Clicca qui per scaricare

Condividi
La proposta dell’Idiographic Science. Discussione degli assunti teorici, epistemologici e metodologici di un possibile approccio idiografico in psicologia
Titolo Rivista: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Autori/Curatori: Raffaele De Luca Picione 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: 2 Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  44 P. 389-432 Dimensione file:  436 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2020-002001
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Il lavoro mostra come un possibile rinnovamento dell’approccio idiografico si fondi non più sulla classica distinzione tra il "particolare" e l’"universale" (prerogativa storica dell’approccio nomotetico), ma sulla possibilità di produrre nuova conoscenza attraverso diverse forme di generalizzazione a partire dal caso singolo. Il caso singolo conserva grande interesse nello studio e nella ricerca dei feno-meni psicologici, in virtù della costitutiva contestualità, contingenza, variabilità temporale e situatività di ogni fenomeno umano. In virtù di tali considerazioni, viene presentato l’approccio idiografico attraverso un’attenta disamina storica, la rifondazione delle sue assunzioni teoretiche, epistemologiche e metodologiche, tra cui la ri-concettualizzazione di alcune opposizioni teoriche ormai obsolete, la considerazione di alcune debolezze epistemologiche dell’uso del campione nelle discipline psicologiche, il rapporto stretto tra l’unicità e il generale, il processo di generalizzazione abduttiva, la relazione circolare tra teoria e fenomeni, la riconsiderazione del processo di validazione delle ricerche.


Keywords: idiografia; ricerca psicologica; abduzione; semiotica; modello dinamico-contestuale di mente.

  1. De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2016c). Possible use in psychology of threshold concept in order to study sensemaking processes. Culture & Psychology, 22(3), 362-375.
  2. De Luca Picione, R., Martino, M. L., & Troisi, G. (2019). The Semiotic Construction of the Sense of Agency. The Modal Articulation in Narrative Processes. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 1-19.
  3. Lamiell, J. T. (2003). Beyond individual and group differences. Thousand Oaks: Sage.
  4. Allport, G. W. (1937). The personalistic psychology of William Stern. Character & Personality. A Quarterly for Psychodiagnostic & Allied Studies, 5, 231-246.
  5. Allport, G. W. (1961). Pattern and growth in personality. New York: Holt, Rinehart & Winston.
  6. Allport, G. W. (1965). Letters from Jenny. New York: Harcourt, Brace & World, 1965.
  7. Allport, G.W. (1962). The general and the unique in psychological science. Journal of Personality, 30, 405-422.
  8. Allport, G.W. (1966). Traits revisited. American Psychologist, 21, 1-10.
  9. Amerio P. (1995). Fondamenti teorici di psicologia sociale. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  10. Amerio, P. (2000). Ottica nomotetica e ottica idiografica in psicologia sociale. Rassegna di Psicologia, 17-(3), 129-145.
  11. Bertuglia, C. S. & Vaio F. (2011). Complessità e modelli. Un nuovo quadro interpretativo per la modellizzazione nelle scienze della natura e della società. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  12. Brock, A. C. (2016). The universal and the particular in psychology and the role of history in explaining both. In Klempe H. & Smith R. Centrality of History for Theory Construction in Psychology (pp. 29-46). Cham: Springer., DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8821-7
  13. Cabell, K. R., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2014). The catalyzing mind. Beyond models of causality. Annals of theoretical psychology (Vol. 11). New York: Springer.
  14. Cattell, R. B. (1952). The three basic factor-analytic research designs-their interrelations and derivatives. Psychological bulletin, 49(5), 499.
  15. Cohen, J. (1994). The earth is round (p<.05). American Psychologist, 49(12), 997-1003., DOI: 10.1037//0003-066X.49.12.997
  16. Cornejo, C. (2012). What should idiographic language be like? In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, & A. Gennaro (Eds.). Making sense of infinite uniqueness: The emerging system of idiographic science yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 4, pp. 21-33). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
  17. Davison, G. C., & Lazarus, A. A. (1994). Clinical innovation and evaluation: Integrating practice with inquiry. Clinical Psychology: Science and Practice, 1(2), 157-168.
  18. De Luca Picione, R. (2013). An old debate but still alive, fruitful and able to renew itself: the language in psychology between the particular and the universal [Review of the book making sense of infinite uniqueness: The emerging system of idiographic science, edited by S. Salvatore, A. Gennaro, & J. Valsiner]. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 9(4), 869-872.
  19. De Luca Picione, R. (2015a). La mente come forma. La mente come testo. Una indagine semiotico-psicologica dei processi di significazione. Milano. Mimesis Edizioni.
  20. De Luca Picione, R. (2015b). The Idiographic Approach in Psychological Research. The Challenge of Overcoming Old Distinctions without Risking to Homogenize. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(3), 360-370.
  21. De Luca Picione, R. (2016). The Foundation of Psychology as a Theory-Driven Science. The Centrality of Sensemaking Process to Renew the Discipline. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50 (3), 532-542.
  22. De Luca Picione, R. (2019). Mirrors and Reflexive processes: From looking oneself in the mirror to sensemaking one’s own experience. Insidious paths between semiotics, cultural psychology and dynamic psychology. In W. J. Silva Filho & Luca Tateo (edts). Thinking about Oneself. The Place and Value of Reflection in Philosophy and Psychology (pp. 123-139). Springer., DOI: 10.1007/978-3-030-18266-3_8
  23. De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2012). Senso e Significato. Rivista di Psicologia Clinica, 2, 17-26.
  24. De Luca Picione, R. (2020, first on line). The Semiotic Paradigm in Psychology. A Mature Weltanschauung for the Definition of Semiotic Mind. Integrative
  25. Psychological and Behavioral Science.
  26. De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2014). Catalysis and morphogenesis: The contextual semiotic configuration of form, function, and fields of experience. In K. R. Cabell & J. Valsiner (Eds.). The catalyzing mind: Beyond models of causality (pp. 149-163). Springer., DOI: 10.1007/978-1-4614-8821-7_8
  27. De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2016a). Borders and Modal Articulations. Semiotic Constructs of Sensemaking Processes Enabling a Fecund Dialogue Between Cultural Psychology and Clinical Psychology. Journal of Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 50.29-43.
  28. De Luca Picione, R., & Freda, M. F. (2016b). The processes of meaning making, starting from the morphogenetic theories of Rene´ Thom. Culture and Psychology, 22 (1), 139-157.
  29. De Luca Picione, R., Martino, M., L. & Freda, M. F. (2017). Understanding Cancer Patients’ Narratives: Meaning-Making Process, Temporality, and Modal Articulation. Journal of Constructivist Psychology, 30(4), 339-359., DOI: 10.1080/10720537.2016.1227738
  30. De Luca Picione, R., Nedergaard J., Freda M. F., & Salvatore, S. (2019). Idiographic Approach to Health. VIII Volume of Yearbook of Idiographic Science. Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  31. De Luca Picione, R., Martino, M. L., & Freda, M. F. (2018). Modal articulation: The psychological and semiotic functions of modalities in the sensemaking process. Theory and Psychology, 28(1), 84 --103., DOI: 10.1177/0959354317743580
  32. De Luca Picione, R. & Valsiner, J. (2017). Psychological functions of semiotic borders in sense-making: Liminality of narrative processes. Europe’s Journal of Psychology, 13(3), 532-547
  33. Dilthey, W. (1982). Critica della ragione storica. Torino: Einaudi.
  34. Dilthey, W. (2007). Introduzione alle scienze dello spirito. Tentativo di fondazione per lo studio della società e della storia. Milano: Bompiani.
  35. Diriwächter, R. (2009). Idiographic microgenesis: Re-visiting the experimental tradition of Aktualgenese. In Valsiner, J. P. Molenaar, M. Lyra. & N. Chaudhary (edts). Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences (pp. 319-352). Springer, New York, NY.
  36. Ebbinghaus, H. (1885/1913). Memory: A contribution to experimental psychology. New York: Dover.
  37. Eco, U. (1997). Semiotica e filosofia del linguaggio, Torino: Einaudi.
  38. Elliott, R. (2002). Hermeneutic single-case efficacy design. Psychotherapy research, 12(1), 1-21., DOI: 10.1080/713869614
  39. Fonagy, P. & Moran, G. (1993). Selecting single case research designs for clinicians. In: Miller N, Luborsky L, Barber J, Docherty P (Eds). Handbook of Psychodynamic Treatment Research. Basic Books, (pp 62-95). New York.
  40. Geertz, C. (1973). The interpretation of cultures: Selected essays. New York: Basic Books.
  41. Gergen, K. J. (1985). The social constructionist movement in modern psychology. American psychologist, 40(3), 266-275
  42. Harrè, R. (2002). Rom Harrè on social structure and social change: Social reality and the myth of social structure. European Journal of Social Theory, 5(1), 111-123., DOI: 10.1177/13684310222225333
  43. Hoffmeyer, J. (2007). Semiotic Scaffolding of living systems. In M. Barbieri (ed.): Introduction to Biosemiotics. The New Biological Synthesis, (pp.149-166). Dordrecht: Springer.
  44. Holt, R. R. (1962). Individuality and generalization in the psychology of personality. Journal of Personality, 30, 377-404.
  45. Hurtado-Parrado, C., & López-López, W. (2015). Single-Case Research Methods: History and Suitability for a Psychological Science in Need of Alternatives. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 49(3), 32-349.
  46. Jaspers, K. (1964). Psicopatologia generale. Roma: Il Pensiero Scientifico.
  47. Kächele, H. & Thomä, H. (2003). La ricerca in psicoanalisi: lo studio del caso clinico. Urbino: Quattroventi.
  48. Kull, K. (2014) Catalysis and Scaffolding in Semiosis. In Cabell, K. R., and Valsiner, J. (Eds.) (2014). The catalyzing mind. Beyond models of causality. Annals of Theoretical Psychology. Vol.11. New York: Springer.
  49. Lamiell, J. T. (1981). Toward an idiothetic psychology of personality. American Psychologist, 36(3), 276-289.
  50. Lamiell, J. T. (1998). Nomothetic and Idiographic: contrasting Windelband’s understanding with contemporary usage. Theory & Psychology, 8(1), 23-38., DOI: 10.1177/0959354398081002
  51. Leendert, M. (1998). On methodological distinctions: Nomothetic psychology, or historical understanding. Theory & Psychology, 1(8), 39-57.
  52. Lewin K. (1931). The conflict between Aristotelian and Galileian modes of thought in contemporary psychology. Journal of Genetic Psychology, 5, 141-177; trad. it. Il conflitto fra una concezione aristotelica ed una concezione galileiana nella psicologia contemporanea. In K. Lewin, Teoria dinamica della personalità. Firenze: Giunti, 1965.
  53. Lewin, K. (1951). Field theory in social science. New York: Harper & Row; trad. it. Teoria e sperimentazione in psicologia sociale, Bologna: il Mulino, 1972.
  54. Lingiardi, V. (2006). La ricerca single case. In Dazzi N., Lingiardi V., Colli A. (edts). La ricerca in psicoterapia. Modelli e Strumenti, (pp. 123-148). Milano: Raffaello Cortina Editore.
  55. Lundh, L.-G. (2015). The person as a focus for research. The contributions of Windelband, Stern, Allport, Lamiell and Magnusson. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 1(1-2), 15-33.
  56. Magnusson, D. (2012). The human being in society: Psychology as a scientific discipline. European Psychologist, 17, 21-27.
  57. Maruyama, M. (1963). The second cybernetics: deviation amplifying mutual causal processes. American Scientist, 51, 164-179.
  58. Maruyama, M. (1999). Heterogram analysis: where the assumption of normal distribution is illogical. Human Systems Management, 18, 53-60.
  59. Molenaar, P. C. (2015). On the relation between person-oriented and subject-specific approaches. Journal of Person-Oriented Research, 1(1-2), 34-41.
  60. Molenaar, P. C. M. (2004). A manifesto on psychology as idiographic science: bringing the person back into scientific psychology, this time forever. Measurement: Interdisciplinary Research and Perspectives, 2, 201 - 218.
  61. Molenaar, P. C. M. (2007). Psychological methodology will change profoundly due to the necessity to focus on intra-individual variation. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 41(1), 35-40.
  62. Molenaar, P. C. M., & Valsiner, J. (2009). How generalization works through the single case: A simple idiographic process analysis of an individual psychotherapy. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout, & J. Clegg (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science, 1, 23-38. Rome: Firera Publishing Group.
  63. Neuman, Y. (2003). Processes and boundaries of the mind: Extending the limit line. New York: Academic/Plenum Publishers, Springer.
  64. Neuman, Y. (2014). Introduction to computational cultural psychology. New York: Cambridge University Press.
  65. Peirce, C. S. (1935). Collected papers of Charles Sanders Peirce. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.
  66. Piaget, J. (1969). La nascita dell’intelligenza. Firenze: Giunti.
  67. Popper, K. (1969). Scienza e filosofia. Problemi e scopi della scienza. Torino: Einaudi.
  68. Salvatore, S. (2004). Inconscio e discorso. Inconscio come discorso. In B. Ligorio (Ed.), Psicologie e culture. Contesti, identità e interventi, (pp. 125-155). Roma: Edizioni Carlo Amore.
  69. Salvatore, S. (2014). The mountain of cultural psychology and the mouse of empirical studies. Methodological considerations for birth control. Culture & Psychology, 20(4), 477-500.
  70. Salvatore, S. (2016). Psychology in black and white. The project of a theory-driven science. Charlotte (NC): Information Age Publishing.
  71. Salvatore, S. (2017). The Formalization of Cultural Psychology. Reasons and Functions. Integrative Psychological and Behavioral Science, 51(1), 1-13.
  72. Salvatore, S., & Freda, M. F. (2011). Affect, unconscious and sensemaking. A psychodynamic, semiotic and dialogic model. New Ideas in Psychology, 29, 119-135.
  73. Salvatore, S., & Valsiner, J. (2009). Idiographic science on its way: Toward making sense of psychology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, S. Strout, & J. Clegg (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science, 1, 9-19. RomeThe importance: Firera.
  74. Salvatore, S., & Valsiner, J. (2010). Between the general and the unique: overcoming the nomothetic versus idiographic opposition. Theory & Psychology, 20(6), 817-833., DOI: 10.1177/0959354310381156
  75. Salvatore, S., & Valsiner, J. (2011). Idiographic science as a non-existing object: The importance of the reality of the dynamic system. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, J. Travers Simon, & A. Gennaro (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science,. 3, 7-26. Rome: Firera.
  76. Salvatore, S., Gennaro, A., & Valsiner, J. (Eds.). (2012). Making sense of infinite uniqueness: The emerging system of idiographic science. Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 4). Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
  77. Salvatore, S., Lauro-Grotto, R., Gennaro, A., & Gelo, O. (2009). Grasping the dynamic nature of intersubjectivity. In Valsiner J., Molenaar P., Lyra M. & Chaudhary N. (edts).Dynamic Process Methodology in the Social and Developmental Sciences (pp. 171-190). Springer, New York, NY., DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_8
  78. Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., & Gennaro, A. (Eds.). (2014). Multicentric identities in globalizing world. YIS Yearbook of Idiographic Science (Vol. 5). Charlotte, NC: Information Age Publishing.
  79. Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Strout, S., & Clegg, J. (Eds.). (2009). YIS: Yearbook of Idiographic Science (Vol. 1). Rome: Firera.
  80. Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Travers Simon, J., & Gennaro, A. (Eds.). (2010). YIS: Yearbook of Idiographic Science (Vol. 2). Rome: Firera.
  81. Salvatore, S., Valsiner, J., Travers Simon, J., & Gennaro, A. (Eds.). (2011). YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science (Vol. 3). Rome: Firera.
  82. Sartori, R., & Bortolani, E. (2006). Approccio ideografico e approccio nomotetico alla persona: il caso dei test psicologici. Giornale italiano di psicologia, 33(1), 107-118.
  83. Sebeok, T. A., & Danesi, M. (2000). The Forms of Meaning: Modeling Systems Theory and Semiotic Analysis. Berlin: Mouton de Gruyter.
  84. Skinner, B. F. (2014). Contingencies of reinforcement: A theoretical analysis. BF Skinner Foundation.
  85. Smedslund, J. (1987). The epistemic status of inter-item correlations in Eysenck’s Personality Questionnaire. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 28, 42-55.
  86. Smedslund, J. (1988). What is measured by a psychological measure? Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 29, 148-151.
  87. Smedslund, J. (1995). Psychologic: Common sense and the pseudoempirical. In J. A. Smith, R. Harre, & L. van Langenhove (Eds.), Rethinking psychology (pp. 196-206). London: Sage.
  88. Stern W. (1938). General Psychology from a Personalistic Standpoint. New York: Macmillan.
  89. Stern, W. (1911). Die Differentielle Psychologie in ihren methodischen Grundlagen. Leipzig: Barth.
  90. Thorndike, E. L. (1911). Individuality. New York: Houghton-Mifflin.
  91. Toomela, A. (2010). Methodology of idiographic science: Limits of single case studies and the role of typology. In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, J. Travers Simon, & A. Gennaro (Eds.), YIS: Yearbook of idiographic science, 3, 13-36. Rome: Firera.
  92. Toomela, A. (2014). Mainstream psychology. In T. Teo (Ed.), Encyclopedia of critical psychology. New York: Springer.
  93. Uexküll, J. von (1926). Theoretical Biology. New York: Harcourt, Brace & Company, Inc.
  94. Valsiner, J. & De Luca Picione, R. (2017). La regolazione dinamica dei processi affettivi attraverso la mediazione semiotica. Rivista Internazionale di Filosofia e Psicologia, 8,(1), 80-109.
  95. Valsiner, J. (1998). The guided mind. Cambridge, MA: Harvard University Press.
  96. Valsiner, J. (2000). Culture and human development. London: Sage.
  97. Valsiner, J. (2007). Culture in minds and societies. Foundations of cultural psychology. New Delhi: Sage.
  98. Valsiner, J. (2014). What cultural psychologies need: generalizing theories! Culture & Psychology, 20(2), 147-159.
  99. Valsiner, J. (2015). From person-oriented to person-centered psychology: Abstracting structures of relationships. Journal for Person-Oriented Research, 1(2), 7-14.
  100. Valsiner, J. (2017). Mente e Cultura: La Psicologia come Scienza dell’Uomo. A cura di Marsico, G., De Luca Picione, R. & Tateo L. Roma: Carocci.
  101. Valsiner, J. (2017). From methodology to methods in human psychology. New York: Springer.
  102. Valsiner, J., & Salvatore, S. (2012). How idiographic science could create its terminology? In S. Salvatore, J. Valsiner, & A. Gennaro (Eds.), Making sense of infinite uniqueness: The emerging system of idiographic science yearbook of idiographic science, 4, 3-20. Charlotte: Information Age Publishing.
  103. Vygotskij, L. V. (1990) Pensiero e Linguaggio. Roma-Bari: Biblioteca Universale Laterza.
  104. Wagoner, B. (2009). The experimental methodology of constructive microgenesis. In Valsiner J., Molenaar P., Lyra M. & Chaudhary N. (edts). Dynamic process methodology in the social and developmental sciences, (pp. 99-121). New York, NY: Springer., DOI: 10.1007/978-0-387-95922-1_5
  105. Wallerstein, R. S. (2002). Reconsidering an analytical outcome: Success or Failure? In Reppen J., Schulman, M.A. (edts). Failures in Psychoanalytical Treatment, (pp. 121-151). Madison, CT: International Universities Press.
  106. Weber, M. (1997). Il metodo delle scienze storico-sociali. Torino: Einaudi.
  107. Windelband, W. (1998). History and natural science. Theory & Psychology, 8(1), 5-22. Original speech 1894, published 1904.
  108. Windelband W. (1947). Preludi. Milano: Bompiani.

Raffaele De Luca Picione, in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 2/2020, pp. 389-432, DOI:10.3280/RIP2020-002001

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche