Clicca qui per scaricare

Il trasferimento tecnologico e la strategia di specializzazione intelligente
Titolo Rivista: ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE  
Autori/Curatori: Mariacarmela Passarelli, Francesco Ricotta, Alfio Cariola 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  31 P. 116-146 Dimensione file:  559 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ES2019-002011
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Il presente lavoro ha l’obiettivo di analizzare, in chiave evolutiva, le variabili strategiche e organizzative, che le strutture preposte al trasferimento tecnologico potrebbero adottare, nel perimetro della quadrupla elica e nell’attuazione della Strategia di Specializzazione Intelligente Regionale (S3). Ancora pochi contributi empirici (Carayannis et al., 2018) si sono focalizzati sui modelli di trasferimento tecnologico nel contesto della Quadrupla elica. E in tale filone di ricerca si posiziona il presente contributo. La metodologia utilizzata è il caso di studio multiplo che ha consentito di analizzare due strutture di trasferimento tecnologico che operano in Italia. L’approccio utilizzato è quello del design thinking. A livello strategico, i risultati dell’analisi suggeriscono che le strutture di trasferimento tecnologico evolvono nel perimetro della S3 sulla base di due concetti chiave: la densità dei legami tra gli attori dell’ecosistema innovativo e la consapevolezza degli stakeholders di operare nel contesto della S3.


Keywords: Trasferimento tecnologico, valorizzazione della ricerca, Strategia di Specializzazione Intelligente, Design Thinking

  1. Asheim B.T. (2019). Smart Specialisation, Innovation Policy and Regional Innovation Systems: what about new Path Development in less Innovative Regions?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1): 8-25., 10.1080/13511610.2018.1491001DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1491001
  2. Balderi C., Daniele C., Piccaluga A. (2012). Gli uffici di trasferimento tecnologico delle città italiane: numeri ma non solo numeri. Economia e Politica Industriale, 39(4): 135-159., 10.3280/POLI2012-004006DOI: 10.3280/POLI2012-004006
  3. Bianchi M., Chiaroni D., Chiesa V., Frattini F. (2011). Exploring the role of Human Resources in Technology Out-licensing: an Empirical Analysis of biotech Newtechnology-based Firms. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 23: 825-849., 10.1080/09537325.2011.604153DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2011.604153
  4. Bianchi C.G., dos Santos A.B., Borini F.M. (2018). Open Innovation and Cocreation in the Development of New Products: the Role of Design Thinking. International Journal of Innovation, 6(2): 112-123.
  5. Carayannis E.G., Campbell D.F.J. (2009). “Mode 3” and “Quadruple Helix”: Toward 21st Century Fractal Innovation Ecosystem. International Journal of Technology Management, 46(3/4): 201-234., 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374DOI: 10.1504/IJTM.2009.023374
  6. Carayannis E.G., Grigoroudis E., Campbell D.F., Meissner D., Stamati D. (2018). The Ecosystem as Helix: An Exploratory Theory-building Study of Regional Co-opetitive Entrepreneurial Ecosystems as Quadruple/Quintuple Helix Innovation Models. R&D Management, 48(1): 148-162.
  7. Caseiro N., Santos D., Eds. (2018). Smart Specialization Strategies and the Role of Entrepreneurial Universities. Hershey PA Usa: IGI Global., 10.4018/978-1-5225-6152-1DOI: 10.4018/978-1-5225-6152-1
  8. Clarysse B., Tartari V.E., Salter A. (2011). The Impact of Entrepreneurial Capacity, Experience and Organizational Support on Academic Entrepreneurship. Research Policy, 40(8): 1084-1093.
  9. Cunningham J., O’Reilly P., O’Kane C., Mangematin V. (2014). The Inhibiting Factors that Principal Investigators Experience in Leading Publicly Funded Research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 39(1): 93-110.
  10. Cunningham J.A., Mangematin V., O’Kane C., O’Reilly P. (2016). At the Frontiers of Scientific Advancement: the factors that influence scientists to become or choose to become publicly funded principal investigators. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 41(4): 778-797.
  11. Cunningham J.A., Link A.N. (2016). Exploring the effectiveness of research and innovation policies among European Union countries. International Entrepreneurship and Management Journal, 12(2): 415-425. 10.1007/s11365-016-0394-7.
  12. Cunningham J.A., Menter M., Young C. (2017). A Review of Qualitative Case Methods Trends and Themes Used in Technology Transfer Research. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 42(4): 923-956.
  13. Cunningham J.A., O’Reilly P. (2018). Macro, Meso and Micro Perspectives of Technology Transfer. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3): 545-557.
  14. Dettenhofer M., Doussineau M., Arregui-Pabollet E. (2019). An Analysis of University Governance Dimensions in Academic Research and S3 Innovation Performance. In: Caseiro N., Santos D., Eds. Smart Specialization Strategies and the Role of Entrepreneurial Universities.
  15. Di Minin A., Frattini F. (2016). L’impresa è un’opera aperta. Open innovation in Italia dal 2003 ad oggi. economia e società regionale, XXXIV(3): 19-37.
  16. Etzkowitz H., Leydesdorff L. (2000). The Dynamics of Innovation: From National Systems and “Mode 2” to a Triple Helix of university–industry–government relations. Research Policy, 29(2): 109-123., 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(99)00055-4
  17. EU (2018). European Innovation Scoreboard 2018 -- .
  18. Flyvbjerg B. (2006). Five Misunderstandings about Case-study Research. Qualitative Inquiry, 12(2): 219-245., 10.1177/1077800405284363DOI: 10.1177/1077800405284363
  19. Foray D., David P.A., Hall B. (2009). Smart Specialisation - The Concept, Knowledge Economists Policy Brief. European Commission.
  20. Foray D., David P.A., Hall B. (2011). Smart Specialization from Academic Idea to Political Instrument, the Surprising Career of a Concept and the Difficulties Involved in its Implementation. Mtei WP. Brussels: EC – Commission of the European Communities, Regional Policy Contributing to Smart Growth in Europe.
  21. Foray D., McCann P., Ortega-Argilés R. (2015). Smart Specialization and European Regional Development Policy. In: Audretsch D.B., Link A.N., Walshok M., Eds. Oxford Handbook of Local Competitiveness, 458-480.
  22. Gosetti G. (2018). Guardare “dentro” il lavoro. tecnologie, processi, tendenze di uno scenario che si consolida. Nota su Al posto tuo e Lavoretti. Economia e società regionale, XXXVI(1): 153-160.
  23. Höglund L., Linton G. (2018). Smart Specialization in Regional Innovation Systems: A Quadruple Helix Perspective. R&D Management, 48(1): 60-72.
  24. Lace N., Rumbinaite G. (2016). Successful University - Industry Collaboration as a Factor for Implementation of Smart Specialization Strategy: Evidence from Latvia and Lithuania. Proceedings of the 20th World Multi-Conference on Systemics, Cybernetics and Informatics (WMSCI) -- .
  25. Lew Y.K., Khan Z., Cozzio S. (2018). Gravitating toward the Quadruple Helix: International Connections for the Enhancement of a Regional Innovation System in Northeast Italy. R&D Management, 48(1): 44-59.
  26. Magro E., Navarro M., Zabala‐Iturriagagoitia J.M. (2014). Coordination‐mix: The hidden face of STI policy. Review of Policy Research, 31(5): 367-389.
  27. Miller K., Mcadam R., Mcadam M. (2018). A Systematic Literature Review of University Technology transfer from a Quadruple Helix Perspective: toward a Research Agenda. R&D Management, 48(1): 7-24.
  28. Morgan K. (2017). Nurturing Novelty: Regional Innovation Policy in the Age of Smart Specialisation. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 35(4): 569-583. 10.1177/0263774X16645106.
  29. Neffke F., Henning M., Boschma R. (2011). How do Regions Diversify over Time? Industry Relatedness and the Development of new Growth Paths in Regions. Economic Geography, 87(3): 237-265.
  30. Nepelski D., Piroli G. (2017). Organizational Diversity and Innovation Potential of EU-funded Research Projects. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3): 615-639.
  31. Passarelli M., Cariola A., Vecellio P. (2018). Beyond Multidirectional Technology Transfer: The Case of a ‘Proof-of-concept Network. Industry and Higher Education, 32(5): 312-325., 10.1177/0950422218790538DOI: 10.1177/0950422218790538
  32. Passarelli M. (2017). Il management del trasferimento tecnologico: l’esperienza PoCN di Area Science Park. Milano: EGEA.
  33. Passarelli M., Costabile M. (2014). Un approccio manageriale al trasferimento tecnologico: un’analisi di benchmarking sui TTO universitari europei. Economia e Politica Industriale, 41(4): 265-297., 10.3280/POLI2014-004012DOI: 10.3280/POLI2014-004012
  34. Rehfeld D., Terstriep J. (2019). Regional Governance in North Rhine-Westphalia–lessons for Smart Specialisation Strategies?. Innovation: The European Journal of Social Science Research, 32(1): 85-103., 10.1080/13511610.2018.1520629DOI: 10.1080/13511610.2018.1520629
  35. Rinaldi C., Cavicchi A., Spigarelli F., Lacchè L., Rubens A. (2018). Universities and Smart Specialisation Strategy: From Third Mission to Sustainable Development Co-creation. International Journal of Sustainability in Higher Education, 19(1):67-84., 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2016-0070DOI: 10.1108/IJSHE-04-2016-0070
  36. Sanders E.B.N., Stappers P.J. (2008). Co-creation and the new Landscapes of Design. Co-design, 4(1): 5-18., 10.1080/15710880701875068DOI: 10.1080/15710880701875068
  37. Smith D., Feldman M., Anderson G. (2017). The Longer-term Effects of Federal Subsidies on firm Survival: Evidence from the Advanced Technology Program. The Journal of Technology Transfer, 43(3): 593-614.
  38. Teece D., Pisano G. (1994). The Dynamic Capabilities of Firms: An Introduction. Industrial and Corporate Change, 3(3): 537-556.
  39. Thomke S., von Hippel E. (2002). Customers as Innovators: A New Way to Create Value. Harvard Business Review, 80:74-85.
  40. Vallance P., Blažek J., Edwards J., Květoň V. (2018). Smart Specialisation in Regions with Less-developed Research and Innovation Systems: A Changing Role for Universities?. Environment and Planning C: Politics and Space, 36(2): 219-238., 10.1177/2399654417705137DOI: 10.1177/2399654417705137
  41. von Hippel E. (1986). Lead Users: A Source of Novel Product Concepts. Management Science, 32(7): 791-805.
  42. Yigitcanlar T., Inkinen T. (2019). Place Dynamics for Innovation. In: Yigitcanlar T., Inkinen T. Geographies of Disruption. Place Making for Innovation in the Age of Knowledge Economy. Switzerland AG: Springer Nature., 10.1007/978-3-030-03207-4_3DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-03207-4_3

Mariacarmela Passarelli, Francesco Ricotta, Alfio Cariola, in "ECONOMIA E SOCIETÀ REGIONALE " 2/2019, pp. 116-146, DOI:10.3280/ES2019-002011

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche