Sticky costs: le determinanti e le sfide per manager e accademici
Titolo Rivista: MANAGEMENT CONTROL 
Autori/Curatori: Cristiana Cattaneo, Gaia Bassani 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: Suppl. 1 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  24 P. 103-126 Dimensione file:  343 KB
DOI:  10.3280/MACO2020-001-S1007
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

 



Sticky costs challenge the traditional approach to cost behavior. Costs are sticky if they decrease less when sales fall than they increase when sales rise by an equiva-lent amount. This occurs because managers deliberately adjust the resources committed to activities changing business volumes. This paper investigates the determinants of stickiness in the time-space contexts. Authors conduct a literature review analyzing 482 articles selected from the data-base Business Source Premier. The final sample of 60 papers is examined follow-ing a multitude of criteria: time of publication, journal, methodological approach, objectives, main results and factors determining sticky costs. Results show sticky costs as a global phenomenon that crosses countries and increases during macro-economic crisis. Costs could be classified as sticky, anti-sticky or super sticky and this asymmetric behavior depends on: national and industry context, firm charac-teristics and managers who take decisions about the level of costs.
Keywords: Sticky costs, Literature review, Decision-making, Cost stickiness, De-terminants.

  1. Anderson M., Asdemir O., Tripathy A. (2013), Use of precedent and antecedent information in strategic cost management, Journal of Business Research, 66, pp. 643-650.
  2. Anderson M.C., Banker R.D., Janakiraman S.N. (2003), Are selling, general and administrative costs “Sticky”? Journal of Accounting Research, 41, pp. 47-63.
  3. Anderson M., Banker R., Huang R., Janakiraman S. (2007), Cost behavior and fundamental analysis of SG&A costs, Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 22, pp. 1-28.
  4. Anderson M., Lee J.H., Mashruwala R. (2016), Cost Stickiness and Cost Inertia: A Two-Driver Model of Asymmetric Cost Behavior, SSRN Electronic Journal, pp. 1-38.
  5. Argilés-Bosch J.M., García-Blandón J. (2011), The influence of size on cost behavior associated with tactical and operational flexibility, Estudios de Economía, 38, pp.419-455.
  6. Argilés-Bosch J.M., García-Blandón J., Ravenda D., Valencia-Silva M.M., Somoza A.D. (2017), The influence of the trade-off between profitability and future increases in sales on cost stickiness, Estudios de Economía, 44, pp. 81-104.
  7. Awad E.A. (2015), Economic growth and cost stickiness: evidence from Egypt, Journal of Financial Reporting and Accounting, 13, pp. 119-140.
  8. Awad E.A.I., Ezat A.N. (2017), Sticky cost behavior: evidence from Egypt, Journal of Accounting in Emerging Economies, 7, pp. 16-34.
  9. Balakrishnan R., Gruca T.S. (2008), Cost stickiness and core competency: a note, Contemporary Accounting Research, 25, pp. 993-1006.
  10. Balakrishnan R., Labro E., Soderstrom N.S. (2014), Cost Structure and Sticky Costs, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26, pp. 91-116.
  11. Balakrishnan R., Petersen M.J., Soderstrom N.S. (2004), Does capacity utilization affect the "Stickiness" of cost? Journal of Accounting, Auditing & Finance, 19, pp. 283-299.
  12. Banker R.D., Byzalov D. (2014), Asymmetric Cost Behavior, Journal of management Accounting Research, 26, pp. 43-79.
  13. Banker R.D., Basu S., Byzalov D., Chen J.Y. (2016), The confounding effect of cost stickiness, Journal of Accounting and Economics, 61, pp. 203-220.
  14. Banker R.D., Byzalov D., Chen, L. (2013), Employment protection legislation, adjustment costs and cross-country differences in cost behavior, Journal of Accounting & Economics, 55, 111-127.
  15. Banker R.D., Byzalov D., Ciftci M., Mashruwala R. (2014), The Moderating Effect of Prior Sales Changes on Asymmetric Cost Behavior, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26, pp. 221-242.
  16. Banker R.D., Chen L. (2006), Predicting Earnings Using a Model Based on Cost Variability and Cost Stickiness, The Accounting Review, 81, pp. 285-307.
  17. Baumgarten D., Bonenkamp U., Homburg C. (2010), The information content of the SG&A ratio, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 22, pp. 1-22.
  18. Belina H., Surysekar K., Weismann M. (2019), On the medical loss ratio (MLR) and sticky selling general and administrative costs: Evidence from health insurers, Journal of Accounting & Public Policy, 38, pp. 53-61.
  19. Bosch J.M., Blandón J.G. (2011), The influence of size on cost behaviour associated with tactical and operational flexibility, Estudios de Economia, 38, pp. 419-455.
  20. Bouwens J., Steens B. (2016), Full-Cost Transfer Pricing and Cost Management, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28, pp. 63-81.
  21. Bracci E. (2013), La gestione e ottimizzazione dei costi amministrativi d’azienda: il lean office in azione, Management Control, Special Issue 2, pp. 67-86., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2013-002003
  22. Bradbury M.E., Scott T. (2018), Do managers forecast asymmetric cost behaviour? Australian Journal of Management, 43, pp. 538-554.
  23. Bugeja M., Lu M., Shan Y. (2015), Cost Stickiness in Australia: Characteristics and Determinants, Australian Accounting Review, 25, pp. 248-261.
  24. Calleja K., Steliaros M., Thomas D.C. (2006) A note on cost stickiness: Some international comparisons, Management Accounting Research, 17, pp. 127-140.
  25. Cannon J.N. (2014), Determinants of "Sticky Costs": An Analysis of Cost Behavior using United States Air Transportation Industry Data, The Accounting Review, 89, pp. 1645-1672.
  26. Chae S. J., Ryu H. Y. (2016), The Effect of Control–Ownership Disparity on Cost Stickiness, Journal of Distribution Science, 14, pp. 51-57.
  27. Chen C.X., Lu H., Sougiannis T. (2012), The Agency Problem, Corporate Governance, and the Asymmetrical Behavior of Selling, General, and Administrative Costs, Contemporary Accounting Research, 29, pp. 252-282.
  28. Chiucchi M.S. (2014), Il gap tra teoria e prassi nel Management Accounting: il contributo della field-based research, Management Control, 3, pp. 5-9., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2014-00300
  29. Chung C.Y., Hur S.-K., Liu C. (2019), Institutional investors and cost stickiness: Theory and evidence, Journal of Economics & Finance, 47, pp. 336-350.
  30. Ciftci M., Mashruwala R., Weiss D. (2016), Implications of Cost Behavior for Analysts’ Earnings Forecasts, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 28, pp. 57-80.
  31. Ciftci M., Salama F.M. (2018), Stickiness in Costs and Voluntary Disclosures: Evidence from Management Earnings Forecasts, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 30, pp. 211-234.
  32. Cinquini L, Collini P., Marelli A., Tenucci A. (2011), I cambiamenti del costing nelle aziende manifatturiere: risultati di una ricerca comparative, Management Control, 1, pp. 11-40., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2011-001002
  33. Cinquini L., Miraglia R.A., Giannetti R. (2016), Editoriale. Strumenti di gestione dei costi e misure di performance negli attuali contesti competitivi, Management Control, 2, pp. 5-14., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2016-00200
  34. Cohen S., Karatzimas S., Naoum V.C. (2017), The sticky cost phenomenon at the local government level: empirical evidence from Greece, Journal of Applied Accounting Research, 18, pp. 445-463.
  35. Coller G. (2017), L’eterno divario tra teoria e prassi del pricing nel Management Accounting, Management Control, 2, pp. 11-33., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2018-002002
  36. Cooper R., Kaplan R. (1998), The Design of Cost Management Systems: Text, Cases and Readings. 2nd ed. Upper Saddle River, N.J.: Prentice Hall.
  37. Dalla Via N., Perego P. (2014), Sticky cost behaviour: Evidence from small and medium sized companies, Accounting and Finance, 54, pp. 753-778.
  38. Darabi R. (2013), The relationship between tenure with cost sticky and cost of goods sold in Tehran stock exchange, International Journal of Research in Commerce & Management, 4, pp. 10-17.
  39. Guenther T.W., Riehl A., Rößler R. (2014), Cost stickines: State of art of research and implications, Journal Management Control, pp. 301-318.
  40. Habib A., Hasan M.M. (2019), Corporate Social Responsibility and Cost Stickiness, Business & Society, 2019, 58, pp. 453-492.
  41. Hosomi S., Nagasawa S. (2018a), Study on downside risk of demand and cost behavior of local enterprises: verification of local public enterprise manager's decisions making based on a population estimate scenario in the future, Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 13, pp. 21-44.
  42. Hosomi S., Nagasawa S. (2018b), Empirical study on asymmetric cost behavior: analysis of the sticky costs of local public enterprises, Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 13, pp. 55-82.
  43. Hosomi S., Nagasawa S. (2018c), A study on the effect of amalgamation on cost behavior of local public enterprises, Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 13, pp. 109-130.
  44. Hsu W.-H., Lin C., Liu H.-T. (2018), Customer-supplier Relationship and Cost Structure, NTU Management Review, 28, pp. 243-282.
  45. Kama I., Weiss D. (2013), Do Earnings Targets and Managerial incentives Affect Sticky Costs? Journal of Accounting Research, 51, pp. 201-224.
  46. Kitching K., Mashruwala R., Pevzner M. (2016), Culture and Cost Stickiness: A Cross-country Study, The International Journal of Accounting, 51, pp. 402-417.
  47. Kontesa M., Brahmana R.K. (2018), Cost Stickiness effect on firm's performance: insights from Malaysia, Asia-Pacific Management Accounting Journal, 13, pp. 1-19.
  48. Li W. L., Zheng K. (2017), Product market competition and cost stickiness, Review of Quantitative Finance and Accounting, 49, pp. 283-313.
  49. Liu X. Liu X., Reid Colin D. (2019), Stakeholder Orientations and Cost Management, Contemporary Accounting Research, 2019, 36, pp. 486-512.
  50. Magheed B. A. (2016), The Determines of the Sticky Cost Behavior in the Jordanian Industrial Companies Listed in Amman Stock Market, Journal of Accounting, Business & Management, 23, pp. 64-81.
  51. Marchi L., Trucco S. (2017), La comunicazione al mercato delle performance economico-finanziarie: il ruolo del controllo di gestione, Management Control, 3, pp. 55-78., DOI: 10.3280/MACO2017-003005
  52. Noreen E. (1991), Conditions under Which Activity-based Costs Provide Relevant Costs, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 3, pp. 159-168.
  53. Noreen E., Soderstrom N. (1994), Are Overhead Costs Strictly Proportional to Activity? Journal of Accounting and Economics, 17, pp. 255-278.
  54. Noreen E., Soderstrom N. (1997), The Accuracy of Proportional Cost Models: Evidence from Hospital Service Departments, Review of Accounting Studies, 2, pp. 89-114.
  55. Novák P., Popesko B. (2014), Cost Variability and Cost Behavioiur in Manufacturing Enterprises, Economics and Sociology, 7, pp. 89-103.
  56. Novák P., Dvorský J., Popesko B., Strouhal J. (2017), Analysis of overhead cost behavior: case study on decision-making approach, Journal of International Studies, 10, pp. 74-91.
  57. Panwar R., Nybakk E., Pinkse J., Hansen E. (2015), Being Good When Not Doing Well: Examining the Effect of the Economic Downturn on Small Manufacturing Firms’ Ongoing Sustainability-Oriented Initiatives, Organization & Environment, 28, pp. 204-222.
  58. Porporato M., Werbin E. (2012), Evidence of sticky costs in banks of Argentina, Brazil and Canada, International Journal Financial Services Management, 5, pp. 303-320.
  59. Prabowo R., Hooghiemstra R., Van Veen-Dirks P. (2018), State Ownership, Socio-political Factors, and Labor Cost Stickiness, European Accounting Review, 27, pp. 771-796.
  60. Rouxelin F., Wongsunwai W., Yehuda N. (2018), Aggregate Cost Stickiness in GAAP Financial Statements and Future Unemployment Rate, The Accounting Review, 93, pp. 299-325.
  61. Shust E., Weiss D. (2014), Asymmetric Cost Behavior- Sticky Costs: Expenses versus Cash Flows, Journal of Management Accounting Research, 26, pp. 81-90.
  62. Tranfield D, Denyer D., Smart P. (2003), Towards a Methodology for Developing Evidence-Informed Management Knowledge by Means of Systematic Review, British Journal of Management, 14, pp. 207-222.
  63. Uy A. O. (2016), Analyzing cost behavior of Philippine industrial firms, Academy of Accounting and Financial Studies Journal, 20, pp. 103-113.
  64. Uy A.O. (2011), Modeling cost behavior: linear models for cost stickiness, Academy of Accounting & Financial Studies Journal, Supplement, pp. 25-34.
  65. Vela-Beltrán-del-Río C., Llanos Reynoso L.F. (2019), The Deceitfulness of Sticky Costs on Banking Systems, Journal of Accounting, Business & Management, 25, pp. 61-80.
  66. Venieris G., Naoum V.C., Vlismas O. (2015), Organisation capital and sticky behaviour of selling, generaland administrative expenses, Management Accounting Research, 26, pp. 54-82.
  67. Weiss D. (2010), Cost behavior and analysts' earnings forecasts, The Accounting Review, 85, pp. 1441-1471.
  68. Xu J., Sim J.W. (2017), Are costs really sticky and biased? Evidence from manufacturing listed companies in China, Applied Economics, 49, pp. 5601-5613.
  69. Yang D. (2015), Mergers, CEO Hubris, and Cost Stickiness, Emerging Markets Finance & Trade, 51, pp. 46-63.
  70. Yang Y. (2019), Do Accruals Earnings Management Constraints and Intellectual Capital Efficiency Trigger Asymmetric Cost Behaviour? Evidence from Australia, Australian Accounting Review, 29, pp. 177-192
  71. Yong H.J., Ahn T.S., Jung H.R., Park J.H. (2015), Costing Rule and Cost Behavior in the Korean Defense Industry, Seoul Journal of Business, 21, pp. 31-58.
  72. Zanella F., Oyelereb P., Hossainc S. (2015), Are costs really sticky? Evidence from publicly listed companies in the UAE, Applied Economics, 47, pp. 6519-6528.

Cristiana Cattaneo, Gaia Bassani, in "MANAGEMENT CONTROL" Suppl. 1/2020, pp. 103-126, DOI:10.3280/MACO2020-001-S1007

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche