Click here to download

Technologies and intimacy in danish nursing homes
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI 
Author/s: Holger Hojlund , Anders la Cour 
Year:  2019 Issue: Language: English 
Pages:  22 Pg. 73-94 FullText PDF:  264 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SP2019-003004
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This article discusses the use of technologies in care. The context is nursing homes, and how the residents face the most sophisticated machinery relieving them from needs and also relieving the professionals from burdens related to care. This article will show how various forms of new technologies that are being implemented in modern nursing homes in Denmark, gives different voices to the people suffering from dementia. Thereby the technology plays a significant role in the attempts to make it possible for the dement to regain a kind of personhood. Observed in this way personhood is not something you either have or don’t have, it is something you achieve, and is, developed and maintained. In this case through the interaction between technologies and human element.
Keywords: Intimacy, Technologies in Care; Personhood; System Theory; Social Exclusion.

  1. Agamben, G. 1998. Homo Sacer: Sovereign power and bare life. Stanford, CA: Stanford University Press.
  2. — 2000. Means without end: Notes on politics (Vol. 20). Minneapolis, Minn: University of Minnesota Press.
  3. Allen, D. 2015. Inside ‘bed management’: Ethnographic insights from the vantage point of UK hospital nurses. Sociology of Health & Illness, 37(3): 370-384.
  4. Angus, J., & Bowen, S. 2011. Quiet please, there’s a lady on stage:: Centering the person with dementia in life story narrative. Journal of Aging Studies, 25(2), 11.
  5. Banner, L. & Olney, C.M. 2009. Automated clinical documentation: Does it allow nurses more time for patient care? CIN: Computers, Informatics, Nursing, 27(2): 75-81.
  6. Baril, C., Gascon, V., St-Pierre, L. & Lagace, D. 2014. Technology and medication errors: Impact in nursing homes. International Journal of Health Care Quality Assurance, 27(3): 244-258.
  7. Barnes, M. and Henwood F. 2015. Inform with Care: Ethics and Information in Care for People with Dementia, Ethics and Social Welfare 9(2): 147-163.
  8. Berg, M. & Harterink, P. 2004. Embodying the patient: Record and bodies in early 20th-century US medical practice. Body & Society, 10(2-3): 13-41.
  9. Berg, M. 1998. The Politics of Technology: On Bringing Social Theory into Technological Design, Science, Technology and Human Values, 23(4): 456-491.
  10. Brannelly, T. 2006. Negotiating ethics in dementia care: an analysis of an ethic of care in practice. Dementia, 5(2), 197-212.
  11. Breslin S., Greskovich, W. & Turisco, F. 2004. Wireless technology improves nursing workflow and communications. CIN: Computers, Informatics, and Nursing, 22(5): 275-281.
  12. Cayton, H. 2004. Telling stories: Choices and challenges on the journey of dementia. Dementia, 3(1), 9-17.
  13. Clegg, S.R., Courpasson, D. & Phillips, N. 2006. Power and Organization. London: Sage.
  14. Comaroff, J. 2009. Terror and territory: Guantanamo and the space of contradiction. Public Culture, 9(2): 381-405.
  15. la Cour, A. & Hojlund, H. 2008. Afforingsskemaer – en garanti for sundhed. I: B. Haa & J.G. Jensen (red.): Sundhedsområdet i et systemteoretisk perspektiv. Kobenhavn: Unge Padagoger.
  16. — Untimely Welfare Technologies, Nordic Journal of Working Life Studies, Vol. 9, No. S5, 2019, p. 69-87.
  17. Dahl, Hanne M. & Tine R. Eriksen, eds. 2005. Dilemmas of Care in the Nordic Welfare State: Continuity and Change. Aldershot: Asgate.
  18. Diken, B. & Laustsen, C.B. 2002. Indistinktion. Distinktion, 3(1): 93-111.
  19. Fuglsang, L. 2005. IT and senior citizens: Using the internet for empowering active citizenship. Science, Technology & Human Values, 30(4): 468-495.
  20. Garner, J. 1997. Dementia: An intimate death. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 70(2), 177-184.
  21. Gjødsbøl, I. M., & Svendsen, M.N. 2019. Time and Personhood across Early and Late-Stage Dementia. Medical anthropology, 38(1), 44-58.
  22. Hayes, J., Boylstein, C., & Zimmerman, M.K. 2009. Living and loving with dementia: Negotiating spousal and caregiver identity through narrative. Journal of Aging Studies, 23(1), 48-59.
  23. Haraway, D.J. 1991. Simians, Cyborgs, and Women: The reinvention of nature. London: FA Books.
  24. Harnett, T. 2010. Seeking exemptions from nursing home routines: Residents’ everyday influence attempts and institutional order. Journal of Aging Studies, 24(4): 292-301.
  25. — 2013. Framing spaces in places Creating ‘respite spaces’ in dementia care settings. Dementia, 0(0): 1-16.
  26. Harper Ice, G. 2002. Daily life in a nursing home: Has it changed in 25 years? Journal of Aging Studies, 16(4): 345-359.
  27. Helleberg, K.M. & Hauge, S. 2014. ‘Like a dance’: Performing good care for persons with dementia living in institutions. Nursing Research and Practice, 7.
  28. Hojlund, H. 2003. Forebyggelsens fornuft. Social Kritik, 90(15): 4-17.
  29. — 2005. At give de aldre rost – tre brugerorienterede tilgange til udviklingen i aldresektoren. I: M. Szebehely (red.): Äldreomsorgsforskning i Norden: En kunskapsöversikt. Kobenhavn: Nordiska Ministerradet.
  30. — 2012. Hybrid technologies of welfare. I: N.T. Thygesen (red.): Illusions of Control – a systems theoretical approach to managerial technologies. London: Palgrave.
  31. — 2014. Roller i en systemteoretisk optik. I: G. Harste & M. Knudsen (red.): Systemteoretiske analyser: At anvende Luhmann. Frederiksberg: Nyt fra Samfundsvidenskaberne.
  32. — 2015. Observationsnoter og interviewudskrifter fra besøg på to plejehjem samt interview med forvaltningen i Aalborg, d. 23-24. november 2015.
  33. Hojlund, H. & Hojlund, C. 2000. Falles sprog en anden ordens strategi pa hjemmehjalpsomradet. GRUS, 61: 18-39.
  34. Jenkins, R. 2004. Social Identity (2. udg.). London: Routledge.
  35. Jones, C., Moyle, W. & Stockwell-Smith, G. (2013). Caring for older people with dementia: An exploratory study of staff knowledge and perception of training in three Australian dementia care facilities. Australasian Journal on Ageing, 32(1): 52-55.
  36. Jones, M. 2007. Gentlecare: Changing the experience of Alzheimer’s disease in a positive way. New Westminster, BC: Moyra Jones Resources.
  37. Kalyvas, A. 2005. The sovereign weaver: Beyond the camp. I: A. Norris (red.): Politics, Metaphysics, and Death: Essays on Giorgio Agamben’s Homo Sacer. Durham: Duke University Press.
  38. Kerr, D., Wilkinson, H. & Cunningham, C. 2008. Supporting Older People in Care Homes at Night. York: Joseph Rowntree Foundation.
  39. Kitwood, T. 1997. Dementia Reconsidered: The person comes first. Buckingham: Open University Press.
  40. Komaromy, C. 2000. The sight and sound of death: The management of dead bodies in residential and nursing homes for older people. Mortality, 5(3): 299-316.
  41. Koren, M.J. 2010. Person-centered care for nursing home residents: The culture-change movement. Health Affairs, 29(2): 312-317.
  42. Lemke, T. 2001. The birth of bio-politics: Michel Foucault’s lecture at the College de France on neo-liberal governmentality. Economy and Society, 30(2): 190-207.
  43. — 2005. A zone of indistinction: A critique of Giorgio Agamben’s concept of biopolitics. Outlines, (5): 3-13.
  44. Lillekroken, D., Hauge, S. & Slettebo, A. 2015. Enabling resources in people with dementia: A qualitative study about nurses’ strategies that may support a sense of coherence in people with dementia. Journal of Clinical Nursing, 24(21-22): 3129-3137.
  45. Lindholm, C. 2008. Laughter, communication problems and dementia. Communication & Medicine 5(1): 3-14.
  46. — 2015. Parallel realities: The interactional management of confabulation in dementia care encounters. Research on Language and Social Interaction 48(2): 176–199.
  47. Lindholm, C. and Cray, A. 2011. Proverbs and formulaic sequences in the language of elderly people with dementia. Dementia, 10(4): 603-623.
  48. Luff, R., Ellmers, T., Eyers, I., Young, E. & Arber, S. 2011. Time spent in bed at night by care-homes residents: Choice or compromise? Ageing and Society, 31(7): 1229-1250.
  49. Luhmann,N. 2000. Organisation und Entscheidung. Opladen/Wiesbaden:Westdeutscher Verlag.
  50. Martin, W. & Bartlett, H. 2007. The social significance of sleep for older people with dementia in the context of care. Sociological Research Online, 12(5): 11.
  51. Morris, L. W., Morris, R. G., & Britton, P. G. 1988. The relationship between marital intimacy, perceived strain and depression in spouse caregivers of dementia sufferers. British Journal of Medical Psychology, 61(3), 231-236.
  52. Moser, I. 2011. Dementia and the limits to life: anthropological sensibilities, STS interferences, and possibilities for action in care. Science, Technology and Human Values, 36(5): 704-722.
  53. Niemeijer, A.R., Depla, M.F., Frederiks, B.J. & Hertogh, C.M. 2015. The experiences of people with dementia and intellectual disabilities with surveillance technologies in residential care. Nursing Ethics, 22(3): 307-320.
  54. Nortvedt P. 2001. Profesjonell omsorg – dyd eller ferdighet? I: K.W. Ruyter & A.J. Vetlesen (red.): Omsorgens tvetydighet. Oslo: Gyldendal.
  55. Pritchard, G.W., & Brittain, K. 2015. Alarm pendants and the technological shaping of older people’s care: between (intentional) help and (irrational) nuisance. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 93, 124-132.
  56. Quinn, C., Clare, L., & Woods, B. 2009. The impact of the quality of relationship on the experiences and wellbeing of caregivers of people with dementia: A systematic review. Aging and Mental health, 13(2), 143-154.
  57. Rose, K., Specht, J. & Forch, W. 2014. Correlates among nocturnal agitation, sleep, and urinary incontinence in dementia. American Journal of Alzheimer’s Disease and Other Dementias, 30(1): 78-84.
  58. Salzman, C., Jeste, D.V., Meyer, R.E., Cohen-Mansfield, J., Cummings, J., Grossberg, G.T., Jarvik, L., Kraemer, H.C., Lebowitz, B.D., Maslow, K., Pollock, B.G., Raskind, M., Schultz, S.K., Wang, P., Zito, J.M. & Zubenko, G.S. 2008. Elderly patients with dementia-related symptoms of severe agitation and aggression: Consensus statement on treatment options, clinical trials methodology, and policy. The Journal of Clinical Psychiatry, 69(6): 889-898.
  59. Staheli, U. 2015. The Right to Remain Silent: From a Politics of Connectivity to a Politics of Disconnectivity? (Upubliceret rapport).
  60. Swane, C.E. 1998. Nar demenslidende fortaller sig ind i verden. I:, A.L. Blaakilde & C.E. Swane (red.): Aldring og ældrebilleder, s. 51-82. Kobenhavn: Munksgaard.
  61. Szebehely, M. 2005. Äldreomsorgsforskning i Norden: En kunskapsöversikt. Kobenhavn: Nordiska Ministerradet.
  62. Timmerman, S. & Berg, M. 2003. The practice of medical technology. Sociology of Health & Illness, 25(3): 97-114.
  63. Watson, J. 2013. What is dementia? Implications for caring at the end of life. End Life Journal, 3(1): 1-9.
  64. While, A. & Dewsbury, G. 2011. Nursing and information and communication technology (ICT): A discussion of trends and future directions. International journal of nursing studies, 48(10): 1302-1310.
  65. Wijma, E. M., Veerbeek, M. A., Prins, M., Pot, A. M., & Willemse, B. M. 2018. A virtual reality intervention to improve the understanding and empathy for people with dementia in informal caregivers: results of a pilot study. Aging & mental health, 22(9), 1121-1129.
  66. Williams, V., Webb, J., Dowling, S., & Gall, M. (2019). Direct and indirect ways of managing epistemic asymmetries when eliciting memories. Discourse Studies, 21(2), 199-215.
  67. Williams, S., & Keady, J. 2006. Editorial: The narrative voice of people with dementia. Dementia, 5(2), 163-166.
  68. Williams, S.J. 2005. Sleep and Society: Sociological Ventures into the Unknown. London: Routledge.

Holger Hojlund , Anders la Cour, in "SOCIOLOGIA E POLITICHE SOCIALI" 3/2019, pp. 73-94, DOI:10.3280/SP2019-003004

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content