Click here to download

BeFriend: An opportunity to discover the value of the relationship and contact with the other
Journal Title: WELFARE E ERGONOMIA 
Author/s: Vittorio Lannutti 
Year:  2020 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  10 Pg. 91-100 FullText PDF:  340 KB
DOI:  10.3280/WE2020-001009
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The proposed practical experience reports the main results of the BeFriend project, carried out in two secondary schools in the province of Ascoli Piceno in the 2017/2018 and 2018/2019 school years. BeFriend has addressed the problem of educational poverty from a relational and socio-emotional point of view using the tool of peer mentoring. This is a psycho-pedagogical model and best practice that focuses on the support relationship that is es-tablished between two young. The first one is the mentee, who experiences problematic situa-tions during his growth path, the second one is the mentor, who has the aim of helping the mentee to identify his/her potential by enhancing them in a healthy and functional way. The project was divided into two steps. In the first 120 students, that are 16 and 17 old, were trained in mentoring, through the tools of Gestalt counseling and sociology of migration. In the second step, the 120 students trained, who became mentors, worked with 120 students younger, the mentees (chosen on the basis of emotional difficulties and risk of drop-out), un-der the supervision of educators and trainers within laboratory activities aimed at addressing and discussing in a group and in pairs the fragility and relationship difficulties experienced by the mentees. So they acquired the tools for a conscious, critical and creative use of the social media, rìthe knoweldges about the main causes of migration and how to face and mange prejudice issues. The aim of the project was achieved, as shown both by the commercials on the fight and prevention of bullying/cyberbullying and racism, carried out during one of the workshops and by the answers provided in the questionnaires submitted to students at the conclusion of the project. The most important aspects of which significant emerged were: the overcoming of the infantile phase of egocentrism, an increase of other's trust and of the self-esteem, a greater tendency to listen and to be in empathy, the willingness to get involved and to risk in the relationship with the other unknown.
Keywords: Mentoring; counseling; bullying / cyberbullying; discrimination; self-esteem; rela-tionship.

  1. Buccoliero E. e Maggi M. (2005). Bullismo, bullismi. Le prepotenze in adolescenza dall’analisi dei casi agli strumenti d’intervento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  2. Clarkson P. (2000). Gestalt-Counseling. Roma: Sovera.
  3. Coleman J.S. (1988). Social Capital in the Creation of Human Capital. American Journal of Sociology, 94: 95-120.
  4. Commissione europea (2014). Studio sull’uso efficace dell’istruzione e dell’assistenza nella prima infanzia per prevenire l’abbandono scolastico. Lussemburgo: Ufficio delle pubblicazioni dell’Unione europea.
  5. D’Alessio M., Laghi F. e Giacalone V., (2010). Mentoring e scuola. Teorie, modelli e metodologie di intervento e contrasto alla dispersione scolastica. Milano: Hoepli.
  6. ENAR (2015). Shadow Report. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://hrwf.eu/wp-content/uploads/2015/10/EU2015.pdf.
  7. European Commission (2015). Education and Training. Monitor 2015. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union.
  8. Herrera C., Kauh T., Cooney M., Baldwin Grossman J. and McMaken J. (2008). High School Students as Mentors Findings from the big brothers big sisters school-based mentoring impact study. Philadelphia: Public/Private Ventures.
  9. ISTAT (2015). Il bullismo in Italia: comportamenti offensivi e violenti tra i giovanissimi.
  10. Maggiolini A. (2015). Counseling a scuola. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  11. The Mentoring and Befriending Foundation (2010). Peer Mentoring in Schools. A review of the evidence base of the benefits of peer mentoring in schools including findings from the MBF Outcomes Measurement Programme. Manchester: The Mentoring and Befriending Foundation.
  12. Nussbaum M. (2014). Creare Capacità. Bologna: il Mulino.
  13. Ocse (2015). In It Together: Why Less Inequalities Benefits All. -- Testo disponibile al sito: http://www.oecd.org/social/in-it-together-why-less-inequality-benefits-all-9789264235120-en.htm.
  14. Parsons C., Maras P., Knowles C., Bradshaw V., Hollingworth K. and Monteiro H. (2008). Formalised Peer Mentoring Pilot Evaluation. Canterbury: Christ Church.
  15. Pawson R., Boaz A. and Sullivan F. (2004). Mentoring relationships: an Explanatory review. ESRC UK Centre for Evidence based policy and Practice: working paper 21. Leeds: UK Centre for EBPP.
  16. Perls F. (1977). L’approccio della Gestalt. Roma: Astrolabio.
  17. Recalcati M. (2010). L’uomo senza inconscio. Figure della nuova psicoanalitica. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  18. Recalcati M. (2013). Il complesso di Telemaco. Genitori e figli dopo il tramonto del padre. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  19. Save The Children (2018). Nuotare contro corrente. Povertà educativa e resilienza in Italia. Roma: Save The Children.
  20. Save The Children (2014). La lampada di Aladino. L’indice di Save the Children per misurare le povertà educative e illuminare il futuro dei bambini in Italia. Roma: Save The Children.
  21. Sen A. (2010). L’Idea di Giustizia. Milano: Mondadori.
  22. UNICEF (1989). Convenzione ONU sui diritti dell’infanzia e dell’adolescenza. -- Testo disponibile ai siti: https://www.unicef.it/Allegati/Convenzione_diritti_infanzia_1.pdf e https://www.unicef.org/about/history/files/sowc_1989.pdf

Vittorio Lannutti, BeFriend: An opportunity to discover the value of the relationship and contact with the other in "WELFARE E ERGONOMIA" 1/2020, pp. 91-100, DOI:10.3280/WE2020-001009

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content