Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Book review of Benoît Godin and Dominique Vinck (eds.) Critical Studies of Innovation. Alternative Approaches to the Pro-Innovation Bias. Cheltenham and Northampton: Edward Elgar Publishing, pp. 335
Titolo Rivista: STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI  
Autori/Curatori: Alessandro Mongili 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2018 Fascicolo: 2 Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  17 P. 204-219 Dimensione file:  232 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SO2018-002009
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 





  1. Akrich, M. (1992), “The De-Scription of Technical Objects”, in W. E. Bijker, J. Law (eds.), Shaping Technology/Building Society. Studies in Sociotechnical Change, Cambridge: The MIT Press, pp. 205-24.
  2. Avram, G., Bannon, L., J. Bowers, et al. (2009), “Bridging, Patching and Keeping the Work Flowing: Defect Resolution in Distributed Software Development”, Computer Supported Cooperative Work, 18: 477–507.
  3. Barad, K. (2003), “Posthumanist performativity: Toward an understanding of how matter comes to matter”, in Signs: Journal of Women in Culture and Society, 28 (3): 801–831.
  4. Bauer, M.W. (1995a), “Towards a functional analysis of resistance”, in M.W. Bauer (ed.) Resistance to New Technology – Nuclear Power, Information Technology, Biotechnology, Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 393-418.
  5. Bauer, M.W. (1995a), “Technophobia: a misleading conception of resistance to new technology”, in M.W. Bauer (ed.) Resistance to New Technology – Nuclear Power, Information Technology, Biotechnology, Cambridge, Cambridge UP, 97-123.
  6. Bijker, W.E. (1995), Of Bycicles, Bakelites, and Bulbs, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
  7. Bruun, H., Hukkinen J. (2003), “Crossing Boundaries: An Integrative Framework for Studying Technological Change”, Social Studies of Science, 33(1): 95-116.
  8. Bush, V. (1945), Science, the Endless Frontier, 2nd ed., Washington, US Office of Scientific Research and Development.
  9. Callon, M. (1986), “Éléments pour une sociologie de la traduction. La domestication des coquilles Saint-Jacques et des marins-pêcheurs dans la baie de Saint-Brieuc”, L’Année Sociologique, 36:169-208.
  10. Callon, M. (1988), “Faut-il croire en la recherche industrielle?”, Culture technique, 18: 202-209.
  11. Callon, M., Lascoumes, P., Barthe, Y. (2009), Acting in an Uncertain World: An Essay on Technical Democracy, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
  12. Collins, H., Pinch, T. (1998), The Golem at Large. What You Should Know about Technology, Cambridge, Cambridge UP.
  13. Denis, J., Pontille, D. (2014) “Maintenance work and the performativity of urban inscriptions: The case of Paris subway signs”, Environment and Planning D: Society and Space, 32 (3): 404–416.
  14. Denis, J., Mongili, A., Pontille, D. (2015), “Maintenance & Repair in Science and Technology Studies”, Tecnoscienza, 6(2) :5-15.
  15. Edgerton, D. (1999), “From innovation to use: ten eclectic theses on the historiography of technology”, History and Technology, 16(2): 111-136.
  16. Edgerton, D. (2006), The Shock of the Old: Technology and Global History Since 1900, London, Profile Books.
  17. Escobar, A. (1995), Encountering Development. The Making and Unmaking of the Third World, Princeton, Princeton UP.
  18. Godin, B. (2006), “The Linear Model of Innovation. The Historical construction of an analytical framework”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 31(6): 639-667.
  19. Godin, B. (2015), Innovation Contested. The Idea of Innovation over the Century, London, Routledge.
  20. Godin, B. (2017), Models of Innovation: The History of an Idea, Cambridge, The MIT Press.
  21. Godin, B., Lane, J.P. (2013), “Pushes and Pulls: Hi(S)tory of the Demand Pull Model of Innovation”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 38(5): 621-654.
  22. Graham, S., Thrift, N. (2007), “Out of order: Understanding maintenance and repair”, in Theory, Culture & Society, 24(3): 1–25.
  23. Jackson, S.J. (2014), “Rethinking repair”, in Gillespie, T., Boczkowski, P.J., Foot, K.A. (eds.), Media technologies: Essays on communication, materiality, and society, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 221–240.
  24. Jasanoff, S. (2005), Designs on Nature: Science and Democracy in Europe and the United States, Princeton, Princeton UP.
  25. Latour, B. (1993), La Clef de Berlin, et autres leçons d’un amateur de sciences, Paris, La Découverte.
  26. Mol, A. (2002), The Body Multiple: Ontology in Medical Practice, Durham, Duke University Press.
  27. Mongili, A. (2007), Tecnologia e società, Roma, Carocci.
  28. Mongili, A. (2014), “Designers as users: Blurring positions and theories in creative practices”, in Mongili, A., Pellegrino, G. (eds), Information infrastructure(s): Boundaries, ecologies, multiplicity, Newcastle, Cambridge Scholars Publishing, 2–25.
  29. Mongili., A. (2015), Topologie postcoloniali. Innovazione e modernizzazione in Sardegna, Cagliari, Condaghes.
  30. OECD, (2005), Oslo Manual. Giudelines for Collecting and Interpreting Innovation Data, Paris, OECD and Statistical Office of the European Union.
  31. Puig de la Bellacasa, M. (2011), “Matters of care in technoscience: Assembling neglected things”, Social Studies of Science, 41(1): 85–106.
  32. Rogers, E.M. (1962), Diffusion of Innovations, New York, The Free Press.
  33. Star, S.L. (2010), “This is Not a Boundary Object: Reflections on the Origin of a Concept”, Science, Technology, & Human Values, 35(5): 601-617.
  34. Star, S.L. (2015), “Revisiting Ecologies of Knowledge: Work and Politics in Science and Technology”, in Bowker, G.C., Timmermans, S. , Clarke, A.E., Balka, E. (eds.) Boundary Objects and Beyond. Working with Leigh Star, Cambridge, The MIT Press, 13-46 (originally published in 1995).
  35. Star, S.L., Lampland, M. (2009), “Reckoning with Standards”, in Eadem (eds.) Standards and Their Stories. How Quantifying, Classifying, and Formalizing Practices Shape Everyday Life, Ithaca and London, Cornell UP, 3-24.
  36. Urry, J. (2004), “The ‘System’ of Automobility”, Theory, Culture & Society, 21(4-5): 25–39
  37. Winner, L. (1980), ‘‘Do Artifacts Have Politics?’’, Daedalus, 109(1): 121-136.

Alessandro Mongili, in "STUDI ORGANIZZATIVI " 2/2018, pp. 204-219, DOI:10.3280/SO2018-002009

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche