Click here to download

Continuity, change and transitions of artistic professions in the Italian theatre industry
Journal Title: SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO  
Author/s: Marco Serino 
Year:  2020 Issue: 157 Language: English 
Pages:  20 Pg. 186-205 FullText PDF:  265 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2020-157010
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The article reflects upon artistic work in the theatre sector, to understand how this peculiar profession has historically developed in Italy. Relying on different theoret-ical contributions and diverse empirical sources, the article delineates the institu-tionalisation process of the Italian theatre sector through different phases and transitions. Another topic addressed in this article are the past and current occupa-tional and working conditions of Italian theatre artists. Career pathways are thus discussed with respect to training, access to the profession, national collective agreements and actual forms of subordinate work and self-employment.
Keywords: Theatre, artistic professions, performing arts, institutionalisation

  1. Aa.Vv. (2012). A.M.At.I. Archivio Multimediale degli Attori Italiani. Firenze: Firenze University Press.
  2. Abbott A. (1988). The System of Professions. An Essay on the Division of Expert Labor. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  3. Becker H.S. (1982). Art Worlds. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  4. Bianchini F. (1995). Cultural Considerations in Inner City Regeneration. In: Culture and Neighbourhoods. Volume 1. Concept and References. Strasbourg: Council of Europe Publishing.
  5. Bourdieu P. (1986). The Forms of Capital. In: Richardson J.G., ed., Handbook of Theory and Research for the Sociology of Education. New York: Greenwood Press.
  6. Bourdieu P. (1989). Social Space and Symbolic Power. Sociological Theory, 7(1): 14-25.
  7. Bourdieu P. (1993). The Field of Cultural Production. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  8. Brockett O.G. (1982). History of the Theatre. 4th Edition. Boston: Allyn and Bacon.
  9. Bureau M.-C., Corsani A. (2014). Du désir d’autonomie à l’indépendance. La nouvelle revue du travail, 5. -- Available at http://journals.openedition.org/nrt/1844, accessed 7th March 2020.
  10. Chicchi F., Savioli M., Turrini M. (2014). Soggettività intermittenti. Un’inchiesta sulla scomposizione del lavoro nell’ambito delle industrie creative. Sociologia del lavoro, 133: 42-57.
  11. DiMaggio P. (1987). Classification in Art. American Sociological Review, 52(4): 440-455.
  12. DiMaggio P. (1991). Constructing an Organizational Field as a Professional Project: U.S. Art Museums, 1920-1940. In: Powell W.W., DiMaggio P., eds., The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  13. DiMaggio P. (1992). Cultural Boundaries and Structural Change: The Extension of the High Culture Model to Theater, Opera, and the Dance, 1900-1940. In: Lamont M., Fournier M., eds., Cultivating Differences. Symbolic Boundaries and the Making of Inequality. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  14. DiMaggio P., Powell W.W. (1983). The Iron Cage Revisited: Institutional Isomorphism and Collective Rationality in Organizational Fields. American Sociological Review, 48: 147-160.
  15. Freidson E. (1986). Les professions artistiques comme défi à l’analyse sociologique. Revue française de sociologie, 27(3): 431-443.
  16. Freidson E. (1999). Theory of Professionalism: Method and Substance. International Review of Sociology, 9(1): 117-129.
  17. Gallina M. (1990). Teatro d’impresa, teatro di stato? Torino: Rosemberg & Sellier.
  18. Gallina M. (2005). Il teatro possibile. Linee organizzative e tendenze del teatro italiano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  19. Gallina M. (2007). Organizzare teatro. Produzione, distribuzione, gestione nel sistema italiano. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  20. Gallina M. (2016). Ri-Organizzare teatro. Produzione, distribuzione, gestione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  21. Gallina M., Ponte di Pino O. (2018). Introduzione. In: Gallina M., Monti L., Ponte di Pino O., a cura di, Attore... Ma di lavoro cosa fai? Occupazione, diritti, welfare nello spettacolo dal vivo. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  22. Gerber A. (2017). The Work of Art. Value in Creative Careers. Stanford: Stanford University Press.
  23. Katz S. (2007). L’incertitude professionnelle contre la rationalisation scolaire. Cahiers de la recherche sur l’éducation et les savoirs, 6. Available at http://journals. openedition.org/cres/900; accessed 12th February 2020.
  24. Katz S. (2017). Actors Excluded from the Business. Ordinary Logics of Professional Disqualification and Degradation in Artistic Practice. Biens symboliques/Symbolic Goods, 1: 2-47.
  25. Kuric Kardelis S. (2018). Artesanía Teatral. Evolución y consecuencias de la política cultural en el caso del teatro en Madrid desde los años 80. Sociología del Trabajo, 92: 51-66.
  26. Luciano A., Bertolini S. (eds.) (2011). Incontri dietro le quinte. Imprese e professionisti nel settore dello spettacolo. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  27. Menger P.-M. (1997a). L’activité du comédien. Liens, indépendances et micro-organisations. Réseaux, 15(86): 59-75.
  28. Menger P.-M. (1997b). La profession de comédien. Formations, activités et carrières dans la démultiplication de soi. Paris: Ministère de la Culture et de la Communication, La Documentation Française.
  29. Menger P.-M. (1999). Artistic Labor Markets and Careers. Annual Review of Sociology, 25(1): 541-574.
  30. Menger P.-M. (2002). Portrait de l’artiste en travailleur. Métamorphose du capitalisme. Paris: Seuil.
  31. Menger P.-M. (2005). Les intermittents du spectacle. Sociologie d’une exception. Paris: Éditions de l’École des Hautes Études en Sciences Sociales.
  32. Menger P.-M. (2008). L’emploi dans les spectacles et les paradoxes de sa croissance. Communications, 2: 77-104.
  33. Moulin R. (1983). De l’artisan au professionnel: l’artiste. Sociologie du travail, 25(4): 388-403.
  34. Perrenoud M., Bois G. (2017). Ordinary Artists: From Paradox to Paradigm? Biens symboliques/Symbolic Goods, 1: 2-35.
  35. Powell W.W., DiMaggio P., eds. (1991). The New Institutionalism in Organizational Analysis. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
  36. Proust S. (2001). Une nouvelle figure de l’artiste: le metteur en scène de théâtre. Sociologie du travail, 43(4): 471-489., DOI: 10.1016/S0038-0296(01)01176-1
  37. Proust S. (2003). La communauté théâtrale. Entreprises théâtrales et idéal de la troupe. Revue française de sociologie, 44(1): 93-113.
  38. Proust S., Shapiro R. (2007). Les intermittents du spectacle: une réforme inéluctable? Connaissance de l’emploi, 40.
  39. Sarfatti Larson M. (1977). The Rise of Professionalism. A Sociological Analysis. Berkeley: University of California Press.
  40. Schino M. (2003). La nascita della regia teatrale. Roma-Bari: Laterza.
  41. Serino M. (2013). Theatre Provision and Decentralization in a Region of Southern Italy. New Theatre Quarterly, 29(1): 61-75., DOI: 10.1017/S0266464X13000067.
  42. Serino M. (2018). Reti culturali in una prospettiva multidimensionale. Il campo teatrale in Campania. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  43. Supiot A. (2000). Les nouveaux visages de la subordination. Droit social, 2: 131-145.
  44. Trezzini L. (1990). Geografia del teatro N. 3. Rapporto sul teatro italiano d’oggi. Bologna: Patron.
  45. Trezzini L., Bignami P. (2007). Politica & pratica dello spettacolo. Rapporto sul teatro italiano. Bologna: Bononia University Press.
  46. Turrini M., Chicchi F. (2014). Precarious Subjectivities Are Not for Sale: The Loss of the Measurability of Labour for Performing Arts Workers. Global Discourse, 3(3-4): 507-521., DOI: 10.1080/23269995.2014.885167

Marco Serino, in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 157/2020, pp. 186-205, DOI:10.3280/SL2020-157010

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content