Clicca qui per scaricare

Tracking in the tracks in the Italian public schooling: Inequality patterns in an urban context
Autori/Curatori: Luigi Benfratello, Giuseppe Sorrenti, Gilberto Turati 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  32 P. 39-70 Dimensione file:  277 KB
DOI:  10.3280/EP2020-002002
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 

We study whether, alongside with an explicit tracking system separating students in general versus vocational curricula typical in European countries, the Italian highly centralised public schooling is also characterised by another implicit tracking system, typical of the US, separating students mostly by ability and income within the same track. We pursue this aim by considering the municipality of Turin, a post-industrialised urban context in Northern Italy. We proxy students’ ability and skills with the score obtained at the standardised admission test at the School of Economics and Business of the local university. We find evidence of heterogeneity across tracks and schools within the same track, which suggests that the inequality patterns common in the Italian schooling system are affected by both types of tracking. We then discuss the potential sources of this US-style tracking, namely self-selection of better students in better schools, observed and unobserved school characteristics and income stratification. As for the role of income, we find limited evidence of residential segregation, but students from better socio-economic backgrounds travel more, exploiting information on school quality.

Keywords: Public schools, educational inequalities, schools stratification, tracking, house prices, income segregation
Jel Code: I24, I28, R23

  1. Aaronson D., Barrow L. and Sander W. (2007). Teachers and student achievement in the Chicago Public High Schools. Journal of Labor Economics, 25(1): 95-135.
  2. Akerhielm K. (1995). Does class size matter?. Economics of Education Review, 14(3): 229-241.
  3. Angrist J. D. and Lavy V. (1999). Using Maimonides’ rule to estimate the effect of class size on scholastic achievement. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2): 533-575.
  4. Bayer P., Ferreira F. and McMillan R. (2007). A unified framework for measuring preferences for schools and neighborhoods. Journal of Political Economy, 115(4): 588-638.
  5. Black S. E. (1999). Do Better Schools Matter? Parental Valuation of Elementary Education. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 114(2): 577-599.
  6. Bordignon M., Carapella G., Turati G. (2017), Eduscopio: le determinanti dell’accesso all’informazione, WP 56, Fondazione Giovanni Agnelli, Torino.
  7. Bratti M. (2007). Parents’ income and children’s school drop-out at 16 in England and Wales: evidence from the 1970 British Cohort Study. Review of Economics of the Household, 5(1): 15-40.
  8. Breen R., Luijkx R., Müller W. and Pollak R. (2009). Nonpersistent inequality in educational attainment: evidence from eight European countries. American Journal of Sociology, 114(5): 1475-1521.
  9. Brunello G. and Checchi D. (2007). Does school tracking affect equality of opportunity? New international evidence. Economic Policy, 52: 781-861.
  10. Checchi D. and Flabbi L. (2013). Intergenerational mobility and schooling decisions in Germany and Italy: the impact of secondary school tracks. Rivista di Politica Economica, CII: 7-57.
  11. Checchi D., Ichino A. and Rustichini A. (1999). More equal but less mobile? Education financing and intergenerational mobility in Italy and in the US. Journal of Public Economics, 74(3): 351-393.
  12. Checchi D. and Peragine V. (2010). Inequality of opportunity in Italy. The Journal of Economic Inequality, 8(4): 429-450.
  13. Cipollone P., Montanaro P. and Sestito P. (2010). Value-added measures in Italian high schools: problems and findings. Giornale degli Economisti, 69(2): 81-114.
  14. Clapp J. M., Nanda A. and Ross S. L. (2008). Which school attributes matter? The influence of school district performance and demographic composition on property values. Journal of Urban Economics, 63(2): 451-466.
  15. Cullen J. B., Jacob B. A. and Levitt S. D. (2005). The impact of school choice on student outcomes: an analysis of the Chicago Public Schools. Journal of Public Economics, 89(5-6): 729-760.
  16. De Fraja G. and Martínez-Mora F. (2014). The desegregating effect of school tracking. Journal of Urban Economics, 80: 164-177.
  17. De Giorgi G., Pellizzari M. and Redaelli S. (2010). Identification of social interactions through partially overlapping peer groups. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 2(2): 241-75.
  18. De Paola M., Ponzo M. and Scoppa V. (2013). Class size effects on student achievement: heterogeneity across abilities and fields. Education Economics, 21(2): 135-153.
  19. De Paola M. and Scoppa V. (2010). Peer group effects on the academic performance of Italian students. Applied Economics, 42(17): 2203-2215.
  20. Dhar P. and Ross S. L. (2012). School district quality and property values: examining differences along school district boundaries. Journal of Urban Economics, 71(1): 18-25.
  21. Dobbie W. and Fryer R. G. (2013). Getting beneath the veil of effective schools: evidence from New York City. American Economic Journal: Applied Economics, 5(4): 28-60.
  22. Downes T. A. and Zabel J. E. (2002). The impact of school characteristics on house prices: Chicago 1987-1991. Journal of Urban Economics, 52(1): 1-25.
  23. Dustmann C. (2004). Parental background, secondary school track choice, and wages. Oxford Economic Papers, 56(2): 209-230.
  24. Epple D., Figlio D. and Romano R. (2004). Competition between private and public schools: testing stratification and pricing predictions. Journal of Public Economics, 88(7-8): 1215-1245.
  25. Epple D., Newlon E. and Romano R. (2002). Ability tracking, school competition, and the distribution of educational benefits. Journal of Public Economics, 83(1): 1-48.
  26. Epple D., Romano R. and Sieg H. (2003). Peer effects, financial aid and selection of students into colleges and universities: an empirical analysis. Journal of Applied Econometrics, 18(5): 501-525.
  27. Epple D. and Romano R. E. (1998). Competition between private and public schools, vouchers, and peer-group effects. The American Economic Review, 88(1): 33-62.
  28. European Commission (2010). Why socio-economic inequalities increase? Facts and policy responses in Europe.
  29. Fack G. and Grenet J. (2010). When do better schools raise housing prices? Evidence from Paris public and private schools. Journal of Public Economics, 94(1-2): 59-77.
  30. Flabbi L. (2001). Secondary schooling decisions in Italy. Rivista di Politica Economica, 91: 85-114.
  31. Freeman R. and Viarengo M. (2014). School and family effects on educational outcomes across countries. Economic Policy, 60: 395-446.
  32. Friesen J. and Brian Krauth B. (2007). Sorting and inequality in Canadian schools. Journal of Public Economics, 91(11-12): 2185-2212.
  33. Gibbons S. and Machin S. (2003). Valuing English primary schools. Journal of Urban Economics, 53(2): 197-219.
  34. Gibbons S. and Machin S. (2006). Paying for primary schools: Admission constraints, school popularity or congestion?. The Economic Journal, 116(510): C77-C92.
  35. Gibbons S. and Telhaj S. (2007). Are schools drifting apart? Intake stratification in English secondary schools. Urban Studies, 44(7): 1281-1305.
  36. Hanushek E. A. and Wößmann L. (2006). Does educational tracking affect performance and inequality? Differences-in-Differences evidence across countries. The Economic Journal, 116(510): 63-76.
  37. Invalsi (2012). OCSE PISA 2012. Rapporto Nazionale.
  38. Krueger A. B. adn Whitmore D. M. (2001). The effect of attending a small class in the early grades on College-test taking and middle school test results: evidence from Project Star. The Economic Journal, 111(468): 1-28.
  39. Meurs D., Puhani P. A. and Von Haaren-Giebel F. (2017). Number of siblings and educational choices of immigrant children: evidence from first- and second-generation immigrants. Review of Economics of the Household, 15: 1137-1158.
  40. Ministero dell’Istruzione, dell’Universit`a e della Ricerca (MIUR) (2011). Focus sulle iscrizioni alla scuola secondaria di II grado – a.s. 2011/2012, Direzione Generale per gli Studi, la Statistica e per i Sistemi Informativi – Servizio Statistico.
  41. Nechyba T. (2003). School finance, spatial income segregation, and the nature of communities. Journal of Urban Economics, 54(1): 61-88.
  42. Oakes J. (1985). Keeping track: how schools structure inequality. New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.
  43. Schütz G., Ursprung H. W. and Wößmann L. (2008). Education policy and equality of opportunity. Kyklos, 61(2): 279-308.
  44. Summers A. A. and Wolfe B. L. (1977). Do schools make a difference? The American Economic Review, 67(4): 639-652.

Luigi Benfratello, Giuseppe Sorrenti, Gilberto Turati, in "ECONOMIA PUBBLICA " 2/2020, pp. 39-70, DOI:10.3280/EP2020-002002


FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche