Click here to download

Persone con disabilità, sex appeal e relazioni sentimentali nelle serie-tv: il caso "Special"
Journal Title: SALUTE E SOCIETÀ 
Author/s: Emanuela E. Rinaldi, Nicola Strizzolo 
Year:  2020 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  19 Pg. 72-89 FullText PDF:  192 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SES2020-002006
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Keywords: Disabilità; capitale erotico; relazioni sentimentali; serie-tv; studi sulla disabilità;ricerca qualitativa.

  1. Abubakar M., Anasori E., Lasisi T. T. (2019). Physical attractiveness and managerial favoritism in the hotel industry: The light and dark side of erotic capital. Journal of Hospitality and Tourism Management, 38: 16-26.
  2. Bandura A. (2017). Disimpegno morale. Come facciamo del male continuando a vivere. Trento: Erickson.
  3. Barile N. (2008). La mentalità neototalitaria. Milano: Apogeo.
  4. Barnes C., Mercer G., Shakespeare T. (1999). Exploring Disability. A Sociological Introduction. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  5. Boccia Artieri G. (2004). I media-mondo: forme e linguaggi dell'’esperienza contemporanea. Milano: Meltemi.
  6. Borawska-Chark M., Rohleder P., Finlay M.L. (2017). The Sexual Health Knowledge of People with Intellectual Disabilities: a Review. Sex Res Soc Policy, 14: 393-409. DOI 10.1007/s13178-016-0267-4
  7. Bourdieu P. (1979). La Distinction. Critique sociale du jugement. Paris: Les Editions de Minuit.
  8. Brancato S., a cura di (2011). Postserialità: per una sociologia delle tv-series: dinamiche di trasformazione della fiction televisiva. Napoli: Liguori.
  9. Brembilla P. (2018). It’’s all connected. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  10. Bullen E. (2011). Erotic capital, popular pedagogy and healthy adolescent female sexuality. Girlhood Studies: An Interdisciplinary Journal, 4: 9-27.
  11. Campbell F. (2009). Contours of Ableism: The Production of Disability and Abledness. London: Palgrave Macmillan.
  12. Chiurco L. (2013). Disabilità e linguaggio di riferimento nel rinnovato scenario della Convenzione ONU sui diritti delle persone con disabilità. Roma: ISFOL.
  13. Clements B., Field C.D. (2014). Public opinion toward homosexuality and gay rights in Great Britain. Public Opinion Quarterly, 78: 523-547.
  14. Cohen J., Hershman-Shitri (2017). Mediated relationships with TV characters. The effects of perceived and actual similarity in personality traits. Scientific Study of Literature, 7: 109-128.
  15. Corbetta P. (2003). La ricerca sociale: metodologia e tecniche. Vol. 1: I paradigmi di riferimento. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  16. Cuelenaere E., Willems G., Joye S. (2019). Remaking identities and stereotypes, how film remakes transform and reinforce nationality, disability and gender. European Journal of Cultural Studies: pp.1-17., DOI: 10.1177/136754941882185
  17. Denzin N.K. (2004). Reading Film. In: Flick U., Kardorff E.V. and Steinke I., eds., A Companion to Qualitative Research. London: SAGE.
  18. Di Santo R. (2013). Sociologia della disabilità. Teorie, modelli, attori e istituzioni. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  19. Dolfini D. (2017). Il diritto alla sessualità e la disabilità, tra bisogni e desideri. Il punto di vista delle persone con disabilità, dei loro familiari e degli operatori. Trento: Erickson.
  20. Ellis K. (2013). “This isn’’t something I can fake”: The Discourse of Disability Surrounding Glee. In: Mogk M.E., ed., Different Bodies. Essays on Disability in Film and Television. Jefferson (NC): McFarland.
  21. Ellis K., Goggin G. (2015). Disability and the Media. London: Palgrave.
  22. Evans S.E. (2004). Forgotten Crimes: The Holocaust and People with Disabilities. Chicago: Ivan. R. Dee Publisher.
  23. Ferguson A. (2016). The Uncrowned Queens. Power of Erotic Capital in the Courts of Charles II and Louis XIV. Honours Thesis, Canada: Mount Saint Vincent University's.
  24. Ferri P.M. (2004). Fine dei Mass Media. Le nuove tecnologie della comunicazione e le trasformazioni dell’industria culturale. Milano: Guerini & Associati.
  25. Ferrucci F. (2004), La disabilità come relazione sociale. Gli approcci sociologici
  26. tra natura e cultura. Soveria Mannelli: Rubettino.
  27. Fiduccia B.F.W. (1999). Sexual Imagery of Physically Disabled Women: Erotic? Perverse? Sexist?. Sexuality and Disability, 17: 277–282.
  28. Flick U. (2009). An introduction to qualitative research. Thousand Oaks (CA): Sage.
  29. Fortunato F. (2018). Il capitale sociale. In: Scramaglia R., a cura di, Individui e società tra mutamento e persistenze. Milano: Hoepli.
  30. Fraser B. (2016). Introduction: Disability studies, world cinema and the cognitive code of reality. In: Fraser B., ed., Cultures of Representation: Disability in World Cinema Contexts. New York: Wallflower Press.
  31. Friedman C., Owen A.L. (2017). Defining Disability: Understandings of and Attitudes Towards Ableism and Disability. Disability Studies Quarterly, 37.
  32. Geimer A. (2010). Cultural practices of the reception and appropriation of films from the standpoint of a praxeological sociology of knowledge. In: Bohnsack R., Pfaff N., Weller W., eds., Qualitative analysis and documentary method in international educational research. Opladen: B. Budrich.
  33. Goleman D. (1995). Emotional Intelligence: Why It Can Matter More Than IQ. New York: Bantam Books.
  34. Green A.I. (2013). Erotic capital and the power of desirability: Why “Honey Money” is a bad collective strategy for remedying gender inequality. Sexualities, 16: 137-158., DOI: 10.1177/136346071247110
  35. Green, A.I. (2014). Sexual fields: Toward a sociology of collective sexual life. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  36. Gurrieri L., Cherrier H. (2013). Queering beauty: fatshionistas in the fatosphere. Qualitative Market Research, 16: 276-295., DOI: 10.1108/1352275131132610
  37. Haddad J. (2019). Emmy-nominee Ryan O’’Connell on Bringing ‘‘Special’’ to TV, Gay Disabled Sex and All. Disponibile al sito internet: -- (ultimo accesso 22 agosto 2019).
  38. Hakim C. (2011). Erotic Capital: the Power of Attraction in the Boardroom and the Bedroom. New York: Basic Book.
  39. Harris L. (2002). Disabled Sex and the Movies. Disability Studies Quarterly, vol. 22: 144-162.
  40. Hasson D. (2016). Representing Youth With Disability on Television: Glee, Breaking Bad and Parenthood. New York (NY): Lang.
  41. Jain J. (2018). Bit of Barfi, Sip of Margarita: Disability and Sexuality in Hindi Films. Indian Journal of Women and Social Change, 3: 107–118., DOI: 10.1177/245563271877839
  42. Jungels A.M, Bender A.A. (2015): Missing Intersections: Contemporary Examinations of Sexuality and Disability. In: DeLamater J., Plante R.F., eds., Handbook of the Sociology of Sexuality. Switzerland: Springer International Publishing.
  43. Konjer M., Mutz M. and Meier H.E. (2018). Talent alone does not suffice: erotic capital, media visibility and global popularity among professional male and female tennis players. Journal of Gender Studies, 28: 3-17., DOI: 10.1080/09589236.2017.136569
  44. Liddiard K. (2017). The Intimate Lives of Disabled People. London: Routledge.
  45. Malinowska A. (2018). Lost in representation: Disabled sex and the aesthetics of the ‘norm’. Sexualities, 21: 364-378., DOI: 10.1177/136346071668867
  46. Martin S. (2014). La costruzione dell’immaginario seriale contemporaneo. Eterotopie, personaggi, mondi. Milano: Mimesis.
  47. McCabe M.P. (1999). Sexual Knowledge, Experience and Feelings Among People with Disability. Sexuality and Disability,17: 157-179.
  48. Meyrowitz J. (1985). No sense of Place. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  49. Monasterio F.O. (2016). The Concept of Beauty in Different Cultures. In: Scuderi N., Toth B.A., eds., International Textbook of Aesthetic Surgery. Berlin Heidelberg: Springer.
  50. Schmitz A., Blossfeld H.P. (2013). Catherine Hakim: Erotic Capital: the Power of Attraction in the Boardroom and the Bedroom. European Sociological Review, 29: 136-137.
  51. Thompson J.B. (1995). Media and Modernity: A Social Theory of the Media. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  52. Ulivieri M., a cura di (2014). LoveAbility. L'’assistenza sessuale per le persone con disabilità. Trento: Erickson.
  53. Veglia F., a cura di (2004). Handicap e sessualità: il silenzio, la voce, la carezza. Milano. FrancoAngeli.
  54. Vertoont S. (2017). Would you date ‘‘the undateables’’? An analysis of the mediated public debate on the reality television show ‘‘The Undateables’’. Sexualities, 21: 825–839., DOI: 10.1177/136346071769978
  55. Waltz M. (2016). Fearful reflections. In: Fraser B., ed., Cultures of Representation: Disability in World Cinema Contexts. New York: Wallflower Press.
  56. Webster M., Driskell J.E. (1983). Beauty as status. American Journal of Sociology, 89: 140-165., DOI: 10.1086/22783
  57. Hakim C. (2010). Erotic Capital. European Sociological Review, 26: 499-518.

Emanuela E. Rinaldi, Nicola Strizzolo, in "SALUTE E SOCIETÀ" 2/2020, pp. 72-89, DOI:10.3280/SES2020-002006


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content