Clicca qui per scaricare

Reclutamento nelle università: pressioni valutative e risposte organizzative in diversi settori disciplinari
Autori/Curatori: Emilia Primeri, Emanuela Reale 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2019 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  15 P. 95-109 Dimensione file:  212 KB
DOI:  10.3280/WE2019-001009
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

L’introduzione di pratiche valutative può produrre nelle università cambiamenti istituzionali e organizzativi importanti. Il lavoro analizza, attraverso 50 interviste a personale accademico di tre aree disciplinari diverse e concentrandosi sul reclutamento, le risposte organizzative delle università. Queste possono essere molto diversificate, non collegate alla valutazione, inattese o anche imprevedibili e dipendere, perlopiù, dalle discipline.

Keywords: Valutazione, università, reclutamento, cambiamenti organizzativi, discipline scientifiche, istituzionalismo.

  1. Becher T. (1989). Academic tribes and territories: Intellectual inquiry and the culture of the disciplines. Bristol, PA: Open University Press.
  2. Bleiklie I. and Kogan M. (2007). Organization and governance of universities. Higher Education Policy, 20: 477-493.
  3. Bonaccorsi A. (2007). Explaining poor performance of European science: institutions versus policies. Science and Public Policy, 34(5): 303-316,, DOI: 10.3152/030234207X229411
  4. Clark B.R. (1986). The higher education system: Academic organization in cross-national perspective. Berkeley and Los Angeles: University of California Press.
  5. Clemens B.W and Douglas T.J. (2004). Understanding Strategic Responses to Institutional Pressures. Journal of Business Research, 58(9):1205-1213.
  6. Deem R., Hillyard S. and Reed M. (2007). Knowledge, Higher Education, and the New Managerialism: The Changing Management of UK Universities. Oxford: OUP.
  7. DiMaggio P.J. and Powell W.W. (1983). The Iron cage revised: institutional isomorphism and collective rationality in organizational fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
  8. Enders J. (2004). Higher education, internationalisation, and the nation-state: Recent developments and challenges to governance theory. Higher education, 47(3): pp 361-382., DOI: 10.1023/B:HIGH.0000016461.98676.30
  9. Gornitzka A. (1999). Governmental policies and organisational changes in higher education. Higher Education, 38: 5-31., DOI: 10.1023/A:100370321
  10. Gueissaz A. and Häyrinen-Alestalo M. (1999). How to integrate contradictory aims: the configurations of actors in the evaluation of universities. European Journal of Education, 34(3), 283-297.
  11. Hazelkorn E. (2013). How Rankings are Reshaping Higher Education. In: Climent V., Michavila F. and Ripolles M., editors, Los Rankings Univeritarios: Mitos y Realidades. Ed. Tecnos.
  12. Henkel M. (2005). Academic identity and autonomy in a changing policy environment. Higher Education, 49(1-2): 155-176.
  13. Lascoumes P. and Le Gales P. (2007). Understanding Public Policy through its Instruments – From the Nature of Instruments to the Sociology of Public Policy Instrumentation. Governance: an International Journal of Policy, Administration and Institutions, 20(1): 1-21.
  14. Leisyte L. and Dee J. (2012). Changing Academic Practices and Identities in Europe and the US Critical Perspectives. In: Bastedo M., Higher Education: Handbook of Theory and Research. Dordrecht: Springer.
  15. March J.G. and Olsen J.P. (1984). The New Institutionalism: Organizational Factors in Political Life. American Political Science Review, 78(8): 734-49.
  16. March J.G. and Olsen J.P. (1998). The Institutional Dynamics of International Political Orders. International Organization, 52(4):943-969.
  17. Margison S. and van der Wende M. (2007). To Rank or To Be Ranked: The Impact of Global Rankings in Higher Education. Journal of Studies in International Education, (11)3/4: 306-329.
  18. Meyer H.-D. and Rowan B., editors (2006). The New Institutionalism in Education. State University of New York Press.
  19. Miles M.B. and Huberman A.M. (1994). Qualitative Data Analysis (2nd edition). Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  20. Miller H.T. and Fox C.J. (2001). The Epistemic Community. Administration & Society, 32(6): 668-685., DOI: 10.1177/00953990122019613
  21. Musselin C. (1994). L’Etat et la profession universitaire en France et en Allemagne. In: Politiques et management public, 12(2). Administrer les savoirs: leur production, leur transmission, leur application, leur contrôle – Actes du Sixième Colloque International, Genève – 25/26 mars 1993. pp. 151-173.
  22. Neave G. (1998). The Evaluative State Reconsidered. European Journal of Education, 33(3): 265-284.
  23. Neave G. and van Vught F.A., editors (1991). Prometheus Bound. The Changing Relationship Between Government and Higher Education in Europe. Oxford: Pergamon.
  24. Oliver C. (1991). Strategic responses to institutional processes. Academy of Management Review, 16(1): 145-179.
  25. Paradeise C., Reale E., Bleiklie I. and Ferlie E., editors (2009). University Governance. Western European Comparative Perspectives. Springer.
  26. Progetto PREST-ENCE. From prestige to excellence – ANR (FR) (2013).
  27. Reale E. and Potì B. (2009). Italy: Local policy legacy and moving to an ‘in between’ configuration. In: Paradeise C., Reale E., Bleiklie I. and Ferlie E., editors, University Governance. Western European Comparative Perspectives. Springer, pp. 77-102.
  28. Reale E. and Primeri E. (2014). Reforming Universities in Italy. Towards a new Paradigm? In: Musselin C. and Teixeira P.N., editors, Reforming Higher Education: Public Policy Design and Implementation, Higher Education Dynamics, pp. 39-63.
  29. Reale E. and Seeber M. (2011). Organisation response to institutional pressures in Higher Education: the important role of the disciplines. Higher Education, 61(1): 1-22.
  30. Scott W. R. (2008). Approaching adulthood: the maturing of institutional theory. Theory and Society, 37(427).
  31. Seeber M. (2010). Steering heterogeneous sciences in the Dutch and Italian higher education systems. Working paper CERIS-CNR, Vol. 4.
  32. Teichler U. and Cummings W.K. (2015). Forming, Recruiting and Managing the Academic Profession. A Varied Scene, in Forming, Recruiting and Managing the Academic Profession. Dordrecht: Springer.
  33. Whitley R. (2000). The intellectual and social organization of the science. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  34. Whitley R. and Gläser J. (2007). The Changing Governance of the Sciences. The Advent of Research Evaluation Systems. Sociology of the Sciences Yearbook, Vol. 26. Dordrecht: Springer.

Emilia Primeri, Emanuela Reale, in "WELFARE E ERGONOMIA" 1/2019, pp. 95-109, DOI:10.3280/WE2019-001009


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche