Click here to download

Culturally imposed trauma: The sleeping dog has awakened. Will psychoanalysis take heed?
Author/s: Dorothy E. Holmes 
Year:  2021 Issue: Language: Italian 
Pages:  8 Pg. 11-18 FullText PDF:  275 KB
DOI:  10.3280/PU2021-001002
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Psychoanalysis has given scant attention to cultural trauma. Three contributions to this deficiency are considered: (a) the continuing identification with our psychoanalytic fore- fathers’ silence regarding cultural trauma; (b) the authoritarian practices in psychoanalytic institutions that keep us overly focused on standard intrapsychic formulations to the near exclusion of cultural trauma; (c) the fact that work with cultural trauma is difficult. To do this work requires us to "buck the system". If we do so, we expose ourselves to toxic phenomena in a world still rife with cultural trauma. Psychoanalysts should be encouraged to face and analyze cultural traumas.
Keywords: Cultural trauma; Crimes against humanity; Psychoanalytic institutions; Authoritarianism; Difficulty in working with cultural trauma

  1. Adorno T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik E., Levinson D.J. & Sanford R.N. (1950). The Authoritarian Personality. New York: Harper (trad. it.: La personalità autoritaria. Introduzione di Giovanni Jervis. Milano: Edizioni di Comunità, 1953, 1973; Milano: PGreco, 2016).
  2. Aisenstein M. (2007). On therapeutic action. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 76 (Suppl. 1): 1443-1461.
  3. Akhtar S., editor (2012). The African American Experience: Psychoanalytic Perspectives. Lanham, MD: Aronson.
  4. Damousi J. & Plotkin M., editors (2012). Psychoanalysis and Politics: Histories of Psychoanalysis Under Conditions of Restricted Political Freedom. Oxford, UK: Oxford Univ. Press.
  5. Freud S. (1936). Un disturbo della memoria sull’Acropoli: lettera aperta a Romain Rolland. Opere, 11: 473-481. Torino: Boringhieri, 1979.
  6. Freud S. (1937). Analisi terminabile e interminabile. Opere, 11: 497-535. Torino: Boringhieri, 1979.
  7. Gentile K. (2013). Bearing the cultural in order to engage the process of witnessing. Psychodynamic Psychology, 30. 3: 456-470.
  8. Guralnik O. & Simeon D. (2010). Depersonalization: Standing in the spaces between recognition and interpellation. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 20, 4: 200-216., DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2010.502501
  9. Holmes D. (2006). The wrecking effects of race and social class on self and success. Psychoanalytic Quarterly, 75, 1: 215-235.
  10. Holmes D. (2016a). Come Hither, American psychoanalysis: Our complex multicultural America needs what we have to offer. A plenary address. Journal of the American Psychoanalytic Association, 64, 3: 568-586., DOI: 10.1177/0003065116654272
  11. Holmes D. (2016b). “I knew that my mind could take me anywhere”: Psychoanalytic reflections on the dignity of African Americans living in a racist society. In: Levine S., editor, Dignity: Psychosocial Perspectives. London: Karnac, 2016, pp. 119-139.
  12. Kuriloff E.A. (2014). Contemporary Psychoanalysis and the Legacy of the Third Reich: History, Memory, Tradition. New York: Routledge.
  13. Loewenberg P. & Thompson N., editors (2011). 100 Years of the IPA: The Centenary History of the International Psychoanalytic Association 1910-2010. Evolution and Change. London: Karnac.
  14. Meleon J., Hagendoorn L., Raaijmakers Q. & Visser L. (1988). Authoritarianism and the revival of political racism: Reassessments in The Netherlands of the reliability and validity of the concept of authoritarianism by Adorno et al. Political Psychology, 9, 3: 413-431., DOI: 10.2307/3791722
  15. Moskowitz M. (1996). The social conscience of psychoanalysis. In: Foster R., Moskowitz M. & Javier R., editors, Reaching Across Boundaries of Culture and Class: Widening the Scope of Psychotherapy. Northvale, NJ: Aronson, 1996, pp. 21-46.
  16. Nettles R. & Balter R., editors (2012). Multiple Minority Identities: Applications for Practice, Research and Training. New York: Springer.
  17. Peskin H. (2012). “Man is a wolf to man”: Disorders of dehumanization in psychoanalysis. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 22, 2: 190-205., DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2012.666150
  18. Ramos M.A. (2012). Book review: “Damousi & Plotkin, 2012”. Cultural Psi, 1: 120-121.
  19. Tummala-Narra P. (2013). Psychoanalytic applications in a diverse society. Psychoanalytic Psychology, 30, 3: 471-487.
  20. Wallerstein R. (1998). Lay Analysis: Life Inside the Controversy. London: Routledge.
  21. Wallerstein R. (2014). The interaction of psychoanalysis and totalitarianism. Psychoanalytic Dialogues, 24, 5: 601-614., DOI: 10.1080/10481885.2014.949495
  22. Zaretsky E. (2012). Psychoanalysis, authoritarianism, and the 1960s. In: Damousi & Plotkin, 2012, pp. 233-256.

Dorothy E. Holmes, Culturally imposed trauma: The sleeping dog has awakened. Will psychoanalysis take heed? in "PSICOTERAPIA E SCIENZE UMANE" 1/2021, pp. 11-18, DOI:10.3280/PU2021-001002


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content