Click here to download

A geographical analysis of the location choices of companies in the Naples area
Journal Title: TERRITORIO 
Author/s: Stefano De Falco 
Year:  2020 Issue: 95 Language: Italian 
Pages:  11 Pg. 147-157 FullText PDF:  995 KB
DOI:  10.3280/TR2020-095016
(DOI is like a bar code for intellectual property: to have more infomation:  clicca qui   and here 


The contribute contains a summary of a three-year research activity carried out as part of a project financed by the Ministry of Economic Development. The objective of the work is to verify the influence of topological configurations of companies, in a clustered or independent form, and typological in terms of different industrial sectors of their research, on the determinants of localization choice in urban areas. The empirical analysis concerned the urban area of Naples and the sample of companies analyzed was selected from the perspective of the regional business development strategy RIS3 (Research Innovation Smart Specialization Strategy) of the Campania Region for the full compliance between intervention lines of the mise call and regional ones.
Keywords: Location choice; clusters; Naples

  1. Amato V., 2010, «La città tra competitività e creatività». Rassegna Economica, 2: 13-21.
  2. Ambos B., 2005, «Foreign Direct Investment in Industrial Research and Development: A Study of German mncs». Research Policy, 34, 4: 395-410.
  3. Amin A., Thrift N., 2002, Cities. Reimagining the Urban. Cambridge: Polity Press.
  4. Andersson M., Larsson J.P., 2016, «Local Entrepreneurship Clusters in Cities». Journal of Economic Geography, 16, 1: 39-66.
  5. Angelidou M., 2014, «Smart City Policies: A Spatial Approach». Cities, 41: 3-11.
  6. Aslesen H.W., Isaksen A., 2007, «Knowledge Intensive Business Services and Urban Industrial Development». Service Industries Journal, 27, 3: 321-338., DOI: 10.1080/02642060701207239
  7. Audretsch D.B., Feldman M.P., 1996, «r&d Spillovers and the Geography of Innovation and Production». American Economic Review, 86, 3: 630-640.
  8. Basile R., Capello R., Caragliu A., 2012, «Technological Interdependence and Regional Growth in Europe: Proximity and Synergy in Knowledge Spillovers». Regional Science, 91, 4: 697-722.
  9. Bellone F., Musso P., Nesta L., Warzynski F., 2016, «International Trade and Firm-level Markups When Location and Quality Matter». Journal of Economic Geography, 16, 1: 67-91.
  10. Bennett R., Robson P., Bratton W., 2001, «The Influence of Location on the Use by smes of External Advice and Collaboration». Urban Studies, 38, 9: 1531-1557., DOI: 10.1080/2F00420980126671
  11. Bianchetti C., 2016, Spazi che contano. Roma: Donzelli.
  12. Breschi S., Lissoni F., 2001a, «Knowledge Spillovers and Local Innovation Systems: A Critical Survey». Industrial and Corporate Change, 10, 4: 975-1005.
  13. Breschi S., Lissoni F., 2001b, «Localised Knowledge Spillovers vs. Innovative Milieux: Knowledge ‘Tacitness’ Reconsidered». Regional Science, 80: 255-273., DOI: 10.1007/PL00013627
  14. Briant A., Combes P.P., Lafourcade M., 2010, «Dots to Boxes: do the Size and Shape of Spatial Units Jeopardize Economic Geography Estimations? ». Journal of Urban Economics, 67, 3: 287-302.
  15. jue.2009.09.014. Brown L.D., Call A.C., Clement M.B., Sharp N.Y., 2014, Inside the ‘Black-Box’ of Sell Side Financial Analysts, -- http://ssrn.com/abstract=2228373 (accesso 2019.06.13).
  16. Camagni R., 1991, «Introduction: From the Local ‘Milieu’ to Innovation Through Cooperation networks». In: Camagni R. (ed.), Innovation Networks: Spatial Perspectives. London: Belhaven-Pinter.
  17. Capello R., Faggian A., 2005, «Collective Learning and Relational Capital in Local Innovation Processes». Regional Studies, 39, 1: 75-87., DOI: 10.1080/0034340052000320851
  18. Combes P.P., Gobillon L., 2015, «The Empirics of Agglomeration Economies ». In: Duranton, G., Henderson J.V., Strange W.C. (eds.), Handbook of Regional and Urban Economics, 5. Amsterdam: North-Holland. Cumbers A., Mackinnon D., Chapman K., 2003, «Innovation, Collaboration, and Learning in Regional Clusters: A study of smes in the Aberdeen Oil Complex». Environment and Planning A, 35, 9: 1689-1706.
  19. De Falco S., 2018, «Vesuvius, Pizza, Coffee and...Innovation: Is a New Paradigm Possible for the Creative ‘Vesuvius Valley’, Naples, Italy?». City, Culture and Society, 14: 1-13.
  20. De Falco S., Angelidou M., Addie J.-P.D., 2019, «From the ‘Smart City’ to the ‘Smart Metropolis’? Building Resilience in the Urban Periphery ». European Urban and Regional Studies, 26, 2: 205-223., DOI: 10.1177/0969776418783813
  21. Del Giudice V., Passeri A., De Paola P., Torrieri F., 2014, «Estimation of Risk-return for Real Estate Investments by Applying Ellwood’s Model and Real Options Analysis: An Application to the Residential Real Estate Market of Naples». Applied Mechanics and Materials, 651-653: 1570-1575.
  22. Dematteis G., Governa F., 2005, a cura di, Territorialità, sviluppo locale, sostenibilità: il modello SloT. Milano: FrancoAngeli.
  23. Dematteis G., Governa F., 2003, «Ha ancora senso parlare di identità territoriale?». In: De Bonis L., a cura di, La nuova cultura delle città. Roma: Accademia Nazionale dei Lincei.
  24. Di Bella A., 2015, «Smart City e Geografie della Mediazione Aziendale». Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, 8: 515-529.
  25. Dileo I., Losurdo F., 2011, «Processi cumulativi e politica industriale in una visione di Nuova Geografia Economica». L’industria, 3: 455-467., DOI: 10.1430/35240
  26. Ellison G., Glaeser E.L., 1997, «Geographic Concentration in U.S. Manufacturing Industries: A Dartboard Approach». Journal of Political Economy, 105, 5: 889-927., DOI: 10.1086/26209
  27. Ellison G., Glaeser E.L., Kerr W., 2010, «What Causes Industry Agglomeration? Evidence from Coagglomeration Patterns». American Economic Review, 100, 3: 1195-1213.
  28. Florida R., 1997, «The Globalization of R&D: Results of Survey of Foreign Affiliated R&D-laboratories in the USA». Research Policy, 26, 1: 85-102., DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(97)00004-8
  29. Frallicciardi A.M., Delle Donne B., Palmentieri S., 2010, «Napoli, metropoli in transizione». Rassegna Economica, 2: 159-255.
  30. Frost T.S., 2001, «The Geographic Sources of Foreign Subsidiaries’ Innovations». Strategic Management Journal, 22, 2: 101-123.
  31. Gualerzi D., 2001, Endogenous and Exogenous Factors in Growth Theory. Università di Pisa, -- http://growthconf.ec.unipi.it/papers/Gualerzi.PDF (accesso 2019.06.13).
  32. Greenstone M., Hornbeck R., Moretti E., 2010, «Identifying Agglomeration Spillovers: Evidence From Winners and Losers of Large Plant Openings ». Journal of Political Economy, 118, 3: 536-598., DOI: 10.1086/653714
  33. Huber F., 2012, «Do Clusters Really Matter for Innovation Practices in Information Technology? Questioning the Significance of Technological Knowledge Spillovers». Journal of Economic Geography, 12, 1: 107-126.
  34. Ito B., Wakasugi R., 2007, «What Factors Determine the Mode of Overseas R&D by Multinationals? Empirical Evidence». Research Policy, 36, 8: 1275-1287.
  35. Javalgi R., Griffith D., White S., 2004, «An Empirical Examination of Factors Influencing the Internationalization of Service Firms». Journal of Services Marketing, 17, 2: 185-201., DOI: 10.1108/08876040310467934
  36. Krugman P., 1995, Development, Geography, and Economic Theory. Cambridge-London: mit Press.
  37. Le Bas C., Sierra C., 2002, «Location Versus Home Country Advantages in R&D Activities: Some Further Results on Multinationals’ Location Strategies». Research Policy, 31, 4: 589-609., DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00128-7
  38. Leeuwen E.S., 2010, «The Effects of Future Retail Developments on the Local Economy: Combining Micro and Macro Approaches». Regional Science, 89, 4: 691-710.
  39. Lodde S., 1999, Nuova teoria della crescita e sviluppo locale. Alcune possibili connessioni. Cagliari: Università di Cagliari Press.
  40. Lösch A., 1940, The Economics of Location (translated by Woglam, W.H. and Stolper W.F., 1954). New Haven: Yale University Press.
  41. Markusen J., 2002, Multinational Firms and the Theory of International Trade. Cambridge-London: mit Press.
  42. Marshall A., 1890, Principles of Economics. London: MacMillan. Moretti E., 2013, La nuova geografia del lavoro. Milano: Mondadori.
  43. Nam T., Pardo T., 2011, Smart City as Urban Innovation: Focusing on Management, Policy, and Context, -- http://dl.acm.org/citation.cfm?id=2072100 (accesso 2019.06.13).
  44. Patel P., Vega M., 1999, «Patterns of Internationalisation of Corporate Technology: Location vs. Home Country Advantages». Research Policy, 28, 2-3: 145-155., DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(98)00117-6
  45. Pike research, 2011, Smart cities; Intelligent Information and Communications Technology Infrastructure in the Government, Buildings, Transport, and Utility Domains Pike Research LLC. -- www.pikeresearch.com/newsroom/smart-city-initiatives-can-improve-livingstandards-reduce-carbon-emissions (accesso: 2019.05.12).
  46. Pollice F., 2005, «Il ruolo dell’identità territoriale nei processi di sviluppo locale». Bollettino della Società Geografica Italiana, 10: 75-92.
  47. Rosenthal S., Strange W.C., 2001, «The Determinants of Agglomeration». Journal of Urban Economics, 50, 2: 191-229.
  48. Salone C., 2012, «Paradigmi e scale territoriali dello sviluppo: il ruolo delle regioni in una politica place-based». Rivista Geografica Italiana, 119: 151-174.
  49. Samiee S., 1999, «The Internationalization of Services: Trends, Obstacles and Issues». Journal of Services Marketing, 13, 4-5: 319-336., DOI: 10.1108/08876049910282574
  50. Simmie J., 2003, «Innovation and Urban Regions as National and International Nodes for the Transfer and Sharing of Knowledge». Regional Studies, 37, 6-7: 607-620., DOI: 10.1080/0034340032000108714
  51. Smith A., 1776, An Inquiry Into the Nature and Causes of the Wealth of Nations. London: Strahan and Cadell Press.
  52. Soja E.W., 2014, Dopo la metropoli. Per una critica della geografia urbana. Bologna: Patron.
  53. Spanos G., 2016, «Organization and Export Performance». Economic Letters, 146: 130-134.
  54. von Zedtwitz, M., Gassmann, O., 2002, «Market Versus Technology Drive in R&D
  55. Internationalization: Four Different Patterns of Managing Research and Development». Research Policy, 31, 4: 569-588., DOI: 10.1016/S0048-7333(01)00125-1
  56. Wheeler S.M., 2004, Planning for Sustainability: Creating Livable, Equitable and Ecological Communities. New York: Routledge.
  57. Wood P., 2002, «Knowledge-intensive Services and Urban Innovativeness». Urban Studies, 39, 5-6: 993-1002., DOI: 10.1080/2F00420980220128417
  58. Wood P., 2006, «Urban Development and Knowledge-intensive Business Services: Too Many Unanswered Questions?», Growth and Change, 37, 3: 335-361.

Stefano De Falco, A geographical analysis of the location choices of companies in the Naples area in "TERRITORIO" 95/2020, pp. 147-157, DOI:10.3280/TR2020-095016

   

FrancoAngeli is a member of Publishers International Linking Association a not for profit orgasnization wich runs the CrossRef service, enabing links to and from online scholarly content