Click here to download

I territori dell’auto elettrica: oltre il paradigma urbanocentrico
Author/s: Paola Pucci 
Year:  2020 Issue: 128 Language: Italian 
Pages:  24 Pg. 14-37 FullText PDF:  311 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ASUR2020-128003
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

The paper analyses the relationships between electric mobility, mobility practices, socio-economical and settlement features through a multicriteria analysis for describing the contextual conditions and the propensity to EVs adoption. The empirical application in the Milan urban region offers four scenarios for identifying different intensities/modes/speeds in the diffusion of the EVs, in order to orient policy making process to support and regulate a sustainable mobility transition.
Keywords: Electric vehicles; e-transition; spatial impact; multicriteria analysis; Milan urban region.

  1. Schot J. and Geels F.W. (2008). Strategic niche management and sustainable innovation journeys: theory, findings, research agenda, and policy. Technology Analysis and Strategic Management, 20(5): 537-554., DOI: 10.1080/0953732080229265
  2. Schuitema G., Anable J., Skippon S. and Kinnear N. (2013). The role of instrumental, hedonic and symbolic attributes in the intention to adopt electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 48: 39-49.
  3. Schwanen T. (2015). The bumpy road toward low-energy urban mobility: case studies from two UK Cities. Sustainability, 7(6): 7086-7111.
  4. Shepherd S., Bonsall P. and Harrison G. (2012). Factors affecting future demand for electric vehicles: a model based study. Transportation Policy, 20: 62-74.
  5. Sierzchula W., Bakker S., Maat K. and Van Wee B. (2014). The influence of financial incentives and other socio-economic factors on electric vehicle adoption. Energy Policy, 68: 183-194.
  6. Tran M., Bishop J.D.K., Banister D. and Mcculloch M.D. (2002). Realizing the electric vehicle revolution. Natural Climate Change, 2: 328-333.
  7. Axsen J., Goldberg S. and Bailey J. (2016). How might potential future plug-in electric vehicle buyers differ from current “Pioneer” owners? Transportation Research Part D – Transport and Environment, 47: 357-370.
  8. Bakker S. and Trip J. (2013). Policy options to support the adoption of electric vehicles in the urban environment. Transportation Research Part D –Transport and Environment, 25: 18-23.
  9. Bailey J., Miele A. and Axsen J. (2015). Is awareness of public charging associated with consumer interest in plug-in electric vehicles? Transportation Research Part D – Transport and Environment, 36: 1-9.
  10. Balducci A., Fedeli V. e Curci F. (a cura di) (2017). Oltre la metropoli. L’urbanizzazione regionale in Italia. Milano: Angelo Guerini e Associati. Bansal P., Kockelman K.M. and Wang Y. (2015). Hybrid electric vehicle ownership and fuel economy across Texas. Transportation Research Record Journal of the Transportation Research Board, 2495: 53-64., DOI: 10.3141/2495-06
  11. Bauer G. (2018). The impact of battery electric vehicles on vehicle purchase and driving behavior in Norway. Transportation Research Part D – Transport and Environment, 58, 239-258.
  12. Bergman N., Schwanen T. and Sovacool B. (2017). Imagined people, behaviour and future mobility: Insights from visions of electric vehicles and car clubs in the United Kingdom. Transport Policy, 59: 165-173.
  13. Wu X., Freese D., Cabrera A. and Kitch W.A. (2015). Electric vehicles’ energy consumption measurement and estimation. Transportation Research Part D –Transport and Environment, 34: 52-67.
  14. Zubaryeva A., Thiel C., Barbone E. and Mercier A. (2012). Assessing factors for the identification of potential lead markets for electrified vehicles in Europe: expert opinion elicitation. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79: 1622-1637.
  15. Boeri S., Lanzani A. e Marini E. (1993). Il territorio che cambia. Ambienti, paesaggi e immagini della regione milanese. Milano: AIM – Abitare Segesta Cataloghi.
  16. Bradley T.H. and Frank A.A. (2009). Design, demonstrations and sustainability impact assessments for plug-in hybrid electric vehicles. Renewable Sustainable Energy Reviews, 13: 115.
  17. Campbell A.R., Ryley T. and Thring R. (2012). Identifying the early adopters of alternative fuel vehicles: a case study of Birmingham, United Kingdom. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 46(8): 1318-1327.
  18. Cecere G., Corrocher N. and Guerzoni M. (2018). Price or performance? A probabilistic choice analysis of the intention to buy electric vehicles in European countries. Energy Policy, 118: 19-32.
  19. Chen T.D., Wang Y. and Kockelman K.M. (2015). Where are the electric vehicles? A spatial model for vehicle-choice count data. Journal of Transport Geography: 43: 181-188.
  20. Coenen L., Benneworth P. and Truffer B. (2012). Toward a spatial perspective on sustainability transitions. Research Policy: 41(6): 968-979.
  21. Curtin R., Shrago Y. and Mikkelsen J. (2009). Plug-in Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Ann Arbor: University of Michigan. -- Testo disponibile al sito:
  22. Dimatulac T. and Maoh H. (2017). The spatial distribution of hybrid electric vehicles in a sprawled mid-size Canadian city: evidence from Windsor, Canada. Journal of Transport Geography, 60: 59-67.
  23. Faria R., Moura P., Delgado J. and de Almeida A.T. (2012). A sustainability assessment of electric vehicles as a personal mobility system. Energy Convers. Manage, 61: 19-30.
  24. Fornahl D. and Werner N. (2015). Erratum to: New Electric Mobility in Fleets in the Rural Area of Bremen/Oldenburg. In: Leal Filho W. and Kotter R., eds., E-Mobility in Europe. Green Energy and Technology. Cham: Springer., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-319-13194-8_1
  25. Gallagher K.S. and Muehlegger E. (2011). Giving green to get green? Incentives and consumer adoption of hybrid vehicle technology. Journal of Environmental Economics and Management, 61: 1-15.
  26. Geels F.W. (2012). A socio-technical analysis of low-carbon transitions: introducing the multi-level perspective into transport studies. Journal of Transport Geography, 24: 471-482.
  27. Givoni M. (2013). Alternative pathways to low carbon mobility. In: Givoni M. and Banister D., eds., Moving towards low carbon mobility. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar Publishing.
  28. Giua P. (2019). I territori dell’auto elettrica: possibili strategie e azioni per governare la transizione. Tesi di Laurea Magistrale. Milano: PUPT, Politecnico di Milano.
  29. Goodwin P. and van Dender K. (2013). “Peak Car” – Themes and Issues. Transport Reviews, 33(3): 243-254., DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2013.80413
  30. Hardman S., Jenn A. and Tal G. (2018). A review of consumer preferences of and interactions with electric vehicle charging infrastructure. Transportation Research Part D – Transport and Environment, 62(July): 508-523.
  31. Morton C., Lovelace R. and Anable J. (2017). Exploring the effect of local transport policies on the adoption of low emission vehicles: evidence from the London Congestion Charge and Hybrid Electric Vehicles. Transportation Policy, 60: 34-46.
  32. Namdeo A., Tiwary A. and Dziurla R. (2014). Spatial planning of public charging points using multi-dimensional analysis of early adopters of electric vehicles for a city region. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 89: 188-200.
  33. Newman D., Wells P., Donovan C., Nieuwenhuis P. and Davies H. (2014). Urban, sub-urban or rural: where is the best place for electric vehicles? International Journal of Automotive Technology and Management, 14 (3-4): 306-323., DOI: 10.1504/IJATM.2014.06529
  34. Palermo P.C. (1997) (a cura di). Linee di assetto e scenari evolutivi della regione urbana milanese. Atlante delle trasformazioni insediative. Quaderni di Dipartimento. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  35. Plötz P., Schneider U., Globisch J. and Dütschke E. (2014). Who will buy electric vehicles? Identifying early adopters in Germany. Transportation Research Part A – Policy and Practice, 67: 96-109.
  36. Potter S. (2007). Exploring approaches towards a sustainable transport system. International Journal of Sustainable Transportation, 1: 115-131., DOI: 10.1080/1556831060109199
  37. Ryghaug M. and Toftaker M. (2016). Creating transitions to electric road transport in Norway: the role of user imaginaries. Energy Research and Social Science, 17: 119-126.
  38. Rogers E.M. (1995). Diffusion of Innovations. New York: Simon and Schuster. Saarenpää J., Kolehmainen M. and Niska H. (2013). Geodemographic analysis and estimation of early plug-in hybrid electric vehicle adoption. Applied Energy 107: 456-464.
  39. Saaty T.L. (2005). The analytic hierarchy and analytic network processes for the measurement of intangible criteria and for decision-making. In: Figueira J., Greco S. and Ehrgott M., eds., Multiple criteria decision analysis: state of the art surveys. Heidelberg: Springer, 345-405.
  40. Saaty T.L. (2008). Decision making with the analytic hierarchy process. International Journal of Services Sciences, 1(1): 83-98., DOI: 10.1504/IJSSCI.2008.01759
  41. Sandy Thomas C.E. (2012). How green are electric vehicles? International Journal of Hydrogen Energy, 37(7): 6053-6062.
  42. He L., Chen W. and Conzelmann G. (2012). Impact of vehicle usage on consumer choice of hybrid electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part D: Transport and Environment, 17: 208-214.
  43. Heinen E. and Mattioli G. (2017). Does a high level of multimodality mean less car use? An exploration of multimodality trends in England. Transportation, 46: 1093-1126.
  44. Helmers E. and Marx P. (2012). Electric cars: technical characteristics and environmental impacts. Environmental Sciences Europe, 24(14)., DOI: 10.1186/2190-4715-24-1
  45. Hickman R., Saxena S., Banister D. and Ashiru O. (2012). Examining transport futures with scenario analysis and MCA. Transportation Research Part A, 46: 560-575.
  46. Higgins P., Paevere J., Gardner G. and Quezada (2012). Combining choice modelling and multi-criteria analysis for technology diffusion: an application to the uptake of electric vehicles. Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 79: 1399-1412.
  47. Higgins C.D., Mohamed M. and Ferguson M.R. (2017). Size matters: How vehicle body type affects consumer preferences for electric vehicles. Transportation Research Part A: Policy and Practice, 100(June): 182-201.
  48. Kester J., Sovacool B.K., Noel L. and Zarazua de Rubens G. (2020). Rethinking the spatiality of Nordic electric vehicles and their popularity in urban environments: Moving beyond the city? Journal of Transport Geography, 82.
  49. Kihm A. and Trommer S. (2014). The new car market for electric vehicles and the potential for fuel substitution. Energy Policy, 73: 147-157.
  50. Lanzani A. (1996). Geografie degli ambienti insediativi lombardi. Schede descrittive e interpretative. Territorio, 3: 85-123.
  51. Liao F., Molin E. and van Wee B. (2017). Consumer preferences for electric vehicles: a literature review. Transport Reviews: a transnational, transdisciplinary journal, 37(3): 252-275., DOI: 10.1080/01441647.2016.123079
  52. Liu X., Roberts M.C. and Sioshansi R. (2017). Spatial effects on hybrid electric vehicle adoption. Transportation Research Part D – Transport and Environment, 52: 85-97.
  53. Ma H., Balthasar F., Tait N., Riera-Palou X. and Harrison A. (2012). A new comparison between the life cycle greenhouse gas emissions of battery electric vehicles and internal combustion vehicles. Energy Policy, 44: 160-173.
  54. Morton C., Anable J., Yeboahd G. and Cottrillc C. (2018). The spatial pattern of demand in the early market for electric vehicles: Evidence from the United Kingdom. Journal of Transport Geography, 72: 119-130.

Paola Pucci, in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 128/2020, pp. 14-37, DOI:10.3280/ASUR2020-128003


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content