Clicca qui per scaricare

Il dibattito sulla Protezione Sociale Globale e Transnazionale. Introduzione
Titolo Rivista: MONDI MIGRANTI 
Autori/Curatori: Simone Castellani, Francesca Lagomarsino 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  16 P. 27-42 Dimensione file:  196 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MM2019-003002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Il Welfare State, consolidato nel corso del XX secolo come modello di protezione sociale nelle società neo-liberali, è stato messo sempre più in discussione. L’attuale crisi economica ne ha accelerato il deterioramento e i rischi sociali sono diventati più forti per una parte crescente della popolazione. In particolare, molti migranti restano ai margini dei sistemi di protezione sociale tradizionale a causa del loro status lavorativo e di residenza/cittadinanza. In questo senso, alcuni ricercatori hanno sottolineato la necessità di pensare ad una configurazione della protezione sociale che vada oltre i confini nazionali, proponendo di analizzare come le perso-ne che partecipano in progetti migratori transnazionali stanno ristrutturando la propria protezione per affrontare i rischi sociali. Questo monografico ha lo scopo di introdurre il dibattito sulla Protezione Sociale Globale e Transnazionale nell’ambito degli studi migratori italiani. Parte da una revisione dello stato dell’arte della produzione scientifica per poi apportare esempi di studi empirici originali rea-lizzati su questa linea in Italia, Spagna, Austria e Regno Unito.


Keywords: Protezione sociale transnazionale; welfare state; reti migratorie transnazionali; resource environment; bricolage.

  1. Amelina A., Bilecen B., Barglowski K. e Faist, T. (2012). Ties That Protect ? The Significance of Transnationality for the Distribution of Informal Social Protection in Migrant Networks. SFB 882 Working Paper Series 6. Bielefeld -- https://pub.uni-bielefeld.de/download/2542199/2542200/SFB_882_WP_0006_Amelina_Bilecen_Barglowski_Faist.pdf (data consultazione 13/08/2019).
  2. Ambrosini M. (2015). Ngos and Health Services for Irregular Immigrants in Italy: When the Protection of Human Rights Challenges the Laws. Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies, 13, 2: 116-134;, 10.1080/15562948.2015.1017631DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2015.1017631
  3. Anderson B. (2000). Doing the Dirty Work. The Global Politics of Domestic Labour. London and New York: Zed books.
  4. Avato J., Koettl J. e Sabates-Wheeler R. (2010). Social security regimes, global estimates, and good practices: the status of social protection for international migrants. World Development, 38, 4: 455-466;
  5. Baldassar L. e Merla L. (2014). Transnational families, migration and the circulation of care : understanding mobility and absence in family life. London and New York: Routledge.
  6. Barglowski K. e Pustulka P. (2018). Tightening early childcare choices – gender and social class inequalities among Polish mothers in Germany and the uk. Comparative Migration Studies 6, 1, SpringerOpen: 36;
  7. Barrett A. e Maître B. (2013). Immigrant Welfare receipt across Europe. International Journal of Manpower, 34, 1: 8-23;, 10.1108/01437721311319629DOI: 10.1108/01437721311319629
  8. Bilecen B. (2019). ‘Altın Günü’: migrant women’s social protection networks. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 1, SpringerOpen: 11;
  9. Bilecen B. e Barglowski K. (2015). On the Assemblages of Informal and Formal Transnational Social Protection. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 203-214;
  10. Bilecen B. e Sienkiewicz J.J. (2015). Informal Social Protection Networks of Transnational Social Spaces. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 227-243;
  11. Bimbi F. (1999). The Family Paradigm in the Italian Welfare State (1947-1996). South European Society and Politics 4, 2: 72-88;, 10.1080/13608740408539571DOI: 10.1080/13608740408539571
  12. Boccagni P. (2016). Addressing transnational needs through migration? An inquiry into the reach and consequences of migrants’ social protection across borders, Global Social Policy, 17:168- 187;, 10.1177/1468018116678523DOI: 10.1177/1468018116678523
  13. Boccagni P. (2015). Burden, blessing or both? On the mixed role of transational ties in migrant informal social support, International Sociology, 30, 3: 250-268;, 10.1177/0268580915570508DOI: 10.1177/0268580915570508
  14. Boccagni P. (2014). Caring about migrant care workers : from private obligations to transnational social Welfare ? Critical Social Policy, 34, 2: 221-240:;, 10.1177/0261018313500867DOI: 10.1177/0261018313500867
  15. Bourguignon F. (2015). The Globalization of Inequality. Princeton: Princeton University Press.
  16. Cap P. (2017). Immigration and Anti-migration Discourses: The Early Rhetoric of Brexit. In: Cap P., editor, The Language of Fear (pp. 67-79). London: Palgrave Macmillan uk;, 10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1_6DOI: 10.1057/978-1-137-59731-1_6
  17. Castles S. (2007). Comparing the experience of five major emigration contries. In: Castles S. and Wise R., eds., Migration and development: perspectives from the South. Geneva: Oim.
  18. Castellani S. e Martín-Díaz E. (2019). Re-writing the domestic role: transnational migrants’ households between informal and formal social protection in Ecuador and in Spain. Comparative Migration Studies, 7, 1. SpringerOpen: 7;
  19. Daly M. e Lewis J. (2000). The concept of social care and the analysis of contemporary Welfare states. The British Journal of Sociology , 51, 2: 281-298;
  20. De Haas H. (2010). Migration and development : a teorethical perspective, International Migration Review, 44, 1: 227-264;
  21. De Haas H. (2005). Remittances, migrationand social development. A conceptual review of the literarure, Paper 34, Ginevra, Unrisd.
  22. Dobbs E., Levitt P., Parella S. and Petroff A. (2019). Social Welfare grey zones: how and why subnational actors provide when nations do not? Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies, 45, 9: 1595-1612;, 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1432343DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1432343
  23. Eesc (2013). The impact of anti-crisis measures and the social and employment situation. Brussels: Eesc.
  24. Elson D. (1994). Micro, Meso, Macro: Gender and Economic Analysis in the Context of Policy Reform. In: Bakker I, editor, The Strategic Silence: Gender and Economic Policy (pp. 33-45). London: Zed books and South/North Institute.
  25. Faist T. (2019). The Transnationalized Social Question. Migration and the Politics of Social Inequalities in the Twenty-First Century. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  26. Faist T. (2014). On the transnational social question: How social inequalities are reproduced in Europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 24, 3: 207-222;, 10.1177/0958928714525814DOI: 10.1177/0958928714525814
  27. Faist T. (2000). Transnationalization in international migration: implications for the study of citizenship and culture. Ethnic and Racial Studies, 23, 2: 189-222;, 10.1080/014198700329024DOI: 10.1080/014198700329024
  28. Faist T. e Bilecen B. (2015). Social Inequalities Through the Lens of Social Protection: Notes on the Transnational Social Question. Population, Space and Place, 21, 3: 282-293;
  29. Ferrera M. (1996). The ’southern model’ of Welfare in social europe. Journal of European Social Policy, 6, 1: 17-37;, 10.1177/095892879600600102DOI: 10.1177/095892879600600102
  30. Folbre N. (2006). Measuring Care: Gender, Empowerment, and the Care Economy. Journal of Human Development, 7, 2: 183-199;, 10.1080/14649880600768512DOI: 10.1080/14649880600768512
  31. Ghimis A., Lazarowicz A. e Pascouau Y. (2014). Stigmatisation of eu mobile citizens : a ticking time bomb for the European project. Brussels- https://www.epc.eu/documents/uploads/pub_4096_stigmatisation_of_eu_mobile_citizens.pdf. (Data consultazione 13/08/2019).
  32. Gimenéz C. (2004). Que es el codesarrollo? Expectativas, concepciones y escenarios de futuro. Madrid: Cecod.
  33. Godin M. (2019). Far from a Burden: eu Migrants as Pioneers of a European Social Protection System from Below. International Migration. on-line first;
  34. Goldschmidt T. (2015). Anti-Immigrant Sentiment and Majority Support for Three Types of Welfare. European Societies 17, 5: 620-652;, 10.1080/14616696.2015.1088959DOI: 10.1080/14616696.2015.1088959
  35. Habermas J. (1996). Citizenship and National Identity. In: Habermas J., ed., In Between Facts and Norm (pp. 491-515). Cambridge (ma): Mit Press.
  36. Herrera G. (2013). “Lejos de tus pupilas”: Familias transnacionales, cuidados y desigualdad social en Ecuador. Quito: Flacso Ecuador.
  37. Hochschild A.R. (2001). Global care chains and emotional surplus value. In: Hutton W. and Giddens A., eds., On the edge: Living with global capitalism (pp. 130-146). London: Johnatan Cape;, 10.4324/9781315633794DOI: 10.4324/9781315633794
  38. Hooijer G. e Picot G. (2015). European Welfare States and Migrant Poverty: The Institutional Determinants of Disadvantage. Comparative Political Studies 48, 14: 1879-1904;, 10.1177/0010414015597508DOI: 10.1177/0010414015597508
  39. Kofman E. (2003). The economic and social aspects of migration. Women migrants and refugiees in the European Union. Brussels: Ocde.
  40. Kofman E. e Raghhuram P. (2015). Gendered Migrations and Global Social Reproduction. London and New York: Palgrave Macmillan.
  41. Lafleur J-M. e Mescoli E. (2018). Creating Undocumented eu Migrants through Welfare: A Conceptualization of Undeserving and Precarious Citizenship. Sociology, 52, 3: 480-496;, 10.1177/0038038518764615DOI: 10.1177/0038038518764615
  42. Lafleur J-M. e Stanek M. (2017). Restrictions on Access to Social Protection by New Southern European Migrants in Belgium. In: Lafleur J-M. and Stanek M., eds., South-North Migration of eu Citizens in Times of Crisis (pp. 99-121). Amsterdam: Imiscoe & Springer;, 10.1007/978-3-319-39763-4DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-39763-4
  43. Lafleur J-M. e Vivas Romero M. (2018). Combining transnational and intersectional approaches to immigrants’ social protection: The case of Andean families’ access to health. Comparative Migration Studies, 6, 1, SpringerOpen: 14;
  44. Lagomarsino F. (2006). Esodi e approdi di genere. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  45. Lecerf M. (2016). Poverty in the European Union The crisis and its aftermath. Brussels: European Parlament.
  46. Levitt P., Viterna J., Lloyd C. e Mueller A. (2017). Transnational Social Protection: Setting the Agenda. Oxford Development Studies, 45, 1: 2-19.
  47. Lillie N. e Simola A. (2016). The Crisis of Free Movement in the European Union. Mondi Migranti, 3: 7-20;, 10.1080/13600818.2016.123970DOI: 10.1080/13600818.2016.123970
  48. Martín Díaz E. (2011). El papel del género en la acumulación de capital social: el caso de las mujeres ecuatorianas. In: Ginieniewicz J., ed., La migración latinoamericana a España: una mirada desde el modelo de acumulación de activos (pp. 109-128). Quito: Flacso Ecuador and Global Urban Research Centre, University of Manchester.
  49. Mahon R. e Sonya M. (2017). Not In Focus: Migrant Women Caregivers As Seen by the Ilo and the Oecd. In: Michel S. and Peng I., eds., Gender, Migration and the Work of Care: A Multi-Scalar Approach to the Pacific Rim. Basingstoke: Palgrave Macmillan.
  50. Myles J. e Quadagno J. (2002). Political Theories of the Welfare State. Social Service Review, 76, 1: 34-57;, 10.1086/324607DOI: 10.1086/324607
  51. Offe C. (1984). Contradiction of the Welfare State. London: Hutchinson.
  52. Padilla B. (2013). Saúde dos imigrantes: multidimensionalidade, desigualdades e acessibilidade em Portugal. Revista Interdisciplinar da Mobilidade Humana, 21, 40: 49-68.
  53. Pastore F. (2007). Europe, migration and development.Critical remarks on an emerging policy field, Development, 50: 56-62;
  54. Pastore F. (2004). Dobbiamo temere le migrazioni?. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  55. Pedone C. (2005). ‘Tú siempre jalas a los tuyos’. Cadenas y redes migratorias de las familias ecuatorianas hacia España. In: Herrera G., Carrillo M.C. and Torres A., eds. (pp. 105-143), La Migración Ecuatoriana. Transnacionalismo, Redes e Identidades. Quito: Flacso Ecuador.
  56. Pedone C. e Alfaro Y. (2018). La migración cualificada en America latina: una revision de los abordajes teoricos metodologicos y sus desafios, Periplos, vol 2, 3-18;, 10.1787/570061570356DOI: 10.1787/570061570356
  57. Perna R. (2018). Re-bounding eu citizenship from below: practices of healthcare for ‘(Il)legitimate eu Migrants’ in Italy. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44, 5: 829-848;, 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1362977.DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2017.1362977.
  58. Piperno F. e Tognetti Bordogna M. (2012). Welfare Transnazioanle. La frontiera interna delle politiche sociali. Roma: Ediesse.
  59. Phillimore J., Bradby H., Knecht M., Padilla B. e Pemberton, S. (2019). Bricolage as conceptual tool for understanding access to healthcare in superdiverse populations. Social Theory and Health, 17, 2: 231-252;
  60. Razavi S. e Staab S. (2012). Global Variations in the Political and Social Economy of Care: Worlds Apart. London: Routledge.
  61. Sabates-Wheeler R. (2019). Mapping differential vulnerabilities and rights: ‘opening’ access to social protection for forcibly displaced populations. Comparative Migration Studies , 7, 1. SpringerOpen: 38.
  62. Salazar Parreñas R. (2001). Servants of globalization. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  63. Sayad A. (2002). La doppia assenza. Dalle illusioni dell’emigrato alle sofferenze dell’immigrato. Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  64. Serra Mingot E., Mazzucato V. (2017). Mobile Populations in Immobile Welfare Systems: A Typology of Institutions Providing Social Welfare and Protection Within a Mobility Framework. The European Journal of Development Research 29(4): 787–805.
  65. Serra Mingot E., Mazzucato V. (2018). Providing social protection to mobile populations: symbiotic relationships between migrants and Welfare institutions. Journal of Ethnic and Migration Studies 44(13): 2127–2143., 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1429900DOI: 10.1080/1369183X.2018.1429900
  66. Serra Mingot E., Mazzucato V. (2019). Moving for a ‘better Welfare’? The case of transnational Sudanese families. Global Networks 19(2): 139–157.
  67. Titmuss R.M. (1987). The Philosophy of Welfare: Selected Writings of Richard M. Titmuss. Abel-Smith B. and Titimuss K., editors. London: Allen & Unwin.
  68. Vathi Z., Duci V., and Dhembo E. (2019) Social protection and return migration: trans-national and trans-temporal developmental gaps in the Albania-Greece migration corridor. Migration and Development 8, 2. Routledge: 243–263., 10.1080/21632324.2018.1534377DOI: 10.1080/21632324.2018.1534377
  69. Williams F. (2011). The Transnational Political Economy of Care. In Mahon, R. and Robinson, F., eds., The Global Political Economy of Care: Integrating Ethical and Social Politisc (pp. 21-38). Vancouver: Ubc Press.

Simone Castellani, Francesca Lagomarsino, in "MONDI MIGRANTI" 3/2019, pp. 27-42, DOI:10.3280/MM2019-003002

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche