Le industry platforms: dalla nascita alla strategia degli ologrammi

Titolo Rivista CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES
Autori/Curatori Cristina Simone, Antonio La Sala, Antonio Laudando
Anno di pubblicazione 2020 Fascicolo 2020/1 Lingua Italiano
Numero pagine 23 P. 135-157 Dimensione file 0 KB
DOI 10.3280/cgrds1-2020oa10097
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più clicca qui

Vedi l'articolo Scarica l'articolo open access

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association, Inc (PILA)associazione indipendente e non profit per facilitare (attraverso i servizi tecnologici implementati da CrossRef.org) l’accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche

L'ibridazione delle tecnologie digitali ha reso i confini e le dinamiche evolutive delle industry platforms così sfocati che la letteratura ha introdotto il concetto di industry platforms ecosystem. Analizzando gli sviluppi delle industry platforms, lo studio mira ad approfondire i futuri scenari competitivi, caratterizzati da una concorrenza tra holographic industry platforms. Sebbene negli ultimi vent’anni tale fenomeno abbia acquisito crescente rilevanza, manca ad oggi un framework che evidenzi le proprietà olografiche e le modalità attraverso le quali una industry platform può diversificare il proprio business attaccando ed entrando in nuovi mercati. Con questa lettura olografica si evidenzia la possibilità per la industry platform di diversificare il proprio business attraverso economie di varietà e attraverso logiche dominanti. La ricerca contribuisce studiando le strategie di diversificazione messe in atto dalle industry platforms. Dopo un’ampia revisione della letteratura e con l’obiettivo di evitare che la holographic industry platforms diventi un concetto vuoto, la ricerca discute criticamente il fenomeno attraverso due casi di studio: Google e Amazon.;

Keywords:industry platform; strategia; ologramma; dinamica competitiva; governance

  1. Bauman Z. (2013). Liquid modernity. John Wiley & Sons.
  2. Ceccagnoli M., Forman C., Huang P., Wu D.J. (2012). Cocreation of value in a platform ecosystem! The case of enterprise software. MIS quarterly, pp. 263-290. DOI: 10.2307/41410417
  3. Cusumano M.A., Gawer A., Yoffie D.B. (2019). The business of platforms: Strategy in the age of digital competition, innovation, and power. New York, NY: Harper Collins.
  4. Cusumano M., Nobeoka K. (1998). Thinking Beyond Lean: How Multi-Project Management is Transforming Product Development at Toyota and Other Companies. New York, Paris: The Free Press.
  5. Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2006). Strategies for two-sided markets. Harvard Business Review, 84 (10): 92-101.
  6. Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2011). Platform Envelopment. Strategic Management Journal, 32 (12): 1270–1285. DOI: 10.1002/smj.935
  7. Eisenmann T., Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2009), Opening platforms: How, when, and why?. In: Gawer A., a cura di, Platforms, markets and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  8. Esposito De Falco S., Renzi A., Orlando B., Cucari N. (2017). Open collaborative innovation and digital platforms. Production Planning & Control, 28(16): 1344-1353. DOI: 10.1080/09537287.2017.1375143
  9. Evans D.S. (2003). Some empirical aspects of multi-sided platform industries. Review of Network Economics, 2 (3): 1-19. DOI: 10.2202/1446-9022.1026
  10. Finn E. (2017). What algorithms want: Imagination in the age of computing. MIT Press.
  11. Gabor D. (1948). A New Microscopic Principle. Nature, 161(4098): 777–778. DOI: 10.1038/161777a0
  12. Gabor D. (1972). Holography, 1948-1971. Science, 177(4046): 299-313. DOI: 10.1126/science.177.4046.299
  13. Gawer A. (2011). Platforms, markets and innovation. Cheltenham: Edward Elgar.
  14. Gawer A. (2014). Bridging differing perspectives on technological platforms: Toward an integrative framework. Research Policy, 43 (7): 1239–1249. DOI: 10.1016/j.respol.2014.03.006
  15. Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2002a). Elements of Platform Leadership. MIT Sloan Management Review, 43 (3): 51-58.
  16. Gawer A., Cusumano M.A. (2002b). Platform Leadership: How Intel, Microsoft, and Cisco Drive Industry Innovation. Boston: Harvard Business School Press.
  17. Gawer A., Cusumano M.A., (2013), Industry Platforms and Ecosystem Innovation. Journal of Product Innovation Management, 31(3): 417-433. DOI: 10.1111/jpim.12105
  18. Greenfield A. (2017). Radical technologies: The design of everyday life. Verso Books.
  19. Herzog B. (2018). Valuation of Digital Platforms: Experimental Evidence for Google and Facebook, International Journal of Financial Studies, vol. 6, n.4, pp. 1-13. DOI: 10.3390/ijfs6040087
  20. Jacobides M.G., Cennamo C., Gawer A. (2018). Towards a theory of ecosystems. Strategic Management Journal, 39(8): 2255–2276. DOI: 10.1002/smj.2904
  21. Janssen M., Kuk G. (2016). The challenges and limits of big data algorithms in technocratic governance. Government Information Quarterly, 33(3): 371–377. DOI: 10.1016/j.giq.2016.08.01
  22. Johannessen J.A. (1991). The holographic organization–a design model. Cybernetics and Systems: An International Journal, 22(1): 41-55. DOI: 10.1080/01969729108902270
  23. Johannessen J.A., Hauan A. (1993). Linking network organization to holographic design: future industrial organization. Kybernetes, 22(4): 6–23. DOI: 10.1108/eb005973
  24. Khan, L.M. (2016). Amazon’s antitrust paradox. Yale Law Journal, Issue 3, 126: 710-805.
  25. Krishnan V., Gupta G. (2001). Appropriateness and impact of platform-based product development, Management Science. 47(1): 52–68. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.47.1.52.10665
  26. Li K.C., Jiang H., Yang L.T., Cuzzocrea A. (2015). Big data: Algorithms, analytics, and applications. Boca Ratom: CRC Press.
  27. Mackenzie K.D. (1991). The Organizational Hologram: The Effective Management of Organizational Change. Springer Netherlands.
  28. McGrath M.E. (1995). Product strategy for high-technology companies. New York: Irwin Professional Publishing.
  29. Meyer M.H., Lehnerd A.P. (1997). The Power of Product Platforms: Building Value and Cost Leadership. New York: The Free Press.
  30. Meyer M.H., Lopez L., (1995), Technology strategy in a software products company, Journal of Product Innovation Management, vol. 12, n. 4, pp. 294-306. DOI: 10.1111/1540-5885.1240294
  31. Morgan G. (2007). Images. Le metafore dell'organizzazione. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  32. Morgan G., Ramirez R. (1984). Action learning: A holographic metaphor for guiding social change. Human relations, 37(1):1-27. DOI: 10.1177/001872678403700101
  33. Moschovakis Y.N. (2001). What Is an Algorithm?. In: Engquist B., Schmid W., a cura di, Mathematics Unlimited - 2001 and Beyond. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer.
  34. Muffatto M., Roveda M. (2002). Product architecture and platforms: A conceptual framework, International Journal of Technology Management. 24 (1): 1-16. DOI: 10.1504/ijtm.2002.003040
  35. Müller C. N., Kijl B., Visnjic I. (2018). Envelopment lessons to manage digital platforms: The cases of Google and Yahoo. Strategic Change, 27(2): 139-149. DOI: 10.1002/jsc.2189
  36. Orlando B., Renzi A., Sancetta G., Cucari N. (2018). How does firm diversification impact innovation?. Technology Analysis & Strategic Management, 30(4): 391-404. DOI: 10.1080/09537325.2017.1313405
  37. Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2000). Information complements, substitutes, and strategic product design, Proceedings of the twenty first International Conference on Information Systems, Association for Information Systems, pp. 13-15. DOI: 10.2139/ssrn.249585
  38. Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2005). Two-Sided Network Effects: A Theory of Information Product Design, Management Science, 51 (10): 1494-1504. DOI: 10.1287/mnsc.1050.0400
  39. Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2012). A digital postal platform: Definitions and a roadmap. MIT Center for Digital Business, Working Paper. Testo disponibile al sito: http://ebusiness.mit.edu/research/papers/296_parker_vanalstyne_adigitalpostalplatformdefinitionsandaroadmap.pdf data di consultazione 01/06/2020.
  40. Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2014). Platform Strategy. In: M. Augier and D. Teece, a cura di, The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, 1-9. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_435-1
  41. Parker G., Van Alstyne M. (2018). Innovation, Openness and Platform Control. Management Science. 64 (7): 3015-3032. DOI: 10.1057/978-1-349-94848-2_435-1
  42. Parker G., Van Alstyne M., Jiang X. (2017). Platform Ecosystems: How Developers Invert the Firm, MIS Quarterly, 41(1): 255-266. DOI: 10.25300/misq/2017/41.1.13
  43. Parker G.G., Van Alstyne M.W., Choudary S.P. (2016). Platform Revolution: How Networked Markets Are Transforming the Economy? and How to Make Them Work for You. WW Norton & Company.
  44. Qiu Y. (2017). The Openness of Open Application Programming Interfaces. Information, Communication & Society, 20(11): 1720-36. DOI: 10.1080/1369118x.2016.1254268
  45. Reillier L. C., Reillier B. (2017). Platform strategy: How to unlock the power of communities and networks to grow your business. London: Taylor & Francis.
  46. Robertson D., Ulrich K. (1998). Planning for product platforms, MIT Sloan Management Review, 39(4): 19-31.
  47. Simone C., La Sala A., Montella M.M. (2017). The rise of P2P ecosystem: a service logics amplifier for value co-creation. The TQM Journal, 29(6) 863-880. DOI: 10.1108/tqm-04-2017-0047
  48. Srnicek N. (2017). Platform capitalism. John Wiley & Sons.
  49. Teece D.J. (2016), Business ecosystem, In: M. Augier and D. Teece. The Palgrave Encyclopedia of Strategic Management, 1-4, DOI: 10.1007/978-1-349-94848-2_724-1
  50. Tiwana A., Konsynski B., Bush A.A. (2010). Research commentary-Platform evolution: Coevolution of platform architecture, governance, and environmental dynamics. Information systems research, 21(4): 675-687. DOI: 10.1287/isre.1100.0323
  51. Tiwana A. (2013). Platform ecosystems: Aligning architecture, governance, and strategy. Newnes.
  52. Tsujimoto M., Kajikawa Y., Tomita J., Matsumoto Y., (2018), A review of the ecosystem concept: towards coherent ecosystem design, Technological Forecasting and Social Change, 136:49-58. DOI: 10.1016/j.techfore.2017.06.032
  53. Van Alstyne M., Parker G., (2017), Platform Business: From Resources to Relationships, Platform Business, 9 (1): 25-29. DOI: 10.1515/gfkmir-2017-0004
  54. Van Alstyne M., Parker G., Choudary S.P. (2016). Pipelines, platforms, and the new rules of strategy. Harvard business review, 94(4): 54-62.
  55. Van Dijck J., Poell T., De Waal M. (2018). The platform society: Public values in a connective world. Oxford University Press.
  56. Wareham J., Fox P.B., Cano Giner J.L. (2014). Technology ecosystem governance. Organization Science, 25(4):1195-1215. DOI: 10.1287/orsc.2014.0895
  57. Wheelwright S.C., Clark K.B. (1992). Creating project plans to focus product development, Harvard Business Review, 70(2): 67-83.
  58. Zhang Y., Duan W. (2012). Envelopment-competition Pattern of E-Business Platform - Insights from the Competition among Taobao, Baidu and Tencent. 2012 Fifth International Conference on Business Intelligence and Financial Engineering, 51-55. DOI: 10.1109/bife.2012.19
  59. Accoto C. (2017). Il mondo dato: cinque brevi lezioni di filosofia digitale. Milano: EGEA.
  60. Ansell C., Gash A. (2008). Collaborative governance in theory and practice. Journal of public administration research and theory, 18(4):543-571. DOI: 10.1093/jopart/mum032
  61. Baldwin C.Y., Woodard C.J. (2009). The architecture of platforms: A unified view. Platforms, markets and innovation, 32. DOI: 10.4337/9781849803311.00008
  62. Barile S., Grandinetti R., Simone C. (2019). The rise of a new business ecosystem? Insights by the strategies of exaptation and brokerage. In: IFKAD 2019, 14th edition of the International Forum on Knowledge Asset Dynamics 2019.
  63. Barile S., Simone C., Calabrese M. (2017). The economies (and diseconomies) of distributed technologies. Kybernetes, 46(5): 767–785. DOI: 10.1108/k-11-2016-0314

  • Digital Platform Ecosystems for Sustainable Innovation: Toward a New Meta-Organizational Model? Mario Calabrese, Antonio La Sala, Ryan Patrick Fuller, Antonio Laudando, in Administrative Sciences /2021 pp.119
    DOI: 10.3390/admsci11040119

Cristina Simone, Antonio La Sala, Antonio Laudando, Le industry platforms: dalla nascita alla strategia degli ologrammi in "CORPORATE GOVERNANCE AND RESEARCH & DEVELOPMENT STUDIES" 1/2020, pp 135-157, DOI: 10.3280/cgrds1-2020oa10097