Click here to download

A dynamic perspective to the analysis of the spin-off life cycle
Author/s: Annalisa Caloffi, Francesca Gambarotto, Silvia Rita Sedita 
Year:  2018 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  9 Pg. 86-94 FullText PDF:  223 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ES2018-003008
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The paper aims to contribute to the understanding of the nature of technology transfer processes, by investigating the case of academic spin-offs. Although this mechanism of technology transfer is among the most studied in the literature, we think that some of its peculiarities deserve a "plus" of attention. In particular, we investigate the evolutionary trajectories of spin-off and produce evidence coming from multiple sources. First, we conducted an exploratory survey which informed us of the main features of the University of Padova spin-offs, second, we conducted some in depth interviews and applied a content analysis, third, we mapped the critical junctures of four spin-off studied in detail through the case study methodology.
Keywords: Spin-off, Entrepreneurship, University, Critical Junctures, Life Cycle
Jel Code: L26, O3

  1. Baba Y., Shichijo N., Sedita S.R. (2009). How do collaborations with universities affect firms’ innovative performance? The role of “Pasteur scientists” in the advanced materials field. Research Policy, 38(5): 756-764.
  2. Chesbrough H. (2000). Designing corporate ventures in the shadow of private venture capital. California Management Review, 42(3): 31-49.
  3. Di Gregorio D., Shane S. (2003). Why do some universities generate more start-ups than others? Research Policy, 32: 209-227.
  4. Laursen K., Salter A. (2006). Open for innovation: the role of openness in explaining innovation performance among UK manufacturing firms. Strategic Management Journal, 27(2): 131-150.
  5. Miller D., Friesen P.H. (1984). Organizations: A Quantum View. Englewood Cliffs (NJ): Prentice Hall.
  6. Pérez M., Martínez A.M. (2003). The development of University Spinoffs: early dynamics of technology transfer and networking. Technovation, 23: 823-831., DOI: 10.1016/S0166-4972(02)00034-2
  7. Smith K.G., Mitchell T.R., Summer C.E. (1985). Top-level management priorities in different stages of the organizational life-cycle. Academy of Management Journal, 28: 799-820.
  8. Stinchcombe A.L. (1965). Social structure and Organizations. In: March J.G., ed. Handbook of organizations. Chicago: Randy McNally and Company. Stokes D.E. (1997). Pasteur’s Quadrant-Basic Science and Technological Innovation. Washington DC: Brookings Institution Press.
  9. Van de Ven A.H., Hudson R., Schroeder D. (1984). Designing new business startups: entrepreneurial, organizational, and ecological considerations. Journal of Management, 10(1): 87-107.
  10. Van Geenhuizen M., Soetanto D.P. (2009). Academic spin-offs at different ages: A case study in search of key obstacles to growth. Technovation, 29: 671-681.
  11. Vohora A., Wright M., Lockett A. (2004). Critical junctures in the development of university high-tech spinout companies. Research Policy, 33(1): 147-175., DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(03)00107-0

Annalisa Caloffi, Francesca Gambarotto, Silvia Rita Sedita, A dynamic perspective to the analysis of the spin-off life cycle in "ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE " 3/2018, pp. 86-94, DOI:10.3280/ES2018-003008


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content