Book review of Benoît Godin and Dominique Vinck (eds.) Critical Studies of Innovation. Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias.
Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 335
Titolo Rivista: STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI
Autori/Curatori: Alessandro Mongili
Anno di pubblicazione: 2018
Fascicolo: 2
Lingua: Inglese
Numero pagine: 17
P. 204-219
Dimensione file: 232 KB
DOI: 10.3280/SO2018-002009
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:
clicca qui
qui
- Akrich, M. (1992), “The De-Scription of Technical Objects”, in W. E. Bijker, J. Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 205-24.
- Avram, G., Bannon, L., J. Bowers, et al. (2009), “Bridging, Patching and Keeping the Work Flowing: Defect Resolution in Distributed Software Development”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18: 477–507.
- Barad, K. (2003), “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter”, in Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28 (3): 801–831.
- Bauer, M.W. (1995a), “Towards a functional analysis of resistance”, in M.W. Bauer (ed.) Resistance to New Technology – Nuclear Power, Information Technology, Biotechnology, Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 393-418.
- Bauer, M.W. (1995a), “Technophobia: a misleading conception of resistance to new technology”, in M.W. Bauer (ed.) Resistance to New Technology – Nuclear Power, Information Technology, Biotechnology, Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 97-123.
- Bijker, W.E. (1995), Of Bycicles, Bakelites, and Bulbs, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
- Bruun, H., Hukkinen J. (2003), “Crossing Boundaries: An Integrative Framework for Studying Technological Change”, Social Studies of Science, 33(1): 95-116.
- Bush, V. (1945), Science, the Endless Frontier, 2nd ed., Washington, US Office of Scientific Research and Development.
- Callon, M. (1986), “Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc”, L’Année Sociologique, 36:169-208.
- Callon, M. (1988), “Faut-il croire en la recherche industrielle?”, Culture technique, 18: 202-209.
- Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., Barthe, Y. (2009), Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
- Collins, H., Pinch, T. (1998), The Golem at Large. What You Should Know about Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge UP.
- Denis, J., Pontille, D. (2014) “Maintenance work and the performativity of urban inscriptions: The case of Paris subway signs”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32 (3): 404–416.
- Denis, J., Mongili, A., Pontille, D. (2015), “Maintenance & Repair in Science and Technology Studies”, Tecnoscienza, 6(2) :5-15.
- Edgerton, D. (1999), “From innovation to use: ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology”, History and Technology, 16(2): 111-136.
- Edgerton, D. (2006), The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900, London, Profile Books.
- Escobar, A. (1995), Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, Princeton UP.
- Godin, B. (2006), “The Linear Model of Innovation. The Historical construction of an analytical framework”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(6): 639-667.
- Godin, B. (2015), Innovation Contested. The Idea of Innovation over the Century, London, Routledge.
- Godin, B. (2017), Models of Innovation: The History of an Idea, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
- Godin, B., Lane, J.P. (2013), “Pushes and Pulls: Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(5): 621-654.
- Graham, S., Thrift, N. (2007), “Out of order: Understanding maintenance and repair”, in Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3): 1–25.
- Jackson, S.J. (2014), “Rethinking repair”, in Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P.J., Foot, K.A. (eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 221–240.
- Jasanoff, S. (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton, Princeton UP.
- Latour, B. (1993), La Clef de Berlin, et autres leçons d’un amateur de sciences, Paris, La Découverte.
- Mol, A. (2002), The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham, Duke University Press.
- Mongili, A. (2007), Tecnologia e società, Roma, Carocci.
- Mongili, A. (2014), “Designers as users: Blurring positions and theories in creative practices”, in Mongili, A., Pellegrino, G. (eds), Information infrastructure(s): Boundaries, ecologies, multiplicity, Newcastle, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2–25.
- Mongili., A. (2015), Topologie postcoloniali. Innovazione e modernizzazione in Sardegna, Cagliari, Condaghes.
- OECD, (2005), Oslo Manual. Giudelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Paris, OECD and Statistical Office of the European Union.
- Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011), “Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things”, Social Studies of Science, 41(1): 85–106.
- Rogers, E.M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations, New York, The Free Press.
- Star, S.L. (2010), “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5): 601-617.
- Star, S.L. (2015), “Revisiting Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology”, in Bowker, G.C., Timmermans, S. , Clarke, A.E., Balka, E. (eds.) Boundary Objects and Beyond. Working with Leigh Star, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 13-46 (originally published in 1995).
- Star, S.L., Lampland, M. (2009), “Reckoning with Standards”, in Eadem (eds.) Standards and Their Stories. How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life, Ithaca and London, Cornell UP, 3-24.
- Urry, J. (2004), “The ‘System’ of Automobility”, Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4-5): 25–39
- Winner, L. (1980), ‘‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?’’, Daedalus, 109(1): 121-136.
Alessandro Mongili, in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 2/2018, pp. 204-219, DOI:10.3280/SO2018-002009