeh R. (2006). Broadband Wireless Communications Business. An Introduction to the Costs and Benefits of New Technologies. John Wiley & Sons Ltd.
  20. Eurocities (2010). Cities and Innovation in Europe. Discussion paper.
  21. Eurocities (2010). Strategic Policy Paper on Broadband in Cities.
  22. European Commission (2010). Advancing and Applying Living Lab Methodologies. DG INFSO.
  23. European Commission (2011). Are European SMEs recovering from the crisis?. In: Annual Report on EU Small and Medium sized Enterprises 2010/2011. Rotterdam, Cambridge.
  24. European Commission (2010). Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee 131 of the Regions, A Digital Agenda for Europe.
  25. European Commission (2010). Future Internet Research and Experimentation. DG INFSO, September.
  26. European Commission (2010). Future Media Internet: Research Challenges and Road Ahead. In: DG Information Society and Media. Luxembourg, Publications Office of the European Union.
  27. European Commission (2005). Green Paper on a European Programme for Critical Infrastructure Protection. Bruxelles, EC, COM (2005)576, Annex I.
  28. European Commission (2008). Growing Regions, Growing Europe: Fifth Progress Report on Economic and Social Cohesion. European Commission COM(2008) 371 final.
  29. European Commission (2010). ICT Country Profile. Europe’s Digital Competitiveness Report, 2, i.
  30. European Commission (2009). Progetto nazionale banda larga nelle aree rurali d’Italia. Decisione C/2010/2956, Regime di Aiuto 646/09.
  31. European Commission (2006). Proposal for a Directive of the Council on the Identification and Designation of European Critical Infrastructure and the Assessment of the Need to Improve their Protection. EC, COM (2006) 787. European Union (2013). Cybersecurity Strategy of the European Union: an Open, Safe and Secure Cyberspace. JOIN/2013/0001.
  32. Fountain J.E. (2001). Building the virtual state: information technology and institutional change. Brookings Institutions, Washington.
  33. Gamble R. (1999). Electronic commerce: the way of the future is still in flux. Business Credit, October, 101: 24-27.
  34. Gasbarrone G. (2008). Scenari ICT WiMAX nella Pubblica Amministrazione. In: NotiziarioTecnico Telecom Italia, 17(1), Aprile.
  35. Greenemeier L. (2000). Buying power. Information Week, 780(3): 67-68.
  36. Hellberg C. (2008). Broadband Network Architectures Designing and Deploying Triple-PlayServices. London: Prentice Hall.
  37. Hey T., Tansley S., Tolle K. (2009) (Eds.). The fourth Paradigm Data-intensive Scientific Discovery. Redmond, Washington: Microsoft Research.
  38. Italian Ministry for the Interior (2008). Individuazione delle infrastrutture critiche informatiche di interesse nazionale, Decree, G.U. 30 April, n. 101.
  39. Italian Presidency of the Council of Ministers (2004). Protezione delle infrastrutture critiche informatizzate. In: Dipartimento per l’Innovazione e le Tecnologie, Marzo. Itu (2007). World Information Society Report.
  40. Itu-d (2010). Measuring the Information Society.
  41. Itu-t (2000). Rec. G.805 (03-2000) – Generic Functional Architecture of Transport Networks. Ginevra, Marzo.
  42. Koch P., Cunningham P., Schwabsky N. (2005). Innovation in the Public Sector: Summary and Policy Recommendations. In: PUBLIN Report. Oslo, NIFU STEP, No. D24.
  43. Komninos N. (2008). Intelligent Cities and Globalisation of Innovation Networks. London and New York: Routledge.
  44. Komninos N. (2002). Intelligent Cities. In: Innovation, knowledge Systems and Digital Spaces. London and New York: Taylor & Francis.
  45. Kranzberg M. (1985). The Information Age: Evolution or Revolution?. In: Guile B.R. Information Technologies and Social Transfomation. London: Nat. Accademy Press.
  46. Kroes N. (2010). European Commissioner for Digital Agenda, the Critical Rrole of Cities in Making the Digital Agenda a Reality. In: Closing Speech to Global Cities Dialogue Spring Summit of Mayors. Brussels, 28 May.
  47. Kumar B. (1996). Comunicazioni a larga banda.
  48. Large D. (2009). Broadband Cable Access Networks. The HFC Plant.
  49. Large D. (2007). Broadband Networks Architectures. Designing and Deploying Triple-PlayServices.
  50. Leporelli C. (2010). WP0.0 – I temi chiave del Progetto ISBUL: un punto di vista sui problemi emersi, risultati ottenuti e proposte maturate. In: Programma AGCOM ISBUL.
  51. Lin C. (2006). Broadband Optical Access Networks and Fiber-to-the-Home – Systems Technologies and Deployment.
  52. Lisi A., Ungaro S. (2012). Cloud: vanno indicati ruoli e responsabilità. In: Guida al Pubblico Impiego, 10: 59-61.
  53. Listanti M. (2010). WP1.0 Quadro Tecnico Infrastrutturale. In: Programma AGCOM ISBUL.
  54. Mancarella M. (Eds.) (2011). La Pubblica Amministrazione tra management, eGovernment e federalismo. Trento: Tangram Edizioni Scientifiche.
  55. Marzano F. (2011). Dal Cloud Computing al G-Cloud: rischi e opportunità per la PA. In: Il percorso dell’Agenda Digitale in Italia. Rome, ForumPA. Menzie D.C., Fairliey R.W. (2007). The determinants of the global digital divide: a crosscountry analysis of computer and internet penetration. In: Oxford Economic Papers. University Press, 59.
  56. Merloni F. (Eds.) (2005). Introduzione all’eGovernment. Torino: Giappichelli. Miller K. (2011/2012). Big Data Analytics in Biomedical Research. Biomedical Computation Review, Winter, pp. 14-21.
  57. Mise – Dipartimento Comunicazioni (2010). Piano Nazionale per la Larga Banda.
  58. Murray M. (2001). This little company went to e-market. CMA Management, 6: 28-29.
  59. Nasi G., Buccoliero L., Caccia C. (2005). E-health: methods of information system implementation in health care. Milan: McGraw Hill.
  60. NetConsulting (2011). Le aziende IT in Emilia Romagna: un contributo per l’innovazione in Regione. Impatto dell’IT, del software e dell’ecosistema Microsoft sull’economia regionale.
  61. Nohria N., Berkley J.D. (1994). The virtual organization: bureaucracy, technology and the implosion of control. In: Heckscher C., Donnellon A. (Ed.). The postbureaucratic organization: new perspectives on organizational change. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage.
  62. O’Reilly T., Battelle J. (2009). Web Squared: Web 2.0 Five Years On. In: Special Report, Web 2.0 Summit, Co-produced by O’Reilly & Techweb.
  63. Oecd (2008). Broadband and the Economy. OECD Digital Economy Papers, no. 146. OECD Publishing.
  64. Oecd (2001). Understanding the Digital Divide. OECD Digital Economy Papers, no. 49. Oecd Publishing.
  65. OpenStack (2011). Open source software for building private and public clouds. In: Rapporto Assinform. 1° Osservatorio ICT nella Pubblica Amministrazione.
  66. Orbicom (2005). From the digital divide to the digital opportunity. Claude-Yves Charron Publisher.
  67. Otsuka Y. (2009). Mobile Broadband: Pricing and Services. In: OECD Digital Economy Papers, no. 161. OECD Publishing.
  68. Pallot M., Trousse B., Senach B., Scapin D. (2010). Living Lab Research Landscape: From User Centred Design and User Experience Towards User Co-creation. In: Position Paper, First Living Labs Summer School. Paris, August.
  69. Paquette S., Jaeger P.T., Wilson S.C. (2014). Identifying the security risks associated with governmental use of cloud computing. Government Information Quarterly, 31: 349-502, July.
  70. Pitt Turner IV W., Seader J.H., Brill K.G. (s.a.). Tier Classification Define Site Infrastructure Performance. Site Infrastructure, White Paper.
  71. Point topic (2011). World Broadband Statistics: Short report.
  72. Porter M. (1990). The Competitive Advantage of Nations, New York, Free Press.
  73. Preite G. (Eds.) (2012). Amministrazione pubblica e buon governo al passaggio del millennio. Trento: Tangram Edizioni Scientifiche.
  74. Russom P. (2011). TDWI Best Practices Report: Big Data Analytics. In: The Data Warehouse Institute (TDWI), pp. 1-35.
  75. Schaffers H., Garcia Guzmán J., Navarro M., Merz C. (Eds.) (2010). Living Labs for Rural Development. Madrid: TRAGSA.
  76. Tabbane S. (2010). Deployment Scenarios Deployment Scenarios (LTE, HSPA+ WiMAX).
  77. In: ITU/BDT Arab Regional Workshop on Wireless Broadband Internet Access in Rural Areas, October.
  78. Tatti D. (2011). Interoperabilità: esperienze e prospettive in Italia e in Europa. Rome:
  79. DigitPA, ForumPA. The Open Group (2013). Cloud Computing Portability and Interoperability. In: The Open Group Guide. Doc. no. G135, April.
  80. Trombetti P. (2009). Micro e mini trincea: tecnologie di scavo nel rispetto ambientale. Notiziario Tecnico Telecom Italia, 18(1).
  81. Unesco (2009). Information Society Policies Annual World Report.
  82. United Nation (2008). Overview of Cybersecurity. In: ITU Recommendation ITU-T X.1205. ITU-T, Geneva, p. 2.
  83. United nations (2010). The Global Partnership for Development at a Critical Juncture. MDG Gap Task Force Report.
  84. Von Hippel E. (2005). Democratizing Innovation. Cambridge: The MIT Press.
  85. WFSC, Smart Communities, -- Society (2007). Report 2007, ITU.

Giorgia Citarella, in "ESPERIENZE D'IMPRESA" 1/2017, pp. 73-97, DOI:10.3280/EI2017-001004


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content