Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
Symbiotic Relationships between SEZ and Urban Societies
Titolo Rivista: ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI 
Autori/Curatori: Stefano De Falco 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: 128  Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  20 P. 132-151 Dimensione file:  212 KB
DOI:  10.3280/ASUR2020-128008
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The scientific debate on Special Economic Zones (SEZ) shows many contributions, however the present work intends to offer an original perspective to this theme based on a comparison, through a systemic approach, between the sociourban variables, that make up the symbiotic relationships between SEZ, and urban society. A focus on the SEZ settled in the east of Naples, Italy, is also proposed, which well allows to highlight the investigated socio-urban aspects.

Il dibattito scientifico sulle zone economiche speciali (ZES) è ricco di diversi contributi, tuttavia il presente lavoro intende proporre un’originale prospettiva al tema che ne intende confrontare, mediante un approccio sistemico, le variabili socio-urbane che compongono le relazioni simbiotiche tra ZES e società urbana. È proposto, inoltre, un focus relativo alla ZES avviata nella zona est di Napoli, in Italia, che ben si presta ad evidenziare gli aspetti socio-urbani indagati.
Keywords: ZES; Zone Economiche Speciali; Sistema Urbano.

  1. Addie J.P. (2017). From the urban university to universities in urban society. Regional Studies, 51(7): 1089-1099.
  2. Addie J-P., Angrisani M. and De Falco S. (2018). University-led innovation in and for peripheral urban areas: new approaches in Naples, Italy and Newark, NJ, US. European Planning Studies, 26(6): 1181-1201 Aggarwal A. (2012). Social and economic impact of SEZs in India. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  3. Alfaro d’Alençon P., Campkin B., Gupte R., Mkhabela S., Novy J. and Savelad’Alen M. (2015) (eds.). Urban pamphleteer #5: Global education for urban futures. London: UCL Urban Lab.
  4. Alkon M. (2018). Do special economic zones induce developmental spillovers? Evidence from India’s states. World Development, 107: 396-409.
  5. Bender T. (1998). Scholarship, local life, and the necessity of worldliness. In: van der Wusten H., ed., The urban university and its identity: Roots, locations, roles. Norwell: Kluwer, 17-28.
  6. Benneworth P. (2013) (ed.). University engagement with socially excluded communities. London: Springer.
  7. Bräutigam D. and Tang X. (2011). African Shenzhen: China’s special economic zones in Africa. The Journal of Modern African Studies, 49(1): 27-54.
  8. Bräutigam D. and Tang X. (2014). Going global in groups: Structural transformation and China’s special economic zones overseas. World Development, 63: 78-91.
  9. De Falco S., Angelidou M. and Addie J.P.D. (2018). From the ‘Smart City’ to the ‘Smart Metropolis’? Building Resilience in the Urban Periphery. European Urban and Regional Studies, 7: 1-19.
  10. Dematteis G. (1980). La risposta dei geografi ai problemi di conoscenza posti dallo sviluppo della società italiana. In: Corna Pellegrini G. e Brusa C., a cura di, La ricerca geografica in Italia (1960 1980). Varese: ASK Edizioni, 483-489.
  11. Dematteis G. e Governa F. (2005) (a cura di). Territorialità, sviluppo locale, sostenibilità: il modello SloT, Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  12. Farole T. and Akinci G. (2011). Special economic zones: Progress, emerging challenges, and future directions. New York: World Bank Publications.
  13. Formato E. and Russo M. (2014). Re-use/re-cycle territories a retroactive conceptualisation for East Naples. Tema, Journal of Land Use, Mobility and Environment, 1: 432-440.
  14. Lipman P. (2011). The new political economy of urban education: Neoliberalism, race, and the right to the city. New York: Routledge.
  15. Lu Y., Wang J. and Zhu L. (2015). Do place-based policies work? Micro-level evidence from China’s economic zone program. -- Available on SSRN: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2635851.
  16. Moberg L. (2017). The political economy of special economic zones: Concentrating economic development. London-New York: Routledge.
  17. Pan W.H. and Ngo X.T. (2016). Endogenous growth theory and regional performance: The moderating effects of special economic zones. Communist and Post-Communist Studies, 49: 113-122.
  18. Pendras M. and Dierwechter Y. (2012). The problematic potential of universities to advance critical urban politics. Journal of Geography in Higher Education, 36: 307-321.
  19. Schmid C. (2014). Networks, borders, difference: Towards a theory of the urban.
  20. In: Brenner N., ed., Implosions/explosions: Towards a theory of planetary urbanization. Berlin: Jovis, 67-80. Sing M., Love P. and Liu H. (2018). Rehabilitation of existing building stock: A system dynamics model to support policy development. Cities, in press. SRM. -- Retrieved by www.sr-m.it/barometro-economia-zes/SRM.
  21. Sterman J.D. (2001). System dynamics modeling: Tools for learning in a complex world. California Management Review, 43(4): 8-25.
  22. Sterman J.D. (2010). Business dynamics: System thinking and modeling for a complex world. McGraw-Hill Education.
  23. Wang J. (2013). The economic impact of special economic zones: Evidence from Chinese municipalities. Journal of Development Economics, 101(1): 133-147.
  24. Zeng D.Z. (2011). How do special economic zones and industrial clusters drive China’s rapid development? -- Technical report available at: http://documents.worldbank.org/curated/en/310891468018256346/How-do-special-economiczones-and-industrial-clusters-drive-Chinas-rapid-development.

Stefano De Falco, Relazioni simbiotiche tra ZES e società urbana in "ARCHIVIO DI STUDI URBANI E REGIONALI" 128/2020, pp. 132-151, DOI:10.3280/ASUR2020-128008

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche