Click here to download

Bioclimatic greenhouses for energy efficiency in buildings
Author/s: Carlo Bibbiani, Fabio Fantozzi, Caterina Gargari, Carlo Alberto Campiotti, Patrizia De Rossi 
Year:  2019 Issue: 2 Suppl. Language: English 
Pages:  18 Pg. 213-230 FullText PDF:  143 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RISS2019-002-S1014
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The research aims to verify the contribution to microclimatic comfort offered by the bioclimatic solar greenhouse at the ENEA Casaccia, F92 building. The analysis was carried out using the opensource software, EnergyPlus, for thermal simulation and dynamic energy diagnosis of buildings, based on the 3D geometric model built using the Google SketchUp software. The simulation led to evaluate the gained energy from solar radiation through the glazed surfaces due to the bioclimatic greenhouse and the consequent increase in the operating temperature of the internal environment during the winter season. The research moves from the most recent regulatory developments in terms of energy saving and more modern technology developments related to the design and construction of high energy performance solar control glass elements to demonstrate the effectiveness of bioclimatic greenhouse systems in improving internal comfort levels reducing non-renewable energy consumption for indoor air conditioning. The Temperature hourly trends showed an average increase in the operating T°, during the winter season of about 0.59°C.
Keywords: Bioclimatic greenhouse, energy efficiency, EnergyPlus software, passive solar system, indoor operating temperature, glazing properties.

  1. Aelenei D., de Azevedo Leal H. and Aelenei L. (2014). The Use of Attachedsunspaces in Retrofitting Design: The Case of Residential Buildings in Portugal. Energy Procedia, 48: 1436-1441.
  2. Asdrubali F., Cotana F. and Messineo A. (2012). On the Evaluation of Solar Greenhouse Efficiency in Building Simulation during the Heating Period. Energies, 5: 1864-1880.
  3. Chiesa G., Simonetti M. and Ballada G. (2017). Potential of attached sunspaces in winter season comparing different technological choices in Central and Southern Europe. Energy and Buildings, 138: 377-395.
  4. Gorjian S., Hashjin T.T. and Ghobadian B. (2011). Solar Powered Greenhouses. 10th International Conference on Sustainable Energy Technologies, 4-7 Sep. 2011 Istanbul, Türkye.
  5. Jorgensen O.B. and Hendriksen O.J. (2000). Glazed balconies and sunspaces - energy savers or energy wasters. Energy savers or Energy wasters’ Eurosun, Copenhagen.
  6. Oliveti G., Simona M. and Ruffolo S. (2005). Solar contribution evaluation for building attached sunspace in the Mediterranean climate. Proceedings of the International Conference Passive and Low Energy Cooling for the Built Environment, Santorini, Greece.
  7. Oliveti G., De Simone M., Ruffolo S. (2008). Evaluation of the absorption coefficient for solar radiation in sunspaces and windowed rooms. Solar Energy, 82: 212-219.
  8. Oliveti G., Arcuri N., De Simone M., Bruno R. (2012). Solar heat gains and operative temperature in attached sunspaces. Renewable Energy, 39: 241-249.
  9. Owrak M., Aminy M., Jamal-Abad M.T. and Dehghan M. (2015). Experiments and simulations on the thermal performance of a sunspace attached to a room including heat-storing porous bed and water tanks. Building and Environment, 92: 142-151.

Carlo Bibbiani, Fabio Fantozzi, Caterina Gargari, Carlo Alberto Campiotti, Patrizia De Rossi, in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2 Suppl./2019, pp. 213-230, DOI:10.3280/RISS2019-002-S1014


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content