Clicca qui per scaricare

Does Regulation Really Work? A Principal-agent Approach to the Portuguese Waste Services
Autori/Curatori: Rui Domingos Ribeiro da Cunha Marques, Hugo Consciência Silvestre 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: 1  Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  19 P. 49-67 Dimensione file:  193 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EP2019-001003
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

In this paper we break new ground by investigating the relationship between organizational characteristics and performance in ‘retail’ waste management in Portugal for the year 2016. We found that total costs and tariff revenues can be explained by the management model. Municipal corporations seem to present the lowest results, while private sector participation scores the highest levels. This has implications for the Portuguese regulatory agency. The ongoing regulatory framework is still not sufficient to safeguard users’ interests such as lower prices. We are focusing on performance results that are influenced by previous contractual agreements. Attached to increasing regulatory power, efforts should be placed at contract negotiation between the parties.

Keywords: Principal-agent theory; performance regulation; wastemanagement; Portugal
Jel Code: K2, Q5

  1. Agranoff R. (2014). Local governments in multilevel systems: Emergent public administration challenges. The American Review of Public Administration, 44(4 suppl): 47-62.
  2. Araújo J.F. (2002). Gestão Pública em Portugal: mudança e persistência institucional. Coimbra: Quarteto Editora.
  3. Bertelli A. (2006). The Role of Political Ideology in Structural Design of New Governance Agencies. Public Administration Review, 66(4): 583-95.
  4. Blaikie N. (2009). Designing social research. Malden, MA: Polity.
  5. Blom G. (1958). Statistical estimates and transformed beta variables. New York: John Wiley and Sons.
  6. Bryman A. (2016). Social research methods, 5th edition. Oxford: Oxford university press. Cruz C., Marques R.C. (2013a). Endogenous determinants for renegotiating concessions: evidence from local infrastructure. Local Government Studies, 39(3): 352-74.
  7. Cruz C. & Marques R.C. (2013b). Exogenous determinants for renegotiation of public infrastructure concession. Journal of Construction Engineering and Management, 139(9): 1058-90.
  8. Da Cruz N. F., Marques R.C. (2012). Mixed companies and local governance: no man can serve two masters. Public administration, 90(3): 737-58.
  9. Da Cruz N. F., Simões P., & Marques R.C. (2012). Economic cost recovery in the recycling of packaging waste: the case of Portugal. Journal of Cleaner Production, 37: 8-18.
  10. Demsetz H. (1968). Why regulates utilities? The Journal of Law and Economics, 11(1): 55-65.
  11. Drewry G., Greve C. & Tanquerel T. (eds.) (2005). Performance Measurement and Accountability in the Public Sector. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  12. ERSAR (2018). Relatório Anual dos Serviços de Águas e Resíduos em Portugal. Lisbon: ERSAR.
  13. Greiling D. (2005). Performance Measurement – a driver for increasing the efficiency of public services? Paper presented at the European Group of Public Administration annual Conference. Bern, Switzerland.
  14. Hood C. (1991). A New Public Management for all Seasons?. Public Administration, 69(1): 3-19.
  15. Hood C. (1994). Explaining Economic Policy Reversals. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  16. Lane J. (2000). New Public Management. London: Routledge.
  17. Lane J. (2005). Public Administration and Public Management - the principal agent perspective. New York: Routledge.
  18. Marques R.C. (2005). Regulação de Serviços Públicos. Lisboa: Edições Sílabo.
  19. Marques R.C. (2018). Regulation by contract: Overseeing PPPs. Utilities Policy, 50: 211-14.
  20. Marques R.C. (2017). Why not regulate PPPs?. Utilities Policy, 48: 141-46.
  21. Marques R.C., Berg S. (2010). Revisiting the strengths and limitations of regulatory contracts in infrastructure industries. Journal of Infrastructure Systems, 16(4): 334-42.
  22. Marques R.C., Berg S. (2011). Public‐private partnership contracts: A tale of two cities with different contractual arrangements. Public Administration, 89(4): 1585-1603
  23. Marques R.C., De Witte K. (2011). Is big better? On scale and scope economies in the Portuguese water sector. Economic Modelling, 28(3): 1009-16.
  24. Marques R.C., Silvestre H.C. (2017). Regulation performance of public-private partnerships in the Portuguese water sector: A thematic analysis. Journal of Strategic Contracting and Negotiation, 3(3): 157-178.
  25. Marques R.C. & Simões P. (2008). Does the sunshine regulatory approach work? Governance and regulation model of the urban waste services in Portugal. Resources, Conservation and Recycling, 52(8-9): 1040-49.
  26. Marques R.C., Simões P., & Pinto F.S. (2018). Tariff regulation in the waste sector:
  27. An unavoidable future. Waste Management, 78: 292-300. Niskanen W. (1971). Bureaucracy and Representative Government. Chicago: Aldine-Atherton.
  28. Osborne S.P. (2006). The New Public Governance?. Public Management Review, 8(3): 377-87.
  29. Osborne S.P. (Ed.) (2010). The new public governance: Emerging perspectives on the theory and practice of public governance. London: Routledge.
  30. Pollitt C. (1990). Managerialism and the public services: The Anglo-American experience. Blackwell.
  31. Pollitt C. (2017). Public administration research since 1980: slipping away from the real world?. International Journal of Public Sector Management, 30(6-7): 555-65.
  32. Roberts A. (1997). Performance-based organizations: Assessing the Gore plan. Public Administration Review, 57(6): 465-78.
  33. Silvestre H.C. (2012). Public-private partnership and corporate public sector organizations: Alternative ways to increase social performance in the Portuguese water sector?. Utilities Policy, 22: 41-9.
  34. Silvestre H.C., Marques R.C. & Gomes R. C. (2018). Joined-up Government of utilities: a meta-review on a public-public partnership and inter-municipal cooperation in the water and wastewater industries. Public Management Review, 20(4): 607-31.
  35. Suleiman E. (2003). Dismantling Democratic States. New Jersey: Princeton University Press.
  36. Talbot C. (2011). Theories of performance: Organizational and service improvement in the public domain. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  37. Tavares A.F., Camöes P.J. (2007). Local service delivery choices in Portugal: A political transaction costs framework. Local Government Studies, 33(4): 535-53.
  38. Tavares A.F., Camões P.J. (2010). New forms of local governance: A theoretical and empirical analysis of municipal corporations in Portugal. Public Management Review, 12(5): 587-608.
  39. The Audit Office (2007). Auditoria à Regulação no Sector das Águas - Águas de abastecimento público, águas residuais urbanas e resíduos sólidos urbanos. Lisbon: Tribunal de Contas.
  40. Wilkinson J. (2005). The Growth of Performance Measurement: Help or Hindrance?. In: Drewry G., Greve C. & Tanquerel T. (eds.). Performance Measurement and Accountability in the Public Sector, 11-26. Amsterdam: IOS Press.
  41. Zafra‐Gómez J.L., Prior D., Díaz A.M.P. & López‐Hernández A.M. (2013). Reducing Costs in Times of Crisis: Delivery Forms in Small and Medium Sized Local Governments’ Waste Management Services. Public Administration, 91(1): 51-68.

Rui Domingos Ribeiro da Cunha Marques, Hugo Consciência Silvestre, in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 1/2019, pp. 49-67, DOI:10.3280/EP2019-001003


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche