The Metaphor of Dissociation: Teleological, Phenomenological, Structural, Dynamical

Titolo Rivista QUADERNI DI PSICOTERAPIA COGNITIVA
Autori/Curatori Ellert R.S. Nijenhuis
Anno di pubblicazione 2019 Fascicolo 2019/44 Lingua Inglese
Numero pagine 34 P. 72-105 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/qpc44-2019oa8150
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

Dissociation as used in psychology and psychiatry is a troubled conceptual metaphor. The main problems include conflicting definitions and a lack of internal consistency of some of these formulations. Trying to mend the situation, Van der Hart, Nijenhuis and Steele (2006) revisited Janet’s original definition of dissociation, and referred to it as "structural dissociation of the personality". This term is not meant to suggest that "structural dissociation" involves a particular kind of dissociation as is sometimes thought. To prevent or repair further misunderstanding, in the present article I highlight four inherent features of dissociation of the personality: teleological, phenomenological, structural, and dynamical. The article alsoaims to bridge some metaphors that are commonly described and understood as dichotomies, implying dualisms that plague philosophy, science, and clinical practice. For example, personality is understood as an organism-environment system, involving subjects and "objects" (that may be other subjects) as co-dependent and co-constitutive partners. Regarding matter (brain/body) and mind as attributes of one substance reflects an attempt to avoid the problems of philosophical (substance) dualism, as well as the one-sidedness of philosophical materialism and idealism. The generation, maintenance, and elaboration ofdissociation is analyzed in terms of causing, that is, the mutual manifestation of a network of reciprocal powers. The joint analyses involve an enactive approach to life, and intend to achieve further conceptual clarity and consistency of the metaphor of dissociation.

Keywords:dissociation, causing, conflict, teleology, phenomenology

  • Traitement des souvenirs traumatiques: Accéder à l'instant de dissociation et promouvoir l'intégration Olivier PIEDFORT-MARIN, in European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 100252/2022 pp.100252
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejtd.2021.100252
  • Vehement emotions and trauma-generated dissociation: A Janetian perspective on integrative failure Onno Van der Hart, Jenny Ann Rydberg, in European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation /2019 pp.191
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejtd.2019.06.003
  • Trauma-related dissociation: An analysis of two conflicting models Onno van der Hart, in European Journal of Trauma & Dissociation 100210/2021 pp.100210
    DOI: 10.1016/j.ejtd.2021.100210

Ellert R.S. Nijenhuis, The Metaphor of Dissociation: Teleological, Phenomenological, Structural, Dynamical in "QUADERNI DI PSICOTERAPIA COGNITIVA" 44/2019, pp 72-105, DOI: 10.3280/qpc44-2019oa8150