Clicca qui per scaricare

Valutazione delle abilità creative: confronto fra un campione italiano di anziani sani e il campione normativo americano
Titolo Rivista: RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA  
Autori/Curatori: Maura Crepaldi, Giulia Fusi, Maria Luisa Rusconi 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: Lingua: Italiano 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 673-690 Dimensione file:  242 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RIP2020-002010
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


Negli ultimi anni, osservazioni provenienti da studi in crescente aumento, mostrano quanto la creatività, nella forma di pensiero divergente e convergente, possa favorire il benessere psicologico e cognitivo grazie alle abilità di trovare strategie diverse di problem solving, di sviluppare al meglio le proprie potenzialità e di permettere ai soggetti più fragili, in particolare gli anziani, di trovare un sostegno per il superamento di difficoltà. È importante, quindi, avere a disposizione strumenti validi e condivisibili di valutazione delle abilità creative in ottica pre-ventiva, di promozione e di potenziamento. In questo articolo vengono presenta-ti i dati raccolti su un campione italiano di soggetti anziani sani tramite l’utilizzo del test di creatività ATTA (Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults). Questo test in particolare è stato utilizzato in diversi studi descritti in letteratura ma è tarato solamente sulla popolazione americana. Risulta quindi utile fornire i dati di un campione di riferimento per ricerche future, presentando i dati preliminari ottenuti dalla somministrazione del test a adulti-anziani italiani, al fine di poter con-frontare questi con i dati normativi americani.


Keywords: Creatività, ATTA, TTCT, pensiero divergente, pensiero convergente, adulti, anziani.

  1. Acar, S., & Runco, M. A. (2015). Thinking in multiple directions: Hyperspace categories in divergent thinking. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, And the Arts, 9, 41-53.
  2. Althuizen, N., Wierenga, B., & Rossiter, R., (2010). The validity of two brief measures of creative ability. Creativity Research Journal, 22(1), p. 53-61,, DOI: 10.1080/10400410903579577
  3. Anderson, N. D. (2019). State of the science on mild cognitive impairment (MCI). CNS spectrums, 24(1), 78-87., DOI: 10.1017/S1092852918001347
  4. Antonietti, A. & Molteni, S., (2014). Educare al pensiero creativo. Modelli e strumenti per la scuola, la formazione e il lavoro. Trento, Erickson.
  5. Antonietti, A. & Confalonieri, E. (2015). Il ruolo delle life skills nella promozione del benessere. Ricerche di Psicologia, 97-107.
  6. Baas, M., De Dreu, C. K., & Nijstad, B. A. (2008). A meta-analysis of 25 years of mood-creativity research: Hedonic tone, activation, or regulatory focus?. Psychological bulletin, 134(6), 779.
  7. Benedek, M., Konen, T., & Neubauer, A.C. (2012). Associative abilities underlying creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, And the Arts, 6, 273-281.
  8. Benedek, M., Muhlmann, C., Jauk, E., & Neubauer, A.C., (2013). Assessment of divergent thinking by means of the subjective top-scoring method: effects of the number of top-ideas and time-on-task on reliability and validity. “Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 7:341-349,
  9. Benedek, M., Jauk, E., Fink, A., Koschutnig, K., Reishofer, G., Ebner, F., & Neubauer, A.C. (2014). To create or to recall? Neural mechanisms underlying the generation of creative new ideas. NeuroImage, 88:125-133.
  10. Benedek, M., & Fink, A., (2018). Toward a neurocognitive framework of creative cognition: the role of memory, attention, and cognitive control. Current Opinion in Behavioral Sciences, 27:116-122,
  11. Cesa Bianchi, M., & Antonietti, A. (2013). Creatività nella vita e nella scuola. Milano, Mondadori Università
  12. Dietrich, A. (2010). A Review of EEG, ERP, and Neuroimaging Studies of Creativity and Insight. Psychological Bulletin, 136(5), 822-848,
  13. Dorfman, L., Martindale, C., Gassimova, V., & Vartanian, O. (2008). Creativity and speed of information processing: A double dissociation involving elementary versus inhibitory cognitive tasks. Personality and Individual Differences, 44, 1382-1390,
  14. Fisher, B. J., & Specht, D. K. (2000). Successful aging and creativity in later life”, Journal of Aging Studies. 13, 457-472,, DOI: 10.1016/S0890-4065(99)00021-3
  15. Folstein, M. F., Folstein, S. F., & McHugh, P. R. (1975). “Mini-mental state”: A practical method for grading the cognitive state of patients for the clinician. Journal of Psychiatric Research, 12, 189-198,, DOI: 10.1016/0022-3956(75)90026-6
  16. Forthmann, B., Szardenings, C., & Holling, H., (2018). Understanding the confounding effect of fluency in divergent thinking scores: revisiting average scores to quantify artefactual correlation. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts,
  17. Goff, K., & Torrance, E. P. (2002). “Abbreviated Torrance Test for Adults” manual. Bensenville, IL, Scholastic Testing Service, Inc.
  18. Guilford, J. P. (1950). Creativity. American Psychologist, 5, 444-454.
  19. Guilford, J. P. (1956). The structure of intellect. Psychological Bulletin, 53(4), 267.
  20. Guilford, J. P. (1957). Creative abilities in the arts. Psychological Review, 64(2), 110.
  21. Guilford, J. P. (1959). Three faces of intellect. American Psychologist, 14(8), 469.
  22. Guilford, J. P., Merrifield, P. R. (1960). The structure of intellect model: Its uses and implications. Studies of aptitudes of high-level personnel. University of Southern California, Psychological Laboratory.
  23. Guilford, J. P. (1962). Creativity: Its measurement and development. A source book for creative thinking, 151-167.
  24. Guilford, J. P. (1968). Intelligence, creativity, and their educational implications. San Diego, CA, Robert R. Knapp. Edits. Pub.
  25. Guilford, J. P. (1986). Creative talents: Their nature, uses and development. Bearly limited.
  26. Heilman, K. M. (2005). Creativity and the Brain. New York, Psychology Press., DOI: 10.4324/9780203942895
  27. Jauk, E., Benedek, M., Dunst, B., & Neubauer, A. C. (2013). The relationship between intelligence and creativity: New support for the threshold hypothesis by means of empirical breakpoint detection. Intelligence, 41, 212-221.
  28. Karwowski, M., Lebuda, I., Szumski, G., & Firkowska-Mankiewicz, A., (2017). From moment-to-moment to day-to-day: experience sampling and diary investigations in adults’ everyday creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 11, 309-324,
  29. Kemper, S., & Kemtes, K. (1999). Aging and message production and comprehension. In N. Schwarz, D. C. Park, B. Knauper, & S. Sudman (Eds.). Cognition, aging, and self-reports, 229-244. Hove, England, Psychology Press.
  30. Kim, K. H. (2006). Can we trust creativity tests? A review of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking (TTCT). Creativity research journal, 18(1), 3-14.
  31. Lorenzen, Huber, L. (1991). Self‐Perceived Creativity in The Later Years: Case Studies of Older Nebraskans. Educational Gerontology: An International Quarterly, 17(4), 379-390., DOI: 10.1080/0360127910170407
  32. Madore, K.P., Addis, D.R., & Schacter, D.L. (2015) Creativity and memory: effects of an episodic specificity induction on divergent thinking. Psychological Science, 26 :1461-1468., DOI: 10.1177/0956797615591863
  33. Magni, E., Binetti, G., Bianchetti, A., Rozzini, R., & Trabucchi, M. (1996). Mini-Mental State Examination: a normative study in Italian elderly population. European Journal of Neurology, 3(3), 198-202.
  34. Marron, T.R., Lerner, Y., Berant ,E., Kinreich, S., Shapira-Lichter, I., Hendler, T., & Faust, M. (2018). Chain free association, creativity, and the default mode network. Neuropsychologia.
  35. Niu, W., & Sternberg, R. J. (2001). Cultural influences on artistic creativity and its evaluation. International Journal of Psychology, 36, 225-241., DOI: 10.1080/00207590143000036
  36. Palmiero, M., Nakatani, C., Raver, D., Olivetti Belardinelli, M., & Van Leeuwen, C., (2010). Abilities within and across Visual and Verbal Domains: How Specific is their influence on Creativity?. Creativity Research Journal, 22, 369-377,, DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2010.523396
  37. Palmiero, M., (2015). The effects of age on divergent thinking and creative objects production: a cross-sectional study. High Ability Studies,, DOI: 10.1080/13598139.2015.1029117
  38. Palmiero, M., Di Giacomo, D., & Passafiume, D. (2016). Can creativity predict cognitive reserve? The Journal of Creative Behavior, 50(1), 7-23,
  39. Park, D. C., Lautenschlager, G., Hedden, T., Davidson, N. S., Smith, A. D., & Smith, P. K. (2002). Models of visuospatial and verbal memory across the adult life span. Psychology and Aging, 17, 299-320., DOI: 10.1037/0882-7974.17.2.299
  40. Piffer, D. (2012). Can creativity be measured? An attempt to clarify the notion of creativity and general directions for future research. Thinking Skills Creativity 7, 258-264.
  41. Radel, R., Davranche, K., Fournier, M., & Dietrich, A. (2015). The role of (dis) inhibition in creativity: Decreased inhibition improves idea generation. Cognition, 134, 110-120.
  42. Runco, M. A. (2008). Creativity and education. New Horizons in Education, 56, 107-115.
  43. Runco, M. A., & Acar, S. (2012). Divergent thinking as an indicator of creative potential. Creativity Research Journal, 24(1), 66-75., DOI: 10.1080/10400419.2012.652929
  44. Runco, M. A. (2016). Commentary: Overview of developmental perspectives on creativity and the realization of potential. New Directions for Child and Adolescent Development, (151), 97-109.
  45. Santangelo G. et al (2014). Normative data for the Montreal Cognitive Assessment in an Italian population sample. Neurological Science,
  46. Shamay-Tsoorya, S. G., Adlera, N., Aharon-Peretzb, J., Perrya, D., & Mayselessa, N. (2011). The origins of originality: the neural bases of creative thinking and originality. Neuropsychologia, 49, 178-185,
  47. Silvia P. J., Beaty R.E., Nusbaum E.C., Eddington K.M., Levin- Aspenson H., & Kwapil T.R., (2014). Everyday creativity in daily life: an experience-sampling study of “little c” creativity. Psychology of Aesthetics, Creativity, and the Arts, 8:183-188,
  48. Sternberg, R. J., & Lubart, T. I. (1999). The concept of creativity: Prospects and paradigms. in R. J. Sternberg (Ed.), Handbook of creativity (pp. 3-15). New York, NY, Cambridge University Press.
  49. Torrance, E. P. (1966). The Torrance tests of creative thinking. Princeton, NJ, Personnel Press.
  50. Torrance, E. P. (1972). Predictive validity of the Torrance Tests of Creative Thinking. Journal of Creative Behavior, 6, 236-252.
  51. Torrance, E. P. (2008). The Torrance tests of creative thinking: Norms—Technical manual. Bensenville, IL, Scholastic Testing Service.
  52. Torrance, E. P. (1962). Guiding creative talent. Englewood Cliffs, NJ, Prentice Hall.
  53. Torrance, E. P. (1995). Why fly?. Norwood, NJ, Ablex., DOI: 10.1177/001698629704100108
  54. Welling H. (2007). Four mental operations in creative cognition: the importance of abstraction. Creativity Research Journal, 19:163-177,, DOI: 10.1080/10400410701397214
  55. Zenasni F., & Lubart T.I. (2008). Emotion-related traits moderate the impact of emotional state on creative performances. Journal of Individual Differences, 29(3): 157-167., DOI: 10.1027/1614-0001.29.3.157

Maura Crepaldi, Giulia Fusi, Maria Luisa Rusconi, in "RICERCHE DI PSICOLOGIA " 2/2020, pp. 673-690, DOI:10.3280/RIP2020-002010

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche