Click here to download

From Losses of Ego Functions to the Dance Steps between Psychotherapist and Client. Phenomenology and Aesthetics of Contact in the Psychotherapeutic Field
Journal Title: QUADERNI DI GESTALT 
Author/s: Margherita Spagnuolo Lobb 
Year:  2020 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  20 Pg. 21-40 FullText PDF:  254 KB
DOI:  10.3280/GEST2020-001003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


This paper tries to describe the actual contact-making between client and therapist as a co-created "dance". It basically makes a proposal to get rid of the individualistic language that is still in Gestalt therapy’s categories called "losses of ego functions", by using the idea of dance, which includes the feelings and the movements of both therapist and client. The author under-lines the need to develop the concepts of the original formulation by Perls, Hefferline and Goodman (1951; 1994, pp. 235 ff.) into categories which consider the mutual interactions be-tween two people. This perspective is in line with contemporary studies of neurosciences (just as an example: Damasio, 1999; Siegel, 1999; Gallese et al., 2007), intersubjective and rela-tional psychoanalysis (Mitchell, 2000; Stern et al., 2003). Describing her concept of Aesthetic Relational Knowledge (Spagnuolo Lobb, 2018), the author shows how the therapist feels part of the experiential field co-created with the client. The therapist uses her own attunement and resonance with a field-oriented, phenomenological and aesthetic glance. This perspective al-lows the therapist to stay with the spontaneity of the co-creation of the therapeutic contact (the "dance steps"), including at the same time developmental and psychopathological aspects of the experience of the client (the polyphonic development of domains). These make the client’s experience of the ground, as a "music of steps" that the client plays in the therapeutic session. The author describes the "dance steps" as procedural spontaneous actions of contact-making between therapist and client: they represent a phenomenological way to observe a dy-adic situation and can also be used for research. She also presents a grid that summarises the excitement experienced at the boundary, vital competences and risks of each "dance step". This tool can be used by therapists, to orient their work, and for training, supervision and research purposes. Considering different kinds of "music" in the experience of the ground, this work is based on the humanistic idea that any suffering is also a competence for contact and that change comes from staying with it, instead of from external interventions. This paper is also based on the aesthetic idea that there is a harmony in the way we perceive the world, however we per-ceive it - whether with anxiety and pain or with full senses and joy. Rather than paying atten-tion to what does not work, the author underlines the importance of recognizing this beauty in clients, using the therapist’s own presence as a field-oriented tool.
Keywords: Dance steps, aesthetic relational knowledge, field, losses of ego functions, polyphonic devel-opment of domains.

  1. Barber P. (2006). Becoming a Practitioner Researcher: A Gestalt Approach to Holistic Inquiry. London, UK: Middlesex University Press.
  2. Bloom D.J. (2005). Celebrating Laura Perls: The Aesthetic of Commitment. British Gestalt Journal, 14, 2: 81-90.
  3. Bloom D.J. (2007), “Tigre! Tigre! Che splendente bruci”: valori estetici come valori clinici in psicoterapia della Gestalt. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Amendt-Lyon N. (a cura di), Il permesso di creare. L’arte della psicoterapia della Gestalt, Milano: FrancoAngeli (ed. or.: “Tiger, Tiger, Burning Bright”. Aesthetic values as clinical values in Gestalt Therapy. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Amendt-Lyon N. (Eds.), Creative license. The Art of Gestalt Therapy, Vienna & New York: Springer, 2003).
  4. Buber M. (1993). Io e Tu. In: Il principio dialogico e altri saggi. Cinisello Balsamo: San Paolo (ed. or.: I and Thou. New York, NY: Scribner, 1958).
  5. Clemmens M. (2011). The Interactive Field: Gestalt Therapy as an Embodied Dialogue. In: Bar-Yoseph Levine T. (Ed.), Gestalt Therapy: Advances in Theory and Practice. London, UK: Routledge.
  6. Damasio A. (1999). The feeling of what happens: Body and emotion in the making of consciousness. New York, NY: Harcourt Brace.
  7. Francesetti G. (2014). Dalla sintomatologia individuale ai campi psicopatologici. Verso una prospettiva di campo sulla sofferenza clinica. Quaderni di Gestalt, XXVII, 2: 31-56., DOI: 10.3280/GEST2014-002003.
  8. Frank R. (2005). Il corpo consapevole. Un approccio somatico ed evolutivo alla psicoterapia. Milano: FrancoAngeli (ed. or.: Body of Awareness: A Somatic and Developmental Approach to Psychotherapy. Cambridge, MA: Gestalt Press, 2001).
  9. Frank R. (2019). L’esperienza del movimento: la risonanza cinestetica come sentimento relazionale. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Levi N., Williams A. (a cura di), La psicoterapia della Gestalt con i bambini. Dall’epistemologia alla pratica clinica. Milano: FrancoAngeli (ed. or.: Moving Experience: Kinaesthetic Resonance as Relational Feel. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Levi N., Williams A. (Eds.), Gestalt Therapy with Children. From Epistemology to Clinical Practice. Siracusa: Istituto di Gestalt HCC Italy Publ. Co., 2016).
  10. Gallese V., Eagle M.N., Migone P. (2007). Intentional Attunement: Mirror Neurons and the Neural Underpinnings of Interpersonal Relations. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 55, 1: 131-176., DOI: 10.1177/0003065107055001060
  11. Heidegger M. (1953). Essere e tempo. Torino: Utet (ed. or. Sein und Zeit. Niemeyer Verlag: Halle, 1927).
  12. Hodges C. (1997). Field Theory. Unpublished manuscript presented at New York Institute for Gestalt Therapy, New York.
  13. Honneth A. (2010). The Pathologies of Individual Freedom. Hegel’s Social Theory. Princeton, NJ; Woodstock, UK: Princeton University Press.
  14. Levinàs E. (1985). Umanesimo dell’altro uomo. Genova: Il Melangolo (ed. or. Humanism of the Other. Urbana, IL: University of Illinois Press, 1987).
  15. Lewin K. (1985). Teoria e sperimentazione in psicologia sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino (ed. or.: Field Theory in Social Science. New York, NY: Harper & Brothers, 1951).
  16. Macaluso M.A. (2015). La spontaneità dell’incontro terapeutico come fattore chiave di cambiamento. Quaderni di Gestalt, XXVIII, 2: 75-88., DOI: 10.3280/GEST2015-002005
  17. Mahoney M., Spagnuolo Lobb M., Clemmens M., Marquis A. (2007). Self-Regulation of the Therapeutic Meeting. From Constructivist and Gestalt Therapy Perspectives: A Transcribed Experiment. Studies in Gestalt Therapy. Dialogical Bridges, 1, 1: 67-90.
  18. Merleau-Ponty M. (1945). Fenomenologia della percezione. Milano: Bompiani (ed. or.: The Phenomenology of Perception. Abingdon, UK: Routledge, 2009).
  19. Mitchell S.A. (2002). Il modello relazionale. Dall’attaccamento all’intersoggettività. Milano: Raffaello Cortina (ed. or.: Relationality: From Attachment to Intersubjectivity. New York, NY: Analytic Press, 2000).
  20. Molinari R., Cavaleri P.A. (2015). Il dono nel tempo della crisi. Per una psicologia del riconoscimento. Milano: Raffaello Cortina.
  21. Panksepp J. (1998). Affective Neuroscience: The Foundations of Human and Animal Emotions. Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Oxford University Press.
  22. Parlett M. (2005). Contemporary Gestalt therapy: Field Theory. In: Woldt A.L., Toman S.M. (Eds.), Gestalt therapy: History, Theory, and Practice. Thousand Oaks, CA: Sage Publications.
  23. Parlett M. (2007). Abilità creative e l’arte di vivere bene. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Amendt-Lyon N. (a cura di), Il permesso di creare. L’arte della psicoterapia della Gestalt. Milano: FrancoAngeli (ed. or.: Creative Abilities and the Art of Living Well. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Amendt-Lyon N (Eds.), Creative License: The Art of Gestalt Therapy. Vienna & NewYork: Springer, 2003).
  24. Perls F.S, Hefferline R., Goodman P. (1997). La terapia della Gestalt: eccitazione e accrescimento nella personalità umana. Roma: Astrolabio (ed. or.: Gestalt Therapy: Excitement and Growth in the Human Personality. New York, NY: The Gestalt Journal Press, 1951; 1994).
  25. Perls L. (1992). Living at the Boundary. New York, NY: Gestalt Therapy Press.
  26. Philippson P. (2001). Self in Relation. New York, NY: Gestalt Journal Press.
  27. Porges S. (2014). La teoria polivagale. Fondamenti neurofisiologici delle emozioni, dell’attaccamento, della comunicazione e dell’autoregolazione. Roma: Giovanni Fioriti (ed. or.: The Polyvagal Theory: Neurophysiological Foundations of Emotions, Attachment, Communication, and Self-regulation. New York, NY: W.W. Norton & Company, 2011).
  28. Robine J.-M. (2001). From Field to Situation. In: Robine J.-M. (Ed.), Contact and Relationship in a Field Perspective. Bordeaux: L’Exprimerie.
  29. Robine J.-M. (2003). Intentionality in Flesh and Blood. International Gestalt Journal, XXVI, 2: 85-110.
  30. Robine J.-M. (2015). Social change begins with two. Siracusa: Istituto di Gestalt HCC Italy Publ. Co. (www.gestaltitaly.com).
  31. Siegel D.J. (2012). La mente relazionale: neurobiologia dell’esperienza interpersonale. Milano: Raffaello Cortina (ed. or. The Develng Mind: How Relationships and the Brain Interact to Shape Who We Are. New York: The Guilford Press, 1999).
  32. Spagnuolo Lobb M. (2009a). Co-creation and the Contact Boundary in the Therapeutic Situation. In: Ullman D., Wheeler G. (Eds.), Co-creating the Field: Intention and Practise in the Age of Complexity. The Evolution of Gestalt Series, Vol. 1. New York, NY: Routledge, Taylor and Francis for Gestalt Press, pp. 101-134.
  33. Spagnuolo Lobb M. (2009b). Is Oedipus Still Necessary in the Therapeutic Room? Sexuality and Love as Emerging at the Contact-Boundary in a Situational Field. Gestalt Review, 13, 1: 47-61.
  34. Spagnuolo Lobb M. (2011). Il now-for-next in psicoterapia. La psicoterapia della Gestalt raccontata nella società post-moderna. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  35. Spagnuolo Lobb M. (2012). Lo sviluppo polifonico dei domini. Verso una prospettiva evolutiva della psicoterapia della Gestalt. Quaderni di Gestalt, XXV, 2: 31-50., DOI: 10.3280/GEST2012-002003
  36. Spagnuolo Lobb M. (2017). La conoscenza relazionale estetica del campo. Per uno sviluppo del concetto di consapevolezza in psicoterapia della Gestalt e nella clinica contemporanea. Quaderni di Gestalt, XXX, 1: 17-33.
  37. Spagnuolo Lobb M. (2018). Il sé come contatto, il contatto come sé. Un contributo all’esperienza dello sfondo secondo la teoria del sé della psicoterapia della Gestalt. In: Robine J.-M. (a cura di), Sé. Una polifonia di psicoterapeuti della Gestalt contemporanei. Milano: FrancoAngeli, pp. 263-296 (ed. or. Self as Contact, Contact as Self. A Contribution to Ground Experience in Gestalt Therapy Theory of Self. In: Robine J.M. (Ed.), Self. A Polyphony of Contemporary Gestalt Therapists. St. Romain la Virvée: L’Exprimerie, 2016, pp. 261-289).
  38. Spagnuolo Lobb M. (2019). La psicoterapia della Gestalt con i bambini: sostenere lo sviluppo polifonico dei domini in un campo di contatti. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Levi N., Williams A. (a cura di), La psicoterapia della Gestalt con i bambini. Dall'epistemologia alla pratica clinica. Milano: FrancoAngeli, (ed. or. Gestalt Therapy with Children. Supporting the Polyphonic Development of Domains in a Field of Contacts. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Levi N., Williams A., Eds, Gestalt Therapy with Children. From Epistemology to Clinical Practice. Siracusa: Istituto di Gestalt HCC Italy Publ. Co.).
  39. Staemmler F.M. (2006). The Willingness to Be Uncertain – Preliminary Thoughts About Interpretation and Understanding in Gestalt Therapy. International Gestalt Journal, 29, 2: 11-42.
  40. Stern D.N. (1998). Il mondo interpersonale del bambino. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri (ed. or.: The Interpersonal World of the Infant: A View from Psychoanalysis and Developmental Psychology. New York, NY: Basic Books, 1985).
  41. Stern D.N. (2011). Le forme vitali. L’esperienza dinamica in psicologia, nell’arte, in psicoterapia e nello sviluppo. Milano: Raffaello Cortina (ed. or. Forms of Vitality. Exploring Dynamic Experience in Psychology and the Arts. Oxford, UK; New York, NY: Oxford University Press, 2010).
  42. Stern D.N., Boston Change Process Study Group (2007). L’altra faccia della luna: l’importanza della conoscenza implicita per la psicoterapia della Gestalt. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Amendt-Lyon N. (a cura di), Il permesso di creare. L’arte della psicoterapia della Gestalt. Milano: FrancoAngeli (ed. or.: On the Other Side of the Moon. The Import of Implicit Knowledge for Gestalt Therapy. In: Spagnuolo Lobb M., Amendt-Lyon N. (Eds.), Creative License: The Art of Gestalt Therapy. Wien & New York: Springer, 2003).
  43. Taylor M. (2016). Psicoterapia del trauma e pratica clinica. Corpo, neuroscienze e Gestalt. Milano: FrancoAngeli (ed. or.: Trauma Therapy and Clinical Practice: Neuroscience, Gestalt and the Body. Maidenhead, UK: Open University Press, 2014).
  44. Taylor S. (1998). The Social Being in Social Psychology. In: Gilbert D., Fiske S.T., Elindzy G. (Eds.), The Handbook of Social Psychology. Vol. 1. Boston, MA: McGraw-Hill, pp. 58-95.
  45. Wertheimer M. (1997). Il pensiero produttivo. Firenze: Giunti (ed. or.: Productive Thinking. New York, NY: Harper and Bros, 1945).

Margherita Spagnuolo Lobb, From Losses of Ego Functions to the Dance Steps between Psychotherapist and Client. Phenomenology and Aesthetics of Contact in the Psychotherapeutic Field in "QUADERNI DI GESTALT" 1/2020, pp. 21-40, DOI:10.3280/GEST2020-001003

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content