Click here to download

Self-hypnosis: tool for the maintenance of homeostasis for disease prevention through the activation of inner resources
Journal Title: IPNOSI 
Author/s: Silvana Cagiada, Rita Pizzi 
Year:  2020 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  12 Pg. 25-36 FullText PDF:  243 KB
DOI:  10.3280/IPN2020-002002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


Starting from the studies on consciousness, from the point of view of both neural correlates and awareness and self-awareness, the experimentation aims to verify the possibility of being able to intervene, through the use of hypnosis, on the evolu-tionary process of homeostatic regulation and adaptation, considered as an ex-pression of pathologies in the clinical field, but also as a lever of evolution in the educational and social field. In consideration of various clinical studies on hypno-sis that report positive results after hypnotic treatment, the hypothesis is based on the possibility of acting, for preventive purposes, on the somatic, psychological and relational disfunction, which can induce an energetic blockage of emotionali-ty, educating the subject to recover and manage their energy and balance. The subjects examined and taken into consideration for research purposes were ad-ministered the MHQ test, a self-assessment scale for psychoneurotic patients, whose score, while still showing normal values, highlights the tendency to approach pathological values, at risk for the subject. The hypothesis verified is as follows: the use of hypnosis (heterohypnosis ‒ positive conditioning) for a period of one month, with weekly sessions and subsequent use of self-hypnosis, every day, for two months for preventive purposes, can allow to deconstruction the deviances and restore the resources blocked in the body structure, bringing the subject back to consciousness, directing the learning towards the recovery and maintenance of homeostasis. At the end of the trial, the verification of the achieved results was corroborated by the re-administration of the MHQ test and the statistical evalua-tion of the outcomes, which proved to be significant. The positive outcome of the study suggests that therapists can apply the experimental method on a systematic basis, making possible a fast and definitive recognition of self-hypnosis ‒ as well as hypnosis ‒ as a scientific discipline.
Keywords: Heterohypnosis, self-hypnosis, maieutics, homeostasis, prevention

  1. Alter D. S., Sugarman L.I. (2017). Riorientare la formazione in ipnosi, American Journal of clinical Hypnosis. 59 (3): 235-259., DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2016.1231657
  2. Bernard C. (1966). Introduction à l'étude de la médecine expérimentale. Parigi: Éditions Garnier-Flammarion.
  3. Biondi M. (1997). Mente, cervello e sistema immunitario. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  4. Bo S., Rahimi F., Goitre I., Properzi B., Ponzo V., Regaldo G., Boschetti S., Fadda M., Ciccone G., Abbate Daga G., Mengozzi G., Evangelista A., De Francesco A., Belcastro S., Broglio F. (2018). Effects of Self-Conditioning Techniques (Self-Hypnosis) in Promoting Weight Loss in Patients with Severe Obesity: A Randomized Controlled Trial. Obesity (Silver Spring), 26 (9): 1422-1429.
  5. Breuer J., Freud S. (1967). Studi sull’isteria. Torino: Boringhieri.
  6. Cagiada S. (2015). Autoipnosi. Rivista Medica Italiana di Psicoterapia ed Ipnosi, 1, 11:18. Casalecchio di Reno BO: SMIPI.
  7. Cagiada S. (2017). Ipnosi e autismo: esiti di un trattamento ipnotico in soggetto affetto da sindrome di Asperger. Comprensione degli stati emotivi mediata dallo stato di trance. Ipnosi, 1, 40:51. Milano: Franco Angeli.
  8. Cagiada S., Canidio L., Pizzi R. (2012). A Support to Neuromotor Rehabilitation based on Multimedia Enhanced Hipnosis. International Journal of Computer Applications, 56 (7): 35-38., DOI: 10.5120/8905-2940
  9. Cahn B.R., Polich J. (2006). Meditation states and traits: EEG, ERP and neuroimaging studies. Psychological Bulletin, 132(2): 180-211., DOI: 10.1037/0033-2909.132.2.180.
  10. Cannon W. B. (1926). Physiological regulation of normal states: some tentative postulates concerning biological homeostatics. In: A. Pettit A., editor, A Charles Riches amis, ses collègues, ses élèves. Paris: Les Éditions Médicales.
  11. Cannon W. B. (1956). La saggezza del corpo. Milano: Bompiani.
  12. Classen C., Spiegel D. (2000). Group Therapy For Cancer Patients: A Research-based Handbook Of Psychosocial Care. New York: Basic Books.
  13. Crown S., Crisp A. H. (1966). A Short Clinical Diagnostic Self-rating Scale for Psychoneurotic Patients. The Middlesex Hospital Questionnaire (M.H.Q.). Br. J. Psychiatry, 112(490):917-923.
  14. Damasio A., Damasio H. (2016). Exploring the concept of homeostasis and considering its implications for economics. Journal of Economic Behavior & Organization, 126B:125-129.
  15. De Benedittis G. (2015). Neural mechanisms of hypnosis and meditation. Journal of Physiology, 109:152-164.
  16. De Benedittis G. (2018). Ipnosi e meditazione a confronto. Similarità e differenze. Ipnosi, 1: 5-11., DOI: 10.3280/IPN2018-001001
  17. Dean W., Morgenthaler J. (1991). Smart Drugs and Nutrients. Santa Cruz: B & J Publications.
  18. Erickson M.H. (1981). La mia voce ti accompagnerà. I racconti didattici di Milton H. Erickson. Roma: Astrolabio.
  19. Forester-Miller H. (2017). Self-Hypnosis Classes to Enhance the Quality of Life of Breast Cancer Patients. Am J Clin Hypn., 60 (1): 18-32,, DOI: 10.1080/00029157.2017.1316234
  20. Gardner H. (1994). Intelligenze multiple. Milano: Feltrinelli.
  21. Holroyd J. (2003). The science of meditation and the state of hypnosis. American Journal of clinical Hypnosis, 46(2): 109-128.
  22. Hosseinzadegan F., Radfar M., Shafiee-Kandjani A.R., Sheikh N. (2017). Efficacy of Self-Hypnosis in Pain Management in Female Patients with Multiple Sclerosis. Int. J. Clin. Exp. Hypn., 65(1): 86-97,, DOI: 10.1080/00207144.2017.1246878
  23. Hull C. L., Amsel A., Rashotte M. E. (1984). Mechanisms of adaptive behavior: Clark L. Hull’s theoretical papers, with commentary. Columbia: University Press.
  24. Ketterhagen D., VandeVusse L., Berner M. A. (2002). Self-hypnosis: Alternative anesthesia for childbirth. MCN: The American Journal of Maternal/Child Nursing, 27(6): 335-341., DOI: 10.1097/00005721-200211000-00007
  25. Koch C. (2012). Consciousness: Confessions of a Romantic Reductionist. Boston: The MIT Press.
  26. Milsum J.H. (1966). Biological control systems analysis. New York: McGraw-Hill.
  27. Odum E.P., Barret G. (1972). Fundamentals of Ecology. New York: Thomson Brooks/Cole.
  28. Piaget J. (1981). L’equilibrazione delle strutture cognitive. Torino: Bollati Boringhieri.
  29. Platone. Teeteto (trad. it. Roma: Laterza, 2019).
  30. Riggs D.S. (1970). Control theory and physiological feedback mechanisms. Baltimore: Williams & Wilkins.
  31. Riva G. (1988). L’uomo. Pavia: Ed. Coop Casa del Giovane.
  32. Rossi E. I. (1993). The Psychobiology of Mind-Body Healing. New York: Norton and Compton.
  33. Smith G. P. (2008). Unacknowledged contributions of Pavlov and Barcroft to Cannon’s theory of homeostasis. Appetite, 51 (3): 428-432.
  34. Spiegel D., Classen C. (2003). Terapia di gruppo per pazienti oncologici. Manuale di intervento psicosociale basato sulle evidenze. Milano: McGraw-Hill.
  35. Weilbacher R., Cagiada S. (2015). Modelli di psicoterapia ipnotica. In: Merati L., Ercolani R., a cura di, Manuale pratico di ipnosi clinica e autoipnosi. Milano: Edra, cap. 18, pp. 271-285.
  36. Wiener N. (1948). Cybernetics, or control and communication in the animal and the machine. Cambridge: The MIT Press.

Silvana Cagiada, Rita Pizzi, Self-hypnosis: tool for the maintenance of homeostasis for disease prevention through the activation of inner resources in "IPNOSI" 2/2020, pp. 25-36, DOI:10.3280/IPN2020-002002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content