Clicca qui per scaricare

Enhancing text comprehension through watching TV
Titolo Rivista: CADMO 
Autori/Curatori:  Lucia Lumbelli, Gisella Paoletti, Maurizio Boscarol 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2018 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  13 P. 65-77 Dimensione file:  181 KB
DOI:  10.3280/CAD2018-002005
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The purpose of this experimental research was to analyze the possibility of stimulating student text comprehension through a guided exploration of an amusing TV cartoon that is also difficult to be fully comprehended, using the attractiveness of dynamic images as a resource for improving text compre hension. 38 students of an Italian Secondary School participated to the study. They were 15 years old on average. A group of 19 student received a training for processing the cartoon comprehension difficulties, and was helped in detecting and making the required bridging inferences. A multimedia comprehension post test verified a significant difference between the two groups. The educational implications of the research concern the possibility of using interesting and motivating material for the enhancing text comprehension . The educational treatment performed gave the students the opportunity to acquire a special learning strategy that consists of consciously making the processes that good comprehenders of both written text and audiovisual narratives automatically and correctly are used to make.


Keywords: Text comprehension; TV comprehension; bridging inferences; multimedia; educational strategy.

  1. Bourdieu, P. (1996), Sur la télévision. Paris: Liber-Raisons d’agir; trad. it. Sulla televisione, Milano: Feltrinelli, 1997.
  2. Cavazzini, G. (1999), “Abilità di comprensione della lettura: stimolazione individualizzata o collettiva?”, Scuola e città, 12, pp. 508-524.
  3. Clark, H.H. (1977), “Bridging”, in P.N. Johnson-Laird, P.C.Watson (eds), Thinking: Readings in Cognitive Science (pp. 243-263). Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  4. Cornoldi, C., Colpo, MT Group (1981), Prove oggettive di lettura MT. Firenze: Organizzazioni Speciali.
  5. Duncker, K.(1935), Zur Psychologie des productiven Denken. Berlin: Springer.
  6. Ericsson, E.A., Simon H.A. (1984), Protocol Analysis. Cambridge (MA): MIT Press.
  7. Kintsch, W. (1998). Comprehension: A Paradigm for Cognition. Cambridge (UK): Cambridge University Press.
  8. Kombartzky, U., Ploetzner, R., Schlag, S., Metz, B. (2010), “Developing and Evaluating a Strategy for learning from Animations”, Learning and Instruction, 20, pp. 424-433.
  9. Lowe, R.K. (1999), “Extracting Information from an Animation during Complex Visual Learning”, European Journal of Psychology of Education, 14, pp. 225-244.
  10. Lowe, R.K. (2003), “Animation and Learning: Selective Processing of Information in Dynamic Graphics”, Learning and Instruction, 13, pp. 157-176.
  11. Lowe, R.K. (2004), “Interrogation of Dynamic Visualization during Learning”, Learning and Instruction, 14, pp. 257-274.
  12. Lumbelli, L. (1996), “Focusing on Text Comprehension as a Problem-solving Task: A Fostering Project for Culturally Deprived Children”, in C. Cornoldi, J. Oakhill (eds), Reading Comprehension Difficulties. Processes and Intervention (pp. 301-330). Mahwah (NJ): Erlbaum.
  13. Lumbelli, L. (1999), “Televisione e lettura. Un confronto sperimentale”, IKON, 39, pp. 13-60.
  14. Lumbelli, L. (2007), “Complex Connective Inference and a Possible Type of Implicature”, Lingue e linguaggio, VI, 1, pp. 85-100.
  15. Lumbelli, L. (2008), “From Film and Television to Multimedia Cognitive Effects”, in J.-F. Rouet, R. Lowe, W. Schnotz, Understanding Multimedia Documents (pp. 223-247). New York: Springer.
  16. Lumbelli, L. (2009), La comprensione come problema. Il punto di vista cognitivo. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  17. Lumbelli, L., Paoletti, G. (1999), “Imparare a leggere all’università?”, Orientamenti pedagogici, XLVI, 274, pp. 657-675.
  18. Pennac, D. (1992), Comme un romance. Paris: Gallimard; trad. it. Come un romanzo. Milano: Feltrinelli, 1993.
  19. Pezdek, K. (1987), “Television Comprehension as an Example of Applied Research in Cognitive Psychology”, in D. Berger et al., Applications of Cognitive Psychology: Problem Solving, Education and Computing (pp. 3-15). Hillsdale: Erlbaum.
  20. Popper, K.R. (1994), Cattiva maestra televisione. Milano: Donzelli.
  21. Postman, N. (1985), Amusing Ourselves to Death. New York: Viking.
  22. Rogers, C.R.(1945), “The Non-directive Method as a Technique in Social Research”, American Journal of Sociology, 50, pp. 279-283.
  23. Rogers, C.R. (1951), Client-centered Therapy. Boston: Houghton-Mifflin.
  24. Salomon, G. (1984), “Television is ‘Easy’ and Print is ‘Tough’: The Differential Investment of Mental Effort as a Function of Perception and Attributions”, Journal of Educational Psychology, 76, pp. 647-658.
  25. Salomon, G. (1979-1994), Interaction of Media, Cognition and Learning. San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
  26. Sartori, G. (1997), “Homo videns”. Televisione e post-pensiero. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  27. Schnotz,W. (1993), “Comprehension of Graphics in Texts. Introduction”, Learning and Instruction, 3, pp. 151-156.
  28. Schnotz, W., Bannert, M. (2003), “Construction and Interference in Learning from Multiple Representation”, Learning and Instruction, 13, pp. 141-156.
  29. Schnotz, W., Lowe, R. (2008), “A Unified View of Learning from Animated and Static Graphics”, in R. Lowe, W. Schnotz, Learning with Animation. Research Implications for Design (pp. 304-356). New York: Cambridge University Press.
  30. Wood, D., Bruner, J.S., Ross, G. (1976), “The Role of Tutoring in Problem-solving”, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, 17, 2, pp. 345-378.

Lucia Lumbelli, Gisella Paoletti, Maurizio Boscarol, in "CADMO" 2/2018, pp. 65-77, DOI:10.3280/CAD2018-002005

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche