Clicca qui per scaricare

The «invisible enemy» and the usual suspects. How Covid-19 re-framed migration in Italian media representations
Titolo Rivista: SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE  
Autori/Curatori: Elena Giacomelli, Pierluigi Musarò, Paola Parmiggiani 
Anno di pubblicazione:  2020 Fascicolo: 60 Pratiche virali Lingua: Inglese 
Numero pagine:  18 P. 119-136 Dimensione file:  242 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SC2020-060011
Il DOI è il codice a barre della proprietà intellettuale: per saperne di più:  clicca qui   qui 


The last decade has been characterized by an intense inflow of people into borders of what has been called the "Fortress Europe". Italian governments, from Gentiloni-Minniti to Conte-Salvini, have implemented restrictive border management and migration control measures, fueled also by an over mediatization of the issue in and by public discourses. However, from February 2020 public debates and narratives have been dominated by the Covid-19 pandemic, a health emergency often described as a war against an invisible enemy. Through a qualitative analysis of Italian media representations, this paper analyses how Covid-19 overshadowed and reframed migration narratives and discourses. Moving within the concept of (in)visibility, this paper explores the two macrodiscourses around migration during the lockdown: on one side, the link between migration and illness (fear of infection) that led to strict border security measures; on the other, the utilitaristic x\regularization of migrants working in informal economy. The conclusion reflects on long-term implications of the pandemic on mobility justice (Sheller 2018) and what Mbembe (2020) has defined the "right to breath".


Keywords: Migration discourses; Covid-19; emergency; news media; narratives.

  1. Ambrosetti E., Cela E. (2015), Demography of Race and Ethnicity in Italy, in Saenz R., Rodriguez N., Embrick D. (eds.), The International Handbook of the Demography of Race and Ethnicity, Springer, New York.
  2. Ambrosini M. (2011), Sociologia delle migrazioni , il Mulino, Bologna, .
  3. Amnesty International (2019), Barometro dell’odio. Elezioni europee 2019, -- Available at: https://d21zrvtkxtd6ae.cloudfront.net/public/uploads/2019/05/29202706/Amnestybarometro-odio-2019.pdf Banulescu-Bogdan N., Benton M., Fratzke S. (2020), Coronavirus is spreading across borders, but it is not a migration problem, Migration Policy Institute, Washington.
  4. Baretta P. (eds.) (2019), Notizie senza approdo. Settimo Rapporto Carta di Roma, -- http://www.cartadiroma.org/osservatorio/rapporti/.
  5. Bauman Z. (1996), Tourists and vagabonds: heroes and victims of postmodernity, Institut für Höhere Studien (IHS), Vienna.
  6. - (2006), Liquid Fear, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  7. - (2016), Strangers at Our Door, Polity Press, Cambridge.
  8. Bentivegna S., Boccia Artieri, G. (2019), Le teorie delle comunicazioni di massa e la sfida digitale, Laterza, Roma-Bari.
  9. Berger P.L., Luckmann T. (1966), The Social Construction of Reality: A Treatise in the Sociology of Knowledge, Doubleday & Company, New York.
  10. Binotto M., Bruno M., Lai V. (a cura di) (2016), Tracciare confini.
  11. L’immigrazione nei media italiani, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  12. Bourdieu P. (1980), Le sens pratique, Minuit, Paris.
  13. Calvi C. (1981), L’oro, il fuoco, le forche: la peste napoletana del 1656, in «Archivio Storico Italiano» 139(3): 405-458.
  14. Censis (2018), Rapporto sulla situazione sociale del Paese 2018, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  15. Censis (2018), Rapporto sulla situazione sociale del Paese 2018, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  16. Chakraborty I., Maity P. (2020), COVID-19 outbreak: Migration, effects on society, global environment and prevention, in «The Science of the total environment», 728:138882.
  17. Colombo F., Gili F. (2012), Comunicazione, cultura, società. L’approccio sociologico alla relazione comunicativa, La Scuola, Brescia.
  18. Dal Lago A. (1999), Non persone. L’esclusione dei migranti in una società globale, Feltrinelli, Milano.
  19. Derrida J., Dufourmantelle A. (1997), Sull’ospitalità, Dalai, Milano.
  20. Di Cesare D. (2020), Virus sovrano? L’asfissia capitalistica, Bollati Boringhieri, Torino.
  21. Entman R.M. (1993), Framing: Toward Clarification of a Fractured Paradigm, in «Journal of Communication», 43(4): 51-58. -- https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1460-2466.1993.tb01304.x
  22. Faloppa F. (2020), #ODIO. Manuale di resistenza alla violenza delle parole, Utet, Milano.
  23. Foucault M. (1982), The Subject and Power, in «Critical Inquiry», 8(4): 777-795.
  24. Foucault M., Gordon C. (1980), Power/knowledge: Selected interviews and other writings, 1972-1977, Pantheon Books, New York.
  25. Hall S. (1992), The West and the rest: discourse and power, in S. Hall, B. Gieben (eds.), Formations of Modernity, Polity Press, Cambridge, pp. 275–331. Hollingworth S., Archer L. (2010), Urban Schools as Urban Places: School Reputation, Children’s Identities and Engagement with Education in London, in «Urban Studies», 47, 584–603.
  26. IOM (2020), World Migration Report 2020, -- available at: https://publications.iom.int/books/world-migration-report-2020.
  27. ISMU (2020),Venticinquesimo Rapporto sulle migrazioni 2019, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  28. King R. (2000), Southern Europe in the changing global map of migration, in R.
  29. King, G. Lazaridis, C. Tsardanidis (eds), Eldorado or Fortress? Migration in Southern Europe, Macmillan, Basingstoke, pp. 1-26.
  30. Leogrande A. (2015), La frontiera, Feltrinelli, Milano.
  31. Marini R., Gerli M., (2017), Le variazioni del tema immigrazione nei media italiani: tra cambiamenti del fenomeno e pluralità degli attori, in Marchegiani M. (a cura di), Antico mare e identità migranti: un itinerario interdisciplinare, Giappichelli, Torino, pp. 164-186.
  32. Mbembe A. (2020), The Universal Right to Breathe, in «Critical Inquiry», April 2020, -- https://critinq.wordpress.com/2020/04/13/the-universal-right-to-breathe/
  33. McLuhan H.M. (1964), Understanding media: the extensions of man, The New American Library, New York.
  34. Milazzo G. (a cura di) (2020), Notizie di Transito. VIII Rapporto della Carta di Roma, Osservatorio di Pavia, Associazione Carta di Roma.
  35. Musarò P., Parmiggiani P. (2017), Beyond Black and White: The Role of Media
  36. in Portr ying and Policing Migration and Asylum in Italy, in «Revue
  37. Internationale de Sociologie», 27(2), 241-260., DOI: 10.1080/03906701.2017.132903
  38. Musarò P., Parmiggiani P. (eds.) (2014), Media e migrazioni, FrancoAngeli, Milano.
  39. Pogliano A. (2020), Media, politica e migrazioni in Europa. Una prospettiva sociologica, Carocci, Roma.
  40. Preciado P.B. (2020), Learning from the virus, in «ArtForum», May/June 2020. -- https://www.artforum.com/print/202005/paul-b-preciado-82823
  41. Rose G. (2012), Visual Methodologies: An Introduction to Researching with Visual Methods, Sage, London.
  42. Sayad A. (1999), La double absence. Des illusions de l’émigré aux souffrances de l’immigré, Seuil, Paris.
  43. Sheller M. (2018), Mobility justice: The politics of movement in an age of extremes, Mimi Sheller, New York.
  44. Sontag S. (1990), Illness as metaphor and, AIDS and its metaphors, Doubleday, New York.
  45. Van Hear V., Cohen R. (2017), Visions of Refugia: territorial and transnational solutions to mass displacement, in «Planning Theory and Practice», 18(3): 494-504., DOI: 10.1080/14649357.2017.133023
  46. Wodak R. (2015), The politics of fear. What right-wing discourses mean, Sage, London.



  1. Elena Giacomelli, The Emergence of New Street-Level Bureaucracies in Italy’s Asylum Reception System in Journal of Immigrant & Refugee Studies /2021 pp. 272, DOI: 10.1080/15562948.2021.1939471

Elena Giacomelli, Pierluigi Musarò, Paola Parmiggiani, in "SOCIOLOGIA DELLA COMUNICAZIONE " 60/2020, pp. 119-136, DOI:10.3280/SC2020-060011

   

FrancoAngeli è membro della Publishers International Linking Association associazione indipendente e no profit per facilitare l'accesso degli studiosi ai contenuti digitali nelle pubblicazioni professionali e scientifiche