Click here to download

Social work between Social Investment and New Public Management. The case of Labour Market Service Workers in the Veneto Region
Author/s: Maurizio Busacca, Barbara Da Roit 
Year:  2021 Issue: 159 Language: Italian 
Pages:  20 Pg. 197-216 FullText PDF:  213 KB
DOI:  10.3280/SL2021-159010
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 

Active Labour Market policies are a pillar of the Social Investment (SI) strategy. The article aims at analysing the transformations of social work following the in-troduction of PALs in a context where ideas, organization and practices inspired by New Public Management (NPM) - quasi-markets, planning and performance measurement - influence users’ activation, capacitation and empowerment. The analysis of the Labour Market Service Workers’ experience in the Veneto region suggests that the SI strategy adapted itself and reinforces NPM efficiency-driven ideas. The SI NPM perspectives therefore converge into a trust in the market as a regulation mechanism and contribute to the precariousness and pressure in terms of values, time, money and professional development.
Keywords: Social Investment, New Public Management, Active Labour Market Policies, Veneto, Social Work

  1. ANPAL (2017). Monitoraggio sulla struttura e il funzionamento dei servizi per il lavoro 2017. Roma.
  2. Ascoli U., a cura di (2011). Il welfare in Italia. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  3. Ascoli U., Pavolini E. (2012). Ombre rosse. Il sistema di welfare italiano dopo venti anni di riforme. Stato e mercato, 32(3): 429-464., DOI: 10.1425/3864
  4. Ascoli U., Ranci C., Sgritta G.B. (2015). Investire nel sociale. La difficile innovazione del welfare italiano. Bologna: Il Mulino.
  5. Barbera F., Dagnes J., Salento A. e Spina F., a cura di (2016). Il capitale quotidiano. Un manifesto per l’economia. Roma: Donzelli.
  6. Bengtsson M., de la Porte C., Jacobsson K. (2017). Labour market policy under conditions of permanent austerity: Any sign of Social Investment?. Social Policy & Administration, 51(2): 367-388.
  7. Bifulco L. (2019). Investire e innovare: metamorfosi del sociale e lavoro sociale. Sociologia del Lavoro, 155: 54-73., DOI: 10.3280/SL2019-15500
  8. Bonoli G. (2009). Varieties of Social Investment in Labour Market Policy. In: Morel N., Palier B., Palme J., a cura di, What Future for Social Investment?. Stockholm: Institute for Futures Studies Research Report.
  9. Bordogna L., Neri S. (2010). La regolazione del lavoro pubblico in Italia e in Francia: convergenze e divergenze. Giornale di diritto del lavoro e di relazioni industriali, 127(3): 455-497., DOI: 10.3280/GDL2010-127003
  10. Brennan D., Cass B., Himmelweit S. and Szebehely M. (2012). The marketisation of care: Rationales and consequences in Nordic and liberal care regimes. Journal of European Social Policy, 22(4): 377-391., DOI: 10.1177/095892871244977
  11. Burroni L., Keune M. (2011). Flexicurity: A conceptual critique. European Journal of Industrial Relations, 17(1): 75-91., DOI: 10.1177/095968011039318
  12. Busacca M. (2019a). Innovazione sociale. Città, politiche e forme di ricostruzione del mercato. Milano: Bruno Mondadori.
  13. Busacca M. (2019b). Vecchie professioni per nuove sfide: lavoratori sociali come broker dell’innovazione sociale. La Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 1: 109-125.
  14. Cantillon B., Vandenbroucke F. (2014). Reconciling work and poverty reduction: how successful are European welfare states?. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  15. Caselli D., Dagnes J. (2018). Salvati dalla finanza? Analisi empiriche e prospettive critiche sulla finanziarizzazione del welfare e del benessere. Autonomie locali e servizi sociali, 41(2): 205-220., DOI: 10.1447/9250
  16. Cefalo R., Kazepov Y. (2018). Investing over the life course: The role of lifelong learning in a Social Investment strategy. Studies in the Education of Adults, 50(2): 203-218., DOI: 10.1080/02660830.2018.155070
  17. Crouch C., Keune M. (2012). The governance of economic uncertainty: beyond the ‘new social risks’ analysis. Brussels: ETUI, Working paper 2012.03.
  18. Dellavalle M., Cellini G. (2017). Il servizio sociale di fronte al managerialismo e alle politiche neoliberiste. La Rivista delle Politiche Sociali, 1(1): 55-66.
  19. Dent M., O’Neill M., Bagley C. (1999). Professions: New Public Management and the European Welfare State. Stoke-on-Trent: Staffordshire University Press.
  20. Diefenbach T. (2009). New Public Management in public sector organizations: the dark sides of managerialistic ‘enlightenment’. Public administration, 87(4): 892-909.
  21. Dunleavy P., Hood C. (1994). From old public administration to New Public Management. Public Money & Management, 14(3): 9-16., DOI: 10.1080/0954096940938782
  22. Esping-Andersen G., Gallie D., Hemerijck A. and Myles J., a cura di (2002). Why We Need a New Welfare State. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  23. Ferrera M. (1996). The ‘Southern model’ of welfare in social Europe. Journal of European social policy, 6(1): 17-37., DOI: 10.1177/095892879600600102
  24. Giddens A. (1998). The Third Way. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  25. Hemerijck A. (2012). When Changing welfare states and the Eurocrisis meet. Sociologica, 6(1): 1-50., DOI: 10.2383/3688
  26. Hemerijck A., a cura di (2017). The uses of Social Investment. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  27. Hemerijck A., Burgoon B., Di Pietro A., and Vydra S. (2016). Assessing Social Investment Synergies (ASIS). Brussels: European Commission.
  28. Homburg V., Pollitt C., van Thiel S. (2007). Introduction. In: Pollitt C., van Thiel S., Homburg V., a cura di, New Public Management in Europe. Adaptation and Alternatives. New York: Palgrave MacMillan.
  29. Hood C. (1991). A public management for all seasons?. Public administration, 69(1): 3-19.
  30. Jenson J. (2010). Diffusing ideas for after neoliberalism: The Social Investment perspective in Europe and Latin America. Global Social Policy, 10(1): 59-84., DOI: 10.1177/146801810935481
  31. Jenson J., Saint-Martin D. (2003). New routes to social cohesion? Citizenship and the Social Investment state. Canadian Journal of Sociology/Cahiers canadiens de sociologie, 28(1): 77-99., DOI: 10.2307/334187
  32. Kawulich B.B. (2012). Collecting data through observation. In: Wagner C., Kawulich B.B. and Garner M., a cura di, Doing social research: A global context. Berkshire: McGraw-Hill Higher Education.
  33. Kazepov Y., Ranci C. (2017). Is every country fit for Social Investment? Italy as an adverse case. Journal of European Social Policy, 27(1): 90-104., DOI: 10.1177/095892871667331
  34. León M., Ranci C., Sabatinelli S., Ibáñez Z. (2019). Tensions between quantity and quality in Social Investment agendas: Working conditions of ECEC teaching staff in Italy and Spain. Journal of European Social Policy, 29(4): 564-576., DOI: 10.1177/095892871880840
  35. Lieberman E.S. (2005). Nested analysis as a mixed-method strategy for comparative research. American Political Science Review, 99(3): 435-452., DOI: 10.1017/S000305540505176
  36. Morel N., Palier B. and Palme J., a cura di (2012). Towards a Social Investment Welfare State? Ideas, Policies and Challenges. Bristol: The Policy Press.
  37. Nolan B. (2013). What use is ‘Social Investment’?. Journal of European Social Policy, 23(5): 459-468., DOI: 10.1177/095892871349917
  38. OECD (2019). Strengthening Active Labour Market Policies in Italy, Connecting People with Job. Parigi: OECD Publishing.
  39. Palier B. (2013). Social Policy Paradigms, Welfare State Reforms and the Crisis. Stato e Mercato, 97: 37-66., DOI: 10.1425/7300
  40. Sacchi S., Vesan P. (2015). Employment policy: segmentation, deregulation and reforms in the Italian labour market. In: Ascoli U., Pavoli E., a cura di, The Italian welfare state in a European perspective: A comparative analysis. Bristol e Chicago: Policy Press.
  41. Saint-Martin D. (2000). Building the New Managerialist State: Consultants and the Politics of Public Sector Reform in Comparative Perspective. Oxford: Oxford University Press.
  42. Saraceno C. (2015). A critical look to the Social Investment approach from a gender perspective. Social Politics: International Studies in Gender, State & Society, 22(2): 257-269.
  43. Sehested K. (2002). How New Public Management reforms challenges the roles of professionals. International Journal of Public Administration, 25(12): 1513-1537., DOI: 10.1081/PAD-12001425
  44. Sestito P., Viviano E. (2018). Firing costs and firm hiring: evidence from an Italian reform. Economic Policy, 33(93): 101-130.
  45. Torstendahl R. (1990). Three Approaches to Theories of Professionalism. In: Torstendahl R., Burrage M., a cura di, Professions in Theory and History. London: Sage Publications.
  46. Tummers L., Bekkers V., and Steijn B. (2009). Policy Alienation of Public Professionals. Public Management Review, 11(5): 685-706., DOI: 10.1080/1471903090279823

Maurizio Busacca, Barbara Da Roit, Social work between Social Investment and New Public Management. The case of Labour Market Service Workers in the Veneto Region in "SOCIOLOGIA DEL LAVORO " 159/2021, pp. 197-216, DOI:10.3280/SL2021-159010


FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content