Click here to download

Changing urban geographies through the suburbanization of universities. A case study of Naples, Italy
Journal Title: ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI 
Author/s: Stefano De Falco 
Year:  2019 Issue: 125 Language: Italian 
Pages:  27 Pg. 141-167 FullText PDF:  259 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ASUR2019-125007
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Although many studies consider knowledge-based urban development processes, the multiple functions that universities can play in suburban areas are rarely taken into account. This paper has a dual aim. First, it provides a systemic view of the characteristics of universities that impact suburban areas, and second, it proposes Naples as a case study wherein university suburbanization is a phenomenon that results in the creation of new urban geographies characterized by new suburban externalities.
Keywords: Universities; suburban geography; urban periphery; geographical proximity.

  1. Boulton G. and Lucas C. (2008). What are universities for? LERU Leauge of European Research Universities -- www.leru.org (accessed 09 January 2018).
  2. Acs Z.J., Audretsch D.B., Braunerhjelm P. and Carlsson B. (2010). The missing link: The knowledge filter and entrepreneurship in endogenous growth. Small Business Economic, 34(2): 105-125.
  3. Addie J.-P.D. (2016a). Theorizing Suburban Infrastructure: A Framework for Critical and Comparative Analysis. Transactions of the Institute of British Geographers, 41(3): 273-285.
  4. Addie J.-P.D. (2016b). On the Road to the In-Between City: Excavating Peripheral Urbanization in Chicago’s ‘Crosstown Corridor. Environment and Planning, 48(5): 825-843., 10.1177/0308518X1559493DOI: 10.1177/0308518X1559493
  5. Addie J.-P.D. (2016c). Engaging Universities as Partners and Proponents of the New Urban Agenda: Coordination, Spatial Strategies, Access. London: UNHabitat
  6. UNI and UCL City Leadership Lab. Addie J.-P.D. and Paskins J. (2016). University College London: Leveraging the Civic Capacity of London’s Global University. In: Goddard J., Hazelkorn E., Kempton L. and Vallance P., eds., The Civic University: The Policy and Leadership Challenges. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar, 257-277.
  7. Addie J.-P.D., Keil R. and Olds K. (2015). Beyond town and gown: Universities, territoriality and the mobilization of New Urban structures in Canada. Territory, Politics, Governance, 3: 27-50., 10.1080/21622671.2014.924875DOI: 10.1080/21622671.2014.924875
  8. Anderson M.B. (2010). The discursive regime of the ‘American Dream’ and the new suburban frontier: The case of Kendall County. Urban Geography, 31(8): 1080-1099., 10.2747/0272-3638.31.8.108DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.31.8.108
  9. Atkinson R. (2004). The evidence on the impact of gentrification: New lessons for the urban renaissance? International Journal of Housing Policy, 4(1): 107-131., 10.1080/146167104200021547DOI: 10.1080/146167104200021547
  10. Audretsch D.B. and Feldman M.P. (1996). R&D Spillovers and the Geography of and Production. American Economic Review, vol. 86, issue 3: 630-40.
  11. Audretsch D.B. (2014). From the entrepreneurial university to the university for the entrepreneurial society. Technology Transfer, 39: 313., 10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1.DOI: 10.1007/s10961-012-9288-1.
  12. Balducci A., Cognetti F. e Fedeli V. (2010). La città come campo di riflessione e di pratiche per le università milanesi. In: Balducci A., Cognetti F. e Fedeli V. (a cura di), Milano. La città degli Studi, Storia, geografia e politiche delle università milanesi. Milano: Abitare Segesta, 197-199.
  13. Bathelt H., Malmberg A. and Maskell P. (2004). Clusters and knowledge: Local buzz, global pipelines, and the process of knowledge creation. Progress in Human Geography, 28: 31-56.
  14. Beauregard R.A. (2006). When America became suburban. Minneapolis: University of Minnesota Press.
  15. Benneworth P. and Charles D. (2005). University spin-off policies and economic development in less successful regions: Learning from two decades of policy practice. European Planning Studies, 13(4): 537-557., 10.1080/0965431050010717DOI: 10.1080/0965431050010717
  16. Benneworth P., Charles D. and Madanipour A. (2010). Building localizedinteractions between universities and cities through university spatial development. European Planning Studies, 18(10): 1611-1629., 10.1080/09654313.2010.50434DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2010.50434
  17. Blanchard R. (1935), Grenoble. Etude de géographie urbaine. Grenoble: Didier&Richard.
  18. Boffo S. e Gagliardi F. (2015). Un nuovo contenitore per i rapporti tra università e territorio. Territorio, 73: 67-72.
  19. Boucher G., Conway C. and Van der Meer E. (2003). Tiers of Engagement by Universities in their Region’s Development. Regional Studies, 37: 887-97.
  20. Carrillo F. (2006) (ed.). Knowledge Cities: Approaches, Perspectives and Experiences. Oxford: Butterworth-Heinemann.
  21. Casaleiro P. (2011). Changing from a university city to a knowledge city: The case of Coimbra. International Journal of Knowledge Based Development, 2(2): 25-38., 10.1080/09654313.2013.79196DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.79196
  22. Charles D., Conway, C. (2001). Higher Education Business Interaction Survey. Bristol: HEFCE.
  23. Chatterton P. and Goddard J. (2000). The Response of Higher Education Institutions to Regional Needs. European Journal of Education, 35(4): 475-496.
  24. Cohen M. and Levinthal D. (1990). Absorptive Capacity: A New Perspective on Learning and Innovation. Administrative Science Quarterly, 35(1): 128-152.
  25. Couch C., Fraser Ch. and Percy S. (2003). Urban Regeneration in Europe. Oxford: Blackwell Science.
  26. Couch C., Sykes O. and Börstinghaus W. (2011). Thirty years of urban regeneration in Britain, Germany and France: The importance of context and path dependency. Progress in Planning, 75(1): 1-52.
  27. Crosta P.L. (1998). L’interazione tra università e città come pratica di apprendimento. In: Archivio di Studi Urbani e Regionali, 60-61.
  28. Davidson M. and Lees L. (2010). New-build gentrification: Its histories, trajectories, and critical geographies. Population, Space and Place, 16(5): 395-411.
  29. De Falco S. (2014). Measuring the regional dimension of innovation through an economic model based on rectifying technology audits according to the AICTT-RTA protocol. Archives of Business Research, 2(6): 231-247.
  30. De Falco S. (2015a). Monitoring the performance of university technology transfer offices: the bias control. Archives of Business Research, 3(2): 2054-7404.
  31. De Falco S. (2015b). Territori, governance, sviluppo sostenibile prospettive italiane ed europee. Studi per lo sviluppo sostenibile.
  32. De Falco S. (2015c). Co-Creazione di Valore in Aree Urbane Geografiche Marginali: La Valorizzazione della Cultura Artigianale come Sorgente di Social Innovation. International Journal of European Studies, 1(6): 24-35.
  33. De Falco S. (2015d). Il ruolo del capitale intellettuale nella valorizzazione delle aree urbane marginali in ambito europeo. International Journal of European Studies, 1(3): 41-52.
  34. De Falco S. (2015e). Le politiche della Ue per la riqualificazione di aree geografiche marginali e ruolo del trasferimento tecnologico. International Journal of European Studies, 1(4): 37-45.
  35. De Falco S. (2015f). The role of geographical proximity from universities and research centers in growing resilience of marginal areas: the case of the east area of Naples. International Journal of Urban Planning, 8(2): 23-34.
  36. De Falco S. and Angrisani L. (2015). Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Smart Cities: A S-D Logic’s application to the role of Research Centres in deprived Urban Areas. Naplesforum 12 giugno 2015 Napoli.
  37. De Falco S. e Angrisani M. (2015). Il Trasferimento Tecnologico quale fattore di coesione sociale ed agente catalizzatore nei processi di riqualificazione urbana necessari ad “Abitare insieme”: un focus sulle aree urbane marginali attraverso il protocollo AICTT-RTT” Living Together, Napoli.
  38. De Falco S. and Polese F. (2015). Innovation and Entrepreneurship in Smart Cities: A S-D Logic’s application to the role of Research Centres in deprived Urban Areas. ECIE 10th European Conference on Innovation and Entrepreneurship, 17-18 September, Genoa.
  39. De Leo D. (2015). Università, istituzioni e territori: ripensamenti e opportunità tra opensource urbanism e prosumership. Territorio, 73: 73-78.
  40. Dotti N.F. (2007). Università conoscenza territorio. La capacità di attrarre studenti. Territorio, 43: 112-120.
  41. EU Ministers for Urban Development (2010). Toledo Informal Ministerial Meeting on Urban Development. Toledo Declaration. -- Available at http://ec.europa.eu/regional_policy/newsroom/pdf/201006_toledo_declaration_en.pdf (accessed 09 January 2018).
  42. Fedeli V. (2015). Università nella città regione: un-bundling e re-bundling il rapporto tra città e università in Italia. Territorio, 73: 79-85.
  43. Fernàndez-Esquinas M.F. and Pinto H. (2014). The Role of Universities in Urban Regeneration: Reframing the Analytical Approach. European Planning Studies, 22(7): 1462-1483., 10.1080/09654313.2013.791967DOI: 10.1080/09654313.2013.791967
  44. Florida R. (2003). Rise of the Creative Class: And How It’s Transforming Work, Leisure, Community and Everyday Life. New York: Basic Books.
  45. Franz P. (2010). Knowledge spill-overs for knowledge based development: Progression in theory and obstacles for empirical research. International Journal of Knowledge Based Development, 1(1-2): 25-38.
  46. Fritsch M. and Monz M. (2010). The impact of network structure on knowledge transfer: An application of social network analysis in the context of regional innovation networks. Annual Regional Science, 44: 21-38.
  47. Goddard J., Kempton L. and Vallance P. (2013). Universities and Smart Specialisation: challenges, tensions and opportunities for the innovation strategies of European regions. EKONOMIAZ. Revista vasca de Economía, 83(02): 83-102.
  48. Goddard J. (2009). Reinventing the Civic University. London: NESTA.
  49. Guiso L., Sapienza P. and Zingales L. (2004). The Role of Social Capital in Financial Development. American Economic Review, 94(3): 526-556. Guiso L., Sapienza P. and Zingales L. (2009). Cultural Biases in Economic Exchange? Quarterly Journal of Economics, 124(3): 1095-1131.
  50. Gunasekara C.S. (2006a). Reframing the Role of Universities in the Development of Regional Innovation Systems. Journal of Technology Transfer, 31: 101-123.
  51. Gunasekara C.S. (2006b). The generative and developmental roles of universities in regional innovation systems. Science and Public Policy, 33: 137-150.
  52. Hambleton R. (2006). Rethinking the role of the modern urban university. Insights from the USA. Dialoghi Internazionali, 2, ottobre.
  53. Harris R. and Vorms C. (2017) (eds.). What’s in a name? Talking about urban peripheries. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  54. Kearns A. and Paddison R. (2000). New Challenges for Urban Governance. Journal of Urban Studies, 37(6): 845-850.
  55. Keil R. (2013). Suburban constellations: governance, land and infrastructure, in the 21st century. Berlin: Jovis Verlag.
  56. Knieling J. and Othengrafen F. (2009). En route to a theoretical model for comparative research. In: Knieling J. and Othengrafen F., Planning Cultures in Europe – Decoding Cultural Phenomena in Urban and Regional Planning, Farnham: Ashgate, 39-62.
  57. Knox P.L. (2008). Metroburbia, USA. Piscataway: Rutgers University Press.
  58. Kühn M. and Bernt M. (2013). Peripheralization and power – Theoretical debates. In: Fischer-Tahir A. and Naumann M., eds., Peripheralization. The Making of Spatial Dependencies and Social Injustice. Wiesbaden: Springer VS, 302-317).
  59. Landry C. (2000). The Creative City. A Toolkit for Urban Innovators. London: Comedia – Earthscan.
  60. Lazzeroni M. (2004). Geografia della conoscenza e dell’innovazione tecnologica: un’interpretazione dei cambiamenti territoriali. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  61. Lazzeroni M. e Picaluga A. (2009). L’università che cambia: nuovi profili e nuovi metodi di analisi. In: Bramanti A. e Salone C., a cura di, Lo sviluppo territoriale nell’economia della conoscenza: teorie, attori, strategie, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  62. Martinelli N. (2015). Diritto allo studio e diritto di cittadinanza nel rapporto università-città. Territorio, 73: 94-99.
  63. OECD (2007). Higher Education and Regions: Globally Competitive, Locally Engaged. Paris: OECD.
  64. Palmentieri S. (2017). Innovazione e ridisegno degli spazi urbani: dai “vuoti” ai poli di sviluppo. L’Area Est di Napoli. In: Aa.Vv., Innovazione, competitività e sviluppo nei territori dell’Unione Europea, a cura di Stefano De Falco. Edicampus Rome, 109-122.
  65. Parsi V. e Tacchi E.M. (2003). Quarto, Oggiaro, Bovisa, Dergano. Prospettive di riqualificazione della periferia di Milano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  66. Phelps N.A. (2017). Old Europe, new suburbanization? Governance, land, and infrastructure, in European suburbanization. Toronto: University of Toronto Press.
  67. Portes A. (1998). Social Capital: Its Origins and Applications in Modern Sociology. Annual Review of Sociology, 24: 1-24. Portnov B. and Pearlmutter D. (1999). Sustainable urban growth in peripheral areas. Progress in Planning, 52: 239-308.
  68. Savino M. (2015). Il ruolo dell’università nel processo di trasformazione sociale dopo la crisi. Territorio, 73: 60-66.
  69. Scott P. (1997). The Changing Role of the University in the Production of the New Knowledge. Tertiary Education and Management, 3(1): 5-14.
  70. Trudeau D. and Kaplan J. (2016). Is there diversity in the new urbanism? Analyzing the demographic characteristics of new urbanist neighborhoods in the United States. Urban Geography, 37(3): 458-482., 10.1080/02723638.2015.106902DOI: 10.1080/02723638.2015.106902
  71. Trudeau D. and Malloy P. (2011). Suburbs in disguise? Examining the geographies of the new urbanism. Urban Geography, 32(3): 424-447., 10.2747/0272-3638.32.3.42DOI: 10.2747/0272-3638.32.3.42
  72. Uyarra E. (2010). Conceptualizing the regional roles of universities, implications and contradictions. European Planning Studies, 18: 1227-1246., 10.1080/09654311003791275DOI: 10.1080/09654311003791275
  73. Varga A. (2002). Knowledge Transfers from Universities and the Regional Economy: A Review of the Literature. Pécs University of Pécs Press.
  74. Westhead P. (1997). R&D ‘inputs’ and ‘outputs’ of technology-based firms located on and off Science Parks. R&D Management, 27(1): 45-62.
  75. Wiewel W. and Knapp G.J. (2005). Partnerships for Smart Growth. University-Community. Collaboration for Better Public Place. New York: M.E. Scarpe.
  76. Youtie J. and Shapira P. (2008). Building an Innovation Hub: A Case Study of the Transformation of University Roles in Regional Technological and Economic Development. Research Policy, 37: 1188-1204.
  77. De Falco S. (2018). Vesuvius, pizza, coffee and… innovation: Is a new paradigm possible for the creative “Vesuvius Valley”, Naples, Italy? City, Culture and Society, 14: 1-13.

Stefano De Falco, in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 125/2019, pp. 141-167, DOI:10.3280/ASUR2019-125007

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content