Click here to download

Spread of virtual communities as a potential threat to state security and sustainable well-being
Journal Title: RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA' 
Author/s: Viacheslav B. Dziundziuk, Oleksandr A. Kotukov, Dmytro V. Hryn, Eugene V. Kotukh 
Year:  2020 Issue: 2 suppl. Language: English 
Pages:  12 Pg. 7-18 FullText PDF:  119 KB
DOI:  10.3280/RISS2020-002-S1002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The relevance of the study of virtual communities lies in the fact that Internet communication continues to develop a different form of social interaction. The active formation of virtual communities is facilitated by the development of new information and communication environments, which, through unique technolo-gies based on interactivity, multimedia, globality, anonymity, asynchrony, and low marginal costs, ensure individual communication. Such "social" associations are formed as users who have common interests (discussions, conferences, etc.) or are interested in a specific topic, etc., cross over. Further "zones of mutual interest"are built on these basic theses, which promote mutual understanding and willingness to accept new values. The purpose of the article is to study the concept of a virtual community and determine their negative impact on a person and the state as a whole. The main method in the study was the method of analysis and synthesis of information. During the analysis of the literature on the above topic, the article ex-plored the concept of a virtual community and its role in the life of society. The negative impact on the person and the state is highlighted. It is determined that vir-tual culture can pose a potential threat to national security and it is described how to minimize these risks. The practical significance of the study is determined by the fact that the results of the study and the recommendations given by the author can be considered as one of the options for combating the threat to national secu-rity from virtual communities.
Keywords: Information society, communication, virtual culture, danger, relationships

  1. Adygezalova G.E., Allalyev R.M., Kiseleva A.V. and Grigorieva N.A. (2018). Copyright violation and distribution of prohibited content on the internet: Analysis of legal arrangements in the legislation of the Russian Federation. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(1): 6-14.
  2. Amirgaliyeva S.N., Amirgaaliyeva Z.Y. and Kenshimov C.A. (2016). Game modeling in dynamic processes. In: Proceedings of the 2015 12th International Conference on Electronics Computer and Computation, ICECCO 2015, ICECCO, Almaty.
  3. Astafieva O. (2002). Synergetic approach to the study of sociocultural processes: Opportunities and limits. Publishing House of the Moscow State Business Administration, Moscow.
  4. Bakhov I.S. (2014). Dialogue of cultures in multicultural education. World Applied Sciences Journal, 29(1): 106-109.
  5. Batkovskiy A.M., Kalachikhin P.A., Semenova E.G., Telnov Y.F., Fomina A.V. and Balashov V.M. (2018). Conficuration of enterprise networks. Enterpreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 6(1): 311-328.
  6. Bell C. and Newby H. (1998). Community studies: An introduction to the sociology of the local community. London: Allen and Unwyn.
  7. Bondarenko N.G., Allalyev R.M., Smirnov M.G., Dudchenko A.V. and Strizhova E.V. (2018). History and main trends in the development of copyright. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 9(1): 41-47.
  8. Carneiro R. (2006). A theory of origin of the state. In: The Early State, its Alternatives and Analogues. Volgograd: Uchitel’ Publisher.
  9. Chih W.-H., Hsu L.-C. and Liou D.-K. (2017). Understanding virtual community members' relationships from individual, group, and social influence perspectives. Industrial Management and Data Systems, 117(6): 990-1010.
  10. Clarke J. (1997). Public nightmares and communitarian dreams: The crisis of the social in social welfare. The Sociological Review, 44(1): 66-91.
  11. Deutsch D. (2018). Structure of reality. Parallel universe science. Moscow: Alpina Publisher.
  12. Fedotov A.M., Murzakhmetov A.N. and Dyusembaev A.E. (2018). Expansion of ideas and processes in social and biological communities. Eurasian Journal of Mathematical and Computer Applications, 6(4): 17-28.
  13. Khadzhyradieva S., Slukhai S. and Rachynskyi A. (2020). Public administration in Ukraine: adjusting to European standards. NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy, 13(1): 81-108.
  14. Kremlova S. (2005). Network communities. -- Available from: https://hr-portal.ru/ article/so-kremleva-setevye-coobshchestva.
  15. Leshchev S. (2002). Communicative – therefore, communicative. Мoscow: URSS.
  16. Meyrowitz J. (1985). No sense of place: The impact of electronic media on social behaviour. New York: Oxford University Press.
  17. Mikhaylov A.S. (2018). Socio-spatial dynamics, networks and modelling of regional milieu. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(4): 1020-1030.
  18. Mustafin A. and Kantarbayeva A. (2018). Opening the Leontief's black box. Heliyon, 4(5): e00626.
  19. Nurbasari A., Lukiyanova M.N., Nguyen P.T., Shichiyakh R.A. and Shankar K. (2019). Role of social media in the successful implementation of business user data management. Opcion, 35(88): 2899-2921.
  20. Peñarroja V., Sánchez J., Gamero N., Orengo V. and Zornoza A.M. (2019). The influence of organisational facilitating conditions and technology acceptance factors on the effectiveness of virtual communities of practice. Behaviour and Information Technology, 38(8): 845-857.
  21. Rheingold H. (1993). A slice of life in my virtual community. Global Networks – a Journal of Transnational Affairs, 1: 57-80.
  22. Romanenko Y.O. and Chaplay I.V. (2016). Marketing communication system within public administration mechanisms. Actual Problems of Economics, 178(4): 69-78.
  23. Roszak T. (1986). The cult of information: The folklore of computers and the true art of thinking. Cambridge: Lutterworth Press.
  24. Salimyanova I.G., Novikov A.A., Novikova E.V., Lushchik I.V., Savderova A.F., Berezina N.V., Rudenko L.G. and Allalyev R.M. (2019). Economy digitalization: Information impact on market entities. Journal of Environmental Treatment Techniques, 7(4): 654-658.
  25. Šišulák S. (2017). Userfocus – tool for criminality control of social networks at both the local and international level. Entrepreneurship and Sustainability Issues, 5(2): 297-314.
  26. Skorodumova O. (2004). Culture of the information society. Moscow: Publishing House “Мoscow”.
  27. Turonok S. (2004). Subculture of Internet communities. In: Culture of Russia as its Strategic Resource. Moscow: Publishing House “Delo”.
  28. Vasylieva O.I., Slukhai S.V., Khadzhyradieva S.K., Klochko A.A. and Pashkova A.G. (2020). Ukrainian civil service: implementation of the public administration reform strategy in Ukraine. Journal of Advanced Research in Law and Economics, 11(4): 1439-1445.
  29. Wriston W. (1992). The twilight of sovereignty: How the information revolution is transforming our world. New York: Charles Scribner`s Sons.
  30. Xiao R. and Yu T. (2011). A multi-agent simulation approach to rumor spread in virtual commnunity based on social network. Intelligent Automation and Soft Computing, 17(7): 859-869.
  31. Yereskova T.V., Mazuryk O.V., Aleksandrova O.S., Tymofieieva H.V. and Zavadskyi V.N. (2020). Uncertainty as a regular feature of modern Ukrainian society. Teorija in Praksa, 57(3): 928-946.
  32. Zhilavskaya I.V., Ivanova T.V., Gayazov A.S. and Vladimirova T.N. (2018). Media education and democracy. Espacios, 39(20), 1-11.

Viacheslav B. Dziundziuk, Oleksandr A. Kotukov, Dmytro V. Hryn, Eugene V. Kotukh, in "RIVISTA DI STUDI SULLA SOSTENIBILITA'" 2 suppl./2020, pp. 7-18, DOI:10.3280/RISS2020-002-S1002

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content