Click here to download

My working model in the psychoanalytic group
Journal Title: INTERAZIONI 
Author/s:  Claudio Neri 
Year:  2018 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  9 Pg. 15-23 FullText PDF:  155 KB
DOI:  10.3280/INT2018-002002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Those who have in mind the theory and practice of classical (dual) psychoanalysis, when they try to imagine what happens in a group analysis, almost automatically turn their attention to some ideas: the multiple transference, the group as a representation of the family, the internal group. Francesco Corrao, myself and other italian psychoanalysts have developed a model very far from this approach. The concepts of transference and countertransference are used only as an idea that remains in the background. The group is not considered analogous to the family. The therapist does not speak of a father-analyst, brothers-members of the group, mother-group. The analyst and the other participants are not even seen as "internal objects" and do not overlap with intrapsychic figures. The group is not considered a small Pantheon composed of representations of the most important people in childhood. Instead, the group is thought of as a situation that resounds in a new way in each of the participants; a psychic space wider than the individual ones; an area of transit between individual thoughts and collective thoughts; a place where you could enter in unison with thoughts without a thinker.
Keywords: Group as a whole, the field, group thinking, genius loci, good sociability, thera-peutic efficacy.

  1. Bion W.R. (1961). Experiences in Groups. London: Tavistock Publications (trad. it. Esperienze nei gruppi. Roma: Armando, 1971).
  2. BCPSG ‒ The Boston Change Process Study Group (2010). Change in Psychotherapy: A Unifying Paradigm. New York: Norton (trad. it. Il cambiamento in psicoterapia. Milano: Raffaello Cortina, 2012).
  3. Cruciani P., Neri C. (2009). Sur la naissance de la psychothérapie de groupe en Italie. Revue de Psychothérapie Psichanalutique de Groupe, 52, 1: 45-59.
  4. De Maré P., Piper R., Thompson S. (Eds.) (1991). Koinonia: From Hate, through Dialogue, to Culture in the Larger Group. Koinonia. London: Karnac (trad. it. Dall’odio, attraverso il dialogo, alla cultura nel grande gruppo. Roma: Edizioni Universitarie Romane, 1996).
  5. Foulkes S.H. (1964). Therapeutic Group Analysis. London: George Allen & Unwin Ltd (trad. it. Analisi terapeutica di gruppo. Torino: Boringhieri, 1967).
  6. Lewin K. (1948). Resolving social conflicts: selected papers on group dynamics. New York: Harper & Row (trad. it. I conflitti sociali: saggi di dinamica di gruppo. Milano: FrancoAngeli, 1976).
  7. Neri C. (1988). Champ de l’experience groupal: un homologue ou un analogue du trasfert dans la situation de la cure? Revue de Psychoterapie Psychanalytique de Groupe, 12, 1: 21-33.
  8. Neri C. (2017). Gruppo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  9. Nissim Momigliano L. (2008). Ricordi della casa dei morti e altri scritti. Firenze: Casa Editrice Giuntina.

Claudio Neri, My working model in the psychoanalytic group in "INTERAZIONI" 2/2018, pp. 15-23, DOI:10.3280/INT2018-002002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content