Click here to download

Evaluating quasi-market in employment services. The case of "Dote Unica Lavoro" of Lombardy Region
Journal Title: RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione 
Author/s: Gianluca Scarano, Raffaele Guetto 
Year:  2017 Issue: 69 Language: Italian 
Pages:  24 Pg. 9-32 FullText PDF:  588 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIV2017-069002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Among the latest Italian active labour market policies, much attention has been paid to the assegno individuale di ricollocazione, based on a quasi-market mechanism in employment services. This tool presents several aspects of the Lombard model, characterized by the program Dote Unica Lavoro (DUL). The authors evaluated this system to test governance mechanisms and the ability to mitigate the risks for opportunistic behavior from private agents. Findings show that the DUL program, despite its significant degree of effectiveness, cannot sufficiently reduce the opportunistic behavior among the operators. The incentives of the system tend to place the most disadvantaged jobseekers on less stable jobs, because of the duration required to obtain the refunding of employment services.
Keywords: Active Labour Market Policies; Employment Services; Jobs Act; Quasi-Market; Unemployment; Principal-Agent Theory.

  1. Becker S.O. e Ichino A. (2002). Estimation of average treatment effects based on propensity scores. The Stata Journal, 2, 4: 358-377.
  2. Bifulco L. (2015). Il welfare locale. Roma: Carocci.
  3. Bruttel O. (2005). Contracting-out and the Governance Mechanisms in the Public Employment Service. WZB Discussion Paper, 109. Berlin. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://citeseerx.ist.psu.edu/viewdoc/download?doi=10.1.1.319.6258&rep=rep1&type=pdf
  4. Caliendo M. e Kopeinig S. (2005). Some practical guidance for the implementation of propensity score matching. IZA Discussion Paper, 1588. Bonn. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://ftp.iza.org/dp1588.pdf
  5. Courty P. e Marschke G. (2004). Benchmarking Performance. Public Finance and Management, 4: 288–316.
  6. De Poli S. e Loi M. (2014). Valutazione dell ́ impatto occupazionale degli interventi formativi lunghi attuati nel 2010 dall’Agenzia del Lavoro della Provincia di Trento. Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione, 58: 102- 131.
  7. Dell’Aringa C. (2016). Il Jobs Act: principi ispiratori, contenuti e primi effetti. -- Testo al sito: https://moodle2.units.it/pluginfile.php/139180/mod_resource/content/1/Carlo%20DellAringa%20Sintesi%20%20Jobs%20act.pdf
  8. Dehejia R. H. e Wahba S. (1998). Causal Effects in Nonexperimental Studies: Reevaluating the Evaluation of Training Programs. Journal of the American Statistical Association, 94, 448: 1053-1062.
  9. Dockery A. M. e Stromback T. (2001). Devolving Public Employment Services: Preliminary Assessment of the Australian Experiment. International Labour Review, 140: 429–451.
  10. Donahue J. D. (1989). The Privatization Decision: Public Ends, Private Means. New York: Basic Books Publishers.
  11. Eisenhardt K. M. (1989). Agency Theory: An Assessment and Review. Academy of Management Review, 14: 57–74.
  12. Fana M., Guarascio D. e Cirillo V. (2015). Labour market reforms in Italy: evaluating the effects of the Jobs Act. ISIGrowth Working Paper 5/2015. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.isigrowth.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/12/working_paper_2015_5.pdf
  13. Gibbons R. (1998). Incentives in Organizations. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 12: 115–132.
  14. Gori C., a cura di (2005). Politiche sociali di centro-destra: la riforma del welfare Lombardo. Roma: Carocci.
  15. Heckman J. J. e Smith J.A. (2003). The Determinants of Participation in a Social Program: Evidence from a Prototypical Job Training Program. Journal of Labor Economics, 22, 2: 243-298.
  16. Heckman J. J., LaLonde R. e Smith J. A. (1999). The Economics and Econometrics of Active Labor Market Programs. In: Ashenfelter O. e Card D., a cura di, Handbook of labor economics, Vol. 3A. New York.
  17. Le Grand J. e Bartlett W. (1993). Quasi-Markets and Social Policy. London: MacMillan.
  18. Martini A. e Sisti M. (2009). Valutare il successo delle politiche pubbliche. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  19. Mooney C. Z., e Duval R. D. (1993). Bootstrapping: A Nonparametric Approach to Statistical Inference. Newbury Park, CA: Sage.
  20. Pearl J. (2000). Causality: Models, Reasoning, and Inference. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  21. Picot A. e Wolff B. (1994). Institutional Economics of Public Firms and Ad- ministrations: Some Guidelines for Efficiency-Oriented Design. Journal of Institutional and Theoretical Economics, 150: 211–232.
  22. Rosenbaum P. e Rubin D. (1983). The Central Role of Propensity Score in Observational Studies for Causal Effects. Biometrika, 70: 41–55.
  23. Sacchi S. (2014). Rischio di disoccupazione e ammortizzatori sociali dalla riforma Fornero al Jobs Act di Renzi. Problemi aperti, riforme possibili, nodi irrisolti. Biblioteca della libertà, 49: 63-77.
  24. Sappington D. E. M. (1991). Incentives in Principal-Agent Relationships, Journal of Economic Perspectives, 5: 45–66.
  25. Struyven L. e Steurs G. (2005). Design and Redesign of a Quasi-market for the Reintegration of Jobseekers: Empirical Evidence from Australia and the Netherlands. Journal of European Social Policy, 15: 211–229.
  26. Varesi, P.A. (2007). Il nuovo sistema di collocamento e di servizi per l'impiego. In: Magnani, M. e
  27. Varesi P.A., a cura di, Organizzazione del mercato del lavoro e tipologie contrattuali: commentario ai decreti legislativi n. 276/2003 e n. 251/2004. Torino: Utet.
  28. Williamson O. (1975). Markets and Hierarchies: Analysis and Antitrust Implications: A Study in the Economics of Internal Organization. New York: Free Press.

Gianluca Scarano, Raffaele Guetto, Evaluating quasi-market in employment services. The case of "Dote Unica Lavoro" of Lombardy Region in "RIV Rassegna Italiana di Valutazione" 69/2017, pp. 9-32, DOI:10.3280/RIV2017-069002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content